Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


W7 using far too much memory

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> The Geek Zone Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Misc
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 04:29 - 01 Sep 2010    Post subject: W7 using far too much memory Reply with quote

Morning,

Installed a fresh Windows 7 & it was immediately slow adter everything was installed. In Task Manager the memory was showing over 1gb & it looked like 'Trustedinstaller.exe was the cause so i set it to manual instead of automatic & that's only seemed to free up a tad of memory. The memory is currently showing over 800mb with physical memory not going below 45%.

Just to add, this was with no software installed, just the basics. And i've installed W7 a couple of times before & been running it for a while so doubt it's hardware related (Using it an hour before the new install).

Any ideas?

Thanks.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 04:49 - 01 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Using over a gig is normal for W7.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

neil.
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 06:31 - 01 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Would assume that it's using a large portion of RAM for cacheing (i.e. storing stuff that's recently accessed or what it thinks it's going to access, so that when it does, it'll fetch it faster, as RAM is quicker than the hard disk). This is a good thing, rather than leave bags of RAM unused. The cache will shrink and expand dynamically, as applications want more or less memory.
____________________
CBT February 2008 | A2 June 2008 | Yamaha YBR125 (written off) | Honda CBF125 (current)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Stevie GooGs
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Oct 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:28 - 01 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

I only have fecking firefox and outlook running and im using 3gig o ram, not sure if w7 has searchindexer running, i find that eats the Ram.
____________________
Current: 2019 Yamaha T7 -> 2015 KTM Superduke R | 2000 Yamaha R1 Past -> 2009 KTM 990 SM -> 2005 kawasaki ZX10r -> 2000 Honda CBR 600 FY -> 2002 Honda XLV 125 Varadero
Bike Pics! -> My Photography Website
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

chris-red
Have you considered a TDM?



Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:43 - 01 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hetzer wrote:
Using over a gig is normal for W7.


Mine used 600mb out of the box
____________________
Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

doggone
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:58 - 01 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

There seems to be a fair old list of updates to install too now, is it doing that?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Misc
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:52 - 01 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks all.

Hetzer wrote:
Using over a gig is normal for W7.


I don't remember seeing the usage history in Taskbar going that high with both CPU/Memory, not to mention the slowness when i first installed it.

Cheers.


doggone, only found one update today which is installing.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

el_oso
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 May 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:19 - 01 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

mine uses about ~600Mb when it first starts up. usually uses about 1gb when i have almost everything open like office, media monkey, gom player, adobe, jdownloader, chrome/opera etc
trustedinstaller.exe is part of windows update. may need configuring or it is set on auto-update may be performing updates. either set it manual and check for updates yourself or make it check for updates weekly as i believe it checks for updates daily.
i find that windows 7 is much better at releasing memory it is not using compared to vista and XP. after a using win7 for a full day as soon as i close all my program i got back to only using 600/700mb of memory. XP was a pain and never really seemed to give you back memory that you were not using any more
____________________
Duke 390
Previous: '05 XR125L | '96 XJ600S Diversion |'05 Suzuki GSXR1000 | '05 Honda CBR125-R | '97 YZF 600R Thundercat | '11 Honda CBR250
Car: Jeep Wrangler 4.0L
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Misc
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:49 - 01 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

the_godfather wrote:
mine uses about ~600Mb when it first starts up. usually uses about 1gb when i have almost everything open like office, media monkey, gom player, adobe, jdownloader, chrome/opera etc
trustedinstaller.exe is part of windows update. may need configuring or it is set on auto-update may be performing updates. either set it manual and check for updates yourself or make it check for updates weekly as i believe it checks for updates daily.
i find that windows 7 is much better at releasing memory it is not using compared to vista and XP. after a using win7 for a full day as soon as i close all my program i got back to only using 600/700mb of memory. XP was a pain and never really seemed to give you back memory that you were not using any more


Cheers, the problem is that mine is using over 800MB with no programmes running except the bare minimum.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:55 - 01 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

W7 will take RAM dynamically according to how much you have. Mine takes more with 4gb than it did when I had only 2gb. The amount out of 2gb it takes will also vary depending upon your particular setup (hardware and programs etc).
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Misc
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:05 - 01 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hetzer wrote:
W7 will take RAM dynamically according to how much you have. Mine takes more with 4gb than it did when I had only 2gb. The amount out of 2gb it takes will also vary depending upon your particular setup (hardware and programs etc).


Thanks. I'll have to read up on this more. Thumbs Up Also read that x64 should really be used with 4GB+ ram.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:19 - 01 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

x64 likes at least 4gb and quad-core processors.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

L4Isoside
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Mar 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:03 - 01 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mines using 1.79 gigs just browsing Laughing

Then im pretty sure it uses a % of ya overall memory, i have 6 gigs and so i dont miss it at all tbh.

Even rendering videos it didnt use over 3gigs i think.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Misc
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:29 - 01 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hetzer wrote:
x64 likes at least 4gb and quad-core processors.


I'll probably start using the dedicated x32 W7 then. Didn't even think any of the programmes i had were even installed to x64 but with my system being 64 Dual Core i thought it'd be the best route. I was wrong. Smile
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

el_oso
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 May 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:21 - 01 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

if you are using a 64bit win7 800Mb sounds about right for startup. 64bit OS must more memory than 32bit OS simply because it has 64bits of memory to address instead of 32bits due to bigger pointers...bla bla bla.
not really much point in using a 64bit OS unless you have more than 3Gb of RAM. just wasting RAM addressing memory that isn't their. however, there are other benefits of a 64bit OS other than expanding memory capacity to greater than 4Gb. But that's a whole other story and not really worth it as most programs are not built specifically for a 64bit OS. only example i can think of is 7zip. so unless you are going to be using a lot of compression algorithms or working with files larger than 4Gb i.e. DVD/video editing then switch back to a 32bit unless you upgrade your RAM (or plan on upgrading your RAM)
everyday users will not need more than 3gb. things like web surfing, office and playing videos/music will not need more than 3gb. i suspect your processor will run out of steam before your RAM does
____________________
Duke 390
Previous: '05 XR125L | '96 XJ600S Diversion |'05 Suzuki GSXR1000 | '05 Honda CBR125-R | '97 YZF 600R Thundercat | '11 Honda CBR250
Car: Jeep Wrangler 4.0L
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Misc
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:32 - 01 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

the_godfather wrote:
if you are using a 64bit win7 800Mb sounds about right for startup. 64bit OS must more memory than 32bit OS simply because it has 64bits of memory to address instead of 32bits due to bigger pointers...bla bla bla.
not really much point in using a 64bit OS unless you have more than 3Gb of RAM. just wasting RAM addressing memory that isn't their. however, there are other benefits of a 64bit OS other than expanding memory capacity to greater than 4Gb. But that's a whole other story and not really worth it as most programs are not built specifically for a 64bit OS. only example i can think of is 7zip. so unless you are going to be using a lot of compression algorithms or working with files larger than 4Gb i.e. DVD/video editing then switch back to a 32bit unless you upgrade your RAM (or plan on upgrading your RAM)
everyday users will not need more than 3gb. things like web surfing, office and playing videos/music will not need more than 3gb. i suspect your processor will run out of steam before your RAM does


It's not the start up, it's constantly running above 800MB. My PC's been on all day & don't think it's dropped below that. I'll definitely swap to x32 then as you say. I don't handle large files or play games so just the basics really.

Will i noticed a performance difference when i switch to x32 as it would be freeing up some of the resources?

Thumbs Up
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:45 - 01 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Misc wrote:
the_godfather wrote:
if you are using a 64bit win7 800Mb sounds about right for startup. 64bit OS must more memory than 32bit OS simply because it has 64bits of memory to address instead of 32bits due to bigger pointers...bla bla bla.
not really much point in using a 64bit OS unless you have more than 3Gb of RAM. just wasting RAM addressing memory that isn't their. however, there are other benefits of a 64bit OS other than expanding memory capacity to greater than 4Gb. But that's a whole other story and not really worth it as most programs are not built specifically for a 64bit OS. only example i can think of is 7zip. so unless you are going to be using a lot of compression algorithms or working with files larger than 4Gb i.e. DVD/video editing then switch back to a 32bit unless you upgrade your RAM (or plan on upgrading your RAM)
everyday users will not need more than 3gb. things like web surfing, office and playing videos/music will not need more than 3gb. i suspect your processor will run out of steam before your RAM does


It's not the start up, it's constantly running above 800MB. My PC's been on all day & don't think it's dropped below that. I'll definitely swap to x32 then as you say. I don't handle large files or play games so just the basics really.

Will i noticed a performance difference when i switch to x32 as it would be freeing up some of the resources?

Thumbs Up


The more data you have cached in RAM the less hard-drive paging you'll see. RAM is faster than the HD. At what point the RAM being full up causes a slower system than HD-paging I have no idea. I seriously doubt, being a non-gamer, that you'll see any real-world difference between x32 and x64.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Misc
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:47 - 01 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hetzer wrote:


The more data you have cached in RAM the less hard-drive paging you'll see. RAM is faster than the HD. At what point the RAM being full up causes a slower system than HD-paging I have no idea. I seriously doubt, being a non-gamer, that you'll see any real-world difference between x32 and x64.


Thanks again, i'm probably going to install again, even without the OP problems it felt horrible (was always fine before) must of installed something dodgy as i still don't remember these problems the last time.


Cheers all.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

el_oso
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 May 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:08 - 02 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

no. you will not notice a difference. you might save about 100Mb of RAM tops and for normal day to day task you will not reach the 3Gb capacity of the RAM.
if you do want to make sure you have a bit of headroom find an unused flash drive (or buy one for about £2/3) and use readyboost.
personally i would stick with it how it is. that's because i'm kind of lazy and i do actually use files larger than 4Gb and do frequent compressing/decompressing of files.
____________________
Duke 390
Previous: '05 XR125L | '96 XJ600S Diversion |'05 Suzuki GSXR1000 | '05 Honda CBR125-R | '97 YZF 600R Thundercat | '11 Honda CBR250
Car: Jeep Wrangler 4.0L
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Misc
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:41 - 02 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

the_godfather wrote:
no. you will not notice a difference. you might save about 100Mb of RAM tops and for normal day to day task you will not reach the 3Gb capacity of the RAM.
if you do want to make sure you have a bit of headroom find an unused flash drive (or buy one for about £2/3) and use readyboost.
personally i would stick with it how it is. that's because i'm kind of lazy and i do actually use files larger than 4Gb and do frequent compressing/decompressing of files.


I need to buy a new flash drive so will pick up a spare for this readyboost, they're cheap enough.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

tsmith
Traffic Copper



Joined: 15 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:20 - 04 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

W7 32bit on my 4GHz P4 with 2GB RAM uses ~600mb with just Avira Antivir and Comodo Firewall running. If you use a ready boost device, format it as EXFAT - quickest file system for them. FAT32 has a 4GB limit and NTFS is slower.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Frost
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:39 - 04 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm using 1.1gig or ram and currently have running:

Matlab
Chrome with about 12 tabs
Search
Text editors
Few folders
GIMP

<3 Linux Razz

I've got 4 gig's of ram, 2 of which have never been touched. Yet someone thought it wise to order me a laptop with a shoddy CPU and 8 gigs of ram. I'm not happy.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Misc
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:30 - 04 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

tomsmith wrote:
W7 32bit on my 4GHz P4 with 2GB RAM uses ~600mb with just Avira Antivir and Comodo Firewall running. If you use a ready boost device, format it as EXFAT - quickest file system for them. FAT32 has a 4GB limit and NTFS is slower.


I've got a spare 2GB flash drive inserted, formatted to EXFAT (Allocation unti size was 32kb/s) is this about right?

When i use Readyboost, what am i actually looking for in the taskmanager performance section to show it's working OK?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

tsmith
Traffic Copper



Joined: 15 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:48 - 05 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

set the file allocation size to the largest you can. This will make it faster still, at the expense of some space lost. Ideally try and use a 4 or 8 gig usb2 stick if you can.

when you set up readyboost, you can dedicate the whole device for readyboost to use. This is what I have done with mine. Once formatted and readyboost is running, if you look at the device you will see a single large file called readyboost.sfcache

That's all I do and it works great. If you want to monitor it, download readyboost monitor from here https://area-71.net/rbmon/
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

doggone
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:22 - 05 Sep 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does this look normal for W7?
All that's running is one window of firefox and outlook email but it's always running the CPU at 50% or more.
With XP if you weren't doing anything it would drop to near zero.

It's 64bit and there's 4GB of RAM - lightning fast compared to XP.
I'm guessing it's something about the way it shows the info which is different?


https://img3.imageshack.us/img3/8315/clipboard01yi.jpg
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 16 years, 28 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> The Geek Zone All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.16 Sec - Server Load: 0.61 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 131.49 Kb