|
|
| Author |
Message |
| pepperami |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 pepperami Super Spammer

Joined: 17 Jan 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 21:14 - 20 Aug 2011 Post subject: non standard carbs? just thinking |
 |
|
When I used to play motoball my/our bikes were usually a collection of bits from a number of bikes, but it worked.
However the bikes were made specially for motoball and did`nt need to be set up perfectly for the road.
I used all-sorts of carbs from Jikov`s to Bings, to Mikuni`s but it was always off road.
So I know you dont always need to have the standard carb.
What I want to know, is there an optimum carb/carb size for a road going 125 4-stroke? to gain performance over economy.
Yes I have a full license and a bigger bike so it`s not about me trying to get round any form of restriction.
Your input is appreciated mighty BCF  ____________________ I am the sum total of my own existence, what went before makes me who I am now! |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Paddy Blake |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Paddy Blake World Chat Champion
Joined: 29 Jun 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 22:28 - 20 Aug 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
To make much of a difference I think you would need to change more than just the carb.
You would need to change the cam and exhaust to allow more air through as you increase the amount of fuel it will use.
The bike will run best at a certain fuel to air mixture so if you up the fuel mixture you also need to up the air mixture or it will run worse rather than better.
I don't know which carb would be best but I ran a gn 125 on a gt 550 carb for 9 months.I messed with the main jet to get it right but it was not better or worse the the standard.
I just didn't want to buy a diaphragm for the gn carb.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| pepperami |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 pepperami Super Spammer

Joined: 17 Jan 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 09:45 - 21 Aug 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
I understand what you are saying about possibly changing cams & valves.
But what I`m thinking is that the bike makers have to get thier bikes through all sorts of controls before they can sell them.
This surely means they set carbs and the like on the safe side of caution?
What I`m thinking is that there may be a little bit of easier breathing and just a tiny smidge of extra accelaration/top speed by just changing the carb to one that is more suited?
I doubt if the bike is worth £200 so a performance engine rebuild is not going to happen .
But going to the breakers and fishing out a better suited carb could be an option? possibly? maybe?.
Yes I could change the jets on the carb I have and I am thinking about that as well.
the reason I ask this question in terms of changing the carb is that as a 125 it will only suck in 125cc`s of air/fuel mix, so there`s no point in having a whopping great dell`orto on there but there must be an optimum size???? to allow optimum airflow whilst still having the venturi effect ____________________ I am the sum total of my own existence, what went before makes me who I am now! |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| pepperami |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 pepperami Super Spammer

Joined: 17 Jan 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 17:42 - 22 Aug 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
With all the wise old sage`s? we have on the BCF this thread has failed and I am disapoint  ____________________ I am the sum total of my own existence, what went before makes me who I am now! |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 17:56 - 22 Aug 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
Hi
How big a carb do you want?
A larger carb will provide less of a restriction at high rpm. But as a carb works by creating a restriction , resulting in a low pressure area to draw fuel from the float bowl they tend not to work well if you use a large carb with at small rpm. They tended to become very non idiot proof.
There are ways round this. Most larger bikes use CV carbs. With these it doesn't matter if the bod riding it just cracks the throttle wide open at low revs, there won't be enough of an air pressure change to open the slide. Down side is that they do limit ultimate power and do slightly reduce throttle response compared to a slide carb (but also tend to give a FAR lighter throttle).
A lot of cars (and some larger bikes - often large Italian twins) used accelerator pumps on the carbs. With these opening the throttle squirted a load of petrol straight into the engine so when you opened the throttle hard at low revs the engine wasn't relying on the virtually non existent low pressure through the carb to draw fuel from the float bowl.
There are graphs around of carb size to the amount of power required, so you can go from that. Realistically a road going 4 stroke single isn't going to manage 20hp (most of them will be doing very well to produce 3/4 of that), so using a carb large enough to keep a 25hp engine happy is not going to gain you any top end but likely will lose you flexibility.
All the best
Keith ____________________ Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| pepperami |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 pepperami Super Spammer

Joined: 17 Jan 2010 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 21:11 - 22 Aug 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
Hi
Not that much difference in some ways. 125s have their main market in Europe due to learner laws while loads of other markets have different laws meaning different capacities (hence the 150cc bikes related to European 125s).
A 26mm CV is a fairly large carb for a 4 stroke 125. 26mm slide carb would be massive (enough for well over 20hp).
Probably more difference to be made from the length of the exhaust, cam timing and the length of the intake.
All the best
Keith ____________________ Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Asimo |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Asimo Spanner Monkey

Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stinkwheel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stinkwheel Bovine Proctologist

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 22:53 - 22 Aug 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
My MZ660 had two carbs feeding the one cylinder. A small slide carb and a big CV carb with no slow running circuit. The linkage was arranged such that the slide carb opened for the first third of throttle opening, then the linkage picked up the butterfly for the CV.
Struck me as quite a good system for a single cylinder bike. Fine control of fuelling at lower revs, full-bore-roar at higher revs. ____________________ “Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.”
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Teflon-Mike |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Teflon-Mike tl;dr

Joined: 01 Jun 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 01:14 - 23 Aug 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
| stinkwheel wrote: | My MZ660 had two carbs feeding the one cylinder. A small slide carb and a big CV carb with no slow running circuit. The linkage was arranged such that the slide carb opened for the first third of throttle opening, then the linkage picked up the butterfly for the CV.
Struck me as quite a good system for a single cylinder bike. Fine control of fuelling at lower revs, full-bore-roar at higher revs. |
Have a feeling Yamaha had a similar arrangement to that on some bikes; pretty sure it was on four-valve T550, thirty years ago with an acronym like YICS or some such.
| Kickstart wrote: | A 26mm CV is a fairly large carb for a 4 stroke 125. 26mm slide carb would be massive (enough for well over 20hp). |
Honda CB 'Two Fifty' only has a single 26mm carb and makes a claimed 21bhp... so it's about on the button; but it's a softly tuned engine.
CB125, in full power form, offers 17bhp and runs twin 26 slide carbs, each feeding a miniscule 62cc pot.
As Keith says though; carb is simply a fuel metering device, mixing fuel and air in the right ratio to make a charge that will burn.... it doesn't hold the key to either fuel ecconomy or power, that's in the engine's state of tune; the architecture of the porting, how big the valves are, when and how far the cam-shaft opens them, and how fast the engine can spin before it runs out of puff.....
125cc cylinder will rarely suck a full 125cc of charge in every cycle.
Throttle artificially chokes flow into the engine to goivern power, and all but full throttle, and even then, pressure difference between atmospheric pressure outside the engine and the small vaccuum created at the piston top, is often only 'just' enough to get air moving and heading into the engine.
As revs increase, that 'suck' can get stronger, but like wind resistance when riding, faster you go, greater the resistance gets.
Closest you get to maximum cylinder fill, tends to be around peak torque in the rev range, where an optima is found between suck and drag.... on highly tuned engines, that can be close ot even co incident with peak power, but on most, peak power is some way up the rev range, the engine starting to short fill and loose burn pressure from that, and combustion speed, but still increasing in delivered power from the fact its making less pressure, but much more often, as revs increase.
Only where that 'short fill' is caused by impediment to charge flow, AND that impediment to charge flow caused by the carburettor, will changing the carburettor 'pottentially' help increase power.
Some-times actually using a SMALLER carburettor can see a 'net' power increase, where smaller choke increases gas speed and the 'inertial charging' effect as the valve closes, the faster moving gas not wanting to slow down, or at least not turn around and come back out!
However, far more often the converse is true and using a larger carburettor will REDUCE power from the opposite effect, as WELL as making throttle response less precice, and the 'carburation' more wooly. ____________________ My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?' |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| temeluchus |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 temeluchus World Chat Champion

Joined: 01 Oct 2008 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| ClockworkJesu... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ClockworkJesu... Nitrous Nuisance

Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| pepperami |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 pepperami Super Spammer

Joined: 17 Jan 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 20:53 - 23 Aug 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
Thank you people, I think you`ve answered my question
I really dont want to start mucking about with the internals of the engine and it appears that this carb is best left alone  ____________________ I am the sum total of my own existence, what went before makes me who I am now! |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 15 years, 47 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|