Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Bikers asked for views on anti-tampering plans

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

tatfan
Nitrous Nuisance



Joined: 10 May 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:02 - 05 Sep 2011    Post subject: Bikers asked for views on anti-tampering plans Reply with quote

Taken from a link on MCN website. Might be usefull to someone on here.

https://www.dft.gov.uk/consultations/dft-2011-26
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:47 - 05 Sep 2011    Post subject: Re: Bikers asked for views on anti-tampering plans Reply with quote

tatfan wrote:
Taken from a link on MCN website. Might be usefull to someone on here.

https://www.dft.gov.uk/consultations/dft-2011-26


Surely we should all be feeding back as much as possible in order to get what we want...
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

tatfan
Nitrous Nuisance



Joined: 10 May 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:59 - 05 Sep 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've just had a quick read through, from what I can tell, it's not as bad as a lot of people are making out. Our Government are against the anti tamper measure, they want to keep the SVA, and they are against the 2nd and 3rd stages of emission control that the EU want. Most major bike manufactures all ready have the stage 1 on their bikes, so they agree to it. It also seems that although they agree with all new bikes most have ABS or CBS, they think it will make new entry level bikes to expensive too expensive, so an alternative should be looked for.
I'm expecting to get flamed for it, but I think our Governments policy isn't actually that bad. I just hope all the other countries go with us, and not the EU!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:43 - 05 Sep 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yup, the current lot seem to be fairly sensible. However, there are a few issues in the actual EU proposal - which effect owners - that they don't seem to have considered. We might be as well to focus on those.

I know you posted this in the right place, but from experience, Biking News gets fewer readers than General Bike Chat, so I've posted it there as well.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

DuNkZz1993
L Plate Warrior



Joined: 07 Sep 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:15 - 07 Sep 2011    Post subject: Anti Tampering Legislation Reply with quote

https://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/5334

this is the petition to sign if you against this legislation, please give your signature.

Before you say this isnt going to get passed im not taking the chance as their is a good chance of this happening.

please inform as many people as you can of this petition we need 100,000 signatures.
____________________
GET DOWN---RIDE HARD
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

LordShaftesbu...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:19 - 07 Sep 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Err ... that's a "pertition", whatever that is.

I almost didn't sign it because of that. I mean, how will it make us look when it's presented? It's embarrassing.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:01 - 07 Sep 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

ME AM FIND CRAYOWN TO SINE PERTITION WITH!!!!!11!

I'd suggest that you respond to the consulation first, and then tail on that "pertition" if you've still got your rage on.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Nufkamp
Traffic Copper



Joined: 15 Jul 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:19 - 08 Sep 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

My views on anti-tampering are 'no, fuck off', and that should be the view of every rider. Who the fuck are these cunts to tell me I cant put a different rear tyre on MY bike to what the manufacturer fitted? One of the first changes I made to my Trumpy was to swap the God-awful-in-the-damp Metzlers for a set of Avons.
____________________
As seen on Google Street View https://tinyurl.com/yfdvojc
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

LordShaftesbu...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:31 - 14 Sep 2011    Post subject: Re: Bikers asked for views on anti-tampering plans Reply with quote

tatfan wrote:
Taken from a link on MCN website. Might be usefull to someone on here.

https://www.dft.gov.uk/consultations/dft-2011-26


This looks really involved to fill out. Is there some crib sheet somewhere we can copy and paste from (I can paraphrase easily but I'm not very original).
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

LordShaftesbu...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:24 - 23 Sep 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Must remember to get round to this ...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

el_oso
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 May 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:01 - 23 Sep 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

the CBS shouldn't be allowed. there are certain situations where you should only use the back brake. i.e. mid corner if you have to.
____________________
Duke 390
Previous: '05 XR125L | '96 XJ600S Diversion |'05 Suzuki GSXR1000 | '05 Honda CBR125-R | '97 YZF 600R Thundercat | '11 Honda CBR250
Car: Jeep Wrangler 4.0L
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

kenjh
Borekit Bruiser



Joined: 18 Apr 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:10 - 02 Oct 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

if you want to destroy something ,give it to Government ,study it to death ..what you do there affects us over here ,protect your corner of sanity ..I do not like the new bikes.I will NOT buy a new bike .my newest bike is a 87 ..I understand the need for environment protection ,but there is no way in hell a motorcycle needs a catalytic converter ,,ABS brakes ?? practices your riding skills ..why do the safety freaks need to complicate things ?? one day they will outlaw motorcycles ,
____________________
If I don't know I ask..an' there is a lot I don't know. I am and old biker , not a bold rider there are no old bold riders ...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

ninja_butler
World Chat Champion



Joined: 19 Oct 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 04:15 - 21 Oct 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Am I the only person who can't make head or tail of the proposal document? I have absolutely no idea whatsoever what it means.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Dazbo666
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:23 - 21 Oct 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

ninja_butler wrote:
Am I the only person who can't make head or tail of the proposal document? I have absolutely no idea whatsoever what it means.

I thought it was just me Embarassed
____________________
1st bike (Sept'06 - May'10) : 1991 GPZ500S / Current bike (since Nov 2009) : 2003 Suzuki Bandit 600N
Word of the day : DILLIGAF
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:41 - 21 Oct 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

ninja_butler wrote:
Am I the only person who can't make head or tail of the proposal document? I have absolutely no idea whatsoever what it means.


TLDR - It's bad.
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:19 - 21 Oct 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Reading the actual wording of the proposed directive - and you should read it, don't accept the assurances of a politician who probably hasn't - the story is:

Arrow Mechanisms to reduce evaporative fuel loss (for realsies).
Arrow Swingeing emissions controls, far beyond what most current engines can achieve.
Arrow Mandatory ABS (or linked brakes on <=125cc) with no means to turn it off.
Arrow Mandatory anti tamper components from airbox through to rear tyre.
Arrow Illegal to modify any of those components with non-approved parts.
Arrow Illegal to supply 'race' parts. How racers are supposed to get them is a mystery.
Arrow Mandatory spy-chips that at a minimum will have to warn you (and rat you out, remember this will be illegal) if any non-standard components are installed. You can bet that manufacturers will take the opportunity to have the 2nd generation ones cripple the bike until you've paid a dealer to bless it.
Arrow No fun on bikes, at any time, ever.

I'm not being in any way hyperbolic. This is just a plain reading of the proposed wording. OK, the last point is inferred, but it's pretty clear.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

LordShaftesbu...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:01 - 21 Oct 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

^ All true Mad
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

kenjh
Borekit Bruiser



Joined: 18 Apr 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:50 - 21 Oct 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

it's alway's good to have someone that can understand "legalese"and explain what we are going to lose ..so how to protect ourselves ???
____________________
If I don't know I ask..an' there is a lot I don't know. I am and old biker , not a bold rider there are no old bold riders ...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

LordShaftesbu...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:20 - 21 Oct 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

kenjh wrote:
..so how to protect ourselves ???

Join MAG, write to your political representatives, go on protests, fill in the consultation document, sign the petitions.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

kenjh
Borekit Bruiser



Joined: 18 Apr 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:40 - 21 Oct 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

yah protest ..been on the receiving end of a police baton for standing to close to protesters..write the politicians ..I vote ,,and never see progress on important issues,,damm am I getting cynical or just angry..
____________________
If I don't know I ask..an' there is a lot I don't know. I am and old biker , not a bold rider there are no old bold riders ...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

LordShaftesbu...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:27 - 22 Oct 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here is something else you can do that will take all of 30 seconds:

https://www.mag-uk.org/en/newsdetail/a6877
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

kenjh
Borekit Bruiser



Joined: 18 Apr 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:58 - 22 Oct 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

work .to pay bills ..work on the bike ..or have a ride..before the lawmakers win and riding is no longer allowed ,or hide in the shop ..till they take that away because I am not licensed and have dangerous tools and things not safe in the hands of others ,,how long before it is taken away in the drive to protect us ..
____________________
If I don't know I ask..an' there is a lot I don't know. I am and old biker , not a bold rider there are no old bold riders ...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

LordShaftesbu...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:48 - 24 Oct 2011    Post subject: Re: Bikers asked for views on anti-tampering plans Reply with quote

tatfan wrote:
Taken from a link on MCN website. Might be usefull to someone on here.

https://www.dft.gov.uk/consultations/dft-2011-26

You all have until the 28th (this Friday) to do this!

To make it less mind-melting, here is a handy guide sent to me by MAG:

Quote:
This is only an aid if you haven't managed to read the accompanying
documentation that is available from the consultation website

https://www.dft.gov.uk/consultations/dft-2011-26

Please remember this is a 'download and fill in' consultation, though
you can email your response to

motorcycle.consultation@dft.gsi.gov.uk

if you don't want to post it to

Adrian Burrows
International Vehicles Standards
Department for Transport,
Zone 1/34, Great Minster House, 76 Marsham Street,
London
SW1P 4DR

Because all of Question i specifically refers to the Impact Assessment
that the Dept for Transport has undertaken and will require your
familiarisation with that, you may only wish to answer Questions ii, iii
and iv which is perfectly acceptable.

Question ii. - Whether the proposed vehicle categories are appropriate:

Answer: It is not appropriate to link Type-Approval categories to
Driving Licence categories, especially by sub-dividing the L3e category
in to A1, A2 and A3, as the categories defined in Type Approval and
Driving Licence rules are subject to change independant from each other
and at different points in time.


Question iii. - Whether you foresee any unintended consequences of
adopting this Regulation:

Answer:

-Aspects of Articles 20 and 21 threaten to restrict consumer choice and
increase the cost of new bikes, especially commuter machines by
mandating ABS and environmental devices that will add cost and
complexity, without sound evidence that the benefits will outweigh the
costs (both financial and choice).

- Article 18.4 moves the scope of Type-Approval beyond the point of
original sale, registration or entry into service and imposes
unacceptable burdens on the subsequent owner(s). This and other
consequences described below would severly restrict one-offs and
homebuilds based on Type-Approved vehicles.

- Articles 17, 18, 47 and 52 may well damage UK producers and consumers
interests by restricting the ability to design, manufacture, sell,
purchase or use a range of components that are commonly in use today,
that do not contravene UK Construction & Use regulations. The main
concerns are; the cost of acquiring Type-Approval for auxilliary and
alternative components and the uncertainty surrounding the range of
products that would be affected by allowing the EU Commission to manage
the content of Article 52 through 'delegated acts'.


Question iv. - other comments and information:

Answer:
- We support the UK Gov's desire to maintain the SVA (Single vehicle
approval) system that currently exists in the UK.

- The idea of 'delegated acts' is undemocratic; MEPs cannot be expected
to vote on something that will be decided in the future

- Annex 2 (item 12) attempting to measure and control "steerability,
conering properties and turnability" is very-worrying. Motorcycle
dynamics are complex and do not lend themselves to bureaucratic regulation.

- All of article 18 (Anti-tampering) should be withdrawn as there is no
sound basis for its inclusion
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Andy_Pagin
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:09 - 24 Oct 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Responses sent Thumbs Up
____________________
They're coming to take me away, ho-ho, hee-hee, ha-haaa, hey-hey,
the men in white coats are coming to take me away.
Yamaha Vity -> YBR125 -> FZS600 Fazer -> FZ1-S Fazer
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

LordShaftesbu...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:56 - 24 Oct 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Andy_Pagin wrote:
Responses sent Thumbs Up


Excellent stuff, well done that man.

Who else?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 13 years, 249 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.07 Sec - Server Load: 1.44 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 132.45 Kb