Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Unpleasant surprise

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

LordShaftesbu...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:21 - 03 Dec 2011    Post subject: Unpleasant surprise Reply with quote

So I came home today to find this sitting on the doormat:

https://www.bikechatforums.com/files/lastscan3.jpg

Yes I did forget to tax it last year (it's taxed now), but what pisses me off is that this is the first I've heard of any penalty. As I understand it the DVLA usually issues a £40 penalty and ratchets it up to £80 if you don't pay within a certain time frame.

How can somone pay a penalty they haven't been told about?

Is it worth arguing with them to see if I can get away with paying just the £40?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:11 - 03 Dec 2011    Post subject: Re: Unpleasant surprise Reply with quote

"Commence recovery proceedings", is legal talk for "send you a few letters".

Most people file these in the bin.

And are you sure you didn't feel in a SORN form and send it to the DVLA? If you did, it'd be up to the DVLA to prove you didn't send it.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

keggyhander
World Chat Champion



Joined: 30 Nov 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:36 - 03 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

A private clamping firm is going to clamp your vehicle on your own property??

It would be worth it for the sheer lulz as the power tools and lump hammers were brought into play.

I don't think that letter has been thought through at all.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:53 - 03 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

When did you tax it? They only have 6 months from the (last) date of the offence to put it before a court. Sorry, I don't have the references to hand, stinkwheel dug them up last time this came up.

My personal view (and I'm sitting on 2 x £100 demands for 'uninsured + not SORNED') is that ignoring it is probably the best policy. If you ever get a court summons, that's the time to deal with it.

Lulz at the "County Court Judgement". You're in Dundee, right? That'd be the Sheriff Court then. Rolling Eyes
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

LordShaftesbu...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:39 - 03 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
When did you tax it? They only have 6 months from the (last) date of the offence to put it before a court.


Well according to the tax disc the current expiry is 01/01/12 and the disc cost £70, so using my Sickpup-like detective skills I deduce that the road tax started on the 1st of January this year, firmly closing the DVLA's window.

Oh God I could kiss you.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ajbsmirnoff
World Chat Champion



Joined: 09 Dec 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:53 - 03 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wasn't wheelclamping associated with a demand for money made illegal in Scotland ?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

nowhere.elysium
The Pork Lord



Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:14 - 03 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also, something I learned from my recent bad experience with the DVLA's subsidiary minions; put it under a secured cover. Provided they can't see anything that identifies it as your vehicle, they can't touch it. Before people shout me down; that's from the DVLA's local contracted clamping firm - they were significantly more helpful than those dozy taff mongtards that claim to be a necessary agency.
____________________
'10 SV650SF, '83 GS650GT (it lives!), Questionable DIY dash project, 3D Printer project, Lasercutter project
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

kerr
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 May 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:19 - 03 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

ajbsmirnoff wrote:
Wasn't wheelclamping associated with a demand for money made illegal in Scotland ?

Yes, Clamping is illegal down here Thumbs Up
Another vote for binning it Wink .
____________________
aprilia 125 Af1 Futura >> Suzuki gsxr 600 srad >> J1 zx6r >> cbr 600rr >> Speed Triple
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

sickpup
Old Timer



Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:30 - 03 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Doug97 wrote:
Well according to the tax disc the current expiry is 01/01/12 and the disc cost £70, so using my Sickpup-like detective skills I deduce that the road tax started on the 1st of January this year, firmly closing the DVLA's window.

Oh God I could kiss you.


Pssst, 6 months is wrong. Hope you didn't use tongues Thumbs Up
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:13 - 03 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

sickpup wrote:
Doug97 wrote:
Well according to the tax disc the current expiry is 01/01/12 and the disc cost £70, so using my Sickpup-like detective skills I deduce that the road tax started on the 1st of January this year, firmly closing the DVLA's window.

Oh God I could kiss you.


Pssst, 6 months is wrong. Hope you didn't use tongues Thumbs Up


I'm thinking of the failure to pay VED, which is a summary criminal offence that should come under The Magistrate's Act 1980 Section 127 in England and Wales, right? Wrong? The equivalent Sheriff Court situation escapes me, I am somewhat tired-and-emotional just now. Stinkwheel should have it on tap.

I can't see that there's any civil debt to pursue, since the "penalty charge" is an optional bribe to avoid a criminal prosecution. No opt-in, no contract, no debt. I can't imagine why the DVLA would think they could continue to pursue it instead of a prosecution.

As always, I remain tired-and-emotionally eager to learn.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

sickpup
Old Timer



Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:28 - 04 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
I'm thinking of the failure to pay VED, which is a summary criminal offence that should come under The Magistrate's Act 1980 Section 127 in England and Wales, right? Wrong? The equivalent Sheriff Court situation escapes me, I am somewhat tired-and-emotional just now. Stinkwheel should have it on tap.

I can't see that there's any civil debt to pursue, since the "penalty charge" is an optional bribe to avoid a criminal prosecution. No opt-in, no contract, no debt. I can't imagine why the DVLA would think they could continue to pursue it instead of a prosecution.

As always, I remain tired-and-emotionally eager to learn.


They can decide to pursue it as a civil debt instead of a criminal prosecution. Have to admit I can't remember the ins and outs but that is the bottom line which is why it is pursued as a debt not a prosecution. Thumbs Up
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

LordShaftesbu...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:58 - 04 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Right, so if I ignore it I could eventually be taken to court, and unless I want to lie in court about sending the SORN, I have to pay up. £40 I can stomach but I don't see why I should pay the £80 when I wasn't informed of the payment deadline.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:17 - 04 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Doug97 wrote:
Right, so if I ignore it I could eventually be taken to court, and unless I want to lie in court about sending the SORN, I have to pay up. £40 I can stomach but I don't see why I should pay the £80 when I wasn't informed of the payment deadline.

From the above, there shouldn't be a need to lie as you can merely use the defence "I don't owe the fine because I was never fined - I was merely offered a bribe to avoid prosecution".

Anyone could take you to court over a civil debt, whether it exists or not. In some cases it's quite possible that if you don't lie, you might have to pay up (where the other side has lied).
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:07 - 04 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd be astonished if a Sheriff considered that any debt exists. Worst case, you're told to pay the debt, which will cost them more to collect than they'll receive.

Anyway, at this stage, it's just another random demand for payment, the time to take it seriously is when you receive a court summons.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

LordShaftesbu...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:57 - 05 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:
Anyone could take you to court over a civil debt,


Would the civil debt they claim I owe be £40 or £80 or the £1000 that they threaten in the letter?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

LordShaftesbu...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:41 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:
Doug97 wrote:
Right, so if I ignore it I could eventually be taken to court, and unless I want to lie in court about sending the SORN, I have to pay up. £40 I can stomach but I don't see why I should pay the £80 when I wasn't informed of the payment deadline.

From the above, there shouldn't be a need to lie as you can merely use the defence "I don't owe the fine because I was never fined - I was merely offered a bribe to avoid prosecution".

Anyone could take you to court over a civil debt, whether it exists or not. In some cases it's quite possible that if you don't lie, you might have to pay up (where the other side has lied).


I'm not getting this at all. How can saying I wasn't fined be a defence if the DVLA are not pursuing it as a fine but as a civil debt?

If I get taken to court, whether for a debt or a fine or whatever, I don't want to lie and say that I SORNed it (apart from everything else I couldn't SORN it even if I wanted to as I can only park it on the public highway).
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:50 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

What the DVLA are doing is akin to me (or any other random person) saying "Doug97, you owe me £80 and I will take you to court to get my money".

The £80 is a bribe they offer to take in exchange for not taking you to court for failing to declare SORN / tax the bike. As you have not agreed to this I can't see how this is a debt that can be enforced against you but others are better qualified to comment on this. Think they have quite a few years to take a case to court to recover a debt, but they would need to prove that the debt exists

If they did take you to court for the actual offence (which from memory carries a potential £1000 fine, but the DVLA don't get any of the fine) then I think that is when the 6 month time limit comes into play.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:54 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Doug97 wrote:


I'm not getting this at all. How can saying I wasn't fined be a defence if the DVLA are not pursuing it as a fine but as a civil debt?

If I get taken to court, whether for a debt or a fine or whatever, I don't want to lie and say that I SORNed it (apart from everything else I couldn't SORN it even if I wanted to as I can only park it on the public highway).


Just sounds like another bully boy agency to me.

I'd ignore it and see what they do next, chances are it'll be nothing over such a trivial amount.
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:11 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Worst case:

They take you to court and you are ordered to pay the £80.

If you then do so at that point, that's an end of the matter. A CCJ only appears on your credit record if you don't pay it within the allotted timescale.

They sometimes manage to get your phone number and start pestering you. You need to tell them firmly to either take you to court or stfu to get rid of them.

Yes, the 6 month thing is for prosecuting you for failure to declare SORN, not debt recovery.

So yeah. Worst case you land up paying the £80. Best case you land up paying nothing.

The clamping thing is a deliberate misrepresentation of the law. You can be clamped or fined £1000 for having an untaxed vehicle on the road. They cannot clamp you or fine you £1000 for failing to pay the DVLA £80.

In fact this one has probably overstepped the boundry of implication and turned into outright dishonesty. They usually say something like "Using a vehicle on the road without a valid tax disc can result in your vehicle being clamped and a release fee of over £1000 charged." (which is true, even in Scotland) then leave you to imply that law applies in this case.

To outright state failure to pay an alleged £80 civil debt to the DVLAs 3rd party recovery company can result in your vehicle being clamped is patently untrue. To the point it may be worth reporting this company to the Office of Fair Trading for lying about the law in an attempt to get money out of you.

https://www.oft.gov.uk/about-the-oft/legal-powers/legal/cca/debt-collection

Code of practice for letters
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

LordShaftesbu...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:13 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

stinkwheel wrote:
Worst case:

They take you to court and you are ordered to pay the £80.


Thanks for the explanation, it was most helpful. Could I argue that I shouldn't even have to pay the £80 as I was never given the opportunity to pay the initial £40?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:22 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Doug97 wrote:

Thanks for the explanation, it was most helpful. Could I argue that I shouldn't even have to pay the £80 as I was never given the opportunity to pay the initial £40?


I'd personally argue that you don't owe them any money at all.

The law allows for an £80 out of court settlement to the DVLA (reduced to £40 for early payment) instead of taking you to court for failure to declare SORN.

If you didn't agree to an out of court settlement, they should have taken you to court. It's too late to do that now so you owe them nothing.

The DVLA does not have the legal authority to impose a fine, that is the remit of the courts. One of the oldest laws we have dating back to the Bill of Rights.

EDIT: Incidentally. It's a company called Capita who you're actually dealing with. They are subbing out the "debt recovery" to third party companies after they were contracted to undertake "enforcement" work on behalf of the DVLA. Same private company who undertakes the TV licencing harrassment.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Marcg868
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Jan 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:52 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just tell them to prove you didn't tax or SORN it. They won't be able to prove it and will demand you pay them money. Just ignore them, typical DCA numpties.
____________________
JACK, MISS YOU LOADS YOU LEGEND.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

0l0dom0l0
World Chat Champion



Joined: 21 Oct 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:28 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

If it was me, I would ignore it.

If they sent you a Court Summons, then get all your stuff ready.

Ask them to prove you never sent the sorn off which they can't.

Tell them to prove they sent the letters to your house and gave you ample warning to pay the initial fine which you didn't have option of doing because you didn't receive the letter.

The behaviour of the DVLA is actually criminal. I'm pretty sure watchdog did something on it not long back about someone sending off the SORN and the DVLA not receiving it who were then in exactly the same boat as you. I'll have a look and see if I can find it.
____________________
CBT Passed: 30/08/2009, Theory Passed: 31/08/2010, Mod 1 Passed: 6/9/2010, Mod 2 Passed: 13/09/2010. Restriction ended 13/09/2012.

Bikes: 2007 Derbi GPR 50, 1998 Yamaha Fazer 600 (written off), 2002 Yamaha Fazer 600, 1994 CBR 600F, 2003 Triumph Daytona 600, Kawasaki ZX6R J1.....Current: 2006 Yamaha FZ6, 1998 Suzuki TL1000R and a Honda VFR 400 NC30.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

0l0dom0l0
World Chat Champion



Joined: 21 Oct 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:33 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Taken from here:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/watchdog/2011/09/sorn.html

Quote:
Last year we showed how the DVLA tried to prosecute motorists who kept their cars off the road. Even though they'd sent the correct paperwork that allowed them to skip road tax

Back then, the DVLA had said they hadn't received Duncan Peck's SORN (Statutory Off-Road Notification) document and told him it was his responsibility to contact them when he didn't receive acknowledgement of receipt.

Duncan insisted he had posted it, so the DVLA took him to court when he refused to pay. But a judge found in Duncan's favour saying the DVLA has no statutory power requiring anyone to contact them should they not receive an acknowledgment letter.

It was hoped the ruling would change things. But the complaints continue.

____________________
CBT Passed: 30/08/2009, Theory Passed: 31/08/2010, Mod 1 Passed: 6/9/2010, Mod 2 Passed: 13/09/2010. Restriction ended 13/09/2012.

Bikes: 2007 Derbi GPR 50, 1998 Yamaha Fazer 600 (written off), 2002 Yamaha Fazer 600, 1994 CBR 600F, 2003 Triumph Daytona 600, Kawasaki ZX6R J1.....Current: 2006 Yamaha FZ6, 1998 Suzuki TL1000R and a Honda VFR 400 NC30.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

cb1rocket
World Chat Champion



Joined: 30 Jan 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:45 - 07 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

and am I right in thinking in the past you don''t even need proof to say you posted it, just merely state the fact in court that you did post it and its up to them to prove you didn't?

I remember this being talked before on here something along the lines of the Interpretation Act.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 14 years, 40 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.11 Sec - Server Load: 0.83 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 137.67 Kb