|
|
| Author |
Message |
| sickpup |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 sickpup Old Timer

Joined: 21 Apr 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarJay But it's British!

Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| sickpup |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 sickpup Old Timer

Joined: 21 Apr 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Ingah |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Ingah World Chat Champion
Joined: 10 Apr 2009 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 15:42 - 18 Dec 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
I wouldn't say it is reasonable for you to expect that, ergo it would not be reasonable for them to do that. If it's bad enough that one side of road needs to be gritted - then both sides of the road need gritting!
I'm not a judge though. And even if i was, 2 different judges would give probably give 2 different answers  ____________________ -- Ingah |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| P. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 P. Red Rocket
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| sickpup |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 sickpup Old Timer

Joined: 21 Apr 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| sickpup |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 sickpup Old Timer

Joined: 21 Apr 2004 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 17:40 - 18 Dec 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
| ##Paddy## wrote: | Gritters have 3 settings 10, 20 and 30.
They also have a 2m spreader on the back that "should" fling salt across 2 metres.
Usually depends on the severity of the weather report... some do a route once, some do it twice... in extreme cases they do it 3 or more times across an 8 hour period overnight.
Brother was a gritter lorry driver for well over 10 years and I've worked in his depot, must say it is a pretty risky job as it is, and I can understand where you are coming from, but they are given a route to do, given the lorry with the gritter back end, loaded with the correct salt and told to get on with it.
They do what they are told, they can only grit how and when they are told, you on the other hand can ride to the conditions. Would expect an experienced rider such as yourself to notice the road conditions far better than myself.
(In no way a dig at you... just an insight) |
I agree that it would not be the drivers fault, as you say they follow the proscribed route and don't deviate.
Keep in mind I was driving at around 10mph on a road going up a hill that I had ridden down half an hour earlier with a passenger with no problem and knew had been gritted yet I still kept it at 10mph due to the possibility of ice luckily. Keep in mind the question is it is reasonable to expect one side of a main road to be gritted but not the other?
Also keep in mind I gritted the road leading out of the Cul De sac myself with a shovel and grit from the streets grit bin just so I could push my bike uphill out to the main road just to be safe. I really do take this snow and ice thing seriously.
Don't worry, I wouldn't take an insightful post as a dig.
I'll just add a question here for you Paddy (if you don't mind) as you have experience. Would you expect a single one direction only gritting run on a road wide enough for three vehicles (1 line parked in places and one each way) abreast adequate? |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| P. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 P. Red Rocket
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 17:59 - 18 Dec 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
| sickpup wrote: | I'll just add a question here for you paddy (if you don't mind) as you have experience. Would you expect a single one direction only gritting run on a road wide enough for three vehicles (1 line parked in places and oine each way) abreast adequate? |
Don't mind at all.
As in this type of road?
https://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=Lower+Stone+Street,+Maidstone&hl=en&ll=51.271689,0.524919&spn=0.00729,0.013797&sll=53.800651,-4.064941&sspn=14.118794,28.256836&vpsrc=0&hnear=Lower+Stone+St,+Maidstone,+United+Kingdom&t=h&z=16&layer=c&cbll=51.27159,0.524971&panoid=p9O70eU0EvAzvpFEiXHi7w&cbp=12,170.2,,0,11.34
This is directly outside my window, and as it happens I've just seen a gritter
They do 2 passes usually as this is a town centre, but they are always on the left, reason being the kicker at the back that aims the sand is usually facing right (which is why you'll see a flashing orange beacon on the right hand side of the gritter) If they change it to the other side they lift out the beacon and put on the other side (same beacons used on top of cones.)
Basically on the road above is considered a "wide road" and most depots have 2 types of back ends ... which are a pain in the arse to swap
These are the two types.
https://yesterdaystheory.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/grit2.jpg
As stated on the image, it is supposed to be for residential areas and driven as much as it can be directly down the centre of the road to spread evenly and minimise damage.
https://yesterdaystheory.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/grit1.jpg
This is the wider type, deposits it directly behind but also fires across the lane(s) which is why I time overtakes against a gritter on an NSL
Sorry if that doesn't answer the question, but its partly down to how they are gritting and the "dosage" per drop.
Should also add both have the round spinning object... just the residential has 2 going alternate ways and the wide road has them spinning anti clockwise only. The red line was purely to show the path. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| J.M. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 J.M. World Chat Champion

Joined: 27 Mar 2011 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 23:21 - 18 Dec 2011 Post subject: Re: Reasonably practicable gritting question. |
 |
|
| sickpup wrote: | Highways act 1980 (as amended) section 41 (1a) states....
| Quote: | In particular, a highway authority are under a duty to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that safe passage along a highway is not endangered by snow or ice.
|
|
I've got no legal experience, nor have I read up on any more of the highways act, but here's my interpretation anyhow
Taking it literally I think about it being gritted to ensure that there is no snow/ice, i.e. making sure the road is safe to use. If a road is not safe to proceed across a highway, and the council know, then reasonable effort should be taken to warn road users of this.
It seems that the council acknowledged that the road was dangerous and gritted the road accordingly. However, as you say, they only gritted one side of this road. Personally, seeing the grit on one side of the road, I would naturally presume that the other side of the road would also be safe to use, but this would not be the case as there may be un-gritted black ice on this side of the road.
For this I am assuming that one lane of a high way is a safe passage. "Safe passage" to me sounds like it could be singular rather than plural, so it may be arguable that they provided a safe passage across this highway. Although under the interpretations act 1978, section 6 subsection c, you could argue back that this is infact plural and that they must provide more than one passage where appropriate. Or both lanes in your case.
Because the council acknowledged that road was dangerous but did nothing to clear the second lane or warn users about the second lane being dangerous then I would hesitate a guess that they did not attempt to make that road as safe as reasonably possible.
But then again, I'm talking out of my arse about how I interpreted that act; a kitten probably has better legal understanding than I!  ____________________ 2004 R1 & 2018 XSR900 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| sickpup |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 sickpup Old Timer

Joined: 21 Apr 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Gothtec |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Gothtec Renault 5 Driver
Joined: 14 Dec 2011 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| sickpup |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 sickpup Old Timer

Joined: 21 Apr 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Cunnington |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Cunnington Spanner Monkey

Joined: 01 Jun 2011 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 21:31 - 19 Dec 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
Glad to hear the damage isn't too severe.
Having worked for a local authority roads service, the standard response to a complaint would be to check whether the procedures drafted to ensure compliance with their statutory obligations had been followed.
If these procedures were to be challenged, cue a series of "expert" witnesses to establish the optimum gritting routes for the prevailing weather based upon the type of gritting plant employed etc, etc. By definintion, it is not practicible to ensure no ice forms on any road surface at any time, therefore there will always be an element of opinion involved.
Some more background:
The most effective means of deicing is to pre-grit, which stops the ice from forming. From distant memory it is something like 3 times as effective as spreading salt on ice.
Keeping the salt on the road is the next challenge it can get blown off by passing traffic (which is why some gritters have water tanks along the body - wetting the salt helps it stick to the road) or rain washes it off, therefore timing of the application of the deicing salt is critical, and the responsible authority will have an entire network to consider.
TLDR
I would expect that the onus would be on you to demonstrate that the responsible authority had failed to meet their statutory obligations. They will likely state that as they have followed their procedures designed to ensure, as far as reasonably practicable, that their statutory requirements were discharged, they are not at fault. ____________________ '82 C50, '81 CB100, '84 GS125, '95 NTV650, '00 Bandit 600, '06 SV650, '56 Z1000, '89 NTV600
The Shaggy D.A. wrote: "You are invisible. Those who can see you are trying to kill you." |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Howling TerrorOutOfOffice |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Howling TerrorOutOfOffice Super Spammer

Joined: 05 Dec 2008 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Raffles |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Raffles World Chat Champion
Joined: 14 Apr 2009 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Gothtec |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Gothtec Renault 5 Driver
Joined: 14 Dec 2011 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 01:30 - 20 Dec 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
I actually dislike gritting, it takes responsibility for your own safety from yourself... But they don't allow snowchains etc on your vehicle so your stuffed on that point....
Its also why I need a cheap winter hack.... doesn't matter if I drop it  ____________________ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10% discount at www.globalbikeonline.com, use promo code gboaw10 at the checkout!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| johnsmith222 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 johnsmith222 World Chat Champion
Joined: 26 Dec 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| WannaBeDude |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 WannaBeDude World Chat Champion
Joined: 05 Jul 2011 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 05:32 - 20 Dec 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
Shit riding .................. again !
............................................................................................................ ____________________ Jogging on, destination living. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 14 years, 4 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|