Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Force on impact calculation.

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Dear Auntie BCF...
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

jackw72
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Nov 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:42 - 25 Jan 2012    Post subject: Force on impact calculation. Reply with quote

Hi,

Anyone got any idea what calculation I would use to calculate the force a human being would have whilst sprinting 100m.

I.e. how hard would a man running 8 meters per second hit another object.

I have tried the kinetic energy formula but am wondering if anybody knows what calculation would be used for this?

Thanks,

Jack Thumbs Up
____________________
08/11/2007 A2 Passed.
Suzuki GSXR 1000 K3
Rapid Training passed
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

at106
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 16 Jul 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:40 - 25 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are you trying to find out how hard he would hit another object if he ran into it?

Do you have any other details like his mass? Or the the time taken?

You should be able to use a suvat equation to find the acceleration. And then f=ma to find the force.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

UnknownStuntm...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:00 - 25 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Let me guess, you're a television media executive, been tasked with working on the advertising placement project at the Olympics, and you're exploring your creative opportunity options for the finish to the main event?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Stevey
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 04 Dec 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:55 - 25 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

For Usain Bolt, when he set the world record, it would be 205 N (3s.f.)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

D O G
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:05 - 25 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

What you are trying to work out is the decellerative force the object would exert on the man.

All you need to decide is over what distance the man would be brought to rest. There is always some 'squish' when a body (of anything) hits another body. In this case it would be the human flesh and potentially skeleton compressing, and some flex in the object.

When you have determined this distance, you could extrapolate the time taken to achieve the stop by taking an average speed for the distance at 4m/s (assuming a constant deceleration).

Then you will know the deceleration in ms^2, and, together with your assumption of the individual's mass you will be able to calculate the average force exerted.

That's how I woud do it.

Problem is the 1st part - I'm sure there will be research kicking about.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

jackw72
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Nov 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:53 - 25 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks all for your replies (even stuntman which confused me more than anything).

Mass I am looking at 90kg, as previously said a speed of 8.6 meters per second.

Yes I am looking at how much force a man would impact on something by running at 8.6 mps. Time take 11.6 seconds over 100m. I made the calculation and i was running at 8.6 meters per second.

If I find the acceleration (using suvat) and the force (using f=ma) what do I do from there?

Thanks again,

Jack
____________________
08/11/2007 A2 Passed.
Suzuki GSXR 1000 K3
Rapid Training passed
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

smegballs
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:00 - 25 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

jackw72 wrote:


Yes I am looking at how much force a man would impact on something by running at 8.6 mps. Time take 11.6 seconds over 100m. I made the calculation and i was running at 8.6 meters per second.

If I find the acceleration (using suvat) and the force (using f=ma) what do I do from there?


Are you assuming he hits it and stops dead? If would apply f=ma to the deceleration to find the deceleration force.

If he hits a ribbon across the track the ribbon will move and so the the deceleration will be low. A brick wall is quite unmoving and the deceleration will be high.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

jackw72
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Nov 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:17 - 25 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whatever is easier to calculate I suppose stopping dead would be easiest.

Though if I just want to find the potential energy that a man could impact with does it matter about deceleration?

I guess potential energy is what I want. To be able to say that a 90kg mass moving at 8.6 meters per second hits with XX force.

Thanks,

Jack
____________________
08/11/2007 A2 Passed.
Suzuki GSXR 1000 K3
Rapid Training passed
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

D O G
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:32 - 25 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

He cannot stop dead - that would require infinite force.

If you want to know the kinetic energy a 90kg man moving at 8.6m/s has, that is something different.

This site tells you that it is 3.3kJ.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

jackw72
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Nov 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:42 - 25 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ah that is the one that I want.

So if I wanted to relate that amount of kilojoules to an actual measurement of weight as if to say subject 1 would hit with the force of 10 tonnes or a small car doing 20 mph. How would I convert the kj to tonnes or something along those lines?

Thanks
____________________
08/11/2007 A2 Passed.
Suzuki GSXR 1000 K3
Rapid Training passed
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

D O G
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:48 - 25 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just use that site I linked, you can change the variables.

Now you know that the energy of the running man is 3.3kJ, fix that value and alter the mass.

In your case of a 10 tonne mass, from that site, if it were travelling at .8m/s it would have the same energy as the running man.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

smegballs
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:04 - 25 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

To damage something you need to apply work. Work is another word for energy. In an impact scenario surely the impact energy is more important than the force? You don't measure bullets by the magnitude of the force that accelerates them, you look at their muzzle energy.

Work done = Force x distance.

If know the energy of the running man, and how far he moves the thing he collides with, then you can get the force?

I'm trying to work out whether "hit with the force of" actually means force (as in newtons) or its a semantic issue that means something else.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

ThoughtContro...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:08 - 25 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

What's he hitting and is it static?

Running at 3 m/s into a 50 tonne train travelling towards you at 50 m/s would involve more Newtons force than running into a static wall
____________________
Prize cunt
--
"In a world of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act" - George Orwell
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

jackw72
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Nov 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:11 - 25 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok guys let me put a scenario out but it is kinda complex.

I have just started playing American football and did a test 100m at said speed and weight. I wondered what sort of impact me running into someone stationary at that speed would be equal to.

The faster a mass moves the more force it gets (is there a formula for working out how much the mass increases as it gets faster?)

So lets say I am facing a man who weighs 80kg who isn't moving running towards him at 8.6 meters per second at 90k with a 3.3 kj energy.

I think working out the newtons force would be best considering there is no way to tell how far a man @ 80kg would move in this equation without going into masses of detail.
____________________
08/11/2007 A2 Passed.
Suzuki GSXR 1000 K3
Rapid Training passed
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

D O G
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:59 - 25 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

jackw72 wrote:
Ok guys let me put a scenario out but it is kinda complex.

I have just started playing American football and did a test 100m at said speed and weight. I wondered what sort of impact me running into someone stationary at that speed would be equal to.

The faster a mass moves the more force it gets (is there a formula for working out how much the mass increases as it gets faster?)


It builds up more energy, a 'force' is different - a force is the mechanism of energy transfer from one body to another, the higher the force, the faster the energy is transferred.

jackw72 wrote:
So lets say I am facing a man who weighs 80kg who isn't moving running towards him at 8.6 meters per second at 90k with a 3.3 kj energy.

I think working out the newtons force would be best considering there is no way to tell how far a man @ 80kg would move in this equation without going into masses of detail.


I'm struggling to understand what you are trying to do, too. Laughing I think you are trying to give a 'real world' comparative to the energy in the impact. The easiest way to do this is to assume that all the energy you have when running is used up in the collision - by breaking bones, brusing flesh, acelerating the other guy backwards, stopping you, making sound waves, producing heat etc etc etc.

That energy is 3.3kJ, which is the equivalent of the same energy a 1,000kg car would lose if it crashed into a hypothetical brick wall at 6mph (2.56m/s).

Or, if you could convert it directly into heat energy, and transfer that with no losses to 1kg of water, you could raise its temperature by 0.8 of a degree (celcius).
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Frost
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:04 - 25 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

How much force gets imparted depends on contact time, which bits of the mass contact etc etc. But assuming a full contact that imparts all of the energy, and assuming that you both weigh the same amount then your energy will accelerate him to the same speed that you were once going and cause you to come to a complete halt.
So the faster you go the further and faster you will push him. If you weigh more than him you will impart the same amount of energy to him, but retain some of your own momentum.
The actual numbers involved would depends on how hard he and you are, which will determine the amount of squish and therefore acceleration speeds. e.g strap a pillow to your front and you'll put basically the same energy into him but more slowly so the G forces will be lower even though the energy is the same.

So basically when you ask about how much energy you'd hit him with that's ambiguous as to wether you mean impact force (G) or your energy (Momentum)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

jackw72
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Nov 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:01 - 25 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

D O G wrote:

I'm struggling to understand what you are trying to do, too. Laughing I think you are trying to give a 'real world' comparative to the energy in the impact. The easiest way to do this is to assume that all the energy you have when running is used up in the collision - by breaking bones, brusing flesh, acelerating the other guy backwards, stopping you, making sound waves, producing heat etc etc etc.

That energy is 3.3kJ, which is the equivalent of the same energy a 1,000kg car would lose if it crashed into a hypothetical brick wall at 6mph (2.56m/s).

Or, if you could convert it directly into heat energy, and transfer that with no losses to 1kg of water, you could raise its temperature by 0.8 of a degree (celcius).


Yes that is what I am trying to do. I want to know at the point of impact how much force I am putting out onto the other person (or person weighing wall if it is easier) but in a way that a simpleton could understand.

I hit the man/wall with x amount of force, x amount of newtons etc.

Does my mass (although not physically) increase as I am running faster and by how much? 1.003% per mph?

I dunnahhhh its confusning everyone Razz but thank you for your expertise so far I hope I am challenging you Thumbs Up
____________________
08/11/2007 A2 Passed.
Suzuki GSXR 1000 K3
Rapid Training passed
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

ThoughtContro...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:49 - 26 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

jackw72 wrote:
Does my mass (although not physically) increase as I am running faster and by how much? 1.003% per mph?


Unless you're bending the laws of physics how can your mass increase? Bar any water you sweat off or clods of earth your boots pick up, it's fixed. The variables are your velocity and acceleration, the mass, velocity and acceleration and relative vector of your target.
____________________
Prize cunt
--
"In a world of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act" - George Orwell
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

el_oso
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 May 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:22 - 28 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

it would probably be easier and more useful to calculate momentum.
in most/all sports force is not important. what is important is power or the application of force.
momentum, force, power, work and energy are all related by reasonably simple relationships.
momentum = mass x velocity. which is probably what you are thinking of, not mass increasing with velocity. mass only increases with velocity near the speed of light 3x10^8m/s and i'm pretty sure you can't run that fast. the relationship is one of the most know equations - E = mc^2
____________________
Duke 390
Previous: '05 XR125L | '96 XJ600S Diversion |'05 Suzuki GSXR1000 | '05 Honda CBR125-R | '97 YZF 600R Thundercat | '11 Honda CBR250
Car: Jeep Wrangler 4.0L
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

mickfulton
Nova Slayer



Joined: 17 Jan 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:29 - 29 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

If a runner stops dead from 8.6 m/s in 0.01s then the deceleration would be 8.6/0.01= 860m/s/s


The Force required to do this is F=ma ......... 90kg * 860= X N

Hope this helps ........you need to know the time it takes to stop the runner and this tells you the required force to stop them, or the force the give to the thing stopping them.

It gets more complicated if you take in to account collisions (inelastic or otherwise), so don't bother Smile


Force is something which changes the shape, speed or direction....so if the runner is at constant speed then effectively he is experiencing NO FORCE (i.e. balanced forces) in the horizontal plane.

Maybe try reading a basic newtonian mechanics book
____________________
Current half-cars :2004 SV650, VX535 1991
Exes: YBR 125 2007,GPZ500S 1998
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Paulington
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Mar 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:17 - 07 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Simple physics. In all these calculations I am talking about collisions and everything happening in 'Physicsland', a magical place where no drag forces exist and in all collisions whether elastic or inelastic transfer of energy is total and 100% efficient.

Let's say the man is an average weight of 70kg and that he is running at 8ms^-1.

Ke = 0.5mv^2

Which is calculated as thus:

0.5 x [70x(8^2)] = 2240 Joules.

That means that if that man were to hit an object he would impart 2240 joules of energy into the object.

F=ma and any of the SUVAT equations are NOT THE CORRECT WAY to calculate this as has been done above as you have asked how much force a running man would have, that is the wrong terminology.

A running man has kinetic energy which he has gained from chemical energy in his muscles. The kinetic energy you have referred to is the 'force' but it is better called 'energy'.

The best way of determining the force in Newtons that the runner hitting the object has imparted is using the equations of motion. To do this you would have to use the equations of motion, more specifically 'v = u+at' and 'F=ma'.

Firstly, you would have to know the speed the runner was doing the INSTANT before he hit the wall, that is U, V is the final speed, i.e. 0ms^-1 and T is the amount of time it took the runner to go from max speed to a complete stop after hitting the wall, around 0.1-0.4 seconds.

Then, knowing 'a', you can plug that in to F=ma where a is the answer from the equation above and m is the mass of the man in question.

Or in one single equation:

F = m[(v-u)/t].

This would give you the force in Newtons that the runner applied to the object he hit with his body.
____________________
"Four wheels move the body, two wheels move the soul."
Current Vehicles: '89 Kawasaki KDX200, '99 Yamaha XV535, '00 Honda ST1100 Pan-European, '08 Suzuki GSX-R1000, '08 Mitsubishi Lancer GS4 2.0 TDCi, '15 BMW 1 Series 116d Sport Turbo.
CBT: 27/08/08. Theory: 04/09/09. Module 1: 16/09/09. Module 2: 01/10/09.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 14 years, 254 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Dear Auntie BCF... All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.12 Sec - Server Load: 0.8 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 118.48 Kb