Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Hi Viz Confusion

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message
junglejim This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:58 - 21 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm finding it hard to get my rage on about this particular issue for what I assume are fairly obvious reasons. Embarassed
<--------------

It does seem a bit like French Whispers. Maybe try at Bike Club France?
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

gorillaonabik...
Nearly there...



Joined: 31 Jul 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 03:04 - 25 Jan 2012    Post subject: Re: Hi Viz Confusion Reply with quote

junglejim wrote:
Like many here, I'm very concerned at the prospect of being forced to wear Hi Viz clothing and I'm reading a lot it on various forums.
My initial outrage has turned to confusion because despite spending a long time searching, I can find no confirmation of these new laws from official sources.

Perhaps something from the French DOT, outlining the requirements.
Thanks.


You can stop being confused as I have the French law. I posted something on the George White thingy but here is the link to the French law:

https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000025083522&dateTexte&categorieLien=id

It comes into effect 1st Jan 2013.

The legal reference is NOR : IOCA1126729D N°2012-3

That is the reference number of the decret (law) passed in France so you can get a copy yourself. If you want the requirements, I will translate it for you but MAG and MCN are broadly correct.

Note that the British government is not proposing the legislation currently because it is being proposed in Brussels. I will post the Brussels info when I have an opportunity.

The Brussels legislation is broad-ranging and there will be a number of effects on British motorcyclists, some of which I understand (hi-viz being the easiest to understand) through to anti-tampering which I do not understand. The reason I do not understand the effects is because the laws will need to be interpreted by the British government and this interpretation could mean very few changes for bikers. However, a strict interpretation would be annoying.
____________________
FZR400 (blown engine), ZXR750 (blown engine), ZX6R (accident), CBR600 which had engine issues after which I learned to change gear..., CBR900, CBR924 (stolen), CB600, CB1300 (everything blew up), BMW K1300GT (written off, hit from rear while stationary), Bandit 1250 for a couple of months, Triumph Sprint ST 1050 (nicked) and somewhere in there, I wrote off a Ducati 748 at Cadwell.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
junglejim This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:56 - 02 Mar 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Eh, the French don't usually riot until holiday season.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
junglejim This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

ahaughey536
Borekit Bruiser



Joined: 27 Apr 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:59 - 05 Mar 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Honestly, I'm a learner rider, and after a close call where a silly **** nearly cleaned me out I wear a high vizi jacket at night (mostly) and always have one wrapped around my bag....what harm can it do?
____________________
NSR125R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

mysterious_rider
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:32 - 05 Mar 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

ahaughey536 wrote:
Honestly, I'm a learner rider, and after a close call where a silly **** nearly cleaned me out I wear a high vizi jacket at night (mostly) and always have one wrapped around my bag....what harm can it do?


You might catch the ghey?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ahaughey536
Borekit Bruiser



Joined: 27 Apr 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:55 - 05 Mar 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

I might, but to be honest a sore hole doesn't compare to no hole. lmao
____________________
NSR125R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

st3v3
Super Spammer



Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:20 - 06 Mar 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

ahaughey536 wrote:
Honestly, I'm a learner rider, and after a close call where a silly **** nearly cleaned me out I wear a high vizi jacket at night (mostly) and always have one wrapped around my bag....what harm can it do?
I value my rights, people who don't will never understand.
____________________
Roger wrote: Women don't get damp for clingy puppies. Get some better happy pills, hit the gym & buy a medallion the size of a dinner plate. Job done
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Alpha-9
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Jan 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:07 - 06 Mar 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wear a hivis on my bag which ive tied around the strap so it's kind of a hivis strap thingy... I do it out of preference and because i'm mostly wearing only black


Better safe than sorry Thumbs Up

Beats wearing it anyway, should get some hi-vis tape or something
____________________
Fzr-600 1999
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

keggyhander
World Chat Champion



Joined: 30 Nov 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:22 - 06 Mar 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

st3v3 wrote:
ahaughey536 wrote:
Honestly, I'm a learner rider, and after a close call where a silly **** nearly cleaned me out I wear a high vizi jacket at night (mostly) and always have one wrapped around my bag....what harm can it do?
I value my rights, people who don't will never understand.


I value the right to NOT look like a Dayglo-Derek CBT wobbler, as I passed my test twenty years ago.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:59 - 06 Mar 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

While I choose to embrace the glow, I hereby commit to joining any civil disobedience or legal challenge to making it mandatory in the UK or Paddyland.

Making bikes visible isn't the issue, it's getting drivers who can't or won't look off of the road, ideally before but certainly after they SMIDSY someone.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

st3v3
Super Spammer



Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:08 - 06 Mar 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

keggyhander wrote:
st3v3 wrote:
I value my rights, people who don't will never understand.


I value the right to NOT look like a Dayglo-Derek CBT wobbler, as I passed my test twenty years ago.
I've never worn one, I have a sense of fashion Razz Laughing - I'm not quite sure you took my post rightly, If I choose not to wear one despite a legislation enforcing it, I'm not willing being sanctioned for it. There's no definitive proof to say that bikers not wearing a hi-vis increases accident or fatality rates and I'm not wearing one because some red tape law says I should.

I'm with you on it. Thumbs Up
____________________
Roger wrote: Women don't get damp for clingy puppies. Get some better happy pills, hit the gym & buy a medallion the size of a dinner plate. Job done
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

keggyhander
World Chat Champion



Joined: 30 Nov 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:21 - 06 Mar 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

st3v3 wrote:
I've never worn one, I have a sense of fashion Razz Laughing - I'm not quite sure you took my post rightly, If I choose not to wear one despite a legislation enforcing it, I'm not willing being sanctioned for it. There's no definitive proof to say that bikers not wearing a hi-vis increases accident or fatality rates and I'm not wearing one because some red tape law says I should.

I'm with you on it. Thumbs Up


I think your post sums up my thoughts very precisely.

My prime motivator in this is, indeed, image. I ride a behemoth of a cruiser, airbrushed to fuck (I should be getting it back this weekend) with murals from the film "Excalibur" over a green metal-flake base.

Just how shit would this look with a hi-vis vest sat on top of it. For a start, the colours would clash horribly, darling Wink .

Can you seriously imagine the Hells Angels and the rest of the MC's, MCC's etc riding around with twat-vests on? I speak regularly to some of these guys and their thinking is that they will NEVER wear it. Also, you are persona non grata if you agree with it.

The cruiser guys and backpatchers put up with "Fag" namecalling, but the truth is that it's us who'll be fighting hardest for this nonsense to get binned.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Digit
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 22 Aug 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:13 - 18 Mar 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm feeling a sense of deja vu here, you see, I was around when we were all forced to wear crash helmets, I heard the same objections then.
I was also around when the law required us to use seat belts, same arguments then as well.
I was left for dead by a car driver when on my bike, 'not expected to survive the night' my parents were told. Did the car driver not see me? I don't know, but there has to be the possibility that a high vis jacket could have saved me from the months of recuperation that followed.
I ride high vis!

Roy.
____________________
Happy daze!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

keggyhander
World Chat Champion



Joined: 30 Nov 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:37 - 18 Mar 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Digit wrote:
I don't know, but there has to be the possibility that a high vis jacket could have saved me from the months of recuperation that followed.


A possibility is all it can be.

I defend your right to wear it. In return I expect you to defend my right NOT to.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Digit
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 22 Aug 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:54 - 18 Mar 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
In return I expect you to defend my right NOT to.


Fair point, but as I pointed out I recall the same comments as regards helmets, would you claim the same right to ride bare headed or do you consider that a step too far? The reason I ask is at the time the helmet regs were introduced some people initially refused to comply.
I give 100 % support to individual rights, there are more than enough bloody silly rules as it is, but I also support common sense.
Getting killed 'cos some driver failed to see you is a silly way to go IMO.

Roy.
____________________
Happy daze!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:10 - 18 Mar 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Digit wrote:
Fair point, but as I pointed out I recall the same comments as regards helmets, would you claim the same right to ride bare headed or do you consider that a step too far? The reason I ask is at the time the helmet regs were introduced some people initially refused to comply.
I give 100 % support to individual rights, there are more than enough bloody silly rules as it is, but I also support common sense.
Getting killed 'cos some driver failed to see you is a silly way to go IMO.

Roy.


I agree - in fact we should go a step further... all pedestrians should be forced to wear hi viz too and all cars should be painted yellow. Rolling Eyes
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Digit
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 22 Aug 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:23 - 18 Mar 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Every year the figure for biking deaths is paraded in the press, but not all bikers are lucky enough to be killed outright.
I left hospital amnesiac, epileptic, partially paralysed, deaf in one ear, slurred speech, a concentration span of seconds, unable to walk properly and the side of my face held together with stitches.
It was nearly three years before I recovered, if people wish to risk that for some form of 'fashion statement' then that is their choice.
But trust me, it's not worth it, there are too many dozy car drivers out there!

Roy.
____________________
Happy daze!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Anthrax1039
Nova Slayer



Joined: 13 Nov 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:25 - 18 Mar 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

My two pence is this:

I ride during the day without a high vis*, I'm not a huge fan as it really does ruin the look. During the day if a car driver doesn't notice you then frankly they are just a pillock. It happens.

At night, we are told to ride with lights on. This to us all is common sense, no? So why not just stick a high vis on at night and make yourself a little more conspicuous? At least this way you become more noticeable and in the event of an accident it stands you in better steed as you can argue that the car driver must have been fucking blind not to see such garish attire?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:29 - 18 Mar 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Digit wrote:
Every year the figure for biking deaths is paraded in the press, but not all bikers are lucky enough to be killed outright.
I left hospital amnesiac, epileptic, partially paralysed, deaf in one ear, slurred speech, a concentration span of seconds, unable to walk properly and the side of my face held together with stitches.
It was nearly three years before I recovered, if people wish to risk that for some form of 'fashion statement' then that is their choice.
But trust me, it's not worth it, there are too many dozy car drivers out there!

Roy.


While I feel sorry for your plight I completely disagree with it being a reason to legislate.

Firstly I choose to wear hi viz when I'm out at night and on the morning commute. I also wear a white helmet as that has been shown to make bikers far more visible.

However forcing legislation for safety is a slippery slope:
1. hi viz
2. mandatory white helmets
3. airbag jackets & trousers
4. all bike must have enclosures (like the bmw C1)
5. all bikes must have 3 wheels (like the mp5)
6. all bikes must have 4 wheels.

By forcing people to do anything you infringe their rights to choose. Plus you end up just legislating against the things our skewed ideas of risk demand, horse riding is far more dangerous than biking (just look at the link in roger's sig) yet it's considered an acceptable past time for kids and has far less regulation around it.
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Digit
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 22 Aug 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:36 - 18 Mar 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't accept your logic I'm afraid as it is many years since the helmet rules came in and most certainly did not result in a flood of additional legislation.

Roy.
____________________
Happy daze!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:08 - 18 Mar 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Digit wrote:
I don't accept your logic I'm afraid as it is many years since the helmet rules came in and most certainly did not result in a flood of additional legislation.

Roy.


There has been little for many years until recently. Now we've had the license changes, hi viz in France, 100bhp in many countries in Europe. Cars were the main target for years as they were an easier win.

The problem is that the gains in car safety are much harder to make now which is why they are turning back to bikes.

I hinted at the question earlier, but why shouldn't pedestrians have to wear hi viz in order to cross the road?

I also don't see the logic of your argument which is essentially 'I had a bad crash so now I think I should be able to tell everyone what to do'. If you look at the stats bike accidents are caused roughly 50% by the rider, 50% by others - it doesn't point to an overwhelming amount of bike accidents being smidsys (we just hear about them a lot as they're easy to rant about).

Finally, as has been said before there's no evidence outside of anecdotal that hi viz actually reduces the accident rate (an anecdote the other way - I was smidsy'd in my car - bright blue and sat in the middle of the road! If it couldn't be seen I don't know what would make a biker visible, certainly not hi viz).
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

keggyhander
World Chat Champion



Joined: 30 Nov 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:17 - 18 Mar 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Digit wrote:
I don't accept your logic I'm afraid as it is many years since the helmet rules came in and most certainly did not result in a flood of additional legislation.

Roy.


What, like 125's, two-part tests, and 33bhp restrictions, with many more rules (including Hi-vis) pending?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 14 years, 104 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.17 Sec - Server Load: 1.17 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 136.61 Kb