Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


KTM 200, looks good what do people think?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> New Bikers
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Ribenapigeon
Super Spammer



Joined: 20 Feb 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:33 - 11 Oct 2012    Post subject: KTM 200, looks good what do people think? Reply with quote

https://www.visordown.com/road-tests-first-rides/ktm-200-duke-first-uk-ride-review/21130.html

Looks interesting and as the above review says the sub 300cc market is a bit sparse.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Magnet
Crazy Courier



Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:45 - 11 Oct 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks rather tasty, but I think I would rather pay the extra for a er6n Wink
____________________
It’s not that I’m so smart, it’s just that I stay with problems longer.

GPZ600R Sold, Now ZZR600
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

ukdiceman
Nitrous Nuisance



Joined: 19 Sep 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:14 - 11 Oct 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Either Ride or Bike magazine have a full test on it this month
____________________
FZ6 Fazer
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

P.
Red Rocket



Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:16 - 11 Oct 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Get a proper one... they 690 will be far more enjoyable.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Teflon-Mike
tl;dr



Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:14 - 11 Oct 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
These small capacity bikes seem quite expensive. A Honda CBR125 is £3,400, a Yamaha YZF-R125 is £4,300.

At £3,995 the 200 Duke is just £200 more than the 125 Duke and considering it's got 60% more displacement and at least 60% more thrills, I'd say it's a bargain.


And a Honda CBR250 is £4100, Hyosyng GT250/R £3400/£3700, I cant find a price on the 250 Ninja.

Yeah... why not get a 500 or 650 commuter twin, they are hardly any more money?

I was looking at these the other day, with that exact question in mind, and the answer was..... NUMBERS

Buy prices are close, true, but do a complete cost of ownership exersize over a couple of years of every day commuter work, then the gap widens, quite significantly, and you might be able to run a CBR250 for the full term of its credit deal, to its first MOT and pay for it with what you're not spending on bus-fares. Go up to the bigger bikes, and you're bus fares may pay the HP and go someway towards fuel, but you are starting to pay for the privilege of owning the bigger bike.

I think that the class IS worth more attension, and people ought to consider the merit of a brand new 250 for getting to work, rather than going for something bigger just to massage the ego a bit.. or insisting that they are too expensive and muttering that you dont spend thousands on a brand new bike to save money, and go looking for clapped out thirty year old Super-Dreams or Kawasaki 305's, then moaning that spares are too expensive! These things aren't 'bikes' as we have come to know them; they are a tool, like an angle grinder; something to get the job done, and they can do it very well, and very cheaply, and a brand new one, is barely the price to buy of a second hand sports 600, and pence to run there-after. Under warranty, never been dropped or crashed, its hassle free, trouble free bus-fare beating travel..... and well, you could probably afford to spend a few hundred quid on a cheap 'old' bike for the week-end on a two-bike insurance policy, if you really want extra thrills.

With that kind of outlook; I think that they are all pretty tidy, useful machines, and practically the performance and ecconomy they offer is withing similar boundries. KTM looks good, and is light, GT250 looks big and is heavy; CBR250 is some where between.

On the names and the numbers, I think that Honda reputation would sway me towards the CBR, simply becouse they have more dealers that could service it up and down the country, and theres a known standard of dependability attached to teh brand.

Hyosung, is teh cheapest, but least well supported with poor reputation for dependability. KTM is a bit muddling, and I'd be wary of longer term every day reliability, though hope that as a departure into the realms of every-day road bikes they had worked hard to make this one durable.

For what they are, and what they can do, and what they cost, ultimately, its matter of personaly opinion what's 'best', and whether you value looks over performance, or performance over ecconomy, or convenience over anything.
____________________
My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:49 - 11 Oct 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mmm. Maybe, but I'm much happier on 500 than 250 or 300.

Why go for less bike than you want?

Only to save money.

If you want to save money, why go for a new bike?

If I were counting the pennies, the YBR250 was available up until last year, I'd keep my eyes peeled for that. That'll tide me over until there are used Inazumas on the market (and nobody else wanting them).

I'm bearing in mind that increasingly the young, relatively poor, newly qualified riders who'll be in the market for bikes like these will have got the appropriate license on an NC700S or at least a 500 twin. That's a big step back down.

Sure, it looks like a laugh, but not £4K worth.

I'm really struggling to see the market, unless it's as a 2nd or 3rd bike for fun, rather than as a main one.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Andrew122
Nitrous Nuisance



Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:24 - 11 Oct 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
I'm bearing in mind that increasingly the young, relatively poor, newly qualified riders who'll be in the market for bikes like these will have got the appropriate license on an NC700S or at least a 500 twin. That's a big step back down.

Sure, it looks like a laugh, but not £4K worth.

I have to agree. I tick most of these boxes and wouldn't give this a second look. I really can't see a market for it...
____________________
Restricted licence: 11th May 2012
Daelim Roadwin 125 (Sold) --> Bikeless!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ribenapigeon
Super Spammer



Joined: 20 Feb 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:59 - 11 Oct 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like the look of it as I'm really enjoying my WR125 which is supermoto like the KTM. Bigger supermotos are either way over 300cc or way more expensive. For instance post test I would like the WR250 but its a ridiculous price (over £6000) and heavier than the KTM200 for only a few more bhp.

I know the bike magazines seem to go bonkers over KTM, they seem very "in" at the moment. So I did wonder what the more real world view of KTM is.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Teflon-Mike
tl;dr



Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 03:29 - 12 Oct 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
Mmm. Maybe, but I'm much happier on 500 than 250 or 300.
You have had a mini-fleet at your disposal, how often did you elect to use the 125 over the 300 or 250?
I know what you mean, and I DO appreciate being on my 750 over the tiddlers... most of the time....... used to get a bit wearing following newbs about thinking "Why am I wasting rubber squaring my tyres on this, when I dont go fast enough to get out of third gear!"......but, with the right mind-set, appreciating a bike for what it is, rather than deploring it for what its not, almost anything with an engine can still be 'fun'.

Even Snowies Chinky Cruiserette thing made me grin quite often.... usually when wafting past a petrol station (very, very slowly!) and thinking "Ha! £1.38 a litre and I don't need ANY!" I'll admit, it was very SMALL schadenfreude, but still!

Rogerborg wrote:
Why go for less bike than you want?

Only to save money.


Well you can only save it, if you have it...... there's the first incentive.

How often on here do we see people buying more bike than they need to fulfil their 'wants' and then struggling to keep it maintained?

Rogerborg wrote:
If you want to save money, why go for a new bike?


Back to the number crunching, and having the money to be able to save money. Brand new, can make them easier to buy than a second hand bike.

Easy credit for one; possible trade in another. No cash and a clapped out CG after your test? Well, ride into a dealers, get £500 trade in off the CG as the money down, sign on the line for £80 a month interest free, ride out. No hassle selling your bike, dealing with tyre kickers, then having no bike to go trudge round bikes in the classifieds, and worrying how to get them home.

Yeah, the dirty word 'Depreciation', bike looses 30% of its sticker value moment you wheel it out the showroom door, but thats only an influence if you intend selling it moment you wheel it out teh showroom door!

Ride the damn thing, the reason we presume you'd buy it, and you get the value from its use; and brand new, suggests it ought to be a long time before you need worry about buying new tyres or chain & sprockets, brake pads or other annoying incidentals like replacing bulbs or shock-absorbers or forks seals. Heck, dont even have to take it for an MOT for three years!

Three years? Could be the life of the credit deal, and all in, bike paid for by what you would have spent on bus fares, and you have effectively a 'free' bike, worth whatever it might sell for with its first MOT cert fresh in your hand.

Rogerborg wrote:
If I were counting the pennies, the YBR250 was available up until last year, I'd keep my eyes peeled for that. That'll tide me over until there are used Inazumas on the market (and nobody else wanting them)


Yes, second hand could be cheaper, IF you are canny, and can buy young enough that depreciation has left market value a smaller % of sticker price than the mileage has worn out useful 'life'....

But you have to be pretty cute to find those savings, and lucky enough to find a bike that will do it, AND have the hard cash in your pocket up-front.

Rogerborg wrote:
I'm bearing in mind that increasingly the young, relatively poor, newly qualified riders who'll be in the market for bikes like these will have got the appropriate license on an NC700S or at least a 500 twin. That's a big step back down.


Hmmm... yeah, sort of... BUT.... what did you learn to drive a car in?

Me? 1987, it was a D-Reg (brand-new) Ford Fiesta 1.6 Ghia.... I spent twelve hours behind the wheel with my driving instructor.

What was my first car? A 1957 Morris Minor, a year later when I had saved up enough to buy it.

Similar story for most; my best mate, who I STILL havent forgiven for passing is driving test a week before me, despite his birthday being three weeks after mine, as test center cancelled my test appointment due to bad weather...... he learned to drive in his Dad's 3-year old VW Passat... his first car was a ten year old Escort 11oo.

And similar story for most of my mates learning to drive 25 odd years ago, in mummy or daddy or driving school cars, then when they could afford it buying old bangers as all we could afford.

Its not a huge leap; and after shelling out to do a Riding Course, on a 'big-bike' a 250 is still a step up from a 125 or even just 'nothing'!

So the 'come-down' is really only pscycological.

Rogerborg wrote:
Sure, it looks like a laugh, but not £4K worth.


Hmmm... I would tend to agree with you. I walked away from a very tasty Super-Black-Bird two years ago for that money. Might be one of the worlds fastest production bikes and a very accomplished all-round super-sporting tourer... but... £4K.... nope I couldn't rationalise 170mph as 4K's worth of fun..... so there is no way that I can rationalise an 80-90mph tiddler as justifying £4K of fun!

BUT, I CAN rationalise one as £4K's worth of work-horse earning its keep getting some-one to work and back..... And any fun it offers beyond that a bit of a bonus!

Rogerborg wrote:
I'm really struggling to see the market, unless it's as a 2nd or 3rd bike for fun, rather than as a main one.


I think its the other way round Rog... I CAN see the market for these; and we see it here when newbs start asking about 125's as cheaper than car commuter fare, or youngsters ask about good first bikes to get to and from college.

As a 'main-bike' they actually make more sense than anything else. They are earning thier keep, being cheap and dependable and hopefully hassle free.

The bread and butter winning, get to work and dont have to make an excuse to the boss for turning up an hour late covered in oil, transport 'needs' fullfilled, for minimum money/hassle.... then you can go think about having fun with the jam earned in the over time, you can do in the time you aren't spending trying to DIY service the bike!

Fifteen years ago, when the ex passed her car test and moaned that she needed wheels to ferry kids about..... I was breaking myself to afford to keep the VF1000 on the road so I could leave the car behind for her, AND afford to put the petrol she wanted in it.

Back to where we started; one of these things might not be the bike I WANTED, but, trying to fit in work/family/play balence, something like one of these COULD play a pretty useful role for many people, if we gave them more credit and didn't dismiss them so readily.
____________________
My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

P.
Red Rocket



Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:56 - 12 Oct 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Boozehawk wrote:
I like the look of it as I'm really enjoying my WR125 which is supermoto like the KTM. Bigger supermotos are either way over 300cc or way more expensive. For instance post test I would like the WR250 but its a ridiculous price (over £6000) and heavier than the KTM200 for only a few more bhp.

I know the bike magazines seem to go bonkers over KTM, they seem very "in" at the moment. So I did wonder what the more real world view of KTM is.


So buy a used TT600R, SM wheels and downgear it.

I had fun on it
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

nowhere.elysium
The Pork Lord



Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:01 - 12 Oct 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

It looks like it costs a retarded amount for what you get.

Pity, because I wouldn't mind a nice 2-300cc single. No way I'd buy one new, though; definitely not at those prices.
____________________
'10 SV650SF, '83 GS650GT (it lives!), Questionable DIY dash project, 3D Printer project, Lasercutter project
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

BigJoe78
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 09 Jul 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:43 - 12 Oct 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its neither one thing nor t'other.
Well below 33bhp for those on restricted and obviously not learner legal so seems a bit pointless
____________________
2013 ZX6R 636
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ribenapigeon
Super Spammer



Joined: 20 Feb 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:50 - 12 Oct 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes it is odd at 200cc would have thought 250cc would have made more sense.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 13 years, 81 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> New Bikers All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.09 Sec - Server Load: 1.1 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 91.24 Kb