|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Derivative |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Derivative World Chat Champion
Joined: 03 Aug 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| BigDan1190 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 BigDan1190 Could Be A Chat Bot

Joined: 03 Mar 2010 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 22:24 - 26 Dec 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
Yup.
These are the ones you wan't mate;
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Soundmagic-PL30-In-Ear-Headphones-/281042937319?pt=UK_AudioVisualElectronics_HomeAudioHiFi_Headphones&hash=item416f76e5e7
Swap the rubber tips for the provided foam tips. The wire hooks over your ear, but the best bit is the earphone itself sits in your ear canal and the rest of your plastic fit in the rest of your ear - if you understand my meaning. They sit flat against your head, so the helmet won't push them in any further.
I always wear mine, then wear a balaclava/neckwarmer over my ears so when putting the helmet on it won't pull them out. I've tried several earphones and those ones right there are the best of the best.
Cheers,
Dan
EDIT: I didn't find you the best price there, so be sure to search the net before buying. Soundmagic PL30.
Last edited by BigDan1190 on 22:25 - 26 Dec 2012; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| mysterious_rider |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 mysterious_rider World Chat Champion

Joined: 11 Sep 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 22:33 - 26 Dec 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
£3.40 of silicone putty, mould those puppies (plus at least one more set) into your lugs, job done. ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| BigDan1190 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 BigDan1190 Could Be A Chat Bot

Joined: 03 Mar 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Derivative |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Derivative World Chat Champion
Joined: 03 Aug 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| BigDan1190 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 BigDan1190 Could Be A Chat Bot

Joined: 03 Mar 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| moppy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 moppy World Chat Champion

Joined: 25 Apr 2011 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 00:58 - 27 Dec 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
Are you confusing Noise Cancelling with Noise Isolating?
Two different dogs.
Cancelling assumes there is 'active' noise cancelling where an opposing noise is produced to 'cancel' the noise you do not want to hear. But not affect the noise you want to hear. They really only work for repetitive noises such as engine drone. Boom boom boom. But not so good for wind noise. Ssssssh ssssh sssssh..
Noise Isolating blocks out external noise by filling your ear canal with rubber/foam which will block outside noise and by flexing will absorb some noise too.
Noise cancelling are much more expensive than isolating but the cancelling system can be overwhelmed by wind noise so you can get interruptions and poor sound quality when worn inside a helmet blasting through the air. ____________________ W-ireless A-rtificial L-ifeform L-imited to O-bservation P-eacekeeping and E-fficient R-epair |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| barrkel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 barrkel World Chat Champion
Joined: 30 Jul 2012 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 01:44 - 27 Dec 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
I have some Soundmagic earbuds - not exactly the same style linked here, but somewhat similar, PL50 - and they are by some distance the worst headphones I've ever listened to music on in my life. Appalling sound quality, tinniest wateriest piss dribbling out into my ear canal.
Only place I use active noise cancelling is on planes, where I use Sennheiser PXC 450s. Expensive (I paid 200 for mine), but they work. I used to have to do transatlantic trips for my job, well worth it.
My current go-to earbuds for sound isolation and music under a helmet are Sennheiser CX 500s, which were linked to by someone here on BCF. Much much better sound quality, and fairly decent isolation (but not active cancellation). And cheaper than the PL30 linked above.
The PL50 was so bad I suspect the company that makes them either changed production methods, or has serious QA issues. Read the 1-star reviews on Amazon that describe them as having no bass whatsoever. That was my experience with them. If they had cost 99p I thought they would still be overpriced. The PL50s are also a poor shape to fit under helmets; the wire needs looping over the back of the ear, and it hurts after a few hours of being pinched there. Hours of wearing earphones is, naturally, my primary use case - boring motorway riding. ____________________ Bikes: S1000R, SH350; Exes: Vity 125, PS125, YBR125, ER6f, VFR800, Brutale 920, CB600F, SH300x4
Best road ever ridden: www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2MhNxUEYtQ |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 02:33 - 27 Dec 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
| barrkel wrote: | I have some Soundmagic earbuds - not exactly the same style linked here, but somewhat similar, PL50 - and they are by some distance the worst headphones I've ever listened to music on in my life. Appalling sound quality, tinniest wateriest piss dribbling out into my ear canal.
Only place I use active noise cancelling is on planes, where I use Sennheiser PXC 450s. Expensive (I paid 200 for mine), but they work. I used to have to do transatlantic trips for my job, well worth it.
My current go-to earbuds for sound isolation and music under a helmet are Sennheiser CX 500s, which were linked to by someone here on BCF. Much much better sound quality, and fairly decent isolation (but not active cancellation). And cheaper than the PL30 linked above.
The PL50 was so bad I suspect the company that makes them either changed production methods, or has serious QA issues. Read the 1-star reviews on Amazon that describe them as having no bass whatsoever. That was my experience with them. If they had cost 99p I thought they would still be overpriced. The PL50s are also a poor shape to fit under helmets; the wire needs looping over the back of the ear, and it hurts after a few hours of being pinched there. Hours of wearing earphones is, naturally, my primary use case - boring motorway riding. |
I handed a pair of Sennheiser earphones back to duty free at AMS. Shite. I wouldn't touch them again as the engineer who told me they tested fine was talking pony too.
I also use earphones on flights so I know the pish from the decent.
My favourites were Shure SE315 but then I got a pair of Sony Noise Cancelling which are cheaper than Shure but were cancelling rather than isolation.
I now use Bose quiet comfort as they are the best most comfy with excellent reproduction. But not cheap and useless under a helmet  ____________________ W-ireless A-rtificial L-ifeform L-imited to O-bservation P-eacekeeping and E-fficient R-epair |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Benno |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Benno World Chat Champion

Joined: 06 May 2012 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Dean-J |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Dean-J Crazy Courier
Joined: 30 Oct 2011 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 09:03 - 27 Dec 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
Im with Rogerborg on this, i moulded a set of standard samsung earbuds into some putty, comfortable and keep them firmly in place. Also has the benefit of removing the outside noise from the equstion so you can listen to the music at much more sensible levels  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 11:12 - 27 Dec 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Derivative wrote: | It seems like the putty in combination with earbuds could be viable if you stop it from getting into the speaker somehow, though. Perhaps some tape and a knife to cut a hole in the end. |
Just wrap a little of the putty loosely around the bud without covering the tip, shove it all in, then use your fingers to push the rest of the putty in securely.
I made a hash of the first set by using too much putty. You only want to use enough to fill the inner bit of your lugs:
https://i47.tinypic.com/5tcfb.jpg
£3.40 gets enough for two sets (or two goes), versus £20+ for PL30s. ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Maruchino |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Maruchino Spanner Monkey
Joined: 02 Jul 2009 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 13:29 - 27 Dec 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
Etymotic ear buds are what you want for proper noise isolation. Work a treat for me.
https://www.etymotic.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 13:52 - 27 Dec 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
They are fine so long as your ear canal can tolerate them. Sometimes the pressure exerted on the sensitive area there makes some designs uncomfortable. For some folks. ____________________ W-ireless A-rtificial L-ifeform L-imited to O-bservation P-eacekeeping and E-fficient R-epair |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Maruchino |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Maruchino Spanner Monkey
Joined: 02 Jul 2009 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 14:25 - 27 Dec 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Walloper wrote: |
They are fine so long as your ear canal can tolerate them. Sometimes the pressure exerted on the sensitive area there makes some designs uncomfortable. For some folks. |
They come with four different types of earbuds for this very reason - I find the triple flange to be uncomfortable (both sizes), but the foam ones are perfect (so much so I never bothered trying the glider shape) |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| barrkel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 barrkel World Chat Champion
Joined: 30 Jul 2012 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 14:44 - 27 Dec 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Walloper wrote: | I handed a pair of Sennheiser earphones back to duty free at AMS. Shite. I wouldn't touch them again as the engineer who told me they tested fine was talking pony too. |
I'm no audiophile - I don't troll head-fi.org, I don't own any Grados, in fact I don't own any open-backed headphones at all - but the Sennheiser PXC 450 with sound cancelling disabled are definitely the clearest headphones I own. That is, I can hear every instrument more distinctly when I focus on them, when listening via those headphones. Bass is not over-emphasized, but still very clear. I chose them over the Bose QC because they are over-ear headphones that fit my ears, the QCs are rather smaller. I know, from long LAN gaming sessions as a teenager, that headphones pressing on my ears makes them hurt after a few hours.
The CX 500 have reasonably meaty bass, which suits the kind of music I play when riding - unsubtle.
The SoundMagic PL50 even sucked listening to podcasts - made everything sound like AM radio. ____________________ Bikes: S1000R, SH350; Exes: Vity 125, PS125, YBR125, ER6f, VFR800, Brutale 920, CB600F, SH300x4
Best road ever ridden: www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2MhNxUEYtQ |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 15:48 - 27 Dec 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
| barrkel wrote: | | Walloper wrote: | I handed a pair of Sennheiser earphones back to duty free at AMS. Shite. I wouldn't touch them again as the engineer who told me they tested fine was talking pony too. |
I'm no audiophile - I don't troll head-fi.org, I don't own any Grados, in fact I don't own any open-backed headphones at all - but the Sennheiser PXC 450 with sound cancelling disabled are definitely the clearest headphones I own. That is, I can hear every instrument more distinctly when I focus on them, when listening via those headphones. Bass is not over-emphasized, but still very clear. I chose them over the Bose QC because they are over-ear headphones that fit my ears, the QCs are rather smaller. I know, from long LAN gaming sessions as a teenager, that headphones pressing on my ears makes them hurt after a few hours.
The CX 500 have reasonably meaty bass, which suits the kind of music I play when riding - unsubtle.
The SoundMagic PL50 even sucked listening to podcasts - made everything sound like AM radio. |
Agree with this, I also would not expect proper reproduction from cheaper earphones. The Sennheiser I took back were those spastiod ones where they rest against the outside of your ear canal not inside and not on the outside. They problem with them was they let in surrounding noise and the volume was so low I couldn't hear my iPlod unless in a very quiet place.
I'm a bit anal about ear protection at work and on the bike and have hearing tests every year. At present I have 20-20 hearing and would prefer to keep it like that.
I guess Sennheiser do make a decent product, if you find something which suits but since the Sennheiser engineer I talked to would not 'listen' to my complaint I thought it better no to buy any more of their stuff (shite).  ____________________ W-ireless A-rtificial L-ifeform L-imited to O-bservation P-eacekeeping and E-fficient R-epair |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| BigDan1190 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 BigDan1190 Could Be A Chat Bot

Joined: 03 Mar 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 18:44 - 27 Dec 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
| BigDan wrote: | Oh my god... Why the fuck are we overcomplicating this?
Yes, noise cancelling is different to noise isolating. Who gives a fuck for this application?! The guy wants something that stops the wind noise, and plays music. We don't need to preach about the specific technologies, and we don't even need to discuss sound quality that much - incidentally, the PL30s I linked to above are excellent sound quality, and very comfortable. Perfect for wearing underneath a bike helmet - this is a thread about recommending headphones.
Also, in reply to rogerborg, yet again you've missed the point. We want EARPHONES, not EARPLUGS. Your £3.40 x 2 doesn't include the cost of some extra headphones to bodge into the putty.
Seriously. Stop the overcomplication. |
The Quiet Revolution:
The new S1 Digital general aviation headset was specially developed for pilots of single- and twin-engine propeller aircraft respectively helicopter and ensures safe and reliable voice communication, easy control, outstanding audio quality, and wearing comfort. At the heart of this technical innovation is the new Digital Adaptive NoiseGard™ system, a technology that sets entirely new standards in the field of noise compensation and makes the dream of flight even safer. With a push of button the headset adapts to the noise environment in the cockpit within seconds.
For the development of the S1 Digital, Sennheiser found a perfect partner in BMW Group DesignworksUSA. The result of their collaboration are groundbreaking features such as a special eyeglass zone, treble boost control and adjustable contact pressure. The Bluetooth wireless interface lets you connect your headset to a cell phone and MP3 player and makes listening above the clouds an unforgettable experience.
Features
Smart Update digital ANR customizes noise reduction to the user’s aircraft environment
Headband tension adjustment for customized comfort
Foldable ear cups
Treble boost for customized audio clarity
Peak-level protection for hearing safety
Ear-pad comfort zones do not squeeze on user‘s glasses
Specially designed communication and music filters optimize sound quality
Bluetooth phone and music connectivity
Built-in mic bias voltage for cell-phone use
Fail safe operation - headset can be used as a conventional, passive headset in case of power failure
Delivery Includes
1 S1 DIGITAL headset
1 Transport case for headset and accessories
1 Cable clip
1 Belt clip
1 Wind and pop screen
1 Quick Guide
1 Operating instructions ____________________ W-ireless A-rtificial L-ifeform L-imited to O-bservation P-eacekeeping and E-fficient R-epair |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| BigDan1190 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 BigDan1190 Could Be A Chat Bot

Joined: 03 Mar 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 13 years, 93 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|