Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Bigger Engine = More Sever Injury

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

james1988
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 May 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:11 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Bigger Engine = More Sever Injury Reply with quote

Hello,

I've been having a discussion (in the losest sense of the word) in work this morning about biking and injuries. The general consesus seems to be the larger the engine the worse the injury to the rider should they have an accident.

My view is that 60mph is 60mph if your on a 125cc or a 1000cc and therefore you can almost negate engine size when it comes to injury (unless the bike fell on you, I would imagine it would do more damage).

Am I being stupid or does my argument make sense?

Sorry for shit formatting; I'm on my phone.

James
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Bendy
Mrs Sensible



Joined: 10 Jun 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:18 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

My brain can't quite comprehend this one so early in the morning. Cool
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Pete.
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:19 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

You're looking at it too simplistically. 60mph is indeed 60mph, but a bigger engine means more mass, more kinetic energy when moving etc. If you're going to be near a sliding uncontrolled mass the lighter it is the better for you.

Take speed out of the equation, would you rather tip over at a standstill and get your leg trapped under a moped or a Pan Euro?
____________________
a.k.a 'Geri'

132.9mph off and walked away. Gear is good, gear is good, gear is very very good Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Jim Mc
Nearly there...



Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:23 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

But would you rather die on a shitty moped or in a ball of flames on a super sports?

Apologies to anyone who likes mopeds. Wink
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Pete.
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:27 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jim Mc wrote:
But would you rather die on a shitty moped or in a ball of flames on a super sports?

Apologies to anyone who likes mopeds. Wink


No self-respecting dead person would want to be seen alive on a moped.
____________________
a.k.a 'Geri'

132.9mph off and walked away. Gear is good, gear is good, gear is very very good Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Eddie Hitler
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:39 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Too many factors. Size of the bike is one of them, but negligible IMO. I found it annoying when friends and family gasted at me when I rocked up on a 1000cc. "You'll hurt yourself on that!" was common. Neutral
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

CarlosCBR
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:45 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jim Mc wrote:
But would you rather die on a shitty moped or in a ball of flames on a super sports?


What about f you died in a ball of flames on a shitty moped? I fear this may upset the equilibrium of the earth though so is best avoided.
____________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OPv5mDPQ14

https://www.facebook.com/carl.simmonds.7
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

james1988
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 May 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:06 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Eddie Hitler wrote:
Too many factors. Size of the bike is one of them, but negligible IMO. I found it annoying when friends and family gasted at me when I rocked up on a 1000cc. "You'll hurt yourself on that!" was common. Neutral


This is what I was trying to get at in work. Size doesn't necessarily mean that greater injury will be caused.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:26 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

The EU did a study on Engine power vs injuries back in the early '90s. They found no correlation between the two, and found that there was no need for a blanket 100bhp power limit on motorcycles.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Recluso
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 16 Mar 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:35 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seeing how many kids seem to kill themselves on 50cc's and 125's I think the argument is pretty moot Wink

I don't think it can really be effectively generalised as there's far too many variable to consider. If you're looking purely at the speed aspect then yes, it could be suggested that a larger capacity machine has the potential to faceplant you into a wall pretty effectively.

But looking at it as a whole, it's not really as cut and dry as 'big engine = instadeath' imo.


Very contemplative question for the time of the morning! Put your brain back to sleep!
____________________
'Just erotic. Nothing kinky. It's the difference between using a feather and using a chicken.'
Honda PS125i > Yamaha YBR125 > Yamaha XJ6 Diversion > Yamaha Tracer 900
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

andyscooter
World Chat Champion



Joined: 30 May 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:48 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

i get similer

i wear a textile bike jacket on my 100cc

why do you wear all that on a scooter is normally the one i get asked

because 50 mph is 50mph whatever your riding and it hurts the same when you fall off is my normal answer
____________________
gilera runner vxr200 (chavped)
if its spelt wrong its my fat fingers and daft auto correct on my tablet
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Bikermice
Nova Slayer



Joined: 16 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:01 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

I know your thread talks about the moment you crash, but surely the moments leading up to a crash are also a factor? I mean, a 125 might be lighter but generally has thinner tyres, might also only have 1 disc up front and drum on the back - whereas a 1000cc would have 2x discs up front and disc at the back, wider and better tyres etc. I also suspect that during a low-side crash, a big bike would be less likely to flip around due to the weight?

Like you say, far too many variables to generalise. I find it insulting when people say you're going to kill yourself on a bike, as it suggests that everyone on a bike just opens the throttle and closes their eyes. Fact is most of us ride a lot safer than cagers because we're more vulnerable.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

mysterious_rider
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:47 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bikermice wrote:
I know your thread talks about the moment you crash, but surely the moments leading up to a crash are also a factor? I mean, a 125 might be lighter but generally has thinner tyres, might also only have 1 disc up front and drum on the back - whereas a 1000cc would have 2x discs up front and disc at the back, wider and better tyres etc. I also suspect that during a low-side crash, a big bike would be less likely to flip around due to the weight?

Like you say, far too many variables to generalise. I find it insulting when people say you're going to kill yourself on a bike, as it suggests that everyone on a bike just opens the throttle and closes their eyes. Fact is most of us ride a lot safer than cagers because we're more vulnerable.



Errr Laughing I think most of us ride bikes for the thrill, Which now and again means breaking speed limits. Cool
____________________
KAWASAKIIIII
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:59 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Their claim, their burden of proof. Describe the scenarios, explain where the damage is coming from.

Against that extra weight flipping and sliding around, there's the fact that a bigger bike is less likely to get into an accident at any given speed in the first place due to being more visible and turning and stopping better.

Why are you arguing with ignorants anyway? You'll only get dumb all over you, and you'll never shake their conviction that bike = death and big bike = megadeath.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Wonko The Sane
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Jan 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:01 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bikermice wrote:
I know your thread talks about the moment you crash, but surely the moments leading up to a crash are also a factor? I mean, a 125 might be lighter but generally has thinner tyres, might also only have 1 disc up front and drum on the back - whereas a 1000cc would have 2x discs up front and disc at the back, wider and better tyres etc. I also suspect that during a low-side crash, a big bike would be less likely to flip around due to the weight?

Like you say, far too many variables to generalise. I find it insulting when people say you're going to kill yourself on a bike, as it suggests that everyone on a bike just opens the throttle and closes their eyes. Fact is most of us ride a lot safer than cagers because we're more vulnerable.


personally I'd rather have my varadero land on me than a pan-european
given the choice between the varadero and a CG125, i'll take the CG

having been riding my Varadero with it's single front disk, it definitely has enough stopping power, however, double the weight of the bike and it might struggle a bit, hence the twin set ups on heavier bikes or bikes intended for higher speed / racing.

I've seen a couple of crash vids on youtube, which is where the following opinion has been formed, a larger bike seems to have more mass which needs to be displaced, as such it's not uncommon for a bike to roll or flip whereas people falling off 125's, the bike seems to slide as though it doesn't gain enough grip and resistance to sliding to cause it to flip.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Walloper
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:09 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pete. wrote:
You're looking at it too simplistically. 60mph is indeed 60mph, but a bigger engine means more mass, more kinetic energy when moving etc. If you're going to be near a sliding uncontrolled mass the lighter it is the better for you.

Take speed out of the equation, would you rather tip over at a standstill and get your leg trapped under a moped or a Pan Euro?



The size or mass of the thang (mass A) which propels another mass (Mass B) has not relationship to how much energy the other mass can impart on another mass (Mass C).

For sure the only possible scenario where a bigger mass (A) will effect the energy in the smaller mass (B) is when the smaller mass (B) is between the bigger mass (A) and the 'immovable' mass (C).


So getting off a litre bike at 60 MPH will have exactly the same physical effect as far as (B) is concerned as stepping of a 49cc bike at 60 MPH.

And it is 'a splitting of the hair' to decide which mass I would rather be crushed/blootered by at 60 MPH. Smile
____________________
W-ireless A-rtificial L-ifeform L-imited to O-bservation P-eacekeeping and E-fficient R-epair
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

recman
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Mar 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:17 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the subject of bike safety equations, here's one I often get asked by the dolts at work.
"Why do need to put all that gear on when you only live a few minutes away?" Rolling Eyes

I answer with the question; "Who helps you tie your shoes?". Wink

Walloper wrote:
blootered


I do believe that's a brand new word, well done sir. Thumbs Up
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Wonko The Sane
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Jan 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:26 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

The thing to remember with bigger more powerful bikes is that the throttle is not an on/off switch...



unless you're on a 125cc :p
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Walloper
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:27 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

qb78 wrote:
On the subject of bike safety equations, here's one I often get asked by the dolts at work.
"Why do need to put all that gear on when you only live a few minutes away?" Rolling Eyes

I answer with the question; "Who helps you tie your shoes?". Wink

Walloper wrote:
blootered


I do believe that's a brand new word, well done sir. Thumbs Up


I think it's onomatopoeia and can describe one's personal state of inebriation or that of another's or the degree of severity for a blow given or received.
____________________
W-ireless A-rtificial L-ifeform L-imited to O-bservation P-eacekeeping and E-fficient R-epair
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Walloper
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:29 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Black Sheep wrote:
The thing to remember with bigger more powerful bikes is that the throttle is not an on/off switch...



unless you're on a 125cc :p


Knickers... If you give it too much throttle it will throw you off.

Wink
____________________
W-ireless A-rtificial L-ifeform L-imited to O-bservation P-eacekeeping and E-fficient R-epair
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Fizzer Thou
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 Aug 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:32 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is a paragraph in this study

https://www.bikechatforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=265138

...that tries to "suggest" that a bigger bike is more likely to cause a more severe injury.

What concerns me most is if someone in Guvingmunt wants to ban us oldies from riding bikes over a certain size "just in case I might hurt myself"
____________________
Just talk bikes.What else is there?

Always have a 'Plan B'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Fizzer Thou
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 Aug 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:34 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

qb78 wrote:
On the subject of bike safety equations, here's one I often get asked by the dolts at work.
"Why do need to put all that gear on when you only live a few minutes away?" Rolling Eyes

I answer with the question; "Who helps you tie your shoes?". Wink

Walloper wrote:
blootered


I do believe that's a brand new word, well done sir. Thumbs Up


https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Blooter
____________________
Just talk bikes.What else is there?

Always have a 'Plan B'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

iMark
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Nov 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:34 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Depends on circumstances...
What were you doing at the time of 60mph?
Just cruising along at 60 on a smaller cc?
Giving it WOT out of a bend at 60 on a litre?

Generally I say more accidents happen on smaller bikes though because of younger, less mature... pedbois being prats


qb78 wrote:

Walloper wrote:
blootered


I do believe that's a brand new word, well done sir. Thumbs Up


Last time I used blootered it was when talking about some drunk... Razz
____________________
K8 GSXR 1000
"G" : you got him to have a look at a forum which seems to have established a picture of an erect penis in a cat's mouth as it's mascot and thought he might consider it ok?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Im-a-Ridah
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:42 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is kind of like the falacy peddled by the cops that speed kills, which is complete nonsense. Not being able to react in time, not being able to slow down in time, not bothering to look or think at all... these are real killers.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:42 - 07 Feb 2013    Post subject: Re: Bigger Engine = More Sever Injury Reply with quote

Given two equal low sides, the size of the engine isn't going to make much difference unless the impact of the bike is an issue - but the the fully faired GT125R comet thingy actually doesn't weigh THAT much less than a CBR1000RR say!

However, if you're sitting at 60mph on the 125 and twist the throttle hard, not much is going to happen. On the 1000cc bike in a low gear either the front is likely to come up or the rear lose traction.

Further, the 1000cc will probably go from 0 to 120mph quicker than the the 125 will get to 60 - so for the same 'effort' you can be going at twice the speed.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 12 years, 250 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.15 Sec - Server Load: 0.88 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 134.91 Kb