|
|
| Author |
Message |
| headlamp |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 headlamp World Chat Champion

Joined: 26 Nov 2003 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 14:30 - 03 Dec 2004 Post subject: This seems like a good idea |
 |
|
Just saw this article in today's London Evening Standard.
I think the idea should be extended to all three lane A roads as well. Whilst they are at it they should ban vans from lane three too! ____________________ Using a mobile phone while driving a car should be made a capital offence! |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stryker |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stryker Brolly Dolly

Joined: 30 Aug 2004 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 14:35 - 03 Dec 2004 Post subject: |
 |
|
OH for the love of God, FINALLY!
Its about time someone took notice of that! I assume they mean this is in force during rush hour?
* They cause delays overtaking each other at a diff of 1mph.
* This will also cut down on accidents as they've no reason to swing from lane to lane any more.
* No more lorries in lane three. If they are not meant to be in lane 2 no FOOKIN way are they going to be in lane 3.
 ____________________ Now what? |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| dodsi |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 dodsi Dirty Carny

Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| fazed |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 fazed Korn is my hero!

Joined: 21 Apr 2004 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 14:49 - 03 Dec 2004 Post subject: |
 |
|
Yay ! Finally a good idea . That will stop Mr truck driver 1 overtaking Mr truck driver 2 at 57mph when Mr truck driver 1 is doing 56 , on the M26 , thats one thing what actually annoys the £$*% out of me .  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| innominate |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 innominate Brolly Dolly

Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| headlamp |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 headlamp World Chat Champion

Joined: 26 Nov 2003 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| TheShaggyDA |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TheShaggyDA Repost Police

Joined: 14 Jun 2004 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 15:29 - 03 Dec 2004 Post subject: |
 |
|
Coming home on the M1 on my Enfield wednesday night, I was sitting behind a lorry at 60. An artic started his overtake, and it took him one mile to get parallel with the one in front of me, and another mile and a half to pass it and pull in. He then hit his brakes, as he'd moved back to lane 1 just as another artic was joining from the slip road. Talk about a rolling roadblock.
Freight should be moved to trains, so only local deliveries are required, leaving the countries arteries unclogged, IMHO. ____________________ Current: CB500 Previous: CB100N, CB250RS, XJ900F, GT550, GPZ750R/1000RX, AJS M16, R100RT, Enfield Bullet
[i:6e3bfc7581]But still I fear and still I dare not laugh at the madman...[/i:6e3bfc7581] |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| zx636 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 zx636 Scooby Slapper
Joined: 28 Jul 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Bendy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Bendy Mrs Sensible

Joined: 10 Jun 2002 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Git |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Git Brolly Dolly
Joined: 17 Dec 2003 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| zx636 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 zx636 Scooby Slapper
Joined: 28 Jul 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| zx636 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 zx636 Scooby Slapper
Joined: 28 Jul 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Git |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Git Brolly Dolly
Joined: 17 Dec 2003 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 15:42 - 03 Dec 2004 Post subject: |
 |
|
The one what?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Harold_Shand |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Harold_Shand World Chat Champion

Joined: 07 Jun 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| zx636 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 zx636 Scooby Slapper
Joined: 28 Jul 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Git |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Git Brolly Dolly
Joined: 17 Dec 2003 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 16:01 - 03 Dec 2004 Post subject: |
 |
|
Hi
There are some lorry drivers who take the mickey but many are fine. I agree with the point above that the best thing to do would be to remove the speed limiters from them (and they are currently speed limited to 56mph when the actual speed limit for them on the motorway is 60mph). The M42 was a nightmare in the morning, being a 2 lane motorway (much of its length) with regularly lorries blocking the overtaking lane.
Rather than limiting them to the left hand lane some kind of ruling how long an overtaking maneovre can take would be reasonable. For example, in the example above of the 2.5 mile overtaking manoevre then it would possibly be reasonable to prosecute them for driving without due consideration (and pulling them over and spending half an hour checking their documents would act as a pretty good penalty on its own, especially if that means they now need to park up overnight to avoid going over their hours).
While putting traffic onto the railways might appeal, in reality it would not be cost effective. You would land up with 2 lorries rather than one (one to a rail depot, one from). Journies would take far longer which would screw up various bits of "just in time" inventory keeping. Massive subsidies would be required to make the railways even vaguely cost effective when compared to the roads (passenger subsidies on the railways up over 30p per passenger mile in some areas, and the ticket prices are still hideous). Some could certainly be effectively carried by railways, but probably only those where there is a large volume of business going from one particular destination to another particular destination. Works well for coal for power stations, and could work well with (for example) the cars from Toyota near Derby heading to a port for export.
It is a difficult one, and really not sure what the solution is. A reasonable size motorway network would certainly help.
All the best
Keith ____________________ Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| JonB |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 JonB Afraid of Mileage

Joined: 03 Jun 2004 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 16:09 - 03 Dec 2004 Post subject: |
 |
|
Well this is one step towards better motorways, funny how they ignore the middle lane hoggers who forget that it is technically only an "Overtaking lane".  ____________________ Be careful whose advice you buy, but, be patient with those who supply it. Advice is a form of nostalgia, dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than it?s worth. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| zx636 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 zx636 Scooby Slapper
Joined: 28 Jul 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| mchaggis |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 mchaggis World Chat Champion

Joined: 09 May 2004 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 16:21 - 03 Dec 2004 Post subject: Re: lorries |
 |
|
| zx636 wrote: |
Can you imagine how many more traffic police will be needed to enforce any lorry lane ban. more traffic police = slower traffic. |
They'll just use cameras like they do with everything else. They don't need training and will do the same repetitive job without getting bored until hell freezes over/ someone burns them.
The trouble is that they only do that one job, and nothing else that a traffic policeman can do. If more people stuck to 70mph as there were more policemen about, the traffic flow wouldn't neccesarily slow down, as there would be less in the way of shuffle as drivers speed up and slow down as they leave and reach bunches of traffic.
This shuffle business is how huge traffic jams can be caused by a few rubber neckers, the traffic behind them has to brake, the traffic behind that has to brake, etc. etc. back up the road, like a wave of slowing traffic. The delay in people braking means that eventually there's a lot of traffic going a lot slower.
Not a great description of it imo, feel free to describe it in better, more understandable terms. ____________________ I must not be a troll...
Mmmm, Guinness
Discovering the delights of Hammerite and a 3/4" brush.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| cagiva gezzer |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 cagiva gezzer World Chat Champion
Joined: 17 Mar 2003 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 16:23 - 03 Dec 2004 Post subject: |
 |
|
From what i've read in that article, lorries will only be allowed in the "slow /LH" lane.
My issue with this is that myself, being on a 125, spends a lot of time in the "slow" lane as i would rather go at 60mph a lot of the time as it saves loads of oil and fuel + engine wear.
So, from the wording of this article, lorries would not be allowed to overtake me, and some do normally. This means i'm going to end up with some fat arse lorry up my arse!
Before someone says i shouldn't be on the M'way if im only doing 60, i can do 80-90 with everyone else, but the costs out weigh the benefits.
I say, give the lorries a lane, give the cars two and give the bikers one! ____________________ "because one stroke isnt enough and four strokes waste two" |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| mchaggis |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 mchaggis World Chat Champion

Joined: 09 May 2004 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 16:33 - 03 Dec 2004 Post subject: |
 |
|
I'm not sure how well built and surfaced the hard shoulder is, but if it was used as an added lane, and refuge points built along it every mile or two for cars to pull into if they're breaking down, it could ease some flow problems.
Or, make the lanes changeable with cat's eyes that light up to show the different lanes. Or, operate a tidal system of using lanes from the opposite side of the motorway depending on how heavy the traffic is. ____________________ I must not be a troll...
Mmmm, Guinness
Discovering the delights of Hammerite and a 3/4" brush.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Jrod |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Jrod Page 3 Girl

Joined: 02 Aug 2004 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 16:38 - 03 Dec 2004 Post subject: |
 |
|
Just keep lorrys on the inside, They are only allowed to do 60 I thought?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 21 years, 68 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|