Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Why no v-twin/il4 in Enduro/Sm?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Matt94
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:16 - 19 Jun 2013    Post subject: Why no v-twin/il4 in Enduro/Sm? Reply with quote

I'm not even sure if this is a really retarded question or not but I was just thinking about it..

How come they never put these style engines in enduro/sm bikes? Was there any particular reason?

Excuse my potato-ness. Laughing
____________________
current; beemer 5 series!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

P.addy
Red Rocket



Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:19 - 19 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

https://www.ralepi.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/2011-Aprilia-SXV-550-Front-Angle-588x554.jpg

V twin yo.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Supermoto_Fan
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Jun 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:22 - 19 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

SXV 550, pretty batshit mental bike
____________________
Yamaha MT-09 - Triple powerrrr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

P.addy
Red Rocket



Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:23 - 19 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

https://www.raptorsandrockets.com/images/KTM/KTM_950_SM_S006.JPG Wink
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Matt94
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:27 - 19 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

oh yeah.. derp.

il4 though? Very Happy
____________________
current; beemer 5 series!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

P.addy
Red Rocket



Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:30 - 19 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Would be useless.

High revving etc.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:35 - 20 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Two reasons:

1.) Weight. Have you noticed how enduro bikes tend to be quite light weight? Even lighter than sportsbikes? Also, they tend to be quite narrow, which inline fours aren't.

2.) power delivery. You want a nice lumpy single or twin to doff doff doff your way out of the deep mud and up inclines. An inline four's delivery is so smooth that you'd just spin the rear tyre every time you open the throttle.

Derp.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

c-m
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:43 - 20 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

An IL4 is lighter than a v-twin.

How high up the rev range you go is neither here nor there, you just let the clutch out later.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

P.addy
Red Rocket



Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:02 - 20 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

c-m wrote:
An IL4 is lighter than a v-twin.


Got any stats on that?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:43 - 20 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

c-m wrote:


How high up the rev range you go is neither here nor there, you just let the clutch out later.

On the road, absolutely; off road, absolutely not!

I took my crm 125 (a revvy nsr engine) to a very muddy off road event when it had nsr-esque gearing. I could barely get over 10mph, as it either. Bogged down at low revs and span up high revs.

Further, the 'big bang' nature of a big single can help get more traction. I used my 690 for my first enduro and was passing better riders on lighter bikes in some really nasty muddy bits. I suspect high gearing and low down power meant it could get traction where others would just spin up.

As mentioned, there's also the width issue and that you don't NEED lots of power... 500cc 2 strokes went out of fashion because the 250s were easier to ride... and now KTM is beating 450 4 strokes on it's 350.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

CarlosCBR
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:05 - 20 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

IL4 motocross.....

https://blog.crazymoto.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/a101605_1.jpg

V-twin motocross....

https://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c338/RussS_/SVAdventure/SVAdventure21Front1.jpg
____________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OPv5mDPQ14

https://www.facebook.com/carl.simmonds.7
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:37 - 20 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Neither are motocross, where they'd do terribly Wink.

The R1 was used for the prologue stage of the Erzberg rally - it's a bit like pikes-peak, but all off road. So lots of open fast bits, nothing technical and plenty of traction.

Competitors than can afford it will generally use bikes like the 950/990 enduro, HP2 and the like.
Everyone will be on a proper competition enduro bike for the main event.

The second bike looks more like an adventure bike, however converted SVs are some times used in sand racing - and someone entered a pretty stock one in a SM race too!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Fizzer Thou
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 Aug 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:32 - 21 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

https://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x250/mattvolm/2007060918_Erzberg20207.jpg

https://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a124/Minnetonka_Mark/2009%20KTM%20950%20SuperEnduro/IMG_2370s.jpg
____________________
Just talk bikes.What else is there?

Always have a 'Plan B'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

chris-red
Have you considered a TDM?



Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:01 - 21 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

c-m wrote:
An IL4 is lighter than a v-twin.

How high up the rev range you go is neither here nor there, you just let the clutch out later.


No they aren't
____________________
Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

nowhere.elysium
The Pork Lord



Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:09 - 21 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

c-m wrote:
An IL4 is lighter than a v-twin.
Only if you solely equate a V-twin with American engineering.
____________________
'10 SV650SF, '83 GS650GT (it lives!), Questionable DIY dash project, 3D Printer project, Lasercutter project
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

c-m
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:35 - 21 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

chris-red wrote:
c-m wrote:
An IL4 is lighter than a v-twin.

How high up the rev range you go is neither here nor there, you just let the clutch out later.


No they aren't


I reckon they are, you've got far more metal used to add that second cylinder in a v configuration that the extra metal used to extend the cylinder block to have 4 smaller combustion chambers.

Sure you have two more pistons and con rods but they are smaller and lighter then those used in a v-twin as each combustion chamber is smaller, and stroke shorter.

There's also no need for such a heavy counter weight to balance things out and reduce vibration.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

chris-red
Have you considered a TDM?



Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:18 - 21 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is a lot more metal in a Il4 just look at the size of one compared to a v twin.

The more cylinders you have the more weight. as the more parts you need to build it.
____________________
Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Scootaloo
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 09 Dec 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:20 - 21 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tef... Tef... where ye B? put these noob's out of their misery...
____________________
(CBF125 - 09) (CBF125 - 11) (CB-1 - 89) (CBF500 - 06) (Push Bike) (CB-1 - 90) (XL125 - 01) (VF500 - 83) (GPZ500 - 94) (GPZ500 - 95) (GPZ500 - 87) (XV535 - 94) (XV535 - 94) (GPZ500 - 87)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

P.addy
Red Rocket



Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:24 - 21 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

SV650 twin

2 cylinders, 81.0mm x 62.6mm
167kg dry

GSF650 il4

4 cylinders, 65.5mm x 48.7mm
215kg dry

Just looking at that... il4 are fucking heavy, there is more material despite the smaller pistons.. Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

nowhere.elysium
The Pork Lord



Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:29 - 21 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

c-m wrote:
I reckon they are, you've got far more metal used to add that second cylinder in a v configuration that the extra metal used to extend the cylinder block to have 4 smaller combustion chambers.
Well, I've just gone to the car park with a tape measure, and done some very rough measurements of my SV650 and my colleague's GSF650, and I say you're wrong.

Quite aside from the matter of exhaust weights, fuelling kit and fluid capacities, the bulk of an I4 is greater than a V2.

SV650 top end size is (15*15*22)*2, so that's 9900cm3, bottom end size is 28*28*28, which comes to 21952cm3. Total is 31852cm3.
GSF650 top end size is 21*20*40 = 16800cm3, bottom end size is 19*34*40 = 25840cm3. Total is 42640cm3.

While occupied area is quite clearly not the same as total mass, there is a lot more there, and even if the casings were both 90% empty, there'd still be 25% more material required to form the cases for the I4 over the V2.

The reason I haven't quoted the manufacturers listed weights is that the GSF650 uses a steel cradle frame, while the SV650 has an alloy frame, which is going to be lighter regardless.

:edited to diminish hostility a bit:
____________________
'10 SV650SF, '83 GS650GT (it lives!), Questionable DIY dash project, 3D Printer project, Lasercutter project


Last edited by nowhere.elysium on 13:57 - 21 Jun 2013; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

weasley
World Chat Champion



Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:31 - 21 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

IL4s have long crankshafts, and cranks are the heavy bits. And being long they need to be stiffer too, so even heavier. And I'll bet that two IL4 conrods weigh more than one V2 rod (from equivalent engine sizes/powers/torques).

Not to mention all those valves! Very Happy
____________________
Yamaha XJ600 | Yamaha YZF600R Thundercat | KTM 990 SMT | BMW F900XR TE
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

reed
Nearly there...



Joined: 28 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:32 - 21 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

nowhere.elysium wrote:
c-m wrote:
I reckon they are, you've got far more metal used to add that second cylinder in a v configuration that the extra metal used to extend the cylinder block to have 4 smaller combustion chambers.
Well, I've just gone to the car park with a tape measure, and done some very rough measurements of my SV650 and my colleague's GSF650, and I say you're talking crap.

Quite aside from the matter of exhaust weights, fuelling kit and fluid capacities, the bulk of an I4 is greater than a V2.

SV650 top end size is (15*15*22)*2, so that's 9900cm3, bottom end size is 28*28*28, which comes to 21952cm3. Total is 31852cm3.
GSF650 top end size is 21*20*40 = 16800cm3, bottom end size is 19*34*40 = 25840cm3. Total is 42640cm3.

While occupied area is quite clearly not the same as total mass, there is a lot more there, and even if the casings were both 90% empty, there'd still be 25% more material required to form the cases for the I4 over the V2.

The reason I haven't quoted the manufacturers listed weights is that the GSF650 uses a steel cradle frame, while the SV650 has an alloy frame, which is going to be lighter regardless.


I think you have got way too into this.
____________________
Generic XOR 50, Gilera SMT 50, GSXR 400 GK73A, Ducati Monster 600, Honda Hornet 600.
Sold. Stolen. Written off. Sold. Current.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

nowhere.elysium
The Pork Lord



Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:34 - 21 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Reed wrote:
I think you have got way too into this.
Meh, slow day at work, and the car park in question is just outside my office. Plus I'm an argumentative sod.
____________________
'10 SV650SF, '83 GS650GT (it lives!), Questionable DIY dash project, 3D Printer project, Lasercutter project
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

reed
Nearly there...



Joined: 28 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:36 - 21 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

nowhere.elysium wrote:
Reed wrote:
I think you have got way too into this.
Meh, slow day at work, and the car park in question is just outside my office. Plus I'm an argumentative sod.


Fair enough. Thumbs Up

I must say I agree with what you say.
____________________
Generic XOR 50, Gilera SMT 50, GSXR 400 GK73A, Ducati Monster 600, Honda Hornet 600.
Sold. Stolen. Written off. Sold. Current.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

reed
Nearly there...



Joined: 28 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:41 - 21 Jun 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

On a random unrelated note, I just remembered this cool 125cc in line 4 I read about a while ago. Very cool. Mr. Green

https://thekneeslider.com/honda-125cc-inline-4-cylinder-monkey-bike/
____________________
Generic XOR 50, Gilera SMT 50, GSXR 400 GK73A, Ducati Monster 600, Honda Hornet 600.
Sold. Stolen. Written off. Sold. Current.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 13 years, 107 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.11 Sec - Server Load: 0.68 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 132.55 Kb