Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


What's the difference between three cyclinders and four...

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> The Workshop Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

reddeviljp
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 21 Aug 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:16 - 10 Oct 2013    Post subject: What's the difference between three cyclinders and four... Reply with quote

Brought up in a bike loving family I was always led to believe that the four-cylinder bike was the ultimate bike and anything less was inferior. Now, with the success of the Street Triple and the impending MT-09 I'm being told that three cyclinders are the dogs bollocks and superior to the four? What's changed?

What's the reason for all the praise for three cylinders?
____________________
Bike: 1993 CB400 SuperFour - 1999 Yamaha FZS600 - DAS passed 7/11/13 - Working my way towards a Yamaha FZ1.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:21 - 10 Oct 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nothing really.

An IL4 is still the idea package of width, cooling, economy, and power.

Triumph used it more as a USP than anything else, found it worked well with the gearing/whole package, and now a few others have picked it up and ran with it.

Now some are saying ZOMG tripelsss are amazaballss!!111

If Triples are so great, why are all moto GP bikes 4 cylinders, and why was the last bike to win WSS an IL4?

TLDR, there's no "perfect" cylinder configuration.
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Pete.
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:28 - 10 Oct 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

"What's the difference between three cyclinders and four..."

One cylinder.
____________________
a.k.a 'Geri'

132.9mph off and walked away. Gear is good, gear is good, gear is very very good Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Nobby the Bastard
Harley Gaydar



Joined: 16 Aug 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:32 - 10 Oct 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Narrower engine.
____________________
trevor saxe-coburg-gotha:"Remember this simple rule - scooters are for men who like to feel the breeze on their huge, flapping cunt lips."
Triumph Sprint ST 1050
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:33 - 10 Oct 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nobby the chihuahua wrote:
Narrower engine.


V-twin trumps it in that respect, if narrowness is your primary concern, then a twin is a superior choice, or even a V4.
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Nobby the Bastard
Harley Gaydar



Joined: 16 Aug 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:36 - 10 Oct 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wafer_Thin_Ham wrote:

V-twin trumps it in that respect, if narrowness is your primary concern, then a twin is a superior choice, or even a V4.


Play 'who's fastest' whilst filtering with a Z1300 and then tell me that a narrow profile has no advantage.

You get (almost) the same power advantage of the 4 and potentially better smothness than the 4 (pissing on a twin) without the complications of V.
____________________
trevor saxe-coburg-gotha:"Remember this simple rule - scooters are for men who like to feel the breeze on their huge, flapping cunt lips."
Triumph Sprint ST 1050


Last edited by Nobby the Bastard on 20:38 - 10 Oct 2013; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:37 - 10 Oct 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nobby the chihuahua wrote:
Wafer_Thin_Ham wrote:

V-twin trumps it in that respect, if narrowness is your primary concern, then a twin is a superior choice, or even a V4.


Play 'who's fastest' whilst filtering with a Z1300 and then tell me that a narrow profile has no advantage.


Laughing
The engine width isn't even close to being the limiting factor on that bike. The bars stick out a good 4 inches further than the engine either side.

Engine width is only the limiting factor on lean angle, and even then you can counteract with rear sets/a high or stiffer rear shock.
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:41 - 10 Oct 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nobby the chihuahua wrote:

You get (almost) the same power advantage of the 4 and potentially better smothness than the 4 (pissing on a twin) without the complications of V.


It's not all about "power". That's too ambiguous.

Want your twin to feel faster? Then down gear it.

Need more smoothness? Fit a balancer shaft, or use a 90 degree V that is balanced.

To my mind the triple isn't ideal for anything. Any perceived gains in it's configuration can be got from an IL4.

IL3, or IL4, I'd say the 4 has better low down smoothness, although less thrust on stock gearing. Mainly as the Japanese love to over gear things.
____________________
My Flickr


Last edited by Wafer_Thin_Ham on 20:49 - 10 Oct 2013; edited 2 times in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Nobby the Bastard
Harley Gaydar



Joined: 16 Aug 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:41 - 10 Oct 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wafer_Thin_Ham wrote:


Laughing
The engine width isn't even close to being the limiting factor on that bike. The bars stick out a good 4 inches further than the engine either side.

Engine width is only the limiting factor on lean angle, and even then you can counteract with rear sets/a high or stiffer rear shock.


Have you noticed that modern cars are wider at the bottom/middle than at the top. That's due to the survival cell and the various crumple zones and air bags that are built into them.

I have. If you haven't noticed stuff like that, how do you survive your rides?
____________________
trevor saxe-coburg-gotha:"Remember this simple rule - scooters are for men who like to feel the breeze on their huge, flapping cunt lips."
Triumph Sprint ST 1050
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Pete.
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:44 - 10 Oct 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nobby the chihuahua wrote:

Play 'who's fastest' whilst filtering and then tell me who's the fastest filterer in the cemetary.


FTFY Very Happy
____________________
a.k.a 'Geri'

132.9mph off and walked away. Gear is good, gear is good, gear is very very good Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:46 - 10 Oct 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nobby the chihuahua wrote:


Have you noticed that modern cars are wider at the bottom/middle than at the top. That's due to the survival cell and the various crumple zones and air bags that are built into them.

I have. If you haven't noticed stuff like that, how do you survive your rides?


Personally I've found it's the bars (after folding the mirrors in) that are the limiting factor when filtering. Certainly not engine width.

Can't say I've paid much attention to the relative width of the bottom of a car compared to the top, as I don't think it's a massive factor when filtering, although I'm sure attempting to have a dig at my riding will help in this debate. Smile
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Nobby the Bastard
Harley Gaydar



Joined: 16 Aug 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:51 - 10 Oct 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wafer_Thin_Ham wrote:


It's not all about "power". That's too ambiguous.

Want your twin to feel faster? Then down gear it.

Need more smoothness? Fit a balancer shaft, or use a 90 degree V that is balanced.

To my mind the triple isn't ideal for anything. Any perceived gains in it's configuration can be got from an IL4.


First off, adding a balancer shaft will rob the engine of the 'power' that you find so 'ambiguoius'....

Make it a V2 and you complicate your engine. if you are talking four stroke, you are looking at 4 cams and two cam chains or resorting to push-rods.

Make your twin feel faster by kicking it down a gear?Aside from the fact that kicking it down a gear would make it slower (I believe that what you meant 'accelerate faster', but that's bye-the-bye) I'd rather have something that can provide the necessary oomph regardless of gear than faff about kicking it down a gear (or three) just to make reasonable progress.
____________________
trevor saxe-coburg-gotha:"Remember this simple rule - scooters are for men who like to feel the breeze on their huge, flapping cunt lips."
Triumph Sprint ST 1050
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Nobby the Bastard
Harley Gaydar



Joined: 16 Aug 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:52 - 10 Oct 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pete. wrote:
Nobby the chihuahua wrote:

Play 'who's fastest' whilst filtering and then tell me who's the fastest filterer in the cemetary.


FTFY Very Happy


I don't play those games. I used to and I have the scars...
____________________
trevor saxe-coburg-gotha:"Remember this simple rule - scooters are for men who like to feel the breeze on their huge, flapping cunt lips."
Triumph Sprint ST 1050
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:54 - 10 Oct 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nobby the chihuahua wrote:


First off, adding a balancer shaft will rob the engine of the 'power' that you find so 'ambiguoius'....

Make it a V2 and you complicate your engine. if you are talking four stroke, you are looking at 4 cams and two cam chains or resorting to push-rods.

Make your twin feel faster by kicking it down a gear?Aside from the fact that kicking it down a gear would make it slower (I believe that what you meant 'accelerate faster', but that's bye-the-bye) I'd rather have something that can provide the necessary oomph regardless of gear than faff about kicking it down a gear (or three) just to make reasonable progress.


I didn't mean kicking it down a gear. I mean the actual gearing. Be that by the gearbox or the sprockets. "Power" is ambiguous. Are we talking about peak torque, bhp, or thrust?

When you say oomph, I assume you mean thrust, in which case, buy whichever configuration you enjoy the noise of, and alter the gearing until it has an much oomph as you want.

Adding a balancer shaft doesn't sap that much power. IMO not even enough for most people to notice.
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Nobby the Bastard
Harley Gaydar



Joined: 16 Aug 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:01 - 10 Oct 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

As a final comment, there are 2 bikes that have a reputation (aside from the run of the mill 4 in-line bikes like the R1, Fireblade etc.) of being absolutely insane. I'd love to ride one. I know someone who owns one of the pair and at some point I'll pursuade him to let me have a go.

Most of them were written off.

They are the Kawasaki H1 and the Laverda Jota.

Both were triples.
____________________
trevor saxe-coburg-gotha:"Remember this simple rule - scooters are for men who like to feel the breeze on their huge, flapping cunt lips."
Triumph Sprint ST 1050
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Vincent This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:04 - 10 Oct 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nobby the chihuahua wrote:
As a final comment, there are 2 bikes that have a reputation (aside from the run of the mill 4 in-line bikes like the R1, Fireblade etc.) of being absolutely insane. I'd love to ride one. I know someone who owns one of the pair and at some point I'll pursuade him to let me have a go.

Most of them were written off.

They are the Kawasaki H1 and the Laverda Jota.

Both were triples.


Aaa, you mean the '98 R1, and the 2004 ZX10R?

O, wait. Wink
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:05 - 10 Oct 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vincent wrote:
120 degree tripples sound better than IL4s...........er.. imo of course.


Keep meaning to try and blag a test ride on the new MT09.

Street triple with Arrow half system sounds dirty.
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:27 - 10 Oct 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lots of engineers believe there are two ideal engine configurations from the point of view of packaging on a motorcycle. The ideal configuration isn't too wide (like an IL4 can be) or too tall (Like a V twin nearly always is).

Honda believe that the V4 is the ideal configuration due to it meeting the above requirements. However, it's a pain in the butt from an intake and exhaust point of view, and rear cylinder cooling has always been an issue.

On the other hand, Aprilia created a 3 cylinder GP bike as their first four stroke MotoGP bike, the RS3 cube. This was basically a formula 1 V10 with 7 of the cylinders lopped off. This is because a number of automotive engineers believe there is an ideal cylinder capacity which happens to be an approximate 330-350cc value. In a triple this meets the 990cc original rules for MotoGP, and can also build a 3500cc V10.

A triple is not too wide, nor too tall, and doesn't have any problem with intake or exhaust location. It can be tuned for bottom end torque or top end power just like a V twin and a four. It's cheaper to manufacture than a four cylinder, and is waay cheaper than a complex V4. In the right crank configuration it has a good primary balance, and a decent secondary balance.

Triples are good engines. Yamaha is going to triples because it can't compete with the other Japanese bikes any other way. It wants to differentiate itself from the other japs. In doing so it found that it could make a good triple. Funnily enough, Yamaha have a history with triple engines anyway, so it's not entirely unprecedented. It's also an easy way to give an engine 'character' whilst still being able to make it reasonably powerful and have reasonable bottom end.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Nobby the Bastard This post is not being displayed because it has a low rating (Redundant). Unhide this post / all posts.

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:07 - 10 Oct 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nobby the chihuahua wrote:
Wiki is a wonderful source of information.


Wut?

Because I can string a sentence together and know a little bit about bikes that means I must have plagiarised it from a wiki? Confused
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Nobby the Bastard This post is not being displayed because it has a low rating (Redundant). Unhide this post / all posts.

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:57 - 10 Oct 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nobby the chihuahua wrote:
MarJay wrote:


Wut?

Because I can string a sentence together and know a little bit about bikes that means I must have plagiarised it from a wiki? Confused


A sentence yes, 4 paragraphs, no.


First off, I wrote that stuff from memory. Most of it is my opinion, but I'd say it was pretty accurate. This is why people complain about the lack of decent content on this forum, because people like me who can write and actually DO know something about bikes and engineering get shat on by little gobshites like you.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamaha_XS750

That I DID take from wikipedia, I didn't make that up, so you're quite welcome to be a dick about that if you wish.
{edit} Where do you think wiki content comes from? It comes from people like me who know about the subject and can write. Middle Finger Middle Finger {edit}
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Islander
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:04 - 10 Oct 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nobby the chihuahua wrote:


I'm also having trouble thinking of a Yamaha triple...


Really?

Never heard of an XS750 then?

BTW people are capable of stringing a few paragraphs together. It isn't hard.


Last edited by Islander on 23:07 - 10 Oct 2013; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ariel Badger
Super Spammer



Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:07 - 10 Oct 2013    Post subject: Reply with quote

You can't beat the raw power of a big single, be it my Badger or an MT03.
It is like sex, if you like it dirty, sweaty and brutal without a condom you should not ride a multi.
____________________
Bikers make great organ donors, get 115 on your licence today.


Last edited by Ariel Badger on 23:08 - 10 Oct 2013; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 12 years, 339 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> The Workshop All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.16 Sec - Server Load: 0.65 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 141.32 Kb