|
|
| Author |
Message |
| j.silvs |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 j.silvs World Chat Champion
Joined: 01 Dec 2012 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 21:27 - 14 Dec 2013 Post subject: £1300 excess?!?! |
 |
|
Getting renewal prices.
MCE comes out the best at £364 TPFT with the 2nd cheapest coming in at £600
However, the excess is £1300!! It comes with excess protection as stated here:
https://www.mceinsurance.com/PolicyDocs/BD_NilXS_Keyfacts_001.pdf
But I don't get it. Does this mean I won't pay an excess if someone were to make a claim against me or if it got robbed?!
Help!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| bezzabsa |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 bezzabsa Scooby Slapper
Joined: 24 Jan 2013 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Ste |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Ste Not Work Safe

Joined: 01 Sep 2002 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| wots |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 wots World Chat Champion

Joined: 30 Aug 2012 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 21:37 - 14 Dec 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
My fire blade policy was the same. £1100 excess with excess protect. TPFT £320 TPO (obviously no excess) was £376.
Read the T&C's and it seems to stack up. Not that I would claim, but there you go.
Also got ride other bikes on the TPFT, was not on the quote but is on the docs. ____________________ Currently: Yamaha DT 125 LC2,Repsol Fireblade, and Bumblebee MSX 125 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stuartt |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stuartt World Chat Champion

Joined: 28 Jun 2012 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| anthony_r6 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 anthony_r6 World Chat Champion

Joined: 31 Mar 2011 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Ste |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Ste Not Work Safe

Joined: 01 Sep 2002 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| wots |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 wots World Chat Champion

Joined: 30 Aug 2012 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stuartt |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stuartt World Chat Champion

Joined: 28 Jun 2012 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stuartt |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stuartt World Chat Champion

Joined: 28 Jun 2012 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Ste |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Ste Not Work Safe

Joined: 01 Sep 2002 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stuartt |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stuartt World Chat Champion

Joined: 28 Jun 2012 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Shaft |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Shaft World Chat Champion

Joined: 27 Dec 2010 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Ste |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Ste Not Work Safe

Joined: 01 Sep 2002 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 01:59 - 15 Dec 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
British Insurance Brokers' Association - "It's important that you inform your broker of all incidents of damage or loss, however small, and even if you do not make a claim for them. There have been cases where insurance companies have refused to meet claims because the driver failed to disclose previous incidents."
So you're meant to tell them, but of course whether you do or not is up to you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| sabian92 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 sabian92 World Chat Champion
Joined: 21 Oct 2012 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Polarbear |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Polarbear Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| ninja_butler |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ninja_butler World Chat Champion
Joined: 19 Oct 2011 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 14:57 - 15 Dec 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Al |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Al World Chat Champion

Joined: 26 Feb 2006 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| 0l0dom0l0 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 0l0dom0l0 World Chat Champion

Joined: 21 Oct 2009 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 12:56 - 16 Dec 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
It's never particularly bothered me having a high excess on any of my policies for the bike or the car.
I wouldn't claim on the insurance if my bike got stolen, wouldn't claim if I crashed it, the only time someone would claim would be if I hit them, and well that's tough shit really.
Having a high excess really doesn't matter unless you crash which I don't plan to do so. ____________________ CBT Passed: 30/08/2009, Theory Passed: 31/08/2010, Mod 1 Passed: 6/9/2010, Mod 2 Passed: 13/09/2010. Restriction ended 13/09/2012.
Bikes: 2007 Derbi GPR 50, 1998 Yamaha Fazer 600 (written off), 2002 Yamaha Fazer 600, 1994 CBR 600F, 2003 Triumph Daytona 600, Kawasaki ZX6R J1.....Current: 2006 Yamaha FZ6, 1998 Suzuki TL1000R and a Honda VFR 400 NC30. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| dydey90 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 dydey90 World Chat Champion

Joined: 01 Oct 2013 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| sabian92 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 sabian92 World Chat Champion
Joined: 21 Oct 2012 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| fatjames |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 fatjames World Chat Champion

Joined: 09 Jul 2011 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| arry |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 arry Super Spammer
Joined: 03 Jan 2009 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 16:30 - 16 Dec 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Ste wrote: | British Insurance Brokers' Association - "It's important that you inform your broker of all incidents of damage or loss, however small, and even if you do not make a claim for them. There have been cases where insurance companies have refused to meet claims because the driver failed to disclose previous incidents."
So you're meant to tell them, but of course whether you do or not is up to you. |
Not necessarily. You need to read the question that's asked and act accordingly. Nowadays the insurer cannot rely on duty of disclosure in the way they could in the past - years ago the insurer would say 'but it should have been obvious that we wanted to know that' but that doesn't wash any more; now it's 'if you've asked the direct question, and got a direct truthful answer, anything either side of the line is fair game'.
For example, my proposal is worded 'have you any accidents or losses which may give rise to a claim under any of the covers proposed?' If I'm not insuring for theft, then I'm not proposing theft covers, ergo it's not a non-disclosure issue.
An example of this is the FOS direction case study here:
| Quote: | insurer refuses to pay claim for theft of car because consumer had not disclosed the modifications made to his vehicle
Mr T’s car was stolen from the street where he parked it while he was visiting his local gym. He put in a claim under his motor policy and later told us he was ‘totally shocked’ when his insurer
refused to pay out.
The insurer said it was clear from the information Mr T provided in his claim that the car had been modified. However, he had never notified the insurer of any modifications and he
had answered ‘no’, when asked on the proposal form if he had modified or altered the car.
The insurer had therefore ‘voided’ his policy (in effect treating it as though it had never existed) and it told Mr T he was not covered for the theft. Mr T complained that he was being treated unfairly, but the insurer would not alter its view, so he came to us.
complaint upheld
Mr T confirmed that he had added ‘a satnav unit, Bluetooth kit, Playstation and CD changer’. However, he said he regarded these as ‘simple additions, not modifications’. We looked at the proposal form that Mr T had completed when applying for his policy. This included a question headed ‘Modifications’, asking if there had been ‘any changes to the engine, plus any cosmetic changes to the bodywork, suspension, wheels or brakes’. Mr T had answered ‘no’.
We accepted the insurer’s point that the changes Mr T had made could well have made his car more attractive to thieves. However, there was nothing on the proposal form to indicate that it considered changes of this type to be ‘modifications’. We did not see that Mr T could reasonably have been expected to know, from the examples given by the insurer, that he should have answered ‘yes’ to the question about modifications.
We upheld the complaint and said the insurer should settle the claim in line with the usual terms and conditions of the policy. We said it should also add interest, from the date when the car was stolen to the date when the claim was settled. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 12 years, 268 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|