Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Whats the next step when 21 and got a Cbt? What tests etc.

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> New Bikers
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Jonescasual92
L Plate Warrior



Joined: 03 Apr 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:15 - 03 Apr 2014    Post subject: Whats the next step when 21 and got a Cbt? What tests etc. Reply with quote

Hi all, I'm a bit confused from things I've been reading all over the internet and from what people are telling me about the rules and regulations about what cc you can have at certain ages with certain tests/modules .etc but I can't find an answer to what order I take them in. I know you start with a Cbt which is valid for 2 years but what happens when that expires? Does that mean you can then have any cc without taking any further tests or do you have to renew it? And what's the differences to if you are 21 and over to 21 and under and you want a bike.

I Would appreciate if somebody could give me a step by step guide to what I would need to do exactly to get a full uk bike licence. Thanks! Thumbs Up
____________________
Dan Jones
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

pinkyfloyd
Super Spammer



Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:23 - 03 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your CBT is only a certificate to say you have reached a basic level of training and allowed to ride on the road on L plates. After 2 years that certificate expires and you have to do another CBT. You are not allowed to ride anything more than a 125cc motorcycle and must display L plates.

At 21 years old you can take either the A1 motorcycle test or through a bike school do an A2 licence.

Details are as follows:

Quote:
A1: Small motorbikes up to 11 kW (and a power-to-weight ratio not more than 0.1 kW per kg) and 125 cc

Requirements:CBT, theory test, practical test








A2: Medium motorbikes up to 35 kW (and a power-to-weight ratio not more than 0.2 kW per kg), bike mustn’t be derived from vehicle more than twice its power

Requirements: Direct access route - theory and practical

Staged access route - 2 years experience on A1 motorbike and a further practical test

____________________
illuminateTHEmind wrote: I am just more evolved than most of you guys... this allows me to pick of things quickly which would have normally taken the common man years to master
Hockeystorm65:.well there are childish arguments...there are very childish arguments.....there are really stupid childish arguments and now there are......Pinkfloyd arguments!
Teflon-Mike:I think I agree with just about all Pinky has said.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Jonescasual92
L Plate Warrior



Joined: 03 Apr 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:32 - 03 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

So Can I take an a1 or a2 while I have my Cbt in that 2 years or do I have to wait for the 2 years to be up til I take either of them? Also am I right saying I'd need to pass my a2 in order to upgrade to a 450, 600, 1000 etc. in the future? Sorry for thousands of questions I'm just trying to grasp it haha! Shocked
____________________
Dan Jones
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

NooBish-AbbZ
Nova Slayer



Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 04:41 - 03 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jonescasual92 wrote:
So Can I take an a1 or a2 while I have my Cbt in that 2 years or do I have to wait for the 2 years to be up til I take either of them? Also am I right saying I'd need to pass my a2 in order to upgrade to a 450, 600, 1000 etc. in the future? Sorry for thousands of questions I'm just trying to grasp it haha! Shocked


Any tests need to be completed within the 2 years that the CBT is valid.

The A1 or A2 is needed to ride any bikes bigger than a 125, and yes you will need the A2 license to ride 450/600's etc. (heres the confusing part)

These bikes will need to be no more than 35kW power output and 47bhp output. They CAN be restricted to comply with these rules, however, before restricting, the bike cannot produce more than twice these figures. E.G 69.5kW and 93 bhp. Fine, 70.5kW, and 95 BHp, not fine.


Finally, if you do want to ride a bike with more than 94bhp (most 600cc sportbikes and anything bigger) you will have to complete your A license. This can only be completed as a direct access, unavailable until you turn 24, OR, 2 years to the day after you pass your A2 test.

Remember you will need a theory test for any license more than CBT.

Any more questions, please PM me Smile Hope this helps
____________________
SV650S - Feb '14-March '19
XJ6N- Apr '19 -Present
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Teflon-Mike This post is not being displayed because it has a low rating (Confusing). Unhide this post / all posts.

Rogue_Shadow
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 May 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:14 - 03 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shocked

https://i.imgur.com/lA8iUzH.gif

You've done it again Tef
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

expat200
Borekit Bruiser



Joined: 27 Jun 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:13 - 04 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow, didn't realise it was so complicated these days, my kid back in the UK was trying to tell me about it but didn't seem to have a full grasp of all the details.

Much simpler in my day:
1) Get provisional license in post
2) Buy bike (up to 125cc, 12hp)
3) L-plates on
4) Ride bike (no lessons, no training, no bugger all)
5) Try not to die!
6) Within 2 years: part 1 test (wobble rounds the cones) then part 2 test (road test , examiner standing on pavement??)
7) Out next day and buy a GPZ900/GSX-R1100/RD500LC/Ducati851 (I wish)
8) Try not to die!

On reflection it isn't surprising it was dangerous. If you had your car test then the two year limit didn't apply so you could ride indefinitely on L-plates with no training/test at all.

I am sure there are some 'more mature' riders who remember the 250cc limit (100mph on L-plates!), no time limit on l-plates and no part 1 test at all.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

sabian92
World Chat Champion



Joined: 21 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:31 - 04 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

It fucking staggers me than the government are all "BIKES ARE DANGEROUS HURR DURR" then immediately forget you're legally allowed to ride one at 70mph with precisely fuck all training apart from "here's the brake, here's the twisty thing that makes you go, now sign here". Not even a theory test!

Laughing

To OP:

Yes, you NEED a CBT or you can't ride anything legally, even under instruction (unless you're sitting a CBT, anyway). You get caught with no CBT, you gon get raped by the police. Not only that your insurance won't be valid (as a term is you need a CBT) so you'll get fucked on that as well.

At 16, you can ride a 50cc hairdryer on wheels on a CBT. No motorways, no passengers and you must have L(oser) plates. You can also sit an AM licence, which from what I gather lets you lose the L plates and that's it. Not sure, so few bother anyway.

At 17 your CBT automatically upgrades so you can ride a 125. Again, no motorways (even on a full car licence as you have a provisional bike licence - I'm 21, full car licence since I was 17, can drive on motorways but the Government deem it too dangerous to ride a motorcycle on them instead Rolling Eyes), no passengers and you must have L plates. You can sit your A1 motorcycle entitlement at 17 which allows you to ride a 125 (no more) but on motorways, with a pillion and you lose the L plates. I recommend doing exactly none of those as they couldn't pull the skin off a rotted corpse even with 1 person on them. 2-up on a motorway? Fuck that.

At 19 you can do your A2 entitlement. 46.6hp maximum for 2 years. No bigger than that or again, the po-po will rape you and you'll lose your licence (potentially, depends how naughty you were and how many kittens you killed while doing so).

At 24 (or 2 years on an A2 licence, which ever comes first) you can do your unrestricted A entitlement. Do your mod 1/2, you can ride whatever you can afford to insure.

There. A short and easy guide. At the moment, being you're 21 you can go straight for your A2 as you don't need any previous experience (barring a CBT, you don't need to sit your A1 if you don't want to, and I recommend not bothering as you can't do anything extra useful with it over just a CBT). I reckon if you've got a CBT and been riding regularly for 3 months +, a week of intensive lessons to prepare you for Mod 1/2 and you'll probably pass. Depends how quickly you learn.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

TheSmiler
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 04:16 - 05 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

sabian92 wrote:
at 70mph with precisely fuck all training apart from "here's the brake, here's the twisty thing that makes you go, now sign here". Not even a theory test!


You are having a dream if you can get most 125's to a genuine sat nav tested 70mph.

The CBR 125 and the R125/RS125 are the only ones that I can think of really getting to 70mph + on the flat. Not down a hill.


CBT should cover the basic's of a theory test if done correctly, well most road signs. If you are too stupid (not you but the idiot riding) to realize then Darwins law will come into effect on some country lane hopefully.

Otherwise if you were to have people on the road without CBT and until they had done some kind of test (like a mod2) then you might as well get rid of motorcycles right now. As the cost will cause a rapid decline.
____________________
CB125>CG125>GN125>ER5>K100RS>R1100RS>K100RS
A2 completed 23/07/15 Ready for the Golden Crisp Packet
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

pinkyfloyd
Super Spammer



Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 06:26 - 05 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

sabian92 wrote:
It fucking staggers me than the government are all "BIKES ARE DANGEROUS HURR DURR" then immediately forget you're legally allowed to ride one at 70mph with precisely fuck all training apart from "here's the brake, here's the twisty thing that makes you go, now sign here". Not even a theory test!



I do not know who done you're CBT but I can assure you my CBT is a whole lot more in depth than that and I make sure you are safe to go on the road before I even consider letting you on the road.

The sole reason the CBT was brought in was because people could just get on a machine that is dangerous and go (indicated) 70mph. Oddly enough it has cut fatalities down so it does work.
____________________
illuminateTHEmind wrote: I am just more evolved than most of you guys... this allows me to pick of things quickly which would have normally taken the common man years to master
Hockeystorm65:.well there are childish arguments...there are very childish arguments.....there are really stupid childish arguments and now there are......Pinkfloyd arguments!
Teflon-Mike:I think I agree with just about all Pinky has said.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

sabian92
World Chat Champion



Joined: 21 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:55 - 05 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheSmiler wrote:

You are having a dream if you can get most 125's to a genuine sat nav tested 70mph.

The CBR 125 and the R125/RS125 are the only ones that I can think of really getting to 70mph + on the flat. Not down a hill.

CBT should cover the basic's of a theory test if done correctly, well most road signs. If you are too stupid (not you but the idiot riding) to realize then Darwins law will come into effect on some country lane hopefully.

Otherwise if you were to have people on the road without CBT and until they had done some kind of test (like a mod2) then you might as well get rid of motorcycles right now. As the cost will cause a rapid decline.


Maybe 70 was optimistic but they'll still go fast enough to kill you if you make a mistake without having sat a proper test. My point was you're not allowed to drive alone without a full licence but 6 hours of pottering around a car park and locals roads on a motorcycle (or even a scooter potentially) allows you freedom to do as you like as long as you display L plates and don't carry a pillion and avoid motorways even though mile-for-mile bikes are more dangerous than cars. I'm not suggesting there should be a compulsory test before being allowed out on the road like a mod 2 test but I can't work how why cars seem to be the more dangerous one (and not being allowed to operate one alone on a provisional) but bikes aren't seen to be as dangerous (when in fact they're more dangerous, and new riders could do with all the help they can get so they don't end up being sponged off an A road).

pinkyfloyd wrote:

I do not know who done you're CBT but I can assure you my CBT is a whole lot more in depth than that and I make sure you are safe to go on the road before I even consider letting you on the road.

The sole reason the CBT was brought in was because people could just get on a machine that is dangerous and go (indicated) 70mph. Oddly enough it has cut fatalities down so it does work.


My CBT instructor spent more time ogling women who walked on the pavement outside the car park and berating me and my brother (who I did my CBT with) for giving too much room to cyclists while over taking on a straight road with nothing coming. Needless to say I'm not going back to him for my lessons when I get my big-boy licence. He also spent about half an hour on the phone to his wife because his chimney had fallen off and he was trying to get it sorted. I wasn't impressed.

The important parts (thankfully) he gave most of his attention to as we've both got full car licences so the road part wasn't difficult, it was the operating of the thing that we didn't know how to do. We managed that soon enough so it wasn't a problem but if I was a 16 year old who'd never been on the road before I'd have been crapping myself.

I don't disagree with the CBT thing - it's good that it's there and it brought fatalities down. I just can't fathom why the government think it's fine for bikes to be operated alone without much training but a car isn't when a car is less dangerous.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Tamsin
World Chat Champion



Joined: 07 Mar 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:05 - 05 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

sabian92 wrote:

Maybe 70 was optimistic but they'll still go fast enough to kill you if you make a mistake without having sat a proper test.


They will go fast enough to kill you even if you have sat a test Laughing

To my mind the fundamental difference between bikes and cars is that if you screw up in a car you are significantly more likely to kill un-involved bystanders or other road users. If you screw up on a bike then due to the mass of the vehicle you are less likely to kill or maim someone who is not involved with your mistake.

Not saying you cant kill other people with a bike, but its less likely.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

sidewinder
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:10 - 05 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the reason your can ride a bike will l's and be unsupervised is a size thing.a car hitting say another car at speed will cause a lot more damage than a bike. Maybe Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Teflon-Mike
tl;dr



Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:18 - 05 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

First; ANY bike even a bludy push-bike is 'fast enough to kill you', if you are daft or unlucky enough. Shit, you can get killed tripping over a loose paving slab and falling against a kerb-stone!

Speed dont kill... stupidity kills... clumsiness kills... bad damn luck kills.

An engine may just help the stupid, clumsy or damn unlucky kill themselves more easily!

sabian92 wrote:
I just can't fathom why the government think it's fine for bikes to be operated alone without much training but a car isn't when a car is less dangerous.


You have offered opinion on unsupervised L-Plating, which on the whole, I have to agree with; it does seem rather ironic, that motorcycles, statistically the most likely motorised form of transport to result in death or injury, mile for mile, is the only form of transport, completely unqualified road-users are allowed to take to the roads on with absolutely no qualification.

But you have to differentiate between what the government may 'think' is sensible, and what they permit.

In fact, there is a very significant 'anti-bike' lobby within government... note government, this is not the same as 'parliament'. Without going into big debate on the workings of our legislative & administrative organisation; 'Government' is the entirity of the organisation, the 'Business'; 'Parliament' is merely the board of directors, elected by us the voting public, in same way share-holders elect the board to keep tabs on the non-elected, 'management' who in turn over see the chaps that do the work.

Within the halls of power, there is a significant lobby of un-elected administrators, who really just don't see the point in motorcycles, and could quite happily see them banned, outright, and its these people that draft proposed legislation for MP's to debate and potentially vote into law.

They have a point.

Less than 5% of taxed, road legal private vehicles are bikes; and annually they account for less than 1% of annual road miles. Over half of those miles, significantly purely leisure use; not actual essential or even useful, personal travel.

So we make up a very small % or road users, account for an even smaller % of road miles, and most of what we do, is just for fun, YET our little bit of fun accounts for something like 20% of motor accidents.

Ban the lot of us! Would effect less than 1 in 20 motorists; about, 10 million people, nationally. About a third of them are non enthusiast commuters on learner-legals, without a licence anyway. Of the remainder, about half are mainly leisure riders who don't use the bike for anything but pleasure.

Ban the lot? 3 million disgruntled non enthusiast commuters, who shrug, and buy an Oyster card. 3million annoyed leisure riders who, shrug, and say "Well I didn't use the bike THAT much anyway" or who say, "Effit--- I'll buy a trailer and just do track days"; and a bout 4 million more ardent riders, who, would probably be rather bludy militant; BUT? 4 million? Spread over the entire nation, a couple of dozen in each electoral constituency; MP's ent going to loose much sleep over loosing votes from it!

One fell swoop, road accidents and death rates cut by a fifth, with very negligible political back-lash. Seriousely? In the greater scheme of things, they worry more about a penny on petrol prices than they do about motorbike death rates! THAT is a political hot potatoe. Bikes ent.

Reason for unsupervised L-Plating? Well, its a legacy.

How do you teach a kid to ride a push bike? You don't get a five year old on a Tandum with duel controls, do you? No, you stick them in the saddle of something with stabilisers, give them a push and let them get on with it. when they are speeding aling with teh stabilisers skimming the pavement, you lift them up, or tale them off, and let them ride solo. You expect them to fall of a few times, so you stand there with the elastoplast ready, and tell them 'There There, I told you not to go so fast!" stick'em back together, stick'em back in the saddle, and let them try again.

And until about twenty years ago, that was pretty much the only way you could teach some-one to ride a motorcycle.

Wasn't until the 90's that modern electronics made radio supervision, practical, with smaller more portable, more reliable and more affordable radio sets. Think that the radio supervised DSA 'Persuit Test' was introduced in 1991; along with CBT; then DAS coming in around '96?

CBT when it was introduced, did a fantastic job of reducing accident rates amongst learner riders; setting a minimum 'standard' of competance, and was deemed a huge success.

Still not ideal, and still lobby in Gov't shaking thier heads, sceptically; but, maintaining a status quo... let it slide, give it some spin, hail it as a success.

Last year; 2013, 3rd Directive Licence Changes. According to the EU ruling, NO road user should be allowed on the road unsupervised, before passing recognised driving exam.

It is actually a contradiction of EU directive we have retained unsupervised L-Plating, and it was a bit of political appeasement, to get us to accept the stepped licence; and CYNICALLY, to appease the large proportion of car-driving, L-Plate commuters, or potential commuters, more likely to 'protest' outside parliament, the largest density of them being daily commuters into the London Emission Zone!

'Government' DONT think that unsupervised L-Plating is a 'good idea', they don't really think that motorcycles at ALL are a good idea... BUT, they tolerate them, for 'political expediency'.

Laws do NOT reflect Government opinion... they merely reflect what Politicians think people want, or will tolerate!

Meanwhile; while accident rate amongst 125 L-Platers is pretty high, death rate actually isn't. The Learner Restrictions are 'reasonable' to limit how fast the stupid, clumsy and unlucky can hurt themselves, and if they stick at it, they DO tend to learn pretty fast, maybe not what to do to survive, but at least what NOT to do to hurt themselves in a hurry.

Riding for ecconomics; on less inspiring machinary; they often ride regularly, and more sensibly, gaining experience reasonably well along the way. Unlike DAS newbies, who are often not riding for ecconomy, they are impatient thrill seekers looking for the fast track to get a new 'toy' to engage in new high adrenaline pass time, they engage in relatively infrequently; gaining little experience, other than going faster is more fun. THOSE are the riders most likely to get killed.

Unsupervised L-Plating, is an irony. But in greater scheme of things, its not such a bad thing. And personally? Given the 3rd Directive ruling, I think that they ought to have simply beefed up CBT a little, and 'deligated' A1 testing to CBT instructors, the way they did 'Part 1' Testing in the 80's; and hand out A1 pass certs instead of DL196 forms. Stick the tiddlers out there a little better trained without the Loonie Plates.

A2 & DAS? Well? Different kettle of fish, and looking a a persuit dogged by impatient thrill seeking leisure riders? Age is NO measure of 'maturity'! Far more 40+ adolescents out there riding like teenage loons on the latest hot snot sports-bikes they can afford now the mortyage is paid off, than there are real teen-age loons, on clapped out old kit thats thier only way to work, whose high adrenaline antics tend to be slightly more curtailed by high insurance premiums and expensive tyre costs!

Stepped licence system? Recognise the huge difference between a CG125 and a Hysabusa? Yup; good idea. But of you can prove your competance? What difference does your age make?

I'd be far more comfortable sticking a 19 year old on an XJ900, he wants as comfy every day transport, and a bit of recreational touring come the Uni holidays, than I would sticking a 40 something Sales Manager with a company Mondeo on an R6, straight after test.

So, set the minimum age; hand out A1s for a better CBT course, then have a stages training scheme without any fast-tracks or short cuts. Say, 24hours of Supervised road-training covering set sylabus, to get Cert to make rider eligible for A2, another 48 hours Supervised training to a sylabus, to get eligibility cert to do A3. Any age; prove your competance, work for your licence. No short cuts; no fast track, no 'crash courses'; you want the top tier licence, you work your way up to it, like any-one else; fast or slow as you want or can go; but same scheme for every-one.

BUT... Beurocracy, by implication, has to lack reason; "The Law is an Ass... (as in a mongrel) but it is still the law" We work with what we got.

And what we got? Ent brilliant, but could be a damn site worse, and could be NOTHING at all, if that 'opinion' in whitehall lost its patience!
____________________
My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Tamsin
World Chat Champion



Joined: 07 Mar 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:43 - 05 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

I absolutely agree with that wall of text
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 11 years, 308 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> New Bikers All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.17 Sec - Server Load: 0.62 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 123.68 Kb