Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Honda NX400

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Offroad & Supermoto
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message
MC This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

slowlydoesit
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 14 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:54 - 31 May 2014    Post subject: Re: Honda NX400 Reply with quote

MC wrote:
Came across this when looking for XR's. Obviously insane at 2.5k, but then I saw a new one for 3.7k.

Friend has one, likes it.

Depends what you think you're getting for 3.7k. If you just want a new, light, smallish, reliable adventure bike that just works, what else is there? Even a CRF250L is 3.5k new, if you can find one discounted. Most of the competition is either <250cc or litre-class stuff costing well over 10 grand. The NX400s apparently sell by the millions in South America (i.e. it's proven in variable terrain). Friend says he finds it a bit cramped though. I wouldn't mind one.

Edit: Friend just did a biggish trip riding across the UK, heavily laden with camping gear, then did a day full of trail riding, then rode back. Says its great fun on A and B roads, but doesn't like motorways as cruises happily at 60mph and not much more. Needs luggage carrying capacity.
____________________
Kawasaki KMX200 with broken fixed powervalves and a stutter
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
MC This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

Nexus Icon
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:33 - 31 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

If it shares parts with the NX650 then spares may not be all that much of a problem.

I have to say, reading the specs, it looks a little underpowered. You might as well have a decent 125 for similar performance and better fuel economy.

A Varadero or Derbi Terra/Adventure seem to offer a similar experience.
____________________
Greetings from Shitsville!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

slowlydoesit
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 14 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:33 - 31 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

MC wrote:
Think it's a bit of a risk, not being an official UK model, not knowing what the resale values like etc.

It is. The bike should be easy to work on for any competent mechanic, but some items will no doubt be hard to find.
Wait for CRF300M to be announced then?
____________________
Kawasaki KMX200 with broken fixed powervalves and a stutter
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Fladdem
World Chat Champion



Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:50 - 31 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've been eying that up for a while, it's been for sale for months now, gradually decreasing in price.

I like the look of it, a slightly more road biased XR4 but with a 'leccy start and a slightly supermoto-ey style.

Quote:
You might as well have a decent 125 for similar performance and better fuel economy.


What about the torque of the 400? My Varadero 125 goes faster than my 250, but no way would I give her up for a touch more top-end. A varadero 125 struggles lifting in first, mine will pull third, 4th if on reserve, less weight, and stood up.

My bikes a grey import, yes, it's hard to get bits for, but not impossible, and if you look around you don't have to pay dealership prices.

Quote:

Wait for CRF300M to be announced then?


I hate to say it but the CRF L is a boring line of bikes, heavyier and less powerful than mine. And the TTR is meant to be under-powered and overweight. I think If you are going for a supermoto style, go whole hog and get a big thumper, if you don't need it for dirt use. they all get roughly the same MPG, from about 50 to 70. Less however on the exotic comp bikes, I.e. husaberg, KTM EXC range.

The BMW 650 Funduro is meant to be great fun, a mate at work had one, claimed 60MPG and reckoned he could out corner most sports-bikes. reliable too. Just something else to think about.
____________________
Current:1991 Honda MT50 (Soon to be a H100/MTX/MT5 hybrid), 1976 Honda Cub C70, 2005 Honda Varadero 125, 1993 Yamaha TTR250 Open Enduro , 2010 Road Legal Stomp YX140, 1994 Honda CRM 250 MK III, 1999 Cagiva Mito 125, 1992 Honda CB400 Super Four, Stomp T4 230, 1984 Honda H100s, 2009 Sym XS125K
Past:2003 Aprilia RS125, 1982 Kawasaki GPZ550(FREE BIKE!)
I'm having more fun than a well-oiled midget.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
MC This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

Fladdem
World Chat Champion



Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:43 - 31 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Near enough 3 grand I think. I don't think it's worth that much really.

You could get an XR 400, convert and modify it to be similar for less. But have better suspension, I guess.

Ahh, a shorty. Wink

I'll never know the plights of little legs, however I know the downfalls of long legs very well. There's lots to do to lower a bike, but not a lot to make it bigger. Usually, with short legs, you just have to plan stops and get ready to slide across the saddle to get a leg down.
____________________
Current:1991 Honda MT50 (Soon to be a H100/MTX/MT5 hybrid), 1976 Honda Cub C70, 2005 Honda Varadero 125, 1993 Yamaha TTR250 Open Enduro , 2010 Road Legal Stomp YX140, 1994 Honda CRM 250 MK III, 1999 Cagiva Mito 125, 1992 Honda CB400 Super Four, Stomp T4 230, 1984 Honda H100s, 2009 Sym XS125K
Past:2003 Aprilia RS125, 1982 Kawasaki GPZ550(FREE BIKE!)
I'm having more fun than a well-oiled midget.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

slowlydoesit
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 14 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:33 - 01 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fladdem wrote:
I hate to say it but the CRF L is a boring line of bikes, heavyier and less powerful than mine.

This conversation, or one very much like it, has been thrashed out a hundred times on BCF.
  1. A BCFer asserts that Bike A is boring as hell, usually because the bike is seen as slow/heavy/ugly.
  2. Somebody rational points out that perceptions of what constitutes boring vary from person to person.
  3. Another comments that Bike A is very popular, despite it supposedly being boring.
  4. The original poster makes the argument that being popular doesn't mean good, possibly resorting to a comparison with McDonald's, which is the bike discussion equivalent of Godwin's Law.
  5. A third commenter remarks that the OP's choice of bikes is boring by some standards (e.g. riding a TTR250 instead of a SVX550).
And so it goes round, pointlessly. Smile

Let's just all accept that we have different tastes. However, just to show you how far your own tastes are from those of the market, note the chart below. In particular (and in the spirit of point 3 above) note the final facet of the chart showing the top seller in the Trail/Enduro category. Since the launch of the CRF250L in August 2012 it has occupied that spot for all but two months.

https://i.imgur.com/qkG9c2Z.png
____________________
Kawasaki KMX200 with broken fixed powervalves and a stutter
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
MC This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

slowlydoesit
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 14 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:15 - 01 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

MC wrote:
I was looking at videos of the 250 Hornet, 40bhp, high revving actually looks like a lot of fun. What's the CBR250, 26bhp?

Sure, but then if you're also targeting somebody who wants an economical commuter - and presumably lower priced bikes appeal to that kind of customer - then adding that extra horsepower also means you're adding more cost while reducing fuel efficiency. Products like this are a complex trade-off between manufacturing cost (and thus purchase price), running costs, image and actual ability. Hard for even specialist manufacturers to get right and often they don't as we know. Very Happy

Nice point about the weight of modern bikes. The "it's too heavy!" gambit is one part of the typical "you can't possibly have fun on that" argument, the other is "but it's not making any more power than XYZ!", where XYZ is a bike sold two or three decades ago. This is basically a problem of otherwise smart people not stopping to think about the consequences of emission control regulations and of course learner rider-related power restrictions. (And costs - see above.)

What stands out for me is that nearly all the reviews on the CRF250L mention the lack of power and the high weight relative to a pure off-road machine but then go on to say "You know what? We had lots of fun anyway." That says to me that Honda got this bike right in the way they didn't get (for example) the widely slated FMX650 right.
____________________
Kawasaki KMX200 with broken fixed powervalves and a stutter
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

stevo as b4
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Jul 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:15 - 01 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice chart, but IMO hard to read. I'd have liked to see all April 2013-2014 bike sales across each model of machine on sale.

Oh, and someone is having a right laugh, as they have mis-placed the ZZR1400 in the supersort category. It's nothing like a supersport bike in any way.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

slowlydoesit
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 14 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:28 - 01 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

stevo as b4 wrote:
Nice chart, but IMO hard to read. I'd have liked to see all April 2013-2014 bike sales across each model of machine on sale.

Yeah, the categories are a joke at times. The chart is perhaps a bit contrived, I just threw it together to show how completely the CRF250L dominates its little niche.

As for "sales across each model of machine", do you mean each type of machine i.e. Adventure, Supersports etc.? So Adventure registrations April 2013-April 2014, that sort of thing?
____________________
Kawasaki KMX200 with broken fixed powervalves and a stutter
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Fladdem
World Chat Champion



Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:17 - 01 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Do you want to play in the mud at all?

I think you may struggle with most if you do. If not, then I can't see the road causing much trouble. It's also not just the seat height, but the width, most trail bikes have a relatively skinny seat, so your legs could be closer together, thus not having to bend out and round before down. the XR125, I think has a fairly wide seat for a dirt oriented bike.

Quote:
Nice point about the weight of modern bikes. The "it's too heavy!" gambit is one part of the typical "you can't possibly have fun on that"


Yes, but look at the Varadero 125, has amazing potential for fun, but too heavy, not enough power, dare I say makes it a little bit boring? It pretends it can off-road, but no torque really, so need to rev it, but then no power so encounter the same problem, and due to the weight she feels a bit sluggish.

Now a lazy 400cc single in that chassis, there's potential. And looking at NX400's it is almost exactly what I would like, just minus the fairing. But like you say, it's what I would like, not necessarily what everyone else would.
____________________
Current:1991 Honda MT50 (Soon to be a H100/MTX/MT5 hybrid), 1976 Honda Cub C70, 2005 Honda Varadero 125, 1993 Yamaha TTR250 Open Enduro , 2010 Road Legal Stomp YX140, 1994 Honda CRM 250 MK III, 1999 Cagiva Mito 125, 1992 Honda CB400 Super Four, Stomp T4 230, 1984 Honda H100s, 2009 Sym XS125K
Past:2003 Aprilia RS125, 1982 Kawasaki GPZ550(FREE BIKE!)
I'm having more fun than a well-oiled midget.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
MC This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

Fladdem
World Chat Champion



Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:06 - 01 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

It sounds rational to me. Although maybe some skinnier bars for commuting/filtering purpose.

I love my dirt bike on the road. She's not fast enough for me to lose my licence for speeding Wink But I may lose it for spending too much time on the back wheel. Laughing

I find the closer you get to pure dirt bikes, the less you can jump speed bumps. I have to hit them FAST if I want air, otherwise the suspension just absorbs it, my mates EXC125 is the same. My mt50 just needed a little bounce before and off you go.

I think with road tyres a dirt bike is the ideal choice. But people may argue. In fact I think the ideal bikes are probably things like the V-Strom, comfy, frugal, nippy enough, faired, tall seat, wide-ish bars, space for luggage, wide service intervals, twin engine, less vibey and still not really fast enough to lose your licence.

But I'm not a big fan of fairing, I always promised myself, If I crashed the Varadero and broke the fairing, it would get a supermoto style mudguard and headlight stuck on it. I think it looks awesome without fairing, looks like the Duke but cooler.

I'm not very mature, I can't pick my times wisely when misbehaving. I reckon If my bike could do 110mph, I would be doing 110 MPH. Really I need a bike that doesn't encourage lunacy.

Supermotos and the like, I think encourage idiocy on the road. I gave my TTR to my uncle for a week to ride, he didn't want to give it back. He said he's never had any inclination to ride offroad before, but after 2 commutes, he'd found a green lane and went down it. He also claimed to have not wheelied a bike purposely since 1996, he purposely did mine. He said he wanted to see whether it could do so easily, he said he liked the engine. That was when it was standard.

If I could, I would have a fleet of bikes, but then I wouldn't be able to use them all, I'd just have some sat unused because I'd have to pick which one I wanted that day.
____________________
Current:1991 Honda MT50 (Soon to be a H100/MTX/MT5 hybrid), 1976 Honda Cub C70, 2005 Honda Varadero 125, 1993 Yamaha TTR250 Open Enduro , 2010 Road Legal Stomp YX140, 1994 Honda CRM 250 MK III, 1999 Cagiva Mito 125, 1992 Honda CB400 Super Four, Stomp T4 230, 1984 Honda H100s, 2009 Sym XS125K
Past:2003 Aprilia RS125, 1982 Kawasaki GPZ550(FREE BIKE!)
I'm having more fun than a well-oiled midget.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

slowlydoesit
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 14 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:25 - 01 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fladdem wrote:
I'm not very mature, I can't pick my times wisely when misbehaving. I reckon If my bike could do 110mph, I would be doing 110 MPH. Really I need a bike that doesn't encourage lunacy.

Thumbs Up This is my approach. I know my own weakness - if the bike made it easy to cruise at well over the ton, I know that's what I'd be doing. Then eventually my license would be gone.
____________________
Kawasaki KMX200 with broken fixed powervalves and a stutter
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 11 years, 136 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Offroad & Supermoto All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.09 Sec - Server Load: 1.1 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 110.6 Kb