Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


ce approved motorcycle clothes?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Lyam
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 06 Apr 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:04 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: ce approved motorcycle clothes? Reply with quote

does anyone have a list of clothes either leather or textile that meets ce level1, i ask after recently hearing of draggins new jeans that are the only jeans that met ce level 1 meaning all other kevlar jeans dont, so i guess there allowed to sell clothes that might not offer as much protection as a price tag would indicate. i know of a few suits that met ce level 2 one from wiese and the other from hideout, but why arent all textiles leather at least ce level 1?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:18 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

In short, because CE is nonsense.

In general the only parts of protective clothing that tend to be CE marked are the armour. Why? Because Knox have been submitting their armour for CE testing for years. Its relatively easy to get certification on just a piece of armour, yet it is very very hard and expensive to get CE certification on leathers.

It doesn't mean they are any less protective than CE marked clothing, it just means that they haven't been tested by some Belgian in a white coat.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Lyam
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 06 Apr 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:27 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

but surely if there gear was good enought they would submitt it for testing ive found some furygan jackets that are affordable and ce approved level 1 not just the armour the jacket itself has passed abrasion and burst tests and is recognised as ppe equitment while my more exspensive arlen ness leather suit has (this is not protective clothing) written on it, id happily buy the furygan jacket you know how good it is if its ce approved and how long youl last sliding down the road on a dry day!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Charlie
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 May 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:48 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

My TCX S-Race Gore-Tex boots are CE approved. I might have got the name wrong as my boots are old, but they are the most similar to them on the website.

https://www.tcxboots.com/eng/prodotti-dettaglio.php?prodotto=5
____________________
Past: Honda x8rs, Honda City fly, Honda Hornet 250, Honda VFR750, Yamaha xt600e.
Current: Honda CBR929RR & Yamaha XT660Z Tenere
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:36 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

The costs of testing will make the items more expensive. That will (by itself) tend to reduce sales. Manufacturers must reckon that any extra sales from some more CE labels won't make up for that.

Essentially they think we're dumb cheapskate posers, although they might not word it in exactly those terms.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:47 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lyam wrote:
but surely if there gear was good enought they would submitt it for testing ive found some furygan jackets that are affordable and ce approved level 1 not just the armour the jacket itself has passed abrasion and burst tests and is recognised as ppe equitment while my more exspensive arlen ness leather suit has (this is not protective clothing) written on it, id happily buy the furygan jacket you know how good it is if its ce approved and how long youl last sliding down the road on a dry day!


It's a matter of cost - look at how many items of clothing your chosen manufacturer makes and then imagine they have to pay an extra £X,000 just to get the CE logo...

Alpinestars have 40 jackets on their website, and that's the spring 2012 collection. There'll be another 40 in 'fall' 2012 let's assume it only costs £10k to do the CE testing - that's £800,000 just on the bottom line for jackets. Same on trousers.

If CE is important to you then go get something with it on, but I wouldn't worry too much. My armanis did an admirable job in my big off Smile
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

oldenuff
Renault 5 Driver



Joined: 01 Nov 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:12 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: What the rules say Reply with quote

Tp get the CE approval as 'Protective Clothing' the gear has to pass a series of abrasion, impact and bursting tests before they can be marked with the CE Protective clothing mark. I recall seeing a test in (iirc) Ride of Kevlar jeans where they were not as good as quite modest leathers for abrasion tests.
If you want to guarantee that your kit will perform for you in a crash or fall then you need CE level 1 Protective Clothing. If like me, you do not want to spend as much on kit as on the bike - yes your are talking about upwards of £2000 - then you need to make your own judgement on the quality of the kit you buy.
On this note I went to collect a computer from the repairers last week and guy serving me was bemoaning the fact that his engineer had been biking in the rain the day before in his brand-new very expensive kit from a well-known German outlet and had come home soaked.
I also notice that when I replaced my Buffalo jacket that the current CE armour is very much stiffer than previously so things do cahnge over time.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

iooi
Super Spammer



Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:40 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

I once knew a manufacture you had CE markings on the product packaging....

Turned out after some invistigation. That it WAS the packaging that was CE approved and the product had never been tested Laughing
____________________
Just because my bike was A DIVVY, does not mean i am......
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:26 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Re: What the rules say Reply with quote

oldenuff wrote:

I also notice that when I replaced my Buffalo jacket that the current CE armour is very much stiffer than previously so things do cahnge over time.


Different sorts of armour can pass the CE rating. Foam, Neoprene and hard armour will all pass if constructed correctly but have different stiffness.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

oldenuff
Renault 5 Driver



Joined: 01 Nov 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:53 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Uncertainty Reply with quote

I think that we all face the problem of uncertainty. If, in the case of my repairman, it leaks then you go back and get some sort of rectification.

In the case of helmets or protective clothing it is too late if you find out the hard way that the claims are untrue.

We would be better off if, instead of some theoretical standard, manufacturers were required to post their own test regime and the results that they achieved. We could then make an informed judgement.

You only have to graze through the SHARP results to see that price and protection do not always go hand in hand.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:34 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Re: Uncertainty Reply with quote

oldenuff wrote:
I think that we all face the problem of uncertainty. If, in the case of my repairman, it leaks then you go back and get some sort of rectification.

In the case of helmets or protective clothing it is too late if you find out the hard way that the claims are untrue.

We would be better off if, instead of some theoretical standard, manufacturers were required to post their own test regime and the results that they achieved. We could then make an informed judgement.

You only have to graze through the SHARP results to see that price and protection do not always go hand in hand.


The SHARP ratings are flawed. The SHARP tests don't test every area of a helmet.

I'd rather make my own judgements than have ratings and standards enforced by a government agency because it will increase costs.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

oldenuff
Renault 5 Driver



Joined: 01 Nov 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:15 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Not very sensible Reply with quote

How do you make judgements without good data?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Cunnington
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:28 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Re: Uncertainty Reply with quote

MarJay wrote:

The SHARP ratings are flawed. The SHARP tests don't test every area of a helmet.

I'd rather make my own judgements than have ratings and standards enforced by a government agency because it will increase costs.


But they are better than nothing. Until they started, the best guide for actual performance of a selection of helmets was an article in RIDE.

My old safety officer was a biker with a bee in his bonnet about me buying a set of leathers that were merely "fashion items with CE armour". In my eyes they are better than nothing, but until there is a SHARP style programme for leathers, you don't know how they will perform relative to each other in a repeatable form of test, and we all know that it is entirely feasible that you will experience an off that does not conform with the repeatable test.
____________________
'82 C50, '81 CB100, '84 GS125, '95 NTV650, '00 Bandit 600, '06 SV650, '56 Z1000, '89 NTV600
The Shaggy D.A. wrote: "You are invisible. Those who can see you are trying to kill you."
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:55 - 25 Jun 2012    Post subject: Re: Uncertainty Reply with quote

MarJay wrote:
The SHARP ratings are flawed. The SHARP tests don't test every area of a helmet.

They test well defined areas in a consistent way. ECE regulation 22 covers the rest, with its "as necessary" tests. SHARP doesn't tell the whole story, but it tells another chapter. Do you have a better method for determining the relative impact protection of helmets?

MarJay wrote:
I'd rather make my own judgements than have ratings and standards enforced by a government agency because it will increase costs.

Not sure how you work that one out. SHARP buys helmets retail, so it costs us more in taxation, but shouldn't add to the price of helmets.

Unless they're spending money to get better test results, which is rather the point of the scheme.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:36 - 27 Jun 2012    Post subject: Re: Uncertainty Reply with quote

MarJay wrote:
I'd rather make my own judgements than have ratings and standards enforced by a government agency because it will increase costs.


For those of us without your visual safety analysis skills can you please explain how your judgements are better than a series of tests under controlled conditions?

I assume you check brand, price, pretty graphics and it stops there? But if you know some magic way of genuinely testing a helmet without destroying it in the process I'm eager to hear it!
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

There is a gap of 2 years, 198 days between these two posts...
briansansom This post is not being displayed because it has a low rating (Spam). Unhide this post / all posts.

wr6133
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Dec 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:27 - 12 Jan 2015    Post subject: Re: ce approved motorcycle clothes? Reply with quote

briansansom wrote:
I'm a bit late joining this forum but as more and more companies are making some less than truthful claims thought I could do some good. This link will answer most of what anyone needs to know......

[....]

For more info message me or read our new website www.bksleather.co.uk


Send me a free one, I'll probably crash at least 4 times this year so can provide truthful feedback Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

There is a gap of 1 year, 76 days between these two posts...
dspr This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 10 years, 5 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.11 Sec - Server Load: 0.39 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 107.93 Kb