Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Would there be less long term benefit if we made stuff in UK

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 Topic moved: from Random Banter to Politics & Current Affairs by G (3 Mar 2015 - 09:10)
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Wonko The Sane
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Jan 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:10 - 02 Mar 2015    Post subject: Would there be less long term benefit if we made stuff in UK Reply with quote

Benefits Britain is on and just wondering;

Would there be less people on long term benefits if we manufactured more stuff in the UK or would things stay pretty much as they are?

Some of the people on the program are saying they can't find work due to arthritis and similar issues (lets give benefit of doubt) and left school at 16, been on training schemes but no success.

what's people's thoughts?

I know some people are determined to live on benefits but, having spent some time unemployed for the best part of a year myself (and not able to claim) others do want to be working but for whatever reason aren't finding anything to get themselves back into work.
____________________
Looking to pass your CBT / Bike tests in Bury Lancashire? try www.focusridertraining.co.uk Would recommend.
They're also on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/pages/Focus-Rider-Training/196832923734251
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

BakesBeans
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 14 Aug 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:34 - 02 Mar 2015    Post subject: Re: Would there be less long term benefit if we made stuff i Reply with quote

You're asking the wrong question.

People on benefits is correlated to availability of jobs and the pay level.

More manufacturing in the UK would help reduce the trade deficit, would have a number of positive effects for the UK. More jobs would be one thing, but not the be all and end all.
____________________
Current: Kawasaki ZX636
Previous Bike: Honda CBR600F ABS, Yamaha XJ6 F Diversion ABS, Honda VFR400 NC30
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

angryjonny
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:42 - 02 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Many people are on benefits because they're better-off financially than they would be if they had to travel to low-paid jobs, put the kids in daycare etc. If minimum wage were higher, it'd draw more people back into employment. It isn't jobs that are scarce, it's jobs that pay a living wage that are scarce.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
- This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.

finchy95
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 26 Jan 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:53 - 02 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

My missus just read some woman on that was complaining about taking £1100 a month in benefit because it wasn't "enough" what these people actually need is a fucking reality check. Because that's more than me and her make separately and we work full time. I went on ESA (?) after an accident that meant I couldn't walk and was taking £40 a week. That is not enough. As for employment there's plenty of jobs about people just need to be less fucking fussy.
____________________
2005 suzuki van van - Sold. -> 2015 honda cbr 125 r - current bike.
Now's not the time for fear. That comes later.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
N cee thirty This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

ScottT
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:59 - 02 Mar 2015    Post subject: Re: Would there be less long term benefit if we made stuff i Reply with quote

Wonko The Sane wrote:

Would there be less people on long term benefits if we manufactured more stuff in the UK or would things stay pretty much as they are?




Attitudes have changed a lot since the days when we made everything, my local town population of 60,000 used to have a shipyard employing 20,000+ now it employs ~4000 so yes things here would improve if they went back to employing 20,000.
On the other hand, 35yrs ago if you were (properly) disabled you got a little blue 3 wheeler to help you get around, now if you can fake a bad back you get given a nice new car of your choice.

The problem is so many people see not working as a career choice, when i was a school kid (35+yrs ago) if your dad didnt work it was a bit embarassing, other kids took the piss. Now its cool to boast about how well off you are because of what your claiming!!!

Nothing will change till you can get a bigger difference between someone who works and someone on benefits.
Family of 4 Dad works 40hrs on minimum wage, mum works 16hrs on minimum wage, the family of 4 next door Dad doesnt work due to bad back, mum has never worked but gets paid as dad's carer, the difference in the lifestyle of both familys will be very little, in a lot of cases the non working family will have a better car, bigger tele and more sky channels and be in the pub more, its that difference that needs changing. If making more in this country helped that change then great but it needs a bit more than just that.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

CHR15
Turbo nutter bastard



Joined: 14 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:59 - 02 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

i would be intrigued to see what would happen if cash payments were replaced with some sort of tokens that could only be exchanged for essential goods.

the tokens are also linked somehow to the claimant to prevent them being exchanged on the black market for non essentials.



either that or we just incinerate the undesirables.
____________________
Turbocharged drag thing / project death weapon / GK73A
Ste: I'm not entirely sure how you'd go about verbally abusing someone with a potato but I'm sure it's possible.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

ScottT
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:06 - 02 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

CHR15 wrote:
i would be intrigued to see what would happen if cash payments were replaced with some sort of tokens that could only be exchanged for essential goods.

the tokens are also linked somehow to the claimant to prevent them being exchanged on the black market for non essentials.



Tokens should have the picture of the claimant on them to prevent fraud, also wage slips should have a current picture of the person on them, a valid wage slip from the last 6 weeks should have to be shown to buy beer, fags, lottery tickets, scratchcards etc
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

angryjonny
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:10 - 02 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

ScottT wrote:
Tokens should have the picture of the claimant on them to prevent fraud

Pff. The Queen has been getting these from the government for 88 years and she lives in a castle.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ariel Badger
Super Spammer



Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:24 - 02 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

How many on the program were employable?
____________________
Bikers make great organ donors, get 115 on your licence today.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Tritey This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

DrDonnyBrago
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:33 - 02 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Get the wastrels into work camps factories making stuff.

Who gives a fuck if it isn't competitive, it'll cover the materials and overheads, contribute to gdp and the labour cost is getting paid anyway.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Skudd
Super Spammer



Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:35 - 02 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

It would be great if all the other countries had to jump through all the same rules that we do to manufacture anything. Health and safety/ sick pay/ union rules/ building standards/ rent/sewerage/ water rates/council tax. Then come back and produce stuff at the same price as they do now.
Even local government, although ours isn't brilliant, it isn't as corrupt as many others in the world. Not by a long chalk no matter what the tin hat brigade say.
____________________
Famous last words of Humpty Dumpty. " Stop pushing me "
Petty Anarchists look at "1984".............. The Visionary looks at "Animal Farm".
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

barrkel
World Chat Champion



Joined: 30 Jul 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:51 - 02 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
If minimum wage were higher, it'd draw more people back into employment.

Raising minimum wage would make a certain number of jobs that are currently profitable - i.e. create more value for the employer than is spent on wages - unprofitable, and would reduce employment.

OTOH, it would increase wages for people whose employers are still coming out ahead. But there would almost certainly be a net loss in employment, everything else being equal.

Quote:
More manufacturing in the UK would help reduce the trade deficit

More exports (whether services or manufacturing doesn't matter) from the UK would increase demand for sterling, which would raise the relative value of the currency. This would make UK exports more expensive, and imports cheaper, which would work towards increasing trade deficit. Floating currencies make trade balanced, not increased manufacturing.

Quote:
Leaving the EU would make British manufacturing more competitive to EU imports

The EU is a much larger market than the UK, and would thus get better terms than the UK in free trade agreements with other countries and blocs. And a UK outside the EU would probably not see as favourable terms when trading with the EU; EU imports would be more expensive, and UK exports would be lower. That's lose-lose the way I see it - most of my more expensive purchases, whether it's fine wine, fine food, or fine motorcycles are all imported, many from the rest of the EU. UK products and services should win because they're better, not because of barriers to trade.

If you want to improve the economy, produce better stuff (service or product, I don't care) and consume more stuff (technically any loss from not consuming should be balanced with spending from investment of the savings, but investment is spent on different types of things, and all too often it's unproductive things like property).
____________________
Bikes: S1000R, SH350; Exes: Vity 125, PS125, YBR125, ER6f, VFR800, Brutale 920, CB600F, SH300x4
Best road ever ridden: www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2MhNxUEYtQ
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

bikertomm
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Jul 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:06 - 02 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can't watch these programmes. Though when I catch a glimpse, they do make me laugh.

Why is the counter argument always, 'Yeah they're on benefits and have a nicer TV than I do and a better shinery phone than me'

Hardly living life. Laughing

I too reckon the token idea would be a good effort. But the country has far more important things to sort (Tax loopholes - Starbucks anyone?, funding India's next spaceship, catching career criminals doing 33 in a 30, etc.)
____________________
07' Honda Hornet now full powaah! My guide on performing an oil change!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Ribenapigeon
Super Spammer



Joined: 20 Feb 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:06 - 02 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

DrDonnyBrago wrote:
Get the wastrels into work camps factories making stuff.

Who gives a fuck if it isn't competitive, it'll cover the materials and overheads, contribute to gdp and the labour cost is getting paid anyway.


There is kind of a point there. Back in the day of full employment and mass production industry the feckless would have been looked after by industry. They may have only been given a broom and sent around the factory looking for left handed screwdrivers but they wouldn't have been a burden on the state. Now of course industry provides less and less for the community. In fact the country now looks after industry through actually paying for its labour costs through tax credits. Its been mentioned that feckless benefits claimants should get a dose of "reality". What if industry had to have a dose of this reality as well?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Lord Percy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 03:03 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does it also stem into the whole 'modern world, everyone deserves absolute equality' idea?

e.g. the ideal would be that everyone is working, and those who simply cannot work to afford a good quality of life, e.g. disabled people etc, are given benefits to bring their standard of living up.

So it's all about making sure everyone gets to live the same quality of life, without the weaker members of society being left behind.

Well... that's the theory... Laughing

Now too many people are finding excuses for why they can't work either.

Also it's definitely true that the minimum wage should allow a good quality of life. Benefits should be a bit more 'basic'. Working should be the better option.

But then doesn't it go wider than that? What if the world stops trading with the UK? What if there are no resources coming into the country? So there wouldn't be anything to pay people with for working.

And then I guess the question isn't just about manufacturing, but about whether the UK could live entirely off its own steam alone, if needed..?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:09 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Boozehawk wrote:
What if industry had to have a dose of this reality as well?

Like having to compete with factories employing teenagers in China where they have suicide nets outside the dorm windows?

And that is the PREMIUM products we're buying - the cheap ones are quite likely made in worse conditions.

Increase the minimum wage significantly and competing against that becomes even less realistic.

As to the tokens - likely Russel Brand will be around to beat your kitten up already, so not likely in reality. Such system have to some degree been tried and generally get moaned about because they're not flexible enough (ie tennants super not included.)
In the end, they could still just go and do a shop for a friend and take the cash themselves.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

smegballs
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:50 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

angryjonny wrote:
If minimum wage were higher, it'd draw more people back into employment.


From an employers perspective:

1. If labour costs are going up, that is a good incentive for me to further automation, reducing the amount of labour my business needs.

2. If min wage is going up, I will want to get the very best that I can get for my cash. Why take lowly qualified folks on when there is a wealth of unemployed graduates out there. Likewise it means that there is even less incentive to take a chance on someone with say, a few minor police run-ins. Why take that chance, when there is literally thousands of people with clean records to pick from.

Raising the minimum wage would hurt the fuck-ups and unemployables even more IMO.

Conversely, lower the minimum wage and it gives a reason to throw a bone downwards. I won't be paying Dodgy Darren (with a shoplifting conviction aged 13) 7 quid an hour, it not worth the risk. I might however agree to take him on for 4 quid an hour for the first few months and see how it goes. If he proves capable it will be well worth raising his wages to make sure he stays... if he is a waste-of-space then at least the outlay to the business is minimized.


tl;dr the higher the barriers to entry, the worse of those at the bottom of the pile will be
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Ribenapigeon
Super Spammer



Joined: 20 Feb 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:58 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:
Boozehawk wrote:
What if industry had to have a dose of this reality as well?

Like having to compete with factories employing teenagers in China where they have suicide nets outside the dorm windows?

And that is the PREMIUM products we're buying - the cheap ones are quite likely made in worse conditions.

Increase the minimum wage significantly and competing against that becomes even less realistic.

As to the tokens - likely Russel Brand will be around to beat your kitten up already, so not likely in reality. Such system have to some degree been tried and generally get moaned about because they're not flexible enough (ie tennants super not included.)
In the end, they could still just go and do a shop for a friend and take the cash themselves.


I'm not talking about increasing the minimum wage I'm saying we should stop subsidising employers wages costs. People get pissed off with the cost of benefits but don't realise they're also paying for a business owners £100k range rover when in reality his business is only worth a £20k second hand merc.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:06 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ah, my apologies, I had misunderstood; we're talking about something that will result in a big push for outsourcing a lot of low wage jobs abroad or automating them.

Certainly, the 'tax the rich more' people don't really seem to comprehend quite how much those lower down are significantly supported by the taxes of others.

I would like to see a push to get people to WANT to support British business more - but unfortunately this isn't likely to be realistic - we'd have to start with admitting that the British Public is pretty selfish; who's going to do that?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Lord Percy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:49 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:


I would like to see a push to get people to WANT to support British business more


All it would take is a well-made, intelligent and long-running government media campaign telling us to 'buy British'.

But then it might start treading the 'propaganda' line a little too closely.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ribenapigeon
Super Spammer



Joined: 20 Feb 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:35 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lord Percy wrote:
G wrote:


I would like to see a push to get people to WANT to support British business more


All it would take is a well-made, intelligent and long-running government media campaign telling us to 'buy British'.

But then it might start treading the 'propaganda' line a little too closely.


It didn't work in the seventies.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

wr6133
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Dec 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:39 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

More manufacturing just wouldn't work without some kind of crazy protectionist tariffs to make foreign goods stupidly expensive. I for one wouldn't buy something at a higher cost just because it was made in Britain.

As to the professional benefit parasites I don't understand how they claim so much on benefits. I'm not claiming anything but am out of work from mangling myself crashing delivery bikes last year, out of curiosity I looked at what was claimable and it was under £100 a week, so how the fuck does perfectly employable chav-mc-scrotumsack clear over £1k a month?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 10 years, 344 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.11 Sec - Server Load: 2.24 - MySQL Queries: 19 - Page Size: 144.14 Kb