Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Does This Expain the Financial Crash?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Tracey Suntan-King
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Nov 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:58 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Does This Expain the Financial Crash? Reply with quote

Doing the rounds on Faceache. Is this bedtime story a plausible explanation of the financial crash?

Drunk & Unemployed
____________________
Whether you think you can, or think you can't, you're probably right
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

flikers
Nitrous Nuisance



Joined: 16 Feb 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:06 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Replace the bar giving out drinks with estate agents/banks giving out mortgages and thats basically it.

Pretty stupid write up though.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
- This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.

Tracey Suntan-King
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Nov 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:39 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

mpd72 wrote:
Kind of...

Apart from the usual socialist spin where the blame is mainly laid on the irresponsible bankers/bar owner for allowing credit, rather than the irresponsible unemployed drunks who ran up the debt in the first place because they were "allowed" to do so, without the means or intention of ever paying it back.


Don't the drinkers have the excuse of ignorance or inebriation/ or fecklessness though? Wasn't it a form of entrapment?

I'll admit to being a bit of a lefty, but the idea of over-valuing debt and treating as an asset, then consolidating it into an investment vehicle was never going to work was it?

Someone, but sadly neither the borrower or the banker, was going to have to pay, eventually.

So who is the scoundrel? Who is the fool?
____________________
Whether you think you can, or think you can't, you're probably right
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Flatbadger
World Chat Champion



Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:37 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

White on black might be good when it comes to Guiness, but sod reading that writing! Shocked

Short-termism causes the trouble. You can't blame bankers - they're just doing what any upstanding sociopath would do.
____________________
If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
You're in ISIS
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
- This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.

Orennayar
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 08 Apr 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:21 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

If I can remember correctly, in real life loans were given to people with the expectation that housing prices would keep climbing, assuring some sort of security for the banks. But when said prices stopped rising, everybody freaked out and tried to get rid of the bonds, thus reducing their value and crashing the whole system.
____________________
DAS passed: 21/07/14
2011 YBR125(sold)
2009 XJ6N
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

angryjonny
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:28 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

mpd72 wrote:
Not that I can see. It was a form of fecklessness on behalf of the borrower. Nobody was forced to over borrow and spunk it up the wall. It's about time the drunk unemployed bar customers/overspending feckless borrowers took a bit of responsibility for their own actions rather blaming it all on "bankers"

Responsible borrower, me. But as a taxpayer I still have 4-figures worth of money sunk into RBS, bailing out their mismanagement of their loans/debts. A bank that still makes losses to the tune of billions a year. And still pays bonuses of similar magnitudes.

While banks are throwing money at people who clearly can't afford to pay it back and then making profit out of it by selling the debt on to someone else who will sell it on to someone else, you can't lay the blame at the feet of the borrower.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:46 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's Marys fault.

Burn the witch! (or take back her kinghthood)
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

swampy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:31 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

bnp72 wrote:
Kind of...

Apart from the usual socialist spin where the blame is mainly laid on the irresponsible bankers/bar owner for allowing credit, rather than the irresponsible unemployed drunks who ran up the debt in the first place because they were "allowed" to do so, without the means or intention of ever paying it back.


https://www.city-connect.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/yawning.jpg

Because Socialists.... Your default answer...

angryjohnny hit the nail on the head. This was a global crisis caused by banks selling toxic debt in order to boost their profits and maximise their bonus.

It was essentially irrelevant which party was in government at the time, as it would be incredibly unlikely that the Tories would have introduced any more regulation than Labour of the banking industry.

I am also a shareholder in RBS (as are you), if they can afford to pay public sector workers bonuses, then they should be able to pay me a dividend on my shares. That should sit well with your right wing philosophy...

These are the people you should get angry about - they are getting a better deal than you from public money, rather than turning your ire to public sector pensions or benefits claimants as you do...
____________________
"I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me." Hunter S Thompson
"Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death..." Hunter S Thompson
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

mentalboy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 May 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:37 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you really want a laugh, check out Fannie Mae and Fannie Mac and how post-collapse borrowing restrictions were eased up a couple of months ago allowing them to start loaning to customers in the same kind of fashion that caused the last collapse.
How long before they're bundling bad debts and dumping them on greedy Euro banks who think they're buying a bargain?
Rolling Eyes
____________________
Make mine a Corona.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Flatbadger
World Chat Champion



Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:49 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

mentalboy wrote:
If you really want a laugh, check out Fannie Mae and Fannie Mac..


I'm saving up for a deposit this time, I might just get me a trailer 'park home' out of this next crash. Thumbs Up
____________________
If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
You're in ISIS
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

mentalboy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 May 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:58 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Flatbadger wrote:
mentalboy wrote:
If you really want a laugh, check out Fannie Mae and Fannie Mac..


I'm saving up for a deposit this time, I might just get me a trailer 'park home' out of this next crash. Thumbs Up


Deposit? You need a deposit with them? Bugger! I was hoping for 250K out of them next summer as a jobless immigrant, might have to rethink that one Laughing
____________________
Make mine a Corona.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:57 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

The analogy is a bit suspect, as the banks weren't pissing their lending up the wall, they were buying property, which was viewed as being safe as houses. As long as everybody kept lending, the good times would keep on rolling...

mentalboy wrote:
check out Fannie Mae and Fannie Mac and how post-collapse borrowing restrictions were eased up a couple of months ago allowing them to start loaning to customers in the same kind of fashion that caused the last collapse.

Profligate lending inflated the bubble, but the actual cause of the collapse was the banks shutting off the money hose.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
- This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.

mentalboy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 May 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:15 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:

Profligate lending inflated the bubble, but the actual cause of the collapse was the banks shutting off the money hose.


Was it a shut off of the hose or because it dried up?
Those two lenders (amongst others) would give mortgages to people who had zero earned income, never mind them just stretching their finance, there wasn't much to begin with. And this is the road they are starting to head down again after getting the lawmakers to reverse legislation that meant they had to do tiresome stuff like make sure people were actually in employment and earning money

Said mortgage companies then said 'stuff that for a game of toy soldiers, here world, have some kosher mortgages cheap' and sold them to international banking concerns who thought they were getting lots of monthly repayments coming in.
So, how long before the US starts unloading mortgages on the international markets again with the promises of (non-existent) big bucks to be made???

On the upside, following on from the last crash it does mean that repo'd property out there goes for peanuts and there are still many, many properties out there up for grabs Mr. Green
____________________
Make mine a Corona.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

swampy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:33 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

bnp72 wrote:
This attitude is why I can't be arsed debating with some socialists.


Them being right you mean ? Wink
____________________
"I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me." Hunter S Thompson
"Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death..." Hunter S Thompson
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Jewlio Iglesias This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

grr666
Super Spammer



Joined: 16 Jun 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:36 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

If someone eats far too much and becomes very fat and subsequently unwell is that the fault of
the company that makes the food or the person stuffing it into their mouth?
____________________
Currently enjoying products from Ford, Mazda and Yamaha
Ste wrote: Avatars are fine, it's signatures that need turning off. Thumbs Up
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Pigeon
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Sep 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:36 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

mpd72 wrote:
Kind of...

Apart from the usual socialist spin where the blame is mainly laid on the irresponsible bankers/bar owner for allowing credit, rather than the irresponsible unemployed drunks who ran up the debt in the first place because they were "allowed" to do so, without the means or intention of ever paying it back.


People are like goldfish, throw in enough food and they will consume it all regardless if they are hungry. And bankers are lying, cheating, psychopaths who would rob you blind in the street if they thought they could get away with it.

In the middle is government legislation and enforcement. My 2p for what it's worth is this is where the biggest failing was.
The Glass-Steagall act was put on place to separate the activities of commercial and investment banking. It stopped high-street banks from creating and investing in securities.
Components of the act were watered down over the years but particularly the late 90's and the Fed's interpretation meant banks were allowed to deal in securities, moreover, using client money (specifically monies from retail banking).

So the banks can create debt (mortgages etc), re-package it to spread the risk of good/bad debt (securitise) and get it appraised by ratings agencies so investors can gauge the value of the debt based on its perceived risk. Sold as a Collaterized Debt Obligation (CDO).

But ratings agencies earn vastly money from the sell side, not the buy side. So they are incentivised to positively rate products from banks.
So these CDO's get AAA+ rated, when they are really much lower.

So banks get to offload the risk of the debt they have created at a great price. But moreover, they can also gamble with other financial institutions on the value of their own debt through credit derivatives (such as Credit Default Swap). Which is great, because now they can use leverage and trade on margin. Vastly increasing the potential wins (and losses).

What about if they could securitise (re-package) the CDS's. Offload the risk of the products where they are gambling on theirs and others repackaged mortgage backed securities. Synthetic Collateralized Debt Obligations (SCDO's). Brilliant.

The "value" of SCDO's went from $15bln in 2005 to $5trn at the end of 2006!

And all because governments allowed banks to operate in a much riskier way. Yes people should not have borrowed more than they could afford to repay. But leverage and derivatives combined with poor governance meant those relatively small losses became mind bogglingly enormous.
They pumped a bull with steroids, let it out of it's cage into a china shop and wondered why everything was smashed.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:06 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

mentalboy wrote:
Those two lenders (amongst others) would give mortgages to people who had zero earned income

But viewed another way, the banks were actually buying property. They couldn't lose, even if they never got paid a penny on the mortgages.

You know, unless they stopped lending and foreclosed on millions of people, and saturated the market with repossessed homes that nobody could afford because they'd stopped lending, thereby sending prices plummeting and gutting the value of their own investments.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
- This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.

swampy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:36 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

bnp72 wrote:
Goldfish are stupid, people need to start taking some responsibility for their own actions, apart from Liberals of course, who generally are on the same debating level of a goldfish.


I completely agree. Including those people whose greed and pursuit of the mighty dollar led to this disaster with their 'make money and hang the consequences' approach to business.

You know, those people who still work in the industry and are taking yours and my money in their bonuses.

Yours and mine bnp72

I dunno about you, but I'm a bit pissed they haven't taken responsibility for their actions in any other way than to take a year off of coke and whores at bonus time in 2009 before getting straight back on it a year later when all the fuss died down...

I agree with personal responsibility (I am after all towards the anarchist end of the spectrum). The proles shouldn't have asked for the money if they couldn't pay it back... However, why do you think banks credit check if not to assess whether those they lend to can pay back. Is it not somewhat irresponsible to give money to people that you know can't pay it back. Is it not then criminal to sell that debt to another organisation therefore making money out of giving loans to people you know cannot pay them back ? Wheres the fucking personal responsibility in that chap ? Rolling Eyes
____________________
"I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me." Hunter S Thompson
"Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death..." Hunter S Thompson


Last edited by swampy on 22:59 - 03 Mar 2015; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

angryjonny
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:48 - 03 Mar 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

mpd72 wrote:
apart from Liberals of course, who generally are on the same debating level of a goldfish.

No no no no no. You don't win an argument by insulting the people you're arguing with. It just illustrates that you've run out of valid points. (As does arguing that the public who bailed out the banks are the bad guys in this little story.)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
- This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 10 years, 343 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.16 Sec - Server Load: 2.44 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 144.93 Kb