|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Ribenapigeon |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Ribenapigeon Super Spammer

Joined: 20 Feb 2012 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Triton Thrasher |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Triton Thrasher Could Be A Chat Bot
Joined: 16 Oct 2012 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Suntan Sid |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Suntan Sid World Chat Champion

Joined: 07 May 2009 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 12:57 - 01 Apr 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
AIUI, where this happens the state provides third party only insurance, as part of road tax, it's up to the individual rider/driver/owner if they want to upgrade to fire/theft/fully comp as well. ____________________ "Everybody needs money, that's why they call it money!"  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Ste |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Ste Not Work Safe

Joined: 01 Sep 2002 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Ribenapigeon |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Ribenapigeon Super Spammer

Joined: 20 Feb 2012 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Dalemac |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Dalemac World Chat Champion

Joined: 15 Oct 2006 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarJay But it's British!

Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| tatters |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 tatters Exxon Valdez

Joined: 05 Jan 2004 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 13:54 - 01 Apr 2015 Post subject: Re: Government as insurance provider? |
 |
|
| Quote: | leftie commie risk averse society where riding a motorcycle is considered too high a risk
|
We have this in the province of Saskatchewan, Canada where a lot of industry's and services are province (state) owned.
SGI (Saskatchewan government insurance), Its a complete rip off and there nothing you can do when they hike up the rates as they are the only vehicle licence/insurance provider its a government ran cartel that hates motorcycles. For example to insure a motorcycle over 400cc your looking at a annual rate of between $2000-3500 no matter what you age or experience, you can insure monthly with a added admin fee but its still a hell of a lot of money.
For me to insure my YZF1000 in the UK costs me £100 per year, Same quote with SGI is £1900.  ____________________ Past:NRG50,AF1125(x2),NSR125RR,ZZR250,CX500,VFR400,KR1S,ZZR600(x2),CB400N,YZF1000(x2),KH125,Z200,FX400R,CBR954RR(x2)GPZ500S,GT550,VFR750F(x2),RD350N,XR650R,CBR600F,CB250,KDX250,YZF750R,CRM250,400EXC,KLR650,TTR600RE,DR350S,R100GSPD,RGV250,VMAX1200,DL650,KZ750 Present:G650XC,C12,CRF450X,1190ADV |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Ribenapigeon |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Ribenapigeon Super Spammer

Joined: 20 Feb 2012 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| tatters |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 tatters Exxon Valdez

Joined: 05 Jan 2004 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 14:14 - 01 Apr 2015 Post subject: Re: Government as insurance provider? |
 |
|
| Boozehawk wrote: |
What happens if you make a claim? One of the things got me thinking about this was a BCF member who's bike was stolen then his quotes after that were as much as a bike was worth. Practically making insurance pointless. |
Your rates go up, you can also lose your safety rating if you were at fault in a accident which is like a NCB but gives very little of a discount. They act like a normal private insurance company in most ways but with added government incompetence, For some reason they always seem to try and have vehicles repaired even though most of the time its not economically worth it.
My sister-in-laws early 90's ford mustang was stolen by Indians and crashed into a ditch, at the time the car was only worth around $3-4k but SGI spend almost $9k having the damage repaired when it would of been better off just paying out the market value. ____________________ Past:NRG50,AF1125(x2),NSR125RR,ZZR250,CX500,VFR400,KR1S,ZZR600(x2),CB400N,YZF1000(x2),KH125,Z200,FX400R,CBR954RR(x2)GPZ500S,GT550,VFR750F(x2),RD350N,XR650R,CBR600F,CB250,KDX250,YZF750R,CRM250,400EXC,KLR650,TTR600RE,DR350S,R100GSPD,RGV250,VMAX1200,DL650,KZ750 Present:G650XC,C12,CRF450X,1190ADV
Last edited by tatters on 14:17 - 01 Apr 2015; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Suntan Sid |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Suntan Sid World Chat Champion

Joined: 07 May 2009 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Ribenapigeon |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Ribenapigeon Super Spammer

Joined: 20 Feb 2012 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| tatters |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 tatters Exxon Valdez

Joined: 05 Jan 2004 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 15:06 - 01 Apr 2015 Post subject: Re: Government as insurance provider? |
 |
|
| Boozehawk wrote: |
Isn't just a huge vote winner in elections to offer to scrap the system then? |
Would never happen with the current provincial population which is sitting around the 1 million mark, too few people for private company's to be competitive, they would need to privatize motor insurance nationally and that's unlikely to ever happen. ____________________ Past:NRG50,AF1125(x2),NSR125RR,ZZR250,CX500,VFR400,KR1S,ZZR600(x2),CB400N,YZF1000(x2),KH125,Z200,FX400R,CBR954RR(x2)GPZ500S,GT550,VFR750F(x2),RD350N,XR650R,CBR600F,CB250,KDX250,YZF750R,CRM250,400EXC,KLR650,TTR600RE,DR350S,R100GSPD,RGV250,VMAX1200,DL650,KZ750 Present:G650XC,C12,CRF450X,1190ADV |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Teflon-Mike |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Teflon-Mike tl;dr

Joined: 01 Jun 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 15:13 - 01 Apr 2015 Post subject: Re: Government as insurance provider? |
 |
|
| Boozehawk wrote: | Somebody recently told me some countries the state acts as vehicle insurer. How would this work? Could it be a better way of doing vehicle insurance? |
We already have the option... sort of..
| Road Traffic Act 1991 wrote: | Exception from requirement of third-party insurance.
In subsection (1) (which removes the requirement for third-party insurance or security where £15,000 is kept deposited with the Accountant General of the Supreme Court) for “£15,000” there shall be substituted “ £500,000 ”. |
The amount of 'bond' was significantly raised by the 1991 RTA, because it hadn't been revised for about thirty years; and the value of bond needed had fallen so low, little more then the price of a fully loaded Golf GTi; the loop-hole was being exploited a little, by otherwise insurable drivers, where the bond was actually cheaper than a 3rd party premium!
As I understand it; you place the Bond, and the government stand guarantor against any 3rd party liability, and for as long as you leave the bond on deposit. It doesn't earn any interest, but as long as you don't have an accident, you can get your money back whenever you like. If any-one claims against you though; you loose the lot, even if the claims only for a few hundred quid.
Wording also provided the 'cover' to any vehicle owned by the bond placer, irrespective of who might be driving that vehicle... so one bond could cover a whole LOT of drivers and a whole lot of cars!
Meanwhile, Around 1993, the Norwich Union had approx 95% market share of the UK Motorcycle Insurance business, when they decided to stop offering new polices.
They almost killed UK Biking at a stroke... as other insurers 're-evaluated' their position compared to NU, and either followed suit or hiked premiums, enormously.
Was suggested at the time, (by the men in big glasses) that motor-insurance was only marginally 'profitable' to start with, and to many insurers it was almost a loss leader to get other business, or to get revenue from selling 'extras' like the credit to pay for the annual policy, while motorcycle insurance was particularly 'unprofitable', due to low vehicle values but high potential liabilities, and high claims risks.
State-Backed insurance schemes, as other countries that have them, were suggested then, as a 'model' for a UK system if commercial insurance brokers failed to plug the gap left by the NU.
I believe, that Major's government gave the men in big glasses a "jolly good talking to", though, and the NU back-tracked a bit on its original position to stop issuing new motorcycle policies; and limited that to merely not offering 'first' policies to riders under 30, and other insurers were 'encouraged' to get into the market; and doing more 'sensible' risk assessment than NU had done, leading to voluntary excesses and more caveots, like separate 'pillion cover' becoming more common place...
So based on that, I doubt that HMGov't are likely to be keen to jump in on the act now, and take business off their buddies in big glasses, unless there is a real crisis, and the country is going to grind to a halt, with every one sticking their cars on SORN, to avoid DVLA payola 'penalty charges' for owning an uninsured vehicle, 'cos the brokers wont give any-one a policy.. ____________________ My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?' |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| c-m |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 c-m World Chat Champion
Joined: 12 May 2006 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Alpineandy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Alpineandy World Chat Champion
Joined: 18 Mar 2015 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Polarbear |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Polarbear Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Alpineandy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Alpineandy World Chat Champion
Joined: 18 Mar 2015 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Triton Thrasher |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Triton Thrasher Could Be A Chat Bot
Joined: 16 Oct 2012 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Alpineandy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Alpineandy World Chat Champion
Joined: 18 Mar 2015 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Triton Thrasher |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Triton Thrasher Could Be A Chat Bot
Joined: 16 Oct 2012 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Robby |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Robby Dirty Old Man

Joined: 16 May 2002 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 19:35 - 01 Apr 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
Thing is, insurance isn't a rip-off business. It's a large, competitive business with low margins.
If you're young it's very expensive - at 18 year old could expect to pay £2-4k to insure a small hatchback for a year. This is because said 18 year old is likely to have a crash with a payout cost (vehicle, injuries, legal, admin) of 1.8-3.6k. Or to put it in a more real world scenario, out of 100 18 year old drivers, the overall payout on claims in a year is going to be 180-360k. It isn't hard to get up to that figure. A few broken bones, a few written off cars, many hours of legal costs.
My bike insurance is £100 with a cheap insurer with crap customer service and awful admin charges. I could pay £300 to go to a decent company and get a decent service. If insurance was a Govt run industry, I would pay £300 for crap service. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 23:15 - 01 Apr 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
Hi
They had this system in Victoria, Australia, when we were there (assume they still do).
It did make real insurance (ie, fully comp cover) dirt cheap. The insurance was included in the cost of rego (ie, their equivalent of VED). This was hideously expensive compared to UK road tax. Combined with the cost of insurance it probably worked out roughly the same price for someone of around 30 as UK combined tax and insurance.
Down side was that having a 2nd bike insured in the UK can cost a nominal amount extra. Over there no discount for a 2nd vehicle.
All the best
K ____________________ Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Alpineandy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Alpineandy World Chat Champion
Joined: 18 Mar 2015 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| sickpup |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 sickpup Old Timer

Joined: 21 Apr 2004 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 23:53 - 01 Apr 2015 Post subject: Re: Government as insurance provider? |
 |
|
| Teflon-Mike wrote: |
| Road Traffic Act 1991 wrote: | Exception from requirement of third-party insurance.
In subsection (1) (which removes the requirement for third-party insurance or security where £15,000 is kept deposited with the Accountant General of the Supreme Court) for “£15,000” there shall be substituted “ £500,000 ”. |
The amount of 'bond' was significantly raised by the 1991 RTA, because it hadn't been revised for about thirty years; and the value of bond needed had fallen so low, little more then the price of a fully loaded Golf GTi; the loop-hole was being exploited a little, by otherwise insurable drivers, where the bond was actually cheaper than a 3rd party premium!
As I understand it; you place the Bond, and the government stand guarantor against any 3rd party liability, and for as long as you leave the bond on deposit. It doesn't earn any interest, but as long as you don't have an accident, you can get your money back whenever you like. If any-one claims against you though; you loose the lot, even if the claims only for a few hundred quid.
Wording also provided the 'cover' to any vehicle owned by the bond placer, irrespective of who might be driving that vehicle... so one bond could cover a whole LOT of drivers and a whole lot of cars! |
Another subject you know little about.
You place the Bond and any damages come out of the Bond which you are required to immediately top up. You do not lose the total Bond if someone makes and wins a claim only the amount of the claim. In fact what generally happened was that the Company under Bond paid out the claim in cash rather than from the Bond. The Bond after all only being a guarantee that you would pay any claim.
I find it highly unlikely the Bond system was being exploited, apart from anything the set up and running required a law firm and if the Bond doesn't cover the cost of a claim the further amount also came out of your pocket and you had to replace the Bond.
I have even been taken to court for no insurance under this system as the Police officer didn't know what a C-note was. The company I worked for had over 4000 vehicles covered by a single Bond note, that was the point of the system. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 11 years, 197 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|