Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Cat C/D - how badly do they affect value?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

BravoCharlie
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 Jun 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:01 - 06 Apr 2015    Post subject: Cat C/D - how badly do they affect value? Reply with quote

Good Evening all!

I hope we are well.

I hope the following isn't too silly a question, and that I've worded it properly, but I'm looking for some advice on buying/selling cat C bikes, and how much they would affect the value of a bike, if it had been restored?

So, if a bike was worth £2k, and there was another bike similar in good condition but written off as Cat-C/D previously, would there be much of a difference in price?

thanks,

Barry
____________________
Current: Kawasaki ZL600 Eliminator
Past: Suzuki GZ125, Kawasaki GT550, Kawasaki GPX600R, Honda vrx400,Kawasaki Zephyr 750, Suzuki SV650 K5
Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Albigularis
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:35 - 06 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd expect a repaired C or D to be £1600-£1500 depending on extras and so on, if the same bike was £2000 and not a write off.

If you look through on eBay at bikes, you'll notice one or two sometimes that are really cheap. You think "Why hasn't this sold yet?", you check the photos, looks good, you check the description ready to make an offer... "Cat C". Damn.
____________________
Biking history so far-
Aprilia RS125 - Kawasaki ZXR400 - Triumph Street Triple R - Suzuki GSXR1000 L3 - BMW R1200GS - Kawasaki Z1000 - Kawasaki ZX10R C1H - Ducati Multistrada 1200 S Touring - Suzuki Hayabusa
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Alex A
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Mar 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:37 - 06 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

60-70% of the like-for-like 'normal' price, because:

1) That's the most an insurance company would potentially pay out in the future for a bike that's already been written off.

2) Many buyers are risk averse re. the quality of the repair (if it's written off it means it wasn't repaired by the insurer), and the ease of re-sale in the future.

Having said that, the impact is more severe on newer / more expensive bikes. On something that's already well depreciated, you might get closer to the going rate.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:50 - 06 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is this really a question about what an insurer would offer you for it?

Maybe one for arry.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

BravoCharlie
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 Jun 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:55 - 06 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry, I thought i put at the bottom of my original thread.

It's come to my attention that my SV is a Cat C from 2013. I knew it'd been down the road, hints such as the headlights and the fact it used to be red kinda told me that!

I'm not planning on selling the bike right now, as I'm really enjoying the bike and it has been absolutely faultless, normally when i buy a bike I keep a few hundred quid in the bank to sort out any faults in the first month - this has presented no faults in the 2/3 months i've had it. But it's interesting to know how much it will affect me in future.

thanks chaps!
____________________
Current: Kawasaki ZL600 Eliminator
Past: Suzuki GZ125, Kawasaki GT550, Kawasaki GPX600R, Honda vrx400,Kawasaki Zephyr 750, Suzuki SV650 K5
Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
N cee thirty This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

Ted
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:40 - 06 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

The value of cat C & D vehicles is dropping even more than it was before. This is because a lot of insurance companies are now refusing to pay out if the vehicle is damaged in a new accident, on the basis that somebody has already been paid out the full value of the vehicle when it was written off. They obviously still have to cover damage to third parties. But you must inform them when taking out the policy if it has been previously written off, or your policy would be void.

This is the case with car insurance anyway, but I should think it applies to bike insurance too.

The wife is looking for a new car, from what I've seen on eBay, repaired and VIC checked write-offs sell for just over 50% of the price non-written-off cars sell for. Again, car based figures here...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:20 - 06 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ted wrote:
This is because a lot of insurance companies are now refusing to pay out if the vehicle is damaged in a new accident, on the basis that somebody has already been paid out the full value of the vehicle when it was written off.

What's your basis for saying this?
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Tritey This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:56 - 06 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bikes don't need and never have needed a VIC check. It's being done away with for cars soon as well, because it's only caught a literal handful of ringers.

I do wonder why the DVLA colludes with the insurance cartel with regard to 'write offs', when they don't (for example) show stolen/recovered info to potential buyers.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike


Last edited by Rogerborg on 07:34 - 07 Apr 2015; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Pol Anorl This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.
Tritey This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

Ted
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 05:20 - 07 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
Ted wrote:
This is because a lot of insurance companies are now refusing to pay out if the vehicle is damaged in a new accident, on the basis that somebody has already been paid out the full value of the vehicle when it was written off.

What's your basis for saying this?



I was double checking what was required for putting vehicles back on the road, I.e. standards of repairs. I noticed on .gov/vosa type website that they mentioned insurers must be informed and may refuse to pay out. So rung a couple of insurers to check.

But as I said... This was all relating to cars, not bikes, but I would assume the bike insurers work on the same basis.

At the end of the day the best thing to do is check with insurers yourself before buying a previously written off vehicle.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

lilredmachine
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Jan 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 05:53 - 07 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ted wrote:
This is because a lot of insurance companies are now refusing to pay out if the vehicle is damaged in a new accident, on the basis that somebody has already been paid out the full value of the vehicle when it was written off.

I was double checking what was required for putting vehicles back on the road, I.e. standards of repairs. I noticed on .gov/vosa type website that they mentioned insurers must be informed and may refuse to pay out. So rung a couple of insurers to check.

But as I said... This was all relating to cars, not bikes, but I would assume the bike insurers work on the same basis.

At the end of the day the best thing to do is check with insurers yourself before buying a previously written off vehicle.


Think you may find this is scare mongering. In practice I don't think insurers can really not pay out based on it being a write off. After all, you have given the bike value by buying it in the first place. I highly doubt there is a precedent for it as any court would be likely to decide in the owners favour.

Seems along the same line as the CAT B not going back on the road myth. Even a bike with a bent frame can have a new, blank frame from the manufacturer stamped with the same frame numbers. It will assume the same identity as the bike it previously was. This happens all the time in classic/historic vehicle racing in which the cars tend to be road registered, the whole thing can be crashed, bent and burnt to a cinder, rebuilt fresh and as long as the vin plate is transferred it retains the same identity and heritage.

I believe the record for this happening got mentioned last time there was a goodwood revival meeting on the telly, it was something mental like 14 times.
____________________
Bikes: too many, too much for one man to maintain anyway.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Pete.
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 06:21 - 07 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have also been told by an insurer that I may only get back salvage value. If it's a non-fault on your part then I think there's little risk, if it's your own insurer coughing up they might check into it a bit more.

Just to add that the reason I often buy Cat C bikes for work is because I'd have no intention of claiming if it's nicked.
____________________
a.k.a 'Geri'

132.9mph off and walked away. Gear is good, gear is good, gear is very very good Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Ted
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:23 - 07 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

At the end of the day, it's down to the insurers discretion. At Pete says I suspect they wouldn't want to pay if the accident is your fault.

Regarding Cat B (and A), you can't put them back on the road, as the insurer would refuse to give you back the logbook, and the DVLA will not re-issue one.

If the accident is unregistered, as it often is in motor racing, then the owner would just rebuild with new parts and the old VIN number, once its been registered as a Cat A/B, there is no going back.

I'm a fan of Land Rovers, real ones and not the Chelsea Tractors, and for some reason insurers are putting more and more through as Cat B, even though all parts are available off the shelf. This is according to Land Rover forums anyway. Not sure of the reason, could be the insurers have big contracts with shipping 4x4s to undeveloped countries, or perhaps they have a deal with vehicle manufacturers to try and get old cars off the road... You never know.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Ste
Not Work Safe



Joined: 01 Sep 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:34 - 07 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ted wrote:
I'm a fan of Land Rovers, real ones and not the Chelsea Tractors

Shocked Shocked Shocked

Incoming wall of text!!!

Razz
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:36 - 07 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ted wrote:
I was double checking what was required for putting vehicles back on the road, I.e. standards of repairs.

Nothing beyond them being roadworthy. Oh, and VIC for cars, but that's going soon. You may have heard or read an opinion to the contrary, but I'd be confident that it wasn't based on any actual legislation.


Ted wrote:
I noticed on .gov/vosa type website that they mentioned insurers must be informed

Contractually because of uberrima fides, if you know. But that's information that the cartel holds, which they charge us to find out, in order that we can tell them what they just told us. Nice little racket


Ted wrote:
and may refuse to pay out. So rung a couple of insurers to check.

Which ones? Brokers or underwriters? Who did you speak to? What exactly did you ask, and what were their answers? What was the statutory, regulatory, case law or contractual basis, if any, for their position?


Ted wrote:
At the end of the day the best thing to do is check with insurers yourself before buying a previously written off vehicle.

Agreed, if you mean the specific underwriter that you're intending to go with, and getting an answer in writing. Which nobody is ever going to do.

Well, maybe arry.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

instigator.
Nitrous Nuisance



Joined: 04 Apr 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:16 - 07 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm buying a K7 GSXR 750 for £3k since it's a Cat D. Personally, I think I got it a bit cheap, it should have fetched £3.3k on my book fairly easily. The older the bike and the smaller value it has, the less impact it has on it's sale value (naturally).
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

STONEY!
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:42 - 07 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cat B can go back on the road, I have done it 4 times now. You send v62 to dvla, they send the plod round, plod checks frame number and asks if you really want it back on the road you say yes, they write report, you get shiny new red v5c.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Pol Anorl This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.
Pol Anorl This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

Ted
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:21 - 07 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
Ted wrote:
I was double checking what was required for putting vehicles back on the road, I.e. standards of repairs.

Nothing beyond them being roadworthy. Oh, and VIC for cars, but that's going soon. You may have heard or read an opinion to the contrary, but I'd be confident that it wasn't based on any actual legislation.


I've not heard anything to the contrary... The standards are pretty low, which was what I was double checking.


Rogerborg wrote:

Ted wrote:
I noticed on .gov/vosa type website that they mentioned insurers must be informed

Contractually because of uberrima fides, if you know. But that's information that the cartel holds, which they charge us to find out, in order that we can tell them what they just told us. Nice little racket


I'm not sure of the purpose of that reply, so I'll just nod my head.. Laughing


Rogerborg wrote:

Ted wrote:
and may refuse to pay out. So rung a couple of insurers to check.

Which ones? Brokers or underwriters? Who did you speak to? What exactly did you ask, and what were their answers? What was the statutory, regulatory, case law or contractual basis, if any, for their position?


Brokers, spoke to the people who answered the phones, their answers were as above, I was going to ask for examples of court cases, but then realised it was a £350 car and I don't care... Wink


Rogerborg wrote:

Ted wrote:
At the end of the day the best thing to do is check with insurers yourself before buying a previously written off vehicle.

Agreed, if you mean the specific underwriter that you're intending to go with, and getting an answer in writing. Which nobody is ever going to do.


If I was insuring a vehicle which I felt was worth a good payout, then I would get it in writing, but then I'd go for an agreed value policy...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Ted
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:28 - 07 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

PaulFzs wrote:
Ted wrote:


Regarding Cat B (and A), you can't put them back on the road, as the insurer would refuse to give you back the logbook, and the DVLA will not re-issue one.


incorrect.
https://www.bikechatforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=274620



Okay, the DVLA no longer seems to have anything published online regarding Cat A's as to be destroyed, and Cat B's as parts only, not that I can see anyway.


I shall re-phase my statement...

You might not be able to put 'written off' vehicles (Category A-D) back on the road, if you have been paid out by the insurer for a 'total loss', depending on each individual insurance broker, underwriter, and claims officer. Especially if they ran out of milk for their morning cuppa.


Generic and vague enough? Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

BravoCharlie
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 Jun 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:39 - 07 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for all the info! Out of interest, when do bikes get put on a Q plate? I'd always been told cat C/D bikes are worth considering, but never touch a Q plate?
____________________
Current: Kawasaki ZL600 Eliminator
Past: Suzuki GZ125, Kawasaki GT550, Kawasaki GPX600R, Honda vrx400,Kawasaki Zephyr 750, Suzuki SV650 K5
Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 10 years, 311 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.14 Sec - Server Load: 1.08 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 145.26 Kb