|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Dashmore93 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Dashmore93 L Plate Warrior
Joined: 23 Apr 2015 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 23:23 - 23 Apr 2015 Post subject: Street Triple & the bloody A2 license... |
 |
|
Hi all,
New to the forum, I'm 22 and I am half way there to my A2 license, after getting a years riding experience on an R125. Just the Mod 2 to go now which is booked in.
Originally, my mind was set on the MT07 as it seems to be one of the best bikes for the A2 license aesthetics/performance/fun wise.
But I've been doing a bit of digging around on the Street Triple 675 and this so called (gold dust) 70kw version. I'd much prefer the Striple over the MT to be fair - and I was wondering if anyone on this forum has any experience with the restricted (Spanish?) version of the bike. There's threads out there but they are very vague.
I've seen a few folk on this forum say that they just use the 105bhp version on A2 as it's technically on the DVLA website as being A2 legal if you read it quick enough.
Could you buy a restriction kit for the 105bhp version and blag it? Yes officer its restricted it says so on the DFT website.. *Show printout*
OR
Can you get the ECU flashed down on the 'normal' version to 95bhp and then further restricted with a throttle stop?
If I'm going to get one I want to do it properly and have the right one, don't want a spill and then have to worry about having too much power at the crank and in turn having void insurance..
If it's too much hassle it will just be the MT I reckon?
Thanks for any advice in advance |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Albigularis |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Albigularis World Chat Champion

Joined: 27 Jun 2014 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 23:38 - 23 Apr 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
I'm the top guy on this particular subject as I've obsessed over it so here we go-
The Street Triple comes as standard 79kW, and from the new shape onwards (2013/62 plate) you could order a 70kW version with 35kW restrictor direct from Triumph. This compromises of a different cam shaft to the one in the standard bike (according to the engineers I spoke to) which reduces power to 70kW. The restrictor is a throttle stop with anti-tamper stickers.
The V5 does show a 'kW' rating which means that you should technically know your bike isn't A2 compliant. However, it doesn't mention anything about the specific A2 bike that they make on the DFT list and having checked the registration plate of one, they are exactly the same model. I had an '09 STR on A2 - I have a plastic wrapped copy of that DFT web page in my wallet to this day.
"But it says so on the DFT website" would buy you some degree of leeway, but I expect that ultimately you'd get shunned out and be out of pocket unless you did have the actual 70kW bike in an absolutely be-all-end-all court setting. Although the chances of your insurance thinking to go down this route are slim. You'd just tell your claims handler guy the info and that it's on the DFT list if he questioned it. Probably wouldn't hear anything about it from there on. Much like cheating on your spouse, the key is to avoid suspicion in the first place.
Ultimately it's up to you. But if you're going to actually restrict it (I didn't, sue me) then you're as well with the MT.
Here are the questions to ask yourself to justify the risk-
How likely is it that I'll get pulled over?
How likely is it that the officer will think the bike isn't A2 compliant?
How likely is it that the officer will check for restriction and/or not believe you that it is?
How likely is it that the officer wont believe the DFT website evidence?
How likely is it that the officer will make you produce the V5 and have suspicion to cease the bike until shown you are allowed to ride it?
How likely is it that your insurance will check if it's the full power model in the event of a claim?
How likely is it that your insurance will suspect the bike isn't A2 compliant to begin with in the event of a claim?
How likely is it that your insurance wont pay out due to it not being A2 compliant, but on the DFT list in the event of a claim? ____________________ Biking history so far-
Aprilia RS125 - Kawasaki ZXR400 - Triumph Street Triple R - Suzuki GSXR1000 L3 - BMW R1200GS - Kawasaki Z1000 - Kawasaki ZX10R C1H - Ducati Multistrada 1200 S Touring - Suzuki Hayabusa
Last edited by Albigularis on 23:46 - 23 Apr 2015; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| andys675 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 andys675 World Chat Champion

Joined: 08 Feb 2007 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Dashmore93 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Dashmore93 L Plate Warrior
Joined: 23 Apr 2015 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 00:09 - 24 Apr 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
I was hoping you'd reply Albigularis
When I said 'some folk' I was directly referring to you lol.
Thanks for the info mate that was very detailed. Few more quick ones if you don't mind?
Could you actually restrict the '09 STR in the first place to comply with the 47bhp limit?
I don't mean legally in the eyes of the A2 laws, I mean was/is there a restriction kit available to actually bring the HP down? Obviously, you'd be restricting a 105bhp bike to reach the 47bhp limit, but like you say its 'on the list' so to speak. How am I to know any differently it isn't compliant, your honour.
If you are involved in an accident and the bike is inspected, at least the restriction kit is present?
I don't know, it seems a lot of hassle. I have a Triumph dealer nearby so I guess i'll have to call and find out if they have any in stock OR how much it would be to have the 105hp one de-tuned? (New camshaft? Can't be cheap) Don't really fancy buying a sub-category version of an already popular bike, would be a pain in the ass trying to sell it.
I'm guessing the Z800e is similar. The MT just seems like the smart option? I'm covered if anything was to happen and it's got great reviews. However, the looks/performance just don't come close to the STR.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Albigularis |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Albigularis World Chat Champion

Joined: 27 Jun 2014 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 00:34 - 24 Apr 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Dashmore93 wrote: | I was hoping you'd reply Albigularis
When I said 'some folk' I was directly referring to you lol.
Thanks for the info mate that was very detailed. Few more quick ones if you don't mind?
Could you actually restrict the '09 STR in the first place to comply with the 47bhp limit?
I don't mean legally in the eyes of the A2 laws, I mean was/is there a restriction kit available to actually bring the HP down? Obviously, you'd be restricting a 105bhp bike to reach the 47bhp limit, but like you say its 'on the list' so to speak. How am I to know any differently it isn't compliant, your honour.
If you are involved in an accident and the bike is inspected, at least the restriction kit is present?
I don't know, it seems a lot of hassle. I have a Triumph dealer nearby so I guess i'll have to call and find out if they have any in stock OR how much it would be to have the 105hp one de-tuned? (New camshaft? Can't be cheap) Don't really fancy buying a sub-category version of an already popular bike, would be a pain in the ass trying to sell it.
I'm guessing the Z800e is similar. The MT just seems like the smart option? I'm covered if anything was to happen and it's got great reviews. However, the looks/performance just don't come close to the STR.  |
The '09 could not be restricted in absolute terms as it puts out more than 70kW - unless you take the "It's on the list" defence. There was no kit available other than possibly a 33bhp/25kW one for the older A2 (Restricted A) licence. The other thing to take into consideration is that say with the 70kw version, the throttle stop kicks in at 50% travel to achieve 35kW. If you have that same restrictor on an engine with more power, 50% of the throttle will be a few bhp higher. Although I wouldn't worry about this, as the police do allow for a 10% discrepancy due to varying atmospheric conditions that can affect an engine and so on. I expect that the new model one may fit though, as not that much of the engine was actually changed on the facelift model. Failing that, make one that goes into the throttle grip cam, attach it to a switch of some sort so that you can prove to dibble it's restricted if prompted to.
They would see the restriction kit yes, and if they didn't question the bikes A2 suitability at full power, then there would be no issue, but you are relying on them not suspecting. It is a small bike, so it doesn't immediately tick the mind as a high power rocket-ship.
Getting the 79kW standard one modified to 70kW camshafts would be (at a guess) about £300 parts and £300 labour. They'd also need to re-map it. The A2 ones come direct from Triumph with the new camshaft installed and cost the same price as the standard models.
The z800e is the same I think, I know that the Ducati 821 models are also available to order in A2 ready mode, which is a cam change.
When actually restricted, I expect that the MT and ST would be neck and neck in a straight line, both torquey, similar weight and as aerodynamic as a shed. Cornering, the ST wins, but the MT is no slouch. If I was doing it all over again, I'd give the MT a bash. I don't think I could fully appreciate what the STR could do, and I'm actually looking to buy another one right now. ____________________ Biking history so far-
Aprilia RS125 - Kawasaki ZXR400 - Triumph Street Triple R - Suzuki GSXR1000 L3 - BMW R1200GS - Kawasaki Z1000 - Kawasaki ZX10R C1H - Ducati Multistrada 1200 S Touring - Suzuki Hayabusa |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 05:55 - 24 Apr 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
tl;dr version from me would be: print off a convincing looking receipt for fitting a 35kW restrictor kit and shove it under the seat, put some sort of "35kW" tag or plate or sticker on the throttle body, ride. ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Polarbear |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Polarbear Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 05:57 - 24 Apr 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
I personally wouldn't want to be lumbered with a bike that couldn't be returned to bog standard BRITISH spec easily, cheaply and quickly.
Somewhere along the line you are going to be screwed out of a shed load of money and have a bike that performs as it is not designed to.
Get the MT07, do your tests than when you are able, ride a standard, non strangled STR and see ho good they really are  ____________________ Triumph Trophy Launch Edition |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Crumbso |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Crumbso Nitrous Nuisance
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| dydey90 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 dydey90 World Chat Champion

Joined: 01 Oct 2013 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Crumbso |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Crumbso Nitrous Nuisance
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| talkToTheHat |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 talkToTheHat World Chat Champion

Joined: 21 Feb 2012 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| cheeseman |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 cheeseman Trackday Trickster

Joined: 11 Jun 2014 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 10 years, 337 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|