 |
|
 |

|
Author |
Message |
ultraculture1... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ultraculture1... Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 08 May 2015 Karma :     
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
stevo as b4 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stevo as b4 World Chat Champion
Joined: 17 Jul 2003 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 19:31 - 20 May 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
A lot of points mentioned there in one post! But a quick reply to some of them:
1, The Powervalve. I too have heard the rumour of KIPS valves needing different springs and even shims on the early bikes to effect de-restriction, but I've never really bought the idea myself. This is due to the fact KIPS is an open/closed system, not a progressive or 2-3stage PV, so I can't see how it should need altering to give best performance.
2, The Big One pipe should have done the de-restriction thing for you. The std one has a restrictive collar fitted for the 12bhp B-versions. Even the jetting is the same, so nothing else should need to be changed IMO.
3, The Airbox? It's not restricted as such, but the intake silencer/snorkel is much smaller than the 200's one. It has been experiemented with by using the 200 airbox lid or cutting removing the 125's lid, that some extra power might be found. It does seem to need 2-3sizes up on the main jet, so the fueling must be affected by this change. Some people on forums have claimed +1.5-2bhp more by modding the airbox and re-jetting.
I'm hoping to find out if it has any effect soon when I get some dyno time with my 125, before the new carb and reeds are fitted.
4, The 1990 or maybe it's 92> rear shock's are remote reservoir units, and had a re-bound damping adjuster on the bottom of the shock. When new it probably makes some difference to the ride/damping. You will want the pre-load on a std shock adjusted closer to max if your are say 12stone>. Most KMX's lead hard lives and anything with plenty of mileage on it will be screwed now. I'm not so sure how re-buildable the std shock is or not? There's aftermarket options from around £160-500 though.
5, Forks are a bit soft as std for road use or even faster off road riding. new springs, pre-load spacers and thicker oil might help but would need experimenting with depending on your useage for the bike? KMX200 forks and yokes can be fitted and are 3mm bigger in fork leg diameter and have air valve adjustment on them too.
For supermoto conversions I would say USD fork conversions are a good bet, to get a bit more ride height to compensate for the 17" wheels. There's a few ways to get different USD forks to fit, but hopefully Dave will along to explain more.
The wheels can either have new wider rims laced to the OEM hubs, or aftermarket hubs, or you can go the route of cast alloy wheels.
Wheels that have been made to fit the KMX are, NSR125 wheels, GS500E, or GPZ500S wheels. The front brake can be upgraded with bigger diameter discs and caliper spacer plates and or twin pot front calipers. The KLE500 300mm disc seems to fit the KMX200 hub as well.
If your only riding on the road then a supermoto conversion would work well like it does on the DT125R's, but it's much more expensive to sort out and get the bits for and make it all fit, than it is to use road tyres on std wheels.
But most people would like a bike they can do both gentle off roading and road riding with. There's plenty of people that can advise you of suitable tyres for a compromise depending on what your looking for?
I have used Pirelli MT60's before and found them good on the road, and ok on gravel tracks or dry green lanes etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
ultraculture1... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ultraculture1... Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 08 May 2015 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 19:52 - 20 May 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
Cheers steve, you were the other resident kmxpert i was thinking about
Im not that bothered about converting to sm, but might be handy to keep a set of road wheels and knobblies, but probably cheaper to go dual purpose.
As far as kips springs, i woukd imagine perhaps stiffer spring stops the valve from fully openening? I will have to wait and see, there isnt a definitive video in you tube showing exactly how it can be manually adjusted, the bike im buying is quite old but looks extremely well cared for. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
thx1138 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 thx1138 World Chat Champion

Joined: 06 Oct 2005 Karma :    
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
stevo as b4 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stevo as b4 World Chat Champion
Joined: 17 Jul 2003 Karma :   
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
dangerousdave |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 dangerousdave Traffic Copper

Joined: 22 Apr 2011 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 22:23 - 21 May 2015 Post subject: Re: kips derestrictions. |
 |
|
ultraculture1978 wrote: | Im picking up the kmx on saturday and the guy who owns it says he hasnt touched the powervalve.
Its an 88 he said he has drille out the airbox or something like that and it has a big one exhaust, i know there is lots of info online about this but this seems to be the best forum, so can i please ask for the definitive kmx derestriction guide please?
Thanks |
Nice choice of bike !!
As Steve said above mucking around with the KIPS spring won't make a difference, the valve just needs to open.
ultraculture1978 wrote: | Also is the rear shock damping unit adjustable, can i fit aftermarket, Marzzochi, forks for a plusher ride, how easy is a supermoto conversion. |
Forks can be swapped out for later motocross/enduro units. I sourced an alternative front end for the KMX, which was from a KDX250.
You can see a brief guide to the process on my rebuild thread, it is not a difficult conversion, I found the hard part was finding the correct parts as the KDX250 is now quite rare. However I have seen plenty of late KX or KXF front ends being fitted which surely perform much better once they are set up.
My conclusions of using the KDX fork is the bike is much more stable. The fork is nearly 2" longer at the front, so I raised the rear of the bike to suit. This does need to be done in my opinion, because the increased height alters the angle of the steerer tube resulting in slower steering. This is easy to adjust on the 200 via shorter "dog bones", not so on the 125 as it uses a different linkage in the rear suspension.
Going down this route has the advantage of a much better front brake. I used a KDX disk with a KX caliper. A DRZ400-SM master cylinder worked much better than a KX250 one. I then used braided hoses. Stoppies are no problem.
I did look into using a KX swinger and shock, this has been done. However my conclusion was that a top mount needed to be made up for the rear shock, and the airbox would need to be relocated. I haven't found this necessary at this stage, the standard rear shock is doing the job just fine for now.
As Steve said, the later KMX shocks are better, as they have the remote reservoir. I "upgraded" to one of these and its working fine.
ultraculture1978 wrote: | might be handy to keep a set of road wheels and knobblies, but probably cheaper to go dual purpose. |
I'd recommend going for a spare set of wheels fitted with knobblies. Wheels are pretty cheap to pick up for the KMX. I got a rear wheel for £15. Dual purpose tyres are fine but always a compromise, however depends what you want to do with the bike.
Proper knobblies aren't great on the road and wear out double quick on tarmac, as well as being scary at speed. Trail tyres are surprisingly good on the road but next to useless when it gets wet and muddy off road.
Overall I think the KMX is a lot better than it should be really. They have a strong following for a bike that was last produced in 2002.
I entered a trials/ time trial event on mine last weekend in the enduro class. Was expecting to come right at the bottom of the score board. My result was 32nd out of 48 finishers which was amazing really on easily the oldest bike by about 10 years !!
ultraculture1978 wrote: | have been looking into this for a while and i like the idea of rinsing the bejesus out of the little 2 stroke engine. |
From what I have read the 125 responds well to the usual bolt on tuning parts, exhaust, reeds, carb, filter etc. Of course there's the race-tuning firms as well to open up ports etc if that floats your boat.
Tinker away, but keep an eagle eye on your fuel mixture with any new modification you are making.
Enjoy your new bike, we're always interested in what people are doing with KMX's around here so keep us updated. ____________________ 1988 Kawasaki KMX 200
Previous: Yamaha YZF1000, ZZR600, KMX200, DT50, KX80, CG125, PF50 |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 10 years, 145 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.09 Sec - Server Load: 0.45 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 56 Kb
|