|
|
| Author |
Message |
| roboff94 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 roboff94 Renault 5 Driver

Joined: 03 Jan 2015 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 20:05 - 23 Sep 2015 Post subject: New (Old) Car problems... |
 |
|
Alright Guys,
Not really to much of an issue but something thats been getting to me abit lately.
I'm massively into my cars, especially my VW's. Still on my first car which is my little P reg Polo that ive had since i was 16 (im 20 now) and i love it to bits, only thing is its to damn slow!
So, ive been looking at possibly getting a new car. Top of my list is a Mk2 Golf GTI to be honest, im not into new things at all, they just dont interest me in the slightest. My bikes an E reg, and that plenty new for me haha. I like messing/fixing stuff by myself, and you cant really do that with newer stuff as easily.
Obviously the newest mk2 is getting on for quarter of a century old now, and i do about 200 mile a week to work and back, so my mum and dad are concerned reliability might be an issue. I reckon i could keep on top of it and it would be no worse than my Polo. Other thing my mum and dad keep moaning at me about is how safe it would be? which hasnt even crossed my mind and i dont imagine it will to be honest, not that im some kind of death wishing maniac or owt.
They keep trying to point me in the direction of stuff like mk4's and leons, which while i appreciate it would no doubt be a good car, i couldnt really see myself enjoying owning one that much. I have alot of respect for my mum and dad, and i usually end up agreeing with them, and most of the time do what they suggest (apart from my bike haha)
So what do we reckon people? Sack it and do what i really want, and just put up with any issues that rear theyre ugly heads, or be sensible like my mum and dad recommend i should be?
Cheers
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| mrbox |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 mrbox Wonderwall

Joined: 30 Nov 2013 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 20:47 - 23 Sep 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
my 89 mk2 was my daily driver for 20,000 miles will just minor outlay finally sold it with 140.000 on the clock never broke down once in the two years I had it.
owned the mk2 8v at the same time as a pug 205 1.9 and an 89 rs turbo I used the golf for everything  ____________________ Current bikes: RE Himalayan, Bandit 12, MZ250ES |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| sensi5446 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 sensi5446 Trackday Trickster

Joined: 12 Feb 2014 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| roboff94 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 roboff94 Renault 5 Driver

Joined: 03 Jan 2015 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| sensi5446 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 sensi5446 Trackday Trickster

Joined: 12 Feb 2014 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| petalbriefs |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 petalbriefs Traffic Copper

Joined: 22 May 2014 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 22:19 - 23 Sep 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
205 gti, faster than golf!
Loved mine, was like driving a go cart and my 1.6 with a few mods, was way quicker than my bf's mk2 8v.
205 GTi FTW  ____________________ Proud owner of an R6 + ZXR400
Honda CBR 125 R - Stolen |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Shaft |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Shaft World Chat Champion

Joined: 27 Dec 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 23:26 - 23 Sep 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
| roboff94 wrote: |
Ive been to look at a few (Mk2's), and theyve all been massive let downs so far to be honest, like being told its all original and then theres massive holes hacked in the door cards for some tacky speakers that dont even work.. |
That's gonna be your problem, we're at the back end of a classic car price boom, so every chancer with something that's even vaguely got a following, is ramping up the prices for whatever old shitter is lurking at the bottom of their garden.
Unfortunately, earlier Golf GTis have been fetching good money for a few years now, so the only things left that are affordable, will tend to be the dregs, the really decent cars have been restored and sold for megabucks long ago.
There are still cars worth buying turning up, but you will have to search for them, or get lucky.
If you do find one, reliability shoudn't be a problem (unless you get a car that's suffered years of bodgery and neglect) but look really carefully for signs of rust and accident damage, plus the standard brakes are bloody awful and barely up to the task, although not as bad as the MKI.
Personally, I would be looking for the cars which have a lesser following, but which are just as good, to try and beat the price vampires - if you're dead stuck on VWs, try typing Jetta, Bora or Corrado into the search box on your favourite auction/classified website.
Edit: you could also try looking for Sciroccos (not the latest model) there's still a few later ones around for sensible money. ____________________ Things get better with age; I'm close to being magnificent........
20 RE Interceptor, 83 Z1100A3, 83 GS650 Katana
WooHoo, I'm a Man Point Millionaire! https://www.bikechatforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=234035
Last edited by Shaft on 23:34 - 23 Sep 2015; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| monkeybiker |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 monkeybiker World Chat Champion

Joined: 23 Sep 2014 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Ariel Badger |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Ariel Badger Super Spammer

Joined: 02 Dec 2006 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stevo as b4 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stevo as b4 World Chat Champion
Joined: 17 Jul 2003 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 00:24 - 24 Sep 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
I agree with Shaft TBH. Old stuff is old, but not mega established classics, so that means:
1, Not that many fully restored and original cars kept nice because of high re-sale value and classic status.
2, There's less decent running car's left in the 20-25year old bracket, and less people out there that value them or see them as desirable or classic. But it also often means that the few people that are into these not quite classics yet are massively into them and often hoard them and over inflate the true value of them.
But overall fair play to the OP, you sound like my thoughts with regard to vehicles and what you want to own instead of what other people think you should have etc. Also it's so nice to be out of the whole 'what do you drive at work scenario' where everyone wants to buy a 3-5year old premium hatchback and think they are making it towards the big time because they flash the badge's that they think are desirable and that they think that others see them as well on their way to success etc.
I've got a 20year old Rover, to most people it's worth scrap value only (all Rovers are aren't they?), but to me it's interesting and has some character that a 5year old Audi A3 will never have.
It would definitely be possible to find a good clean and tidy mk2 Golf Gti or similar that's been appreciated by it's owner/s, and looked after, but they are not popping up every week in the classifieds so you might have to wait a while.
I waited 2years for my first Rover 220 coupe, to get one I was happy with, and the current one I bought was re-built from a shell that was otherwise going to be scrapped or sold off for parts some years ago. It's been chopped around with a lot, but is a solid rust free car under the many modifications and after having 3different engines etc over it's life time.
The only thing that puts me off classic VAG stuff is this Euro look stuff when taken to extreme's. I also think VAG stuff helped popularise the sleeper phenomenon and the low and slow look, neither of which I am a huge fan of TBH.
Have nearly bought a Golf Mk3 Gti 8v in the past, and I would agree with Sensi that they are a nice generation of Golf, and I would not want to go for a newer one than that either! |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Robby |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Robby Dirty Old Man

Joined: 16 May 2002 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| roboff94 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 roboff94 Renault 5 Driver

Joined: 03 Jan 2015 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 16:46 - 24 Sep 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
Cheers for the replies guys
There are tons of cars that id love to own, but the VW blood runs deep in my veins, my Grandad worked for them for 40 years, he's always had old beetles that i used to love working on (see avatar) so id feel abit weird if i didnt have a VW really. When i have room/funds for a second car i might delve into none dub territory...
Yeah i look all the time and i can spot the good ones pretty much from the first picture, just gonna have to bide my time i think, but i can live with that i suppose.
Ive run a few insurance quotes and there pretty reasonable really, ive got 3 years ncb, nearly 4, so its bringing it down nicely. At just over 500 quid on the Polo which is good i think for someone my age. We have a Mk1 Clipper GTI aswell, and im struggling getting quotes on that cause i cant use my no claims on it, but thats another problem haha.
And what emissions scandal?...
Thanks people!
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| mysterious_rider |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 mysterious_rider World Chat Champion

Joined: 11 Sep 2010 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 17:31 - 24 Sep 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
Had a 89" mk2 gl 1.8l 8 valve. Was a good car and reliable. Parts were cheap. Now own the 97 1.4 polo fuel injected. Much better car and only a tad slower. If I were you I'd consider one of the older BMWs. Try getting the five cylinder ones as apparently the four cylinder ones have head gasket problems.
But that's my opinion. I love the 55mpg my polo returns  ____________________ KAWASAKIIIII |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stevo as b4 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stevo as b4 World Chat Champion
Joined: 17 Jul 2003 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 23:56 - 24 Sep 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Robby wrote: |
I had a mk2 golf many years ago. I don't see what all the fuss is about. It was an old, basic hatchback. Any vaguely modern hatchback is a much nicer car to drive.
If you want something fun to drive from the 80s or early 90s, go for an MR2 or an MX5. If you want a hatchback that can still be enjoyable, get a focus.
Come to think of it, I've managed to find something enjoyable in just about every car I've ever driven. The exceptions were a newish 1.4 Polo (which was a hire car, so should have been fun) and an E30 BMW 320i (which was as basic as a golf of its age, and shit in all ways |
I kind of see what your saying, in that an old basic 80's hatch is going to feel not so nice to drive as a daily today than say a late 90's- 2005 car might do? But that's a damn logical way of looking at it, and once you go down that road your basically saying the car is just a device to get you around, so a bit more features, refinement, and comfort should make for a better option and less hassle etc.
newer stuff is complicated, and how many people really need ABS, Air con, traction control or airbags etc etc? Yes sure if the car is just an A-B to get you to work and back why not have it comfortable and easy to drive and own. But something newer being more refined or having more features does not make for any more fun or involvement, and if your car is a project or a weekend fun vehicle like a lot of peoples bikes are, then having something older and cool and a hell of a lot more simple is where I think it's at!
Oh and a Focus? Yeah they are a competent hatch, they handle better than some, but who would take on a 10-15year old Focus as a project to do stuff with and have a fun car from doing so? |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| roboff94 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 roboff94 Renault 5 Driver

Joined: 03 Jan 2015 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| UncleFester |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 UncleFester World Chat Champion

Joined: 30 Jun 2013 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| monkeybiker |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 monkeybiker World Chat Champion

Joined: 23 Sep 2014 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 08:48 - 25 Sep 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
| stevo as b4 wrote: | | Robby wrote: |
I had a mk2 golf many years ago. I don't see what all the fuss is about. It was an old, basic hatchback. Any vaguely modern hatchback is a much nicer car to drive.
If you want something fun to drive from the 80s or early 90s, go for an MR2 or an MX5. If you want a hatchback that can still be enjoyable, get a focus.
Come to think of it, I've managed to find something enjoyable in just about every car I've ever driven. The exceptions were a newish 1.4 Polo (which was a hire car, so should have been fun) and an E30 BMW 320i (which was as basic as a golf of its age, and shit in all ways |
I kind of see what your saying, in that an old basic 80's hatch is going to feel not so nice to drive as a daily today than say a late 90's- 2005 car might do? But that's a damn logical way of looking at it, and once you go down that road your basically saying the car is just a device to get you around, so a bit more features, refinement, and comfort should make for a better option and less hassle etc.
newer stuff is complicated, and how many people really need ABS, Air con, traction control or airbags etc etc? Yes sure if the car is just an A-B to get you to work and back why not have it comfortable and easy to drive and own. But something newer being more refined or having more features does not make for any more fun or involvement, and if your car is a project or a weekend fun vehicle like a lot of peoples bikes are, then having something older and cool and a hell of a lot more simple is where I think it's at!
Oh and a Focus? Yeah they are a competent hatch, they handle better than some, but who would take on a 10-15year old Focus as a project to do stuff with and have a fun car from doing so? |
I agree with a lot of why you say.
Modern cars although from an engineering point of view are better cars they just feel a bit boring and without character. You could take a modern car and remove the badge and it would be hard to identify what it was.
Take an old BMW and they have a distinct look about them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| ferrisio |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ferrisio Scooby Slapper

Joined: 03 Jul 2014 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Robby |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Robby Dirty Old Man

Joined: 16 May 2002 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 19:01 - 25 Sep 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
| stevo as b4 wrote: | newer stuff is complicated, and how many people really need ABS, Air con, traction control or airbags etc etc?
|
With ABS and air bags, you tend to find yourself very glad of it when you suddenly do need them - same goes for crumple zones, seatbelt pre-tensioners and the like. You only care about safety devices when you've been in a crash where they made a difference.
Traction control. Still quite rare on a normal hatchback, but if the car is powerful enough to have it then it's nice to have. Particularly on a cold morning when you've just started out and have to quickly pull out.
Air con. I don't need it, but I like having it. Useful on hots days, or on cold mornings when I want to de-mist the screen.
I don't agree with the comments on character either. I don't think old hatchbacks have any character, same as new hatchbacks. They're slower, noisier, and have fewer gadgets.
A hatchback is a basic car. It isn't something to aspire to, it isn't something to aim for a specific model of old rusty heap. If you want a fun car, get a fun car. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| mrbox |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 mrbox Wonderwall

Joined: 30 Nov 2013 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| andyscooter |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 andyscooter World Chat Champion

Joined: 30 May 2009 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| janner_10 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 janner_10 World Chat Champion

Joined: 26 Sep 2011 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Shaft |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Shaft World Chat Champion

Joined: 27 Dec 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 00:18 - 26 Sep 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
| ferrisio wrote: | | UncleBFester wrote: |
MG Maestro Turbo |
Genuinely one of my favourite 80s hot hatches, I owned a standard non-turbo one - what a great car. The turbo was plain shit. |
FTFY.
I sold those new and yes, the standard MG Maestro EFi was a great car - compared to the trend setting Golf GTi, it was more spacious, quicker on acceleration, faster on top speed, had a nicer gearchange, more forgiving handling and brakes that actually worked, plus it was a grand cheaper.
But the Turbo was an ill conceived marketing disaster, that never should've gone into production in the form that it did; but that was what BL/AR did, put things into production well before they were ready and use the buying public as the guinea pigs.
The best turbocharged car AR made in that era, was the Metro; where the Maestro/Montego performed like a 1300 off boost, then 150 rampant horses arrived all in one go (ripping the steering wheel out of your hands and sending you into the nearest ditch) the Metro started boosting lower in the rev range and was much smoother, less like a turbo and more like a big engine transplant.
If they'd taken the trouble to develop a 5 speed gearbox for it, that little car would've been the class of the field. ____________________ Things get better with age; I'm close to being magnificent........
20 RE Interceptor, 83 Z1100A3, 83 GS650 Katana
WooHoo, I'm a Man Point Millionaire! https://www.bikechatforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=234035 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| monkeybiker |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 monkeybiker World Chat Champion

Joined: 23 Sep 2014 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Vincent |
This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.
|
 Vincent Banned

Joined: 16 Oct 2006 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 13:24 - 28 Sep 2015 Post subject: |
 |
|
If you must stay with VW, why not get an early Scirocco? There are some nice restored examples around and you can still pick one up without breaking the bank. Brand loyalty can mean you losing out on a lot of nice cars.
Having all the extras may be an age thing.....I wouldn't get a car now that didn't have stuff like Air-Con and cruise control but it wouldn't have bothered me 20 years ago. The main thing I don't like with older cars is the noise inside.....it can make long distance trips very tiresome  ____________________ Space Is Deep |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 10 years, 286 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|