Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


I'm selling cos I got a family - SOLUTION? Legal?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:03 - 10 Dec 2015    Post subject: I'm selling cos I got a family - SOLUTION? Legal? Reply with quote

Did some random ebay browsing...

Since this isn't legit:

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/6a/cb/e3/6acbe3585b6bed036f888791518d6d8d.jpg

(Baby in a pannier)

Saw this.

https://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/ODAwWDc1NA==/z/BscAAOSw8-tWaGoB/$_57.JPG

I have to wonder is this legit?
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Howling TerrorOutOfOffice
Super Spammer



Joined: 05 Dec 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:08 - 10 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Congratulations.

Until they can bounce properly I wouldn't consider taking a minor as pillion.
____________________
Diabolical homemade music Bandcamp and Soundcloud
Singer songwriter, Artist and allround good bloke Listen to Andrew Susan Johnston here
The Harry Turner Project
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:09 - 10 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

I believe it is as long as it's all secure.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1986/1078/regulation/102/made

Passengers on motor cycles

102. If any person in addition to the driver is carried astride a two-wheeled motor cycle on a road (whether a sidecar is attached to it or not) suitable supports or rests for the feet shall be available on the motor cycle for that person.


https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/23

23 Restriction of carriage of persons on motor cycles.

(2) No person in addition to the driver may be carried on a motor bicycle otherwise than sitting astride the motor cycle and on a proper seat securely fixed to the motor cycle behind the driver’s seat.


That's all that I'm aware of. There's no requirement as to age or competency. You can even sit backwards as long as you're "astride".

Aside, I've just seen that the Highway Code online has finally started linking directly to the appropriate sections of the cited legislation.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code/rules-for-motorcyclists-83-to-88
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MCN
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:15 - 10 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

I thought you must have your feet/stumps on the footrests.

Rule 85

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code/rules-for-motorcyclists-83-to-88
____________________
Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

RhynoCZ
Super Spammer



Joined: 09 Mar 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:47 - 10 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

MCN wrote:
I thought you must have your feet/stumps on the footrests.

Rule 85

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code/rules-for-motorcyclists-83-to-88


Spot on, this applies in the whole EU. Thumbs Up

EDIT: Aaaand I have made a terrible mistake of mistaking SHOULD for MUST. Engrish strikes again this week, time to learn a new language and join a new forum. UK is a strange place. Thinking
____________________
'87 Honda XBR 500, '96 Kawasaki ZX7R P1, '90 Honda CB-1, '88 Kawasaki GPz550, MZ 150 ETZ
'95 Mercedes-Benz w202 C200 CGI, '98 Mercedes-Benz w210 E200 Kompressor


Last edited by RhynoCZ on 23:34 - 10 Dec 2015; edited 2 times in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

carvell
Scuttler



Joined: 05 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:05 - 10 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

MCN wrote:
I thought you must have your feet/stumps on the footrests.

Rule 85

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code/rules-for-motorcyclists-83-to-88

Not spot on, it says they should have both feet on the footrests. Nowhere does it say they MUST have both feet on the footrests.

If you're saying it's illegal to ride a bike without both feet on the footrests then that implies it's also illegal for a pillion to face backwards (it's mentioned in the same sentence), which it isn't (camera men).
____________________
Yamaha TDM 850
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Pete.
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:17 - 10 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

No reason why a child seat could not incorporate footrests either.
____________________
a.k.a 'Geri'

132.9mph off and walked away. Gear is good, gear is good, gear is very very good Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

M.C
Super Spammer



Joined: 29 Sep 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:04 - 11 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Isn't this one of the many recurring topics that normal descend into a yes you can but should you type argument?

Pass the popcorn Dance!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:14 - 11 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pete. wrote:
No reason why a child seat could not incorporate footrests either.

Poor obs, it has stirrups. Wink

C&U just says "suitable supports or rests for the feet shall be available on the motor cycle for that person", it doesn't prescribe anything about them being bolted on to the subframe.

Those look like "supports" to me, sized to "that person".
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MCN
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:26 - 11 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

carvell wrote:
MCN wrote:
I thought you must have your feet/stumps on the footrests.

Rule 85

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code/rules-for-motorcyclists-83-to-88

Not spot on, it says they should have both feet on the footrests. Nowhere does it say they MUST have both feet on the footrests.

If you're saying it's illegal to ride a bike without both feet on the footrests then that implies it's also illegal for a pillion to face backwards (it's mentioned in the same sentence), which it isn't (camera men).


Well if there are hair-splitting trollers crawling out from under something then I'll have to be a bit more careful wot I rote then. Smile

I never said anything was 'illegal'.

There are many 'rules' in the Highway code book. Not many are actual 'Law'.
But almost everyone of them carries a substantial chunk of weight as evidence against anyone who disregards the 'rules'.
Most people know or should know this. Rolling Eyes
Unless they passed their test before the 1930s.

Again for the hard of thinking:

"Rule 85
You MUST NOT carry more than one pillion passenger who MUST sit astride the machine on a proper seat. They should face forward with both feet on the footrests. You MUST NOT carry a pillion passenger unless your motorcycle is designed to do so. Provisional licence holders MUST NOT carry a pillion passenger.

Laws RTA 1988 sect 23, MV(DL)R 1999 reg 16(6) & CUR 1986 reg 102"

'Must' is probably where there is a Law.
'Should' is probably where a court would take a view that someone was being careless when the advice is ignored.

My 2p worth
I don't think there is any 'real' necessity to carry a child on a motorcycle if they can't get their feet on the BIKE foot rests.

Modificating a bike to carry a smaller person via some adapted or fabricated apparatus/contrived equipment will leave too many problems in regards to compliance with C&U regulation, guidance and laws.

If you are dumb enough and fancy having a go then blooter on regardless.
For certain, most other, reasonably minded, people will consider the rider to be a bit of a dangerous twat/eccentric weirdo.

And the PoPo will stop you at every operchancity.

Maybe no law to hammer you with but it is still not making good progress having to stop, get off, do the ID, Ownership and Ins. check and the ear-ache.
They will most likely feel a need to stop you. Very Happy

IHTH. Thumbs Up
____________________
Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

talkToTheHat
World Chat Champion



Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:13 - 11 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Expect every motorcycle hater to report you to social services. Some of my friends have had hastle because they posted pictures of their kids sat astride bikes parked on a driveway. Meanwhile horseriding has never been child abuse.
____________________
Bandit. does. everything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

RodYork
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 11 Apr 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:06 - 12 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

https://youtu.be/_uq9HJYj4WQ?t=3m28s

Let them ride!...but safely!....I went through a lot of turmoil looking for the right set up....ended up with Autocoms & fizzy drinks to stop them falling asleep!
____________________
Bike trip through Europe! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2yTtFPM7Xc
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

RodYork
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 11 Apr 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:17 - 12 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

of course I do not advocate this type of behaviour...it is terrible!

https://youtu.be/OvNWGCApnvY?t=4m34s
____________________
Bike trip through Europe! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2yTtFPM7Xc
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

angryjonny
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:52 - 14 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v404/angryjonny/eh_zps32533506.jpg

Why yes... those *are* cable ties holding the kiddie seat on.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

M.C
Super Spammer



Joined: 29 Sep 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:17 - 14 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

angryjonny wrote:
https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v404/angryjonny/eh_zps32533506.jpg

Why yes... those *are* cable ties holding the kiddie seat on.

Shocked Unless the plan's to lose your child on the central reservation (might be) that's unbelievable.

I don't understand why cyclists have similar things, when you see how much they get shaken about. I saw one riding with one of these:
https://www.nctshop.co.uk/images/5340.jpg
...but the baby didn't seem to be enjoying it.

This is probably better if you don't want to see your kids IQ slowly slipping away Smile:
https://www.littlepossums.co.uk/slings/beco/soleil-backcarry.jpg
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

mentalboy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 May 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:10 - 14 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

MCN wrote:

Rule 85
You MUST NOT carry more than one pillion passenger who MUST sit astride the machine on a proper seat. They should face forward with both feet on the footrests. You MUST NOT carry a pillion passenger unless your motorcycle is designed to do so. Provisional licence holders MUST NOT carry a pillion passenger.

Laws RTA 1988 sect 23, MV(DL)R 1999 reg 16(6) & CUR 1986 reg 102"



The highway code gives you an overview, the specific legislation (as you are probably aware) is given in the three laws below the section. The last of which, CUR 1986 reg 102, takes us back to the legislation first posted by Rogerborg which defines what exactly a footrest constitutes.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Al who is that Al
L Plate Warrior



Joined: 14 Dec 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:50 - 14 Dec 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sidecar or Trike springs to mind - good for a laugh
____________________
Music and toast in darkness
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 10 years, 52 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.11 Sec - Server Load: 1.37 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 102.17 Kb