Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Car 0-60 vs Bike 0-60 who is quickest ?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

gsxr600menace
Borekit Bruiser



Joined: 13 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:21 - 19 Feb 2005    Post subject: Car 0-60 vs Bike 0-60 who is quickest ? Reply with quote

I was watching Bravo last night and they had the fastest road legal 0-60 cars, the quickest one was an audi 80 with a short wheel base with a 0-60 of 3.2, i notice that bikes have figures of 2.7 0-60 but is this 0-60 actually possible ? does anyone know any websites with actual bike 0-60 times on ?
____________________
Just bought yellow & black GSXR600, fast as hell !!! (1st bike)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

mrchips
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Mar 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:23 - 19 Feb 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Most magazines give dyno and speed testing print outs when they review bikes. Dunno about bike websites but www.parkers.co.uk gives car stats.
____________________
Northern Irish? www.nibikers.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Fruit'n'nut
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 11 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:30 - 19 Feb 2005    Post subject: Re: Car 0-60 vs Bike 0-60 who is quickest ? Reply with quote

gsxr600menace wrote:
I was watching Bravo last night and they had the fastest road legal 0-60 cars, the quickest one was an audi 80 with a short wheel base with a 0-60 of 3.2, i notice that bikes have figures of 2.7 0-60 but is this 0-60 actually possible ? does anyone know any websites with actual bike 0-60 times on ?



I would imagine 0-60 times for both cars and bikes are measured on rolling road/dynos, to get the best-possible result (manufacturers waving their willies at each other Very Happy Rolling Eyes Very Happy )

I guess good riders/drivers could get close/match these times, but you'd need to avoid spinning the driving tyre(s)/flipping the bike... There's certainly no way I could get close Shocked Very Happy

In so far as 0-60 times translate into acceleration from a standing start "in real life" - generally the bike should win - for example, I don't have to change into 2nd gear until about 75mph-ish on my GSXR600, and the newest litre sports bikes will hit 104-105mph in first gear (2004 R1 and ZX10R.) How many cars can say the same? Cool Wink
____________________
Power Ranger Very Happy


Last edited by Fruit'n'nut on 16:31 - 19 Feb 2005; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:30 - 19 Feb 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually,

Bike 0-60 times have increased within the last few years, purely because you can't launch a bike easily at full pelt without wheelying. I seem to remember someone writing into BiKE mag claiming that the 0-60 times in the back must be wrong because the original 1993 speed triple (steel framed, 98bhp, 200kg) had a faster 0-60 time than a blade or something.

They claimed that it was because the speed triple was easier to launch from a standstill, and the blade would own it in a 0-100 race.

Most mags publish rubbish standing quarter times, which mean nothing in the real world really.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

jaffa
Nitrous Nuisance



Joined: 22 Jan 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:40 - 19 Feb 2005    Post subject: Re: Car 0-60 vs Bike 0-60 who is quickest ? Reply with quote

Fruit'n'nut wrote:
I would imagine 0-60 times for both cars and bikes are measured on rolling road/dynos

Such figures measured on a dyno would be useless, you would be measuring the ability of the vehicle to accelerate the moving parts of the dyno, the mass of the vehicle is a critical factor with regard to acceleration, it wouldn't be taken into account. In addition the wind resistance wouldn't be accounted for either.

I would expect, based on power to weight ratio that a bike would win this one.
____________________
jaffa - all juice and no pips
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Zoffo
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:41 - 19 Feb 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

A gs1150 has a 0-60 time faster than a Blade. Bikes with all the power low down often beat super sport where the power band doesn't kick in till 7000 rpm.

Many big bikes easily make 60 in first gear so it's often all about traction and keeping the front wheel down. Big Sports tourers have the fastest 0-60 speeds coz they tend to be long and heavier but offset by more horses. Never tried it myself (clutches aren't free) but the Blackbird is supposed to be good for 2.8 0-60 but some of the 200+ gang will probably be along soon to snort at that Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Fruit'n'nut
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 11 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:46 - 19 Feb 2005    Post subject: Re: Car 0-60 vs Bike 0-60 who is quickest ? Reply with quote

jaffa wrote:

Such figures measured on a dyno would be useless, you would be measuring the ability of the vehicle to accelerate the moving parts of the dyno



Fair comment; I don't know anything about dynos really - I'd assumed you could disconnect the roller from everything but the back wheel and just spin up a (relatively) light drum - obviously not!

Smile


jaffa wrote:
the mass of the vehicle is a critical factor with regard to acceleration, it wouldn't be taken into account. In addition the wind resistance wouldn't be accounted for either.



Would manufacturers want to account for mass and wind-resistance in the race for the "best" figures? Question

Wink
____________________
Power Ranger Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

mchaggis
World Chat Champion



Joined: 09 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:52 - 19 Feb 2005    Post subject: Re: Car 0-60 vs Bike 0-60 who is quickest ? Reply with quote

jaffa wrote:
Such figures measured on a dyno would be useless, you would be measuring the ability of the vehicle to accelerate the moving parts of the dyno, the mass of the vehicle is a critical factor with regard to acceleration, it wouldn't be taken into account. In addition the wind resistance wouldn't be accounted for either.

I would expect, based on power to weight ratio that a bike would win this one.


This is why a proper dyno has the drum set up to match the equivalent inertia of the machine which is being tested on it. Hence the inertia of the drum is the same as the inertia of the vehicle, meaning it is meaningful. Wind resistance is still ignored like you say of course.
____________________
I must not be a troll...
Mmmm, Guinness
Discovering the delights of Hammerite and a 3/4" brush. Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:01 - 19 Feb 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Calculated times are speeds are of no real use to anybody.

In some ways the theoretical best 0-60 time would be about 2.7 seconds, as that is 1g acceleration and you only have 1g holding the back wheel on the ground. I reality tyres can have more grip than that.

As to bikes not needing to change gear, that also means they do not get into the power. ZX10R has a first gear speed of over 100mph, which probably means at 60 it is still waiting to come on cam.

What would be more interesting is knowing how many clutches they went through trying to get the Audi to get to 60 in 3.2 seconds.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:02 - 19 Feb 2005    Post subject: Re: Car 0-60 vs Bike 0-60 who is quickest ? Reply with quote

A few cars can beat bikes, stuff like the Tiger z100wr should be faster than bikes, thanks to a longer wheel base and low center of gravity.

When you get to modifying, you can put a bloody big engine in a car, which gets rid of the weight disadvantage and makes use of the extra traction and long wheel base etc.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Silver
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:28 - 19 Feb 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

MarJay wrote:
Most mags publish rubbish standing quarter times, which mean nothing in the real world really.


Although, interestingly enough I beat the 1/4 mile terminal speed quoted by MCN for my ZX6R at Santa Pod by about 6mph.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

skyline
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 20 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:31 - 19 Feb 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmm, but then you look at some of the cars like the one im about to post in the vids section. They gave up on 0-62 (or 60 whatever) and do 0-300kph :O (i assume thats about 180-200mph never found the exact figure). Im sure at some point they will create 'wheelie control' so's to speak, well they will make more of them (just thought dont they have them which but of fuel?). So that way no matter how far back the throttle is pulled the front wheel stays on the floor and then maybe bikes can move forward in 0-62mph runs...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

loply
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:33 - 19 Feb 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

With regards to the powerband argument (that bikes dont reach their power till above 60mph),

Surely the point of the clutch is that you hold the throttle fully open at high revs (in the powerband) and slip the clutch to keep it like this?

You dont dump the clutch so its fully engaged and drive from 2,000rpm surely. Also, you would use the clutch to moderate the drive so that its nearly wheelying constantly wouldnt you? Thus accessing all the power that is possible for the chasis, disregarding the location of the powerband.
____________________
Yamaha SZR660 Caution to the wind, the throttle pinned!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

The#Doctor#
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:41 - 19 Feb 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

uve got 2 remember that that car was suped 2 the max most cars wont be able 2 do 0-60 in under 8 even a porche only in about 5 the average sport 600 with no ad ons will do it 3
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Andy99
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:46 - 19 Feb 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

I dare say Mr C may be able to help us out here with the stats on bikes modded for straightline action.
____________________
Nothing gets the point across quite like a raised middle digit.

Just call me General Crazypaws.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Zoffo
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:07 - 19 Feb 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

loply wrote:
With regards to the powerband argument (that bikes dont reach their power till above 60mph),

Surely the point of the clutch is that you hold the throttle fully open at high revs (in the powerband) and slip the clutch to keep it like this?

You dont dump the clutch so its fully engaged and drive from 2,000rpm surely. Also, you would use the clutch to moderate the drive so that its nearly wheelying constantly wouldnt you? Thus accessing all the power that is possible for the chasis, disregarding the location of the powerband.


Just spin up in the power band on a decent bike. The trick is to let go at max power that the tyre can take.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

loply
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:18 - 19 Feb 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Zoffo,

Thats exactly what I mean. The powerband being high in the revs is irrelevant, as via the clutch you will be putting down the max permissable power anyway.

So what does it matter that your power doesnt kick in till 8,000rpm and youre static?
____________________
Yamaha SZR660 Caution to the wind, the throttle pinned!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Johnny GSX-R
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:28 - 19 Feb 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can vouch for the Blackbird having one hell of a low down ability to launch itself. Its about correct clutch control and power combination, the front needs to be just shy of the ground and held there thus transfering the weight/drive to the rear tyre.
I have a family member with a 480BHP Cosworth Sierra and its NO match for the bike, his suspension is too hard for one and the weight transfer just lights his tyres (wasted ponies).
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

NickD
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:33 - 19 Feb 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Johnny 'XX' wrote:
I can vouch for the Blackbird having one hell of a low down ability to launch itself.


I'll second that. Bit of silliness on tuesday, and my pants are still in the wash. Embarassed
____________________
I was only doing what it said on my licence officer....
Tear along the dotted line!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:35 - 19 Feb 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

loply wrote:
Thats exactly what I mean. The powerband being high in the revs is irrelevant, as via the clutch you will be putting down the max permissable power anyway.


Slipping the clutch or spinning the wheels just means that massive amounts of power are doing nothing except heating up your clutch plates / tyres.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

jaffa
Nitrous Nuisance



Joined: 22 Jan 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:31 - 19 Feb 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

I quite like this, not sure of the actual figues but I think the supercharged version was around 3 seconds to 60mph.
https://www.arielmotor.co.uk
____________________
jaffa - all juice and no pips
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

DynaMight
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:32 - 19 Feb 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Standard road going bikes vs standard road going cars = Bikes win.

When you start getting modified cars then they start getting closer, I mean theres only so fast a bike can get to 60MPH without flipping, After that it'll need extended swingarms and stuff.

It's pretty much the same with 0-100 and 1/4 miles too, Standard GSXR/R1/Fireblade will do a 1/4 in sub 10.5 secs, You'd need a 500+ BHP car to get anywhere close to that.

Cars have the higher top speed though, my 600 would probably cream a Ferrari in 0-60, 0-100 and 1/4 mile but it would keep going upto like 200MPH.

£9,000 GSXR/R1/Fireblade gives more smiles per £ than a £100,000+ Ferrari, Thats for sure Smile Unless your a posing git (Then you could always get a Ducati :p )
____________________
My bikes are at https://www.bikepics.com/members/dynamight/
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Davo
Davo To The Rescue!



Joined: 04 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:11 - 20 Feb 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I mean theres only so fast a bike can get to 60MPH without flipping, After that it'll need extended swingarms and stuff.


Me want's to try a Rocket III, shouldn't think that'll have too much problems with flipping.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

dodsi
Dirty Carny



Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:38 - 20 Feb 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is horses for courses...

at 19 what kind of car can I afford to run?

1 litre something...0-60 eventuially.

OR

500cc bike with a sub 5 second (if your brave) 0-60 time...

HMMMMMM

its all about bang for your buck with bikes.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Krs
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 03 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:10 - 20 Feb 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had a film of a coswroth beating a r1 Thumbs Up
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 21 years, 32 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.08 Sec - Server Load: 0.72 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 135.06 Kb