Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


BMW G 310R

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

RhynoCZ
Super Spammer



Joined: 09 Mar 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:36 - 23 Jun 2016    Post subject: BMW G 310R Reply with quote

The new BMW's A2 friendly motorcycle will be avalible in October this very year. I'm not sure what they are trying to achive here, but it is definitely nice to have something else but MT-03 and Z 300 to pick from. USD front suspension and aluminium swingarm are a bit unusual at this category of motorcycles, but other than that, it's pretty standard A2 motorcycle with ABS.

The engine is a result of cooperation of BMW and TVS Motor Company (Indian concern). The engine development took place in Munich, so they say. More models with this engine are expected (Enduro and Sports motorcyle with full fairings).

Specs.
Engine - Single cylinder, four stroke with 4 valves DOHC head, DFi
Displacement - 313ccm
Power output - 25kW @ 9,500rpm
Torque - 28Nm @ 7,500rpm
Gearbox - 6 speed, wet clutch
Weight - 158kg (wet)
Tank - 11L

Retail price: 130,500CZK (incl. VAT) / 3,703.28GBP (EDIT by Oldie: £4,290)
(Looking at the local Kawasaki dealership and 130k is pretty close to what the Z 300 goes for these days - Z 300 (ABS): 139,900CZK; Z 300 (no ABS): 124,900CZK)

Source (info and pictures NOT in English): https://www.motorkari.cz/clanky/moto-novinky/bmw/bmw-g-310r-v-prodeji-od-rijna.-zname-cenu-34402.html

https://www.motorkari.cz/upload/images/clanky/2016-06/34402/P90202721_highRes.jpg
https://www.motorkari.cz/upload/images/clanky/2016-06/34402/P90204479_highRes.jpg
https://www.motorkari.cz/upload/images/clanky/2016-06/34402/P90202660_highRes.jpg
____________________
'87 Honda XBR 500, '96 Kawasaki ZX7R P1, '90 Honda CB-1, '88 Kawasaki GPz550, MZ 150 ETZ
'95 Mercedes-Benz w202 C200 CGI, '98 Mercedes-Benz w210 E200 Kompressor


Last edited by RhynoCZ on 16:35 - 28 Jun 2016; edited 2 times in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Loui5D
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 22 Sep 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:52 - 23 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

jesus, that makes an Inazuma look good.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:01 - 23 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's not setting even my pulse on fire.

Sales of the new 300s have been pretty poor in the UK, and I don't see that this brings anything new to the sector.

Substantially less torque and power than an Indian made Duke 390, but on the other hand, it weighs more.

No, wait...

Price will be critical, BMW managed to kill sales of the G650GS overnight when they bumped the price up.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

DrSnoosnoo
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Mar 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:16 - 23 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

If I was to buy a A2 bike, I'd be buying the Duke. Yes it's Indian but it seems this Beemer is too.

The Duke gets you right on the limits of what's allowed power/weight wise and I doubt BMW will even consider being cheaper than the cheaper than the competition.
____________________
I'm Sam; Northern, Ginger, Lover
Did have: '95 ZZR600 '83 CG125 '97 ZZR1100 '15 Hypermotard 821 SP Do Have: '10 ZX10R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

RhynoCZ
Super Spammer



Joined: 09 Mar 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:41 - 23 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think BMW will sell tons of those, not in Europe, but if launched in north America, they will sell well, because of the BMW badge.
____________________
'87 Honda XBR 500, '96 Kawasaki ZX7R P1, '90 Honda CB-1, '88 Kawasaki GPz550, MZ 150 ETZ
'95 Mercedes-Benz w202 C200 CGI, '98 Mercedes-Benz w210 E200 Kompressor
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:49 - 23 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe, but that would be a sad indictment on bike buyers. BMW have a pretty poor quality record on their modern bikes, and producing them in India isn't likely to help with that.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Beehive Bedlam This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.

RhynoCZ
Super Spammer



Joined: 09 Mar 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:17 - 23 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes Roger, but modern consumers buy things because of branding and badges. People don't buy a Mercedes-Benz because they need a car, they buy a Mercedes-Benz, because they want a Mercedes-Benz (hence the ''new/affordable'' A and B klasse). Wink

At God.i: Mind you, the licensing tests are not the same in all the 27 (+UK) member countries of the EU. Thumbs Up
____________________
'87 Honda XBR 500, '96 Kawasaki ZX7R P1, '90 Honda CB-1, '88 Kawasaki GPz550, MZ 150 ETZ
'95 Mercedes-Benz w202 C200 CGI, '98 Mercedes-Benz w210 E200 Kompressor
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Vracktal
World Chat Champion



Joined: 04 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:25 - 23 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm actually hoping this is a sales flop, and that's speaking as a BMW owner. For me they've been getting complacent, lowering quality and cutting costs because they think they can count on the badge to shift units.

With this 300 they had an opportunity to at least match the KTM for specs and instead phoned it in with this yawn of a motorcycle. And until they start seeing sales diminish they won't start innovating again.

For what it's worth, I think the same goes for Apple too.
____________________
2007 BMW R1200R: On road
2009 BMW G650X Challenge: On road
1975 Norton Commando 850: Off road, awaiting recommissioning
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Alawson68
Renault 5 Driver



Joined: 26 Jan 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:18 - 23 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

DrSnoosnoo wrote:
If I was to buy a A2 bike, I'd be buying the Duke. Yes it's Indian but it seems this Beemer is too.

The Duke gets you right on the limits of what's allowed power/weight wise and I doubt BMW will even consider being cheaper than the cheaper than the competition.


The full power Duke 390, isn't A2 compliant, it's over on the power to weight ratio. I know because I bought one last year and the dealership wanted to see my licence, so they could upload the right engine map, fortunately I have a full A licence
____________________
1968 Vespa Primavera
2016 KTM Duke 390
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 06:56 - 24 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Alawson68 wrote:
the dealership wanted to see my licence, so they could upload the right engine map

Tin gods. I do wish people would invite them to do one when they start asking to see evidence of things that have nothing to do with them.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

BTTD
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 Nov 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:53 - 24 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Am disappoint BMW. Sad

If it had hints of hipster R9T or the old style R80GS I would be looking at it and thinking... not bad.
But it's so bland and uneventful.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:24 - 24 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's got a definite "designed by committee to offend nobody" look about it.

They're pushing the "girls' bike" marketing pretty hard too - maybe they should ask Suzuki how well that worked out with the Gladius. Wink
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stevo as b4
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Jul 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:55 - 24 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Socket wrote:
Anyone with half a wit will buy an A bike what can be restricted to fall into the A2 category and do the A tests on it when the time comes after they have removed the restrictor in the test centre car park


I'm not a fan of A2, I never was even though it didn't affect me. I did like the old restricted licence system though, it didn't hurt anyone as was simple to understand or bypass if you were old enough.

But how is a say 180-200kg bike with 94bhp ever going to be any good, fun to ride, or a good value ownership experience if restricted to A2 spec?

The twatish argument of using the same bike to progressively de-restrict to take the next test on and it being like having a new bike when you do is bollocks IMO.

An A2 bike needs to be under 47bhp and be light and not made for any other purpose than being the tool for the job for a two year stint.

Unless your going to ride your 94bhp bikes with the restriction removed, they are totally useless for A2 and no good to anyone.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

BTTD
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 Nov 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:31 - 24 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

stevo as b4 wrote:

An A2 bike needs to be under 47bhp and be light and not made for any other purpose than being the tool for the job for a two year stint.

Unless your going to ride your 94bhp bikes with the restriction removed, they are totally useless for A2 and no good to anyone.


I disagree with the logic of that, the young rider then has a bike that is only going to appeal to other A2 learners. That'll be harder to sell, more loss, and a more expensive route to licence.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:09 - 24 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

jnw010 wrote:
I disagree with the logic of that, the young rider then has a bike that is only going to appeal to other A2 learners. That'll be harder to sell, more loss, and a more expensive route to licence.

Agreed. I've been following / trolling the local eBay / Gumtree for some time, and bikes 126cc - 400cc are just not selling, at any price.

Cue much "I know what it's worth Mad " rageface from the sellers, but the market for them has pretty much collapsed.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

wr6133
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Dec 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:11 - 24 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like the bike in the first picture, shame about the BMW she is sat on.

I don't get though why there isn't a slew of A2 bikes right on the power limits. It seems (to me anyway) from the threads we see asking about A2 bikes that a whole load of bikes could be shifted by the first company to relaunch an IL4 400cc, if people will pay for a shitja 300 or a puke 390 then I'm sure a new baby 'blade would fly out of the showrooms.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

techathy
Traffic Copper



Joined: 09 Aug 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:04 - 24 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

stevo as b4 wrote:
But how is a say 180-200kg bike with 94bhp ever going to be any good, fun to ride, or a good value ownership experience if restricted to A2 spec?

Can't think of any reason what so ever.. I mean the restricted SV650S has no performance advantage over the A2 native bikes Laughing

That's road speed v's acceleration given all bikes hitting 100km/h on the rev-limiter.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:44 - 24 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

wr6133 wrote:
I don't get though why there isn't a slew of A2 bikes right on the power limits.

Because accountants and marketeers have been allowed to design bikes.

Honda's bang-on-the-limit CB500 variants have been selling like gangbusters. The Inazuma 250 sold a few because wow such cheapness, very bargain.

Everything else... well, they're technically available.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stevo as b4
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Jul 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:47 - 24 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's torque from the larger cylinders not doing very much work for thier size. We aren't making boat or generator engines here, and don't need to overbuild for strength or dependency.

As for a new 400cc baby blade, it would not need to be an IL4 engine design to get just 47bhp from even 300cc let alone a 400. There seems no point adding weight and cylinders and cost to a design when you don't need them to get the performance required.

And if your thinking IL4 because you just want one, or think they are superior or just closer in ethos to a real blade, it's not a rational business decision to build a bike that is only suitable for EU regs.

But otherwise I like the idea of deliberate specific 47bhp compliant bikes, they are still better to ride and I'm not sure other why they don't sell.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

techathy
Traffic Copper



Joined: 09 Aug 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:24 - 25 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

stevo as b4 wrote:
That's torque from the larger cylinders not doing very much work for thier size. We aren't making boat or generator engines here, and don't need to overbuild for strength or dependency.

First off that's a thrust:weight ratio graph, not a torque graph. Secondly ignore the top end of the rev range for a moment and look at the low to mid-range. That's full on 650 thrust.. actually below 3750 that's better thrust than an un-restricted SV5650S. You're actually within 5% or 1.5kW of peek power for over 4000rpm meaning you have a very consistent acceleration fall-off as the speed builds rather than noticeable drops between gears.

On the road this means you have to rev the shit out of an RC390 to keep up with that SV650S being ridden in a moderate manner. But as it holds power it's still fun to rev-out, though not quite as much fun as the RC390. Then there's the motorway manners, the engine is running at much lower rpm but has almost as much acceleration as the RC390 in 4th. The weight difference was hardly noticeable, only really when moving the bike around by hand.

Honestly, if I had a choice of bike for a 2 year stint on an A2 I'd go for a restricted 650, they're simply easier bikes to deal with on the daily grind & almost as much fun on the back roads.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Monkeywrenche...
Nearly there...



Joined: 27 Mar 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:38 - 25 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

techathy wrote:

First off that's a thrust:weight ratio graph


Is it? hows a motorcycle producing thrust? Exhaust gasses?
____________________
2001 Aprilia RSV Mille R -dead, 2016 XSR 700-gone, 2018 Dorsoduro 900
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:17 - 25 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
Because accountants and marketeers have been allowed to design bikes.

I should probably clarify that to mean that they're obsessed with market segmentation.

35kW is the most that Andy A2 can have, so we'll also make some bikes with less power, in order to bump up the perceived value and therefore price of the 35kW one. Genius, see?

Except that you're sinking the cost of developing and stocking a bike that nobody really wants. The CBR500R has outsold the 300R by 1402 to 237.

Kawasaki are even more bizarre, trying to sell 29KW 300 twins and 21kW 250 singles side by side. Again, the 300s appear to have comfortably outsold the 250s. It's really hard to see why they bother.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

techathy
Traffic Copper



Joined: 09 Aug 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:13 - 25 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Monkeywrencher wrote:
techathy wrote:

First off that's a thrust:weight ratio graph


Is it? hows a motorcycle producing thrust? Exhaust gasses?

In physics thrust is a, typically propulsive, force applied to an object. So in this case the trust is the force at the wheel/tyre interface which is pushing the bike forwards.

Rogerborg, aren't there <25kW licences in some countries? Thus selling as many as possible, to help drive the per-unit production costs down, makes sense.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

herulach
World Chat Champion



Joined: 19 Apr 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:56 - 25 Jun 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="techathy"]
Monkeywrencher wrote:

In physics thrust is a, typically propulsive, force applied to an object. So in this case the trust is the force at the wheel/tyre interface which is pushing the bike forwards.

Rogerborg, aren't there <25kW licences in some countries? Thus selling as many as possible, to help drive the per-unit production costs down, makes sense.


I n English, is it bollocks. Thrust is specifically a reactive force, I.e. jet engine. The word you want is torque.

And considering the regulations dictates power your super torquey engine either needs the redline lowering or your graph is bollocks.

Also, if you're redlinign to hit 60 it's going to be academic anyway as the engines going to last about 5 minutes due to your poor riding.
____________________
YBR 125>FZS600
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 9 years, 234 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.13 Sec - Server Load: 0.83 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 135.06 Kb