Help & FAQs    Search BCF    Members    Groups    Events Calendar
Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Insurance Claim - Non Disclosed Incident **UPDATE**

 Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

TheArchitect
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Dec 2013
Karma :
PostPosted: 15:55 - 12 Oct 2016    Post subject: Insurance Claim - Non Disclosed Incident **UPDATE** Reply with quote
Recently had bike stolen. Put claim into insurance. They've now said my claim has been referred to the underwriters as their checks have flagged a claim on me that was prior to me taking out the policy.

Details: I nudged a bus with my car a couple weeks before I took out my bike policy. I stupidly forgot to notify my car insurance immediately and the bus company put in a claim which was being processed. In the midst of all that I bought bike and insured it forgetting to mention the bus incident to bike insurers. Now bike insurance are saying I failed to declare all past claims.
Bus incident went 50/50 which I was happy with and is now resolved.

Question: How fecked am I?
____________________
GSXR 600 K6 - Stolen
GSXR 600 K6 - Stolen
MT09 - Almost stolen

Last edited by TheArchitect on 15:32 - 22 Nov 2016; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

tom_e
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 27 Feb 2016
Karma :
PostPosted: 16:00 - 12 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
Pretty fecked.

Worst case they'll void your cover.

Best case they may calculate what your premium would have cost had you declared it and bum you for the extra before handing over any payout.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

TheArchitect
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Dec 2013
Karma :
PostPosted: 16:46 - 12 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
fecked in all directions then Sad
____________________
GSXR 600 K6 - Stolen
GSXR 600 K6 - Stolen
MT09 - Almost stolen
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Wonko The Sane
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Jan 2013
Karma :
PostPosted: 16:48 - 12 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
so the claim was still open when you purchased the insurance?

Arry, you around mate?
____________________
Looking to pass your CBT / Bike tests in Bury Lancashire? try www.focusridertraining.co.uk Would recommend.
They're also on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/pages/Focus-Rider-Training/196832923734251
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ste
Not Work Safe



Joined: 01 Sep 2002
Karma :
PostPosted: 16:51 - 12 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
Bend over.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Notj7
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Karma :
PostPosted: 16:52 - 12 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
Just a thought - if his cover is voided will he have to then answer "yes" to the question "has your insurance ever been cancelled or declined" (or whatever the similar question is)?

If yes, what about cancelling quick so they don't have the chance.

YOU CAN'T FIRE ME, I QUIT! Middle Finger Middle Finger
____________________
Left the forum.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

TheArchitect
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Dec 2013
Karma :
PostPosted: 21:41 - 12 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
Yep claim was still being processed when I took out bike policy.

I'm prepping for a shafting Crying or Very sad
____________________
GSXR 600 K6 - Stolen
GSXR 600 K6 - Stolen
MT09 - Almost stolen
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

arry
Super Spammer



Joined: 03 Jan 2009
Karma :
PostPosted: 23:23 - 12 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
Wonko The Sane wrote:
so the claim was still open when you purchased the insurance?

Arry, you around mate?


Key part is deliberate act of non disclosure versus innocent non disclosure. What's the exact wording on statement of fact for the bike policy?

Long and short is deliberate non disclosure they'll void. Innocent they'll look for a proportional remedy (what you would have paid had they have known, against what you had paid as a percentage, then applied to total value of claim).

If I've not made that clear - devil in detail, but at all costs you need to sway innocence of non disclosure.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

TheArchitect
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Dec 2013
Karma :
PostPosted: 08:52 - 13 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
arry wrote:
but at all costs you need to sway innocence of non disclosure.


gotcha.. cheers Arry!

In all honesty this was a genuine mistake on my part in that the bus incident happened within a week of me buying bike, which was 3 days after my wife gave birth to our son so things were a bit hectic at the time!
____________________
GSXR 600 K6 - Stolen
GSXR 600 K6 - Stolen
MT09 - Almost stolen
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

lihp
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Karma :
PostPosted: 09:00 - 13 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
arry wrote:

Long and short is deliberate non disclosure they'll void.


Even if it is unrelated to the claim? After all, nudging a bus with a car doesn't make you more likely to have a bike stolen surely?
____________________
covent.gardens: lihp is my most favourite member ever
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

arry
Super Spammer



Joined: 03 Jan 2009
Karma :
PostPosted: 09:08 - 13 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
lihp wrote:
arry wrote:

Long and short is deliberate non disclosure they'll void.


Even if it is unrelated to the claim? After all, nudging a bus with a car doesn't make you more likely to have a bike stolen surely?


Simply put, yes. If they've asked a clear fair and not misleading question and it's been answered deliberately incorrectly in order to achieve a lower premium or induce the insurer to accept the risk, then that's policy avoidable territory - whatever the circumstances of the claim.

I'm going to go all copy pasta now from a third party site as I've not time to sperge my own version, but in essence CIDRA 2012 reforms is what you need to look up on (latterly, Insurance Act 2015 for Commercial clients).

How will CIDRA bite?

When there is misrepresentation, what will happen? The first step will be to consider whether the insured has breached its duty to take “reasonable care” not to make a misrepresentation. What amounts to “reasonable care” will depend on the relevant circumstances. This seems to be an area which is ripe for debate.

Where there has been a breach of that duty, insurers will have “proportionate” remedies, dependent on whether the misrepresentation was deliberate/reckless or careless.

Quote:
If it was deliberate, the insurer can still avoid the contract. Dishonesty is always classed as deliberate.
If it was “careless” (defined as anything that is not deliberate or reckless), the remedy depends on what the insurer would have done had there been no misrepresentation. For example:
If the insurer would not have entered the insurance contact had it known the true position, then it can still avoid the policy.
If the insurer would have applied different terms to the policy, then those different terms will apply.
If the insurer would have rated the risk differently/increased the premium, then the claim payment can be reduced proportionately.



OP - exact wording of your statement of fact question please.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

TheArchitect
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Dec 2013
Karma :
PostPosted: 09:46 - 13 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
arry wrote:

OP - exact wording of your statement of fact question please.


https://i.imgur.com/RlQrbUlh.jpg
____________________
GSXR 600 K6 - Stolen
GSXR 600 K6 - Stolen
MT09 - Almost stolen
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

arry
Super Spammer



Joined: 03 Jan 2009
Karma :
PostPosted: 10:44 - 13 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
The question is loose and non-specific so you're in a bit of luck there.

You'll be making the points that:
It doesn't specify how broad the question could encompass - for example, I could have lost my mobile phone without insurance and by the question wording I'd need to have disclosed it which would have nothing to do with this class of insurance; the question is therefore unreasonable as it should be more specific and because of this it was neither clear nor fair and was misleading.
Because the question wasn't specific enough to narrow the field down, I assumed, entirely reasonably, that it was specific to my motorcycle only as that is the class of insurance I was proposing for; on which I had not had any accidents claims etc, and therefore I believed my answer to be entirely accurate and reasonable in the circumstances; therefore I have not been either deliberately misrepresentative or reckless in my disclosures.

That should get you to a 'careless' misrepresentation position at best for them, and a 'might well get away with it if I complain hard enough and argue my point well enough and the FOS will back me' for you.

Worst case should be proportional remedy and you'd want to push very hard to just pay the additional premium you'd have been due to pay.

Good luck.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

TheArchitect
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Dec 2013
Karma :
PostPosted: 10:48 - 13 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
arry wrote:
The question is loose and non-specific so you're in a bit of luck there.

You'll be making the points that:
It doesn't specify how broad the question could encompass - for example, I could have lost my mobile phone without insurance and by the question wording I'd need to have disclosed it which would have nothing to do with this class of insurance; the question is therefore unreasonable as it should be more specific and because of this it was neither clear nor fair and was misleading.
Because the question wasn't specific enough to narrow the field down, I assumed, entirely reasonably, that it was specific to my motorcycle only as that is the class of insurance I was proposing for; on which I had not had any accidents claims etc, and therefore I believed my answer to be entirely accurate and reasonable in the circumstances; therefore I have not been either deliberately misrepresentative or reckless in my disclosures.

That should get you to a 'careless' misrepresentation position at best for them, and a 'might well get away with it if I complain hard enough and argue my point well enough and the FOS will back me' for you.

Worst case should be proportional remedy and you'd want to push very hard to just pay the additional premium you'd have been due to pay.

Good luck.


Many thanks Arry!

Spoke to them yesterday and they said it's with underwriters so have to wait for a response. Do I just sit tight, wait for their findings and then respond with my counter or go in with my case now?
____________________
GSXR 600 K6 - Stolen
GSXR 600 K6 - Stolen
MT09 - Almost stolen
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

DrSnoosnoo
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Mar 2012
Karma :
PostPosted: 10:57 - 13 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
This is an example of the stupidity in their questioning your claims history. They hold all the details, they do not need to ask the individual.

If they were being thorough before entering their contract, they would check all records them and their industry hold on the individual.

If I want a mortgage, the banks don't say, can you afford this mate? They do their checks of your income etc and decide on what offer to make.

Scvm
____________________
I'm Sam; Northern, Ginger, Lover
Did have: '95 ZZR600 '83 CG125 '97 ZZR1100 '15 Hypermotard 821 SP Do Have: '10 ZX10R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

TheArchitect
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Dec 2013
Karma :
PostPosted: 11:08 - 13 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
DrSnoosnoo wrote:
This is an example of the stupidity in their questioning your claims history. They hold all the details, they do not need to ask the individual.

If they were being thorough before entering their contract, they would check all records them and their industry hold on the individual.

If I want a mortgage, the banks don't say, can you afford this mate? They do their checks of your income etc and decide on what offer to make.

Scvm


Agreed. I see this as bordering entrapment. They have the means to find the answers to all of these questions yet they choose to ask the questions, almost in the hope that there will be a slip up such as mine.
____________________
GSXR 600 K6 - Stolen
GSXR 600 K6 - Stolen
MT09 - Almost stolen
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :
PostPosted: 11:27 - 13 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
When they come back with "You have to declare car incidents on a bike policy," I'd suggest "But you won't accept car NCD on a bike policy. I assumed that you'd have a reasonable, fair and consistent position on that."
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

carpe_diem
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 28 Jul 2016
Karma :
PostPosted: 11:58 - 13 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
TheArchitect wrote:
DrSnoosnoo wrote:
This is an example of the stupidity in their questioning your claims history. They hold all the details, they do not need to ask the individual.

If they were being thorough before entering their contract, they would check all records them and their industry hold on the individual.

If I want a mortgage, the banks don't say, can you afford this mate? They do their checks of your income etc and decide on what offer to make.

Scvm


Agreed. I see this as bordering entrapment. They have the means to find the answers to all of these questions yet they choose to ask the questions, almost in the hope that there will be a slip up such as mine.


Or in the hope that they'll realise someone (not you, I hasten to add) is trying to pull a fast one. I don't see it as entrapment - it's an honest question to which you're asked to provide an honest answer. I'd have thought that if you'd had an accident three days before being asked the question whether you'd had an accident, if anything you'd be more likely to remember to answer yes (newborn notwithstanding).

DrSnooSnoo, the banks and building societies are now obliged to do an affordability check for a mortgage, which is precisely them asking you if you can afford it, so not sure your analogy holds up there.
____________________
Currently riding: Suzuki EN125 | Previous rides: Vespa 125PX, Yamaha SR125
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

DrSnoosnoo
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Mar 2012
Karma :
PostPosted: 12:07 - 13 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
carpe_diem wrote:
DrSnooSnoo, the banks and building societies are now obliged to do an affordability check for a mortgage, which is precisely them asking you if you can afford it, so not sure your analogy holds up there.


While I went through various rough calculations with a mortgage broker to understand our outgoings and what was remaining to pay mortgages etc, yes, the broker conducted no checks to verify I wasn't lying.

Yet when I was to go ahead with the mortgage I had to supply all of my bank and credit card statements to the lender before acceptance.
____________________
I'm Sam; Northern, Ginger, Lover
Did have: '95 ZZR600 '83 CG125 '97 ZZR1100 '15 Hypermotard 821 SP Do Have: '10 ZX10R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Evil Hans
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Nov 2015
Karma :
PostPosted: 12:29 - 13 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
Rogerborg wrote:
When they come back with "You have to declare car incidents on a bike policy," I'd suggest "But you won't accept car NCD on a bike policy. I assumed that you'd have a reasonable, fair and consistent position on that."


Excellent point. This is going into my collection of "Best BCF Posts Ever"
____________________
Triumph Sprint ST 1050. And it's Red.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

M.C
Super Spammer



Joined: 29 Sep 2015
Karma :
PostPosted: 12:51 - 13 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
TheArchitect wrote:

https://i.imgur.com/RlQrbUlh.jpg

Interesting how they say whether or not a claim was made. For example a Romanian lorry driver rolled back into my work van, refused to give his details, then denied an accident had taken place (despite seeing his lorry embedded in my van). So without a claim how do you prove an accident took place?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

TheArchitect
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Dec 2013
Karma :
PostPosted: 13:15 - 13 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
carpe_diem wrote:
if you'd had an accident three days before being asked the question whether you'd had an accident, if anything you'd be more likely to remember to answer yes (newborn notwithstanding).


You'd think.. except when the incident with the bus happened both myself and the bus driver agreed it was minor enough to just let it be. We both also acknowledged that we would have to notify our respective insurers for sake of being open about it.
I notified my insurer in a 2 minute phone call and left it at that. Because I put so little thought into the whole situation (and the imminent birth of my son playing on my mind) it didn't fully register in my mind as a major incident. So forgotten. It was after I had insured my bike that the bus company put in a claim on me. Even then it was a 2 minute conversation to resolve that it was 50/50 blame...again job done and forgotten.
____________________
GSXR 600 K6 - Stolen
GSXR 600 K6 - Stolen
MT09 - Almost stolen
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

tom_e
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 27 Feb 2016
Karma :
PostPosted: 13:21 - 13 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
M.C wrote:
TheArchitect wrote:

https://i.imgur.com/RlQrbUlh.jpg

Interesting how they say whether or not a claim was made. For example a Romanian lorry driver rolled back into my work van, refused to give his details, then denied an accident had taken place (despite seeing his lorry embedded in my van). So without a claim how do you prove an accident took place?


They're preying on all the people who think they're doing the right thing by declaring everything and that if they don't the insurance company will magically find out and cancel their policy, easy money for them when they bump up the policy price.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

arry
Super Spammer



Joined: 03 Jan 2009
Karma :
PostPosted: 07:14 - 18 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
How did you get on OP?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Motorhate
Nearly there...



Joined: 02 Aug 2013
Karma :
PostPosted: 14:46 - 18 Oct 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote
Rogerborg wrote:
"But you won't accept car NCD on a bike policy. I assumed that you'd have a reasonable, fair and consistent position on that."


Can anybody convincingly explain to me why that is the case? I know they're shisters and gangsters but what is their official reasoning for it?

It would be an easy win for any competing bike insurance company would be to simply accept car NCB for bikes.
____________________
Current - Harley Davidson FXDB Street Bob | Harley Davidson FLTR Road Glide | Harley Davidson Road King
GONE - Honda CB500 Ratbike | Yamaha FZ750 | Yamaha XVS1100 | Kawasaki VN2000 | Kawasaki ER-6 F | Harley Davidson XL883L Sportster
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 9 years, 136 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
 You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 
Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.09 Sec - Server Load: 1.77 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 137.03 Kb