Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


How can Rukka be so popular among bike couriers?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Londoner2015
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 09 Nov 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:51 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: How can Rukka be so popular among bike couriers? Reply with quote

Rukka is one of the most, if not the most, popular brand I see worn by bikers in London. I understand if lawyers and bankers experiencing a mid-life crisis fritter away their money on this type of kit, but how can it be so popular among bike couriers and food delivery couriers? The most common kit I see is the Armas, their top of the range, with superfabric patches; the jacket will set you back about one grand, and the trousers cost £6-700. In other words, this kit is worth more than many of the old and lousy bikes (especially the 125s) used by many couriers. I don’t understand it! How much money are couriers paid? Smile Even if they were to buy it used, it would still be expensive, and offer less protection than cheaper leather or CE-approved textile jackets (Hideout leathers, Scotts leathers and Weise, all British, make ce-homologated jackets and pants).
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

hutchism
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 22 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:36 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

People that ride all year need it. I've got Rukka now after years of mediocre clothing. The first year I had rukka i waa actually riding a cb500 I brought for £100!

I've gone through 3 bikes since then and the Rukka is still going strong. I've never been wet and only ever cold when I've not gotten round to putting the lining in at start on winter.

I'd sooner invest in kit before a new bike. Plus if you get it straight from Germany it's way cheaper, we get shafted in every direction in the Uk!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

c_dug
Super Spammer



Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:50 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm beginning to think the options are Rukka or nothing, I've tried lots of brands and have never found anything that is actually properly waterproof, nor warm in sub zero temperatures.

Rukka is always rated as pukka. Mr. Green

That with some Datona boots and some Tucano muffs seems to be the ultimate recipe!
____________________
I am a bellend, I am a man of constant sorrow, I am a gummy bear, I am a rock.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Londoner2015
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 09 Nov 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:56 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, regardless of the merits of Rukka, I find it surprising that so many bike couriers, ie people on low and potentially irregular wages, are willing to invest so much in such expensive kit.

I don't agree that if you ride all year you need it. I ride all year. I'd prefer a decent bike with ABS, even if it means cheaper gear. I'm stingy on a lot of things but not on bike kit.

In terms of protection, there is no question that leathers and CE - homologated jackets (where the whole garment is homologated on burst, abrasion and cut resistance) offer better protection than Rukka's textiles, and can easily be cheaper. Also, Rukka has level 1 only armour, whereas level 2 absorbs twice as much energy.

Laminated gore pro makes the gear very handy for British winter, but the poor venting options mean Rukkas are much warmer than other gear with gore pro but lots of venting, like Kim's Badlands, which is also more reinforced.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Shinigami
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Feb 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:58 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

can't say i've been wet through my waterproofs at any point and I commute year round. I have an Aldi textile jacket and 'texspeed' armoured trousers (about £35). Not leaked once in years and warm enough for me
____________________
Current: Honda City Fly CLR125 2003 Honda CB600F Hornet 2008 Yamaha FZ6 S2 + 1991 Kawasaki GPZ500
"Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the Comedian is the only thing that makes sense.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ScaredyCat
World Chat Champion



Joined: 19 May 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:00 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Doesn't Rukka stuff come with a lifetime guarantee?
____________________
Honda CBF125 ➝ NC700X
Honda CBF125 ↳ Speed Triple
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Londoner2015
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 09 Nov 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:01 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

c_dug wrote:
I'm beginning to think the options are Rukka or nothing, I've tried lots of brands and have never found anything that is actually properly waterproof, nor warm in sub zero temperatures.


These Klim s have gore pro and lots of vents. They lack a thermal layer and I find their D3o armour too small (the elbow moves around too much on me). The Badlands has superfabric reinforcements, the other one has leather patches. They can both be used well into the spring, when a rukka Armas would make you sweat. J&S in Stockwell sell both.

https://www.revzilla.com/motorcycle/klim-badlands-jacket

https://www.revzilla.com/motorcycle/klim-apex-jacket

Hideout's textile are brilliant. Family - run shop near Stansted. Laminated waterproof. Protective inner lining like in the Halvarssons safety suit, now discontinued. CE-homologation. They can even make it to measure to fit beer bellies etc. Much better venting options than the non-homologated Rukkas

https://www.hideout-leather.co.uk/hideout-leather-hi-pro
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

c-m
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:08 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rukka gear mostly looks like crap but it is great quality.

I've got a pair of Apollo gloves and have put them through hell. So much so that after 10,000 miles on and off road (in just 1 year) they are faded and scuffed but still completely waterproof and still doing their job.

If they employed a better design department I might then consider their trousers or jackets too.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

chris-red
Have you considered a TDM?



Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:10 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cheap gear is false economy, it just doesn't last. I have Halvarssons Textiles similar price point to Rukka. I know they will be waterproof for years to come. I have Datona boots for the same reason.
____________________
Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Londoner2015
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 09 Nov 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:11 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

ScaredyCat wrote:
Doesn't Rukka stuff come with a lifetime guarantee?


No, it’s a 5-year warranty. Possibly the longest warranty I know of. Whether that is worth the extra bucks is very subjective.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Londoner2015
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 09 Nov 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:13 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stadler in Germany make excellent gear with gore-pro. They used to make BMW’s kit and now supply a number of police forces in Northern Europe. They have a jacket with leather reinforcements and lots of vents, and another with superfabric and vents – both more reinforced and versatile than Rukka. You’d have to order directly from Merkel-land, though.
https://www.stadler-bekleidung.de/product-detail-3-layer-en/jacke-track-pro.html
https://www.stadler-bekleidung.de/product-detail-3-layer-en/jacke-force-pro.html

Dainese’s Stradon is gore-pro, with leather reinforcements, about £250 cheaper than the Rukka Armas, and way more stylish.
Dainese’s Ridder is not reinforced like the others, but has laminated gore-tex and excellent vents.

Revit has lots of gore-tex kit. If you want laminated gore-tex, the Revit Dominator and Poseidon both have much better venting options than Rukka, and the Dominator has similar superfabric reinforcements.

And I’m sure there’s many more.

I am sure Rukka’s kit is good quality, and this is why it has a loyal following. But, no, it is by far not the only option, and most certainly not the most protective.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Shinigami
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Feb 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:16 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

chris-red wrote:
Cheap gear is false economy, it just doesn't last. I have Halvarssons Textiles similar price point to Rukka. I know they will be waterproof for years to come. I have Datona boots for the same reason.


It can be a false economy, it also can be the opposite. Had my aldi textile jacket for years now, it was £70 i believe.

I have recently replaced my texspeed trousers as my old ones had given up the ghost after 6 years and 3 (admittedly minor) spills Laughing
____________________
Current: Honda City Fly CLR125 2003 Honda CB600F Hornet 2008 Yamaha FZ6 S2 + 1991 Kawasaki GPZ500
"Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the Comedian is the only thing that makes sense.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ADSrox0r
World Chat Champion



Joined: 23 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:19 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's certainly damned good quality gear but I'm guilty of tarring Rukka wearers as 'owns a GS and once rode it through a puddle' types.
____________________
Current bikes: '08 VFR 800 VTEC(yo) , '07 ZZR1400 Winter hack: '95 Aprilia 650 Pegaso Currently lusting after: RC30
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Londoner2015
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 09 Nov 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:25 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

chris-red wrote:
Cheap gear is false economy, it just doesn't last. I have Halvarssons Textiles similar price point to Rukka. I know they will be waterproof for years to come. I have Datona boots for the same reason.


What gear would that be?
AFAIK, the most expensive textile jacket by Halvarssons is their Amazonas, which is about £ 440 (https://www.motolegends.com/jackets/halvarssons-amazonas-jacket-black-yellow.html ) , i.e. costs less than half the Rukka Armas (ca. £ 1,000).

I fully agree that cheap gear is often (but not always, as Shinigami says) a false economy. Quite simply, there is lots of other gear which is comparably good, cheaper, and in many cases more protective (like the homologated jackets). I have CE-homologated Clover Tekno jacket which I paid about £ 450 (vs the grand an Armas would set you back). The only gripe is that the waterproof is not laminated, but in terms of protection it is more reliable than the Armas; In theory the Finnish thingy could even be better, but, if that’s the case, why didn’t they have it homologated? I trust actual homologation tests more than marketing.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

owl
World Chat Champion



Joined: 21 Oct 2016
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:28 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

got the klim blade, it's their cheapest goretex jacket

had to go a size up which is actually too big, but means you can layer under it, seems fine so far Thumbs Up

Londoner2015 wrote:


These Klim s have gore pro and lots of vents. They lack a thermal layer and I find their D3o armour too small (the elbow moves around too much on me). The Badlands has superfabric reinforcements, the other one has leather patches. They can both be used well into the spring, when a rukka Armas would make you sweat. J&S in Stockwell sell both.

____________________
Observation is the greatest source of wisdom.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Londoner2015
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 09 Nov 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:47 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

By the way, methinks the most versatile textile jacket for English weather is the hi-pro by Hideout leather which I had mentioned (https://www.hideout-leather.co.uk/hideout-leather-hi-pro ). I find the most challenging time to choose what bike gear to wear is the mid-season, i.e. when it’s neither too hot nor too cold, yet can rain out of the blue. Jackets with a removable waterproof membrane suck in these conditions because, if you remove it, you’ll already be soaked by the time it starts raining, you pull over and fiddle with the layers, or with a rain overjacket. If you leave it in and it doesn’t rain, the waterproof layer is also windproof and blocks all the airflow, no matter how many vents you may have, so you bake in your own sweat – or at least I do.
Instead, a jacket with laminated waterproof + lots of vents is biker’s heaven: you can ride with the vents open and close them only if it starts raining, often without even getting off the bike, or leave them slightly open (eg at the back or under the arms) if you prefer the risk of a couple of raindrops over that of sweating too much. These are precisely the reasons why some guys on advrider.com use the grey Klim Apex in Thailand (hot and rainy).
I prefer Hideout’s jacket because it is CE-approved and passed the level 2 homologation tests for Personal Protective Equipment; plus it’s nice to buy quality gear from a small, British shop which manufacturers near Cambridge, and not in an Asian sweatshop. Klim and Hideout both use lousy D30 armour (lousy because too small), but hideout can customise most aspects of the jacket, including changing the protectors with bigger ones. Changing protectors on Klim jackets is tricky because you’d need to have the pockets altered somehow.
I have never ridden with it, but everyone tells me that the poor venting options of the Rukka Armas make it a winter-only jacket, even in England, with our mild non-summer and a spring which is colder than winter in many Southern European countries.

For the weeks it is really hot here in England, I think the best compromise is wearing some kind of Kevlar or protective shirt (Dragging, Bull-it and Bowtek make them), to improve abrasion resistance, underneath some summery and not-particularly protective jacket. Something like the Resurgence Rocker jacket, which seems like a denim jacket but is fully lined with the same fabric of their Voyager jeans, which are CE-level 2, could also be a good compromise. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-WDEx3DGuM

Oh, and don’t forget to make sure whatever you buy either has or can fit level 2 protectors. I see no reason for not having protectors which absorb twice as much energy.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Baffler186
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 May 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:48 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't doubt the quality of Rukka at all, but that's a lot of money that you could lose if you had an off. My insurance would charge £38 a year to insure gear (and only up to £750).

For my half hour a day commute it would be overkill. For weekend use, well I wouldn't go out if it was raining, and I've never suffered cold from cheaper (£100 - £150) jackets. In fact the only part of my body that ever gets too cold is my fingers.
____________________
Current: 2009 SV650 S, 1990 Kawasaki GT550
Previous: 2009 CBF125, 1998 GSF600, 2004 FZ6 Fazer, 1978 CB400a Hondamatic
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:13 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

<--- 6 1/2 year old RST Enduro jacket, £80, still fairly water resistant. Layering a £11.95 Regatta waterproof jacket makes it fully so.

Yes, I know, leathers, CE, but I spend a lot more time not falling off. </Tef>

If I were riding for a living, I'd spring for one of the used Roadcrafter romper suits that occasionally come up on eBay.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Beehive Bedlam This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.

drzsta
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Apr 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:17 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have just bought rukka armaxis jacket, armaxion trousers and Daytona roadstar boots.

It was £1800 worth but I was fed up with getting wet and cold every winter. Yes, it's alot of money but worth it for being comfortable and protected.

If you can't afford it by all means get something cheaper.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

chris-red
Have you considered a TDM?



Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:18 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Londoner2015 wrote:
chris-red wrote:
Cheap gear is false economy, it just doesn't last. I have Halvarssons Textiles similar price point to Rukka. I know they will be waterproof for years to come. I have Datona boots for the same reason.


What gear would that be?
AFAIK, the most expensive textile jacket by Halvarssons is their Amazonas, which is about £ 440 (https://www.motolegends.com/jackets/halvarssons-amazonas-jacket-black-yellow.html ) , i.e. costs less than half the Rukka Armas (ca. £ 1,000).

I fully agree that cheap gear is often (but not always, as Shinigami says) a false economy. Quite simply, there is lots of other gear which is comparably good, cheaper, and in many cases more protective (like the homologated jackets). I have CE-homologated Clover Tekno jacket which I paid about £ 450 (vs the grand an Armas would set you back). The only gripe is that the waterproof is not laminated, but in terms of protection it is more reliable than the Armas; In theory the Finnish thingy could even be better, but, if that’s the case, why didn’t they have it homologated? I trust actual homologation tests more than marketing.


I have the Prince stuff, when I was looking the price difference between it and the Rukka stuff in the shop were negligible, the Rukka didn't fit as well so I choose the Halvarssons. I must admit I read your post wrong. I saw 6-700 which was what i paid for the set, didn't realise that was JUST for the trousers.

I care not for Homologated clothing, having a lab test to rate protective gear means some manufacturers will make gear to pass the test rather than actually making something that will do well in a crash.

This happened a few years ago with Arai, their TOP lid scored 2 or 3/5. This is the lid a large proportion of the top flight racers used. This is the lid Nakano survived a 200mph crash after his rear tyre blew. The test in question was a metal spike fired into the side of the lid. Arai said the test is crap, the side of your head rarely ever takes as impact because your shoulders will hit first. Arai saved weight and bulk by not reinforcing that area, a lighted head has less moment and less force so impacts would be less. Makes perfect sense to me. Who do you trust a helmet manufacturer who has been certainly in the top 3 brands for quality for the last 2 decades or a government department.

The next model had 5 stars Arai compromised change their design to pass the test. Who would spend £500 on a 2* lid?
____________________
Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

tom_e
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 27 Feb 2016
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:30 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

chris-red wrote:

This happened a few years ago with Arai, their TOP lid scored 2 or 3/5. This is the lid a large proportion of the top flight racers used. This is the lid Nakano survived a 200mph crash after his rear tyre blew. The test in question was a metal spike fired into the side of the lid. Arai said the test is crap, the side of your head rarely ever takes as impact because your shoulders will hit first. Arai saved weight and bulk by not reinforcing that area, a lighted head has less moment and less force so impacts would be less. Makes perfect sense to me. Who do you trust a helmet manufacturer who has been certainly in the top 3 brands for quality for the last 2 decades or a government department.

The next model had 5 stars Arai compromised change their design to pass the test. Who would spend £500 on a 2* lid?


It's been my experience is every crash I've had be that on a mountain bike or a motorbike and I've had a few that the side of my head has never hit the ground for exactly that reason, my shoulders on the other hand have taken a beating.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

colink98
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 27 Jun 2016
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:33 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Perfectly happy with my Richa kit.
____________________
PCX125 (stolen) - CBF600 (current)
Ride it like you stole it.
ride sensible and not like an idiot and you wont get 6 points in one week.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Londoner2015
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 09 Nov 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:48 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

tom_e wrote:

It's been my experience is every crash I've had be that on a mountain bike or a motorbike and I've had a few that the side of my head has never hit the ground for exactly that reason, my shoulders on the other hand have taken a beating.


Which is why I find it inexcusable that level 2 protectors are so rare, especially in top-of-the-food-chain jackets, and that so many such jackets do not even give you the option of fitting L2 armour yourself (because pockets are often too small, eg Klim)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Londoner2015
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 09 Nov 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:51 - 11 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

chris-red wrote:


I care not for Homologated clothing, having a lab test to rate protective gear means some manufacturers will make gear to pass the test rather than actually making something that will do well in a crash.

This happened a few years ago with Arai, their TOP lid scored 2 or 3/5. This is the lid a large proportion of the top flight racers used. This is the lid Nakano survived a 200mph crash after his rear tyre blew.


I don’t agree. First of all, have Arai officially confirmed, and do you absolutely believe them, that their helmets used in moto GP competitions are exactly the same as those we members of the general public can buy in a store? Do Nakano and Valentino Rossi (yes, I know Mr Rossi uses AGV) go to a shop and buy the same lid any of us could buy, or do these companies make their gear specifically for them? I remember reading the case of a magazine which tested some kit (I believe it was a leather suit, but I’m not too sure) and found it incredibly superior to the others; it then bought the same one in a store, tested it, and found it was c**p. When contacted, the manufacturer put together some lousy excuse on how ‘by mistake’ they had sent a version meant for pilots and not the one they sell to the general public; of course by genuine mistake and not to cheat the tests. I don’t remember the details of the story, but people with a stronger google-fu may find it.

I agree that tests may measure the wrong things. Sure. Google ‘snell blowing the lid’ , if you don’t already know the story about the American journalist who got fired for exposing how Snell’s standards were flawed; Snell denies the claims, of course, but changed their standards afterwards.

The point with textile is that there is little to no transparency about the materials used. Revit has tags with nice charts showing which fabric is used where, but is an exception. Most manufacturers will only tell you they have super-whatever-tex reinforcmeents; what is this super-whatever? What kind of resistance does it have? No one knows. Most manufacturers only tell you they use high-resistance nylon or something like that. That’s utterly useless information. Is it Cordura? If so, what Denier? 500 denier lasts less than 1 second in a slide; 1000 denier stuff is used in CE-approved clothing, but is stiffer and more expensive.

If a manufacturer claims the CE standards are wrong for some reason, I’d be more than interested in hearing why. The tests seem very reasonable to me, but I keep an open mind. The point is: if you don’t want to trust the CE tests, what can you trust? Brands’ guff, ehm, marketing? Individual crash reports may give an indication, but single cases are irrelevant; there are people who survive 50 mph crashes in jeans and people who end up badly hurt despite wearing leathers.

If a textile jacket is not CE-approved (there are very few CE jackets), I’d at least want reinforcements of some kind (leather or superfabric) in the impact areas, like the Rukka Armas has, or some kind of inner protective lining, like Hideout’s textile (which is CE).
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 9 years, 153 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.15 Sec - Server Load: 0.82 - MySQL Queries: 15 - Page Size: 138.29 Kb