|
|
| Author |
Message |
| speedingmotor... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 speedingmotor... Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 24 Jun 2014 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 13:54 - 02 Nov 2017 Post subject: cg125 : removed flywheel, now timing is maybe mehhhh |
 |
|
hello bcf
i removed the flywheel on my 1979 cg125 because i had to replace my contact breaker points, i tried my best to keep the flywheel in line when i put it back on, but i kind of feel like the timing is now off. it wont rev as high in the rpms as before, and when under load, it seems sometimes on the verge of backfire. perhaps i did something wrong? is there a way of checking readjusting the timing? i dont have the lamp, but i could go see my mechanic i guess. more intersted in understanding/figuring it out.
:: edit :: should i set the piston at TDC and refit the flywheel??
thanks bcffamily
 ____________________ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zojEIR_SGSk |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| cb1rocket |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 cb1rocket World Chat Champion
Joined: 30 Jan 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 14:24 - 02 Nov 2017 Post subject: |
 |
|
This one is tricky to explain. But basically you need to set the gap on contact breaker correctly and in the correct positon. The flywheel is fixed by means of a woodruff key on the crankshaft spindle so isn't adjustable. If you have a meahanic I'm sure he would show you how it done if you pay him hood money.. there is also a mark on the flywheel that should align with a mark on the crankcase.
Someone will explain better than me ____________________ Honda H100S2 Rebuild - https://www.bikechatforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=253852 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| speedingmotor... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 speedingmotor... Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 24 Jun 2014 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 14:32 - 02 Nov 2017 Post subject: |
 |
|
hey cb1 rocket, thanks, so the flywheel will always stay in the "correct place" the loss of power could be from the gaps not correctly set? ____________________ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zojEIR_SGSk |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MCN |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MCN Super Spammer

Joined: 22 Jul 2015 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 15:14 - 02 Nov 2017 Post subject: |
 |
|
You probably have to set the piston to a position just before TDC. TDC is too late for the spark.
The thing that makes the spark points or CDI will have a rotor which is 'fixed' via a 'taper fit' to the camshaft which is synchronised via gears to the crankshaft.
If you haven't fcuked with the rotor position then the timing is OK.
(To check timing you need to determine the angle of the crank by sticking a rod down the spark plug hole and measure the depth when the rod contacts the piston. This is the Degrees Before TDC.
Ignition is always timed before TDC because of inertia in the mass of the piston and crank passing over the centre line of the crankshaft.
Not all engines are set at the same angle.
You can google this yourself.  ____________________ Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| mudcow007 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 mudcow007 World Chat Champion

Joined: 01 Feb 2012 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 16:34 - 02 Nov 2017 Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Stoker |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Stoker Nitrous Nuisance
Joined: 13 Sep 2014 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| speedingmotor... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 speedingmotor... Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 24 Jun 2014 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| bikenut |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 bikenut World Chat Champion
Joined: 21 Nov 2011 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 8 years, 98 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|