Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


CE Armour Level Ratings

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

ThunderGuts
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Nov 2018
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:14 - 08 Apr 2019    Post subject: CE Armour Level Ratings Reply with quote

Afternoon all,

Trying to get my head around this and I'm failing (repeatedly). Despite much Googling, I can't seem to find a "scenario" guide to CE armour levels. I'm keen to get some memory CE armour for my casual bike jacket, but trying to identify what level I should go for. Seems to be level 1 and level 2 stuff available, question is for casual riding (not racing around, so rarely going much above 50mph, not motorways, not the racetrack!) is level 1 appropriate, or should I try and find some level 2 stuff? Might be a bit like slide protection; what's needed on the track is rarely, if ever, needed to the same extent on the road (unless you're a proper lunatic - I'm not!).

Cheers
____________________
TG.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MCN
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:24 - 08 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

You are wandering about in a retail Minefield. Smile
____________________
Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

ThunderGuts
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Nov 2018
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:35 - 08 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

MCN wrote:
You are wandering about in a retail Minefield. Smile


Mmm yes I'm getting that impression. It doesn't help with statements like this;

https://www.motorcyclegear.com/info_pages/faq_armor_ratings_explained.html wrote:

Level 1 protectors: The maximum transmitted force must be below 18 kN, and no single value shall exceed 24 kN
Level 2 protectors: The maximum transmitted force must be below 9 kN, and no single value shall exceed 12 kN.


Clear as mud . . . this suggests level 1 stuff is more protective, but the same article suggests level 2 has the high level of protection. Question

** scratch that, I've now read it properly; transmitted forces **

that said, it still doesn't shed any further light on what is/isn't appropriate activity for Level 1 / Level 2 armour
____________________
TG.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MCN
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:35 - 08 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's a lot to do with safety and a lot to do with sales and a lot to do with shite.

Email the big gear manufacturers. You may get a candid response or you may get the corporate schpiel.

All my gear has ce armour fuctifano what grade.
It's the dense flexible black rubber stuff. With some plastic plates in forearms and shins.

The problem is the meaning or realistic comparisons of testing and real life protection.
They do test like they did with seatbelt etc. years ago but I think evidence is thin or maybe skewed.
An interesting minefield though.

Even wearing armour you can still get deaded coming off a bike especially, but any armour is always better than Hee-Haw.

I think it's a compromise between quality of build, material,comfort, cost and cetera.
And I'm on my phone so spelling is random.
____________________
Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

ThunderGuts
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Nov 2018
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:34 - 08 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah good call. I might give d3o a call as they make the stuff.

It’d be nice to simplify all this stuff. It’s ridiculously confusing navigating through the world of biking kit.
____________________
TG.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kentol750
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 May 2016
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:52 - 09 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

As mcn says..... minefield. D30 is awesome shit. Or, buy clothing and don't crash. No hurty, no worry. In b4 tef spells it out!
____________________
Some bikes.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ste
Not Work Safe



Joined: 01 Sep 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 04:26 - 10 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

A cheese and red cabbage sandwich (made using cheap white bread and two slices of Edam cheese, all wrapped in clingfilm) passes the impact absorption tests required for CE approval.

https://www.johnsonleather.com/Downloadable_Articles/RideArticle_2-07.pdf

For your information
We Found 4 Clips With "Cheese And Red Cabbage"
We Found 692 Clips With "Cheese Sandwich"
We Found 0 Clips With "Cheese And Red Cabbage Sandwich"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Bhud
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Oct 2018
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:55 - 10 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't place any stock in such ratings. I would rely on armour to protect my skin from abrasion, but that's all. Would like to know which CE test simulates your shoulder and collarbone when you slide down the road in your gear at 30 mph and into a kerb. Or the one that simulates a twisting injury to the knee or hip or spine when trapped under a bike sliding down the road at 50. Or the one that simulates your wrists and forearms when you obliquely crash headfirst into the side of a car at 40. Those tests exist, right? No?

This is why the very existence of the idea of government approved armour isn't about physically protecting your body but more about changing attitudes. The people who tend to know all about CE armour don't seem to ride a lot, or even live in European countries. Picture a typical American who talks a lot about riding, claims to have grown up on dirt bikes, has a Tuono on hire credit which he wiĺl sheepishly sell to a real motorcyclist in 40 years' time with just 5k miles on the clock, slick with polishing wax. HE knows all about CE armour, and has a wardrobe full of it. It's a roaring trade.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

talkToTheHat
World Chat Champion



Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:36 - 10 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

The impact test procedure is thereabouts dropping a steel impactor in a manner similar to a half brick from two metres. Transmitted force is about risk of broken bones.

It's not going to help much hitting a solid object at high speed. You need airbags and crumple zones for that. With proper armour hitting a car and going over is reasonaby survivable. Going through one isn't.

It can and does help with hitting the road from a height of 2m or so. The leather and any low friction sliding materials deal with abrasion aspect of horizontal velocity. Armor deals with vertical fall. Including your helmet. What it's designed to do is protect you from the vertical fall. Crush proof sole in CE boots prevents bike that falls on you mashing your feet. All very real, very common and easily mitgated injuries.

And everywhere outside europe has cottoned on to euro tests (and UK sharp helmet testing) being one of the few reliable ways to tell if something actually does what it claims to do.

And I'm riding loads, my bike is daily transport, and being able to tell if something is any better because it costs more is VERY important to me.

Having crashed in cheap nasty and having a hospital trip, and in leathers and CE level 2 armor and only having bruises on the gaps between armour (and minor ligament damage to my thumb), CE level 2 is worth it.

D30 and forcefield net aftermarket armor is really comfortable and less bulky than the RST stuff, the new rst level two inserts don't feel much different to wear than their level 1, but the material is different. Forcefield seems to fit my knees better.
____________________
Bandit. does. everything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Ste
Not Work Safe



Joined: 01 Sep 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:52 - 10 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bhud wrote:
I would rely on armour to protect my skin from abrasion, but that's all.

Armour protects you from impact, not from abrasion.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

MCN
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:05 - 10 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bhud wrote:
I don't place any stock in such ratings. I would rely on armour to protect my skin from abrasion, but that's all. Would like to know which CE test simulates your shoulder and collarbone when you slide down the road in your gear at 30 mph and into a kerb. Or the one that simulates a twisting injury to the knee or hip or spine when trapped under a bike sliding down the road at 50. Or the one that simulates your wrists and forearms when you obliquely crash headfirst into the side of a car at 40. Those tests exist, right? No?

This is why the very existence of the idea of government approved armour isn't about physically protecting your body but more about changing attitudes. The people who tend to know all about CE armour don't seem to ride a lot, or even live in European countries. Picture a typical American who talks a lot about riding, claims to have grown up on dirt bikes, has a Tuono on hire credit which he wiĺl sheepishly sell to a real motorcyclist in 40 years' time with just 5k miles on the clock, slick with polishing wax. HE knows all about CE armour, and has a wardrobe full of it. It's a roaring trade.


It is wide open to critique I agree.

But someone maybe has to start somewhere.

Bike gear is a relatively new furnominem.

There is much better 'technical' gear now-a-days that works.
Keeps you warmer, drier, maybe safer with reflective inserts)
The testing is possibly flawed, random, un-standardised or whatever but the gear is getting better.

I do not see why testing anything is a bad thing or something that should not be regulated.

If there is no regulation unscrupulous manufacturers/retailers will flog as much snake oil as the market can handle.

It is just a bit confusing what is good and what is shit and what is over the top.
I also agree there should not be any encumbrance to enjoying biking because one's bike Jaikit isn't made to some CE standard....
That shit should be knocked back.

There is a argument to ride safer too.

I like the armour in my gear. I know for 100% fact it saved me massively in skin/bone grafts when jumping off a moving motorcycle onto un-protected Tarmacadam. Embarassed
The gear was wrecked. I think if there was no armour I might have lost the end of my third clavical.
____________________
Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

talkToTheHat
World Chat Champion



Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:10 - 10 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I also agree there should not be any encumbrance to enjoying biking because one's bike Jaikit isn't made to some CE standard....
That shit should be knocked back.


Definitely, but when buying new kit? If the same money gets you an RST jacket with and A rating over a frank thomas with a packing foam back protector, i'd get that every time. And J&S are still selling non-ppe tat as motorcycle kit.

Similarly if on the market for protective leathers, i'm picking AAA over A or AA rated kit if I can afford to do so. I'm actually quite surprised at how supple the AAA rated RST GT kit feels which suggests it's a fairly easy target so long as you bother sewing the kit together properly.
____________________
Bandit. does. everything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

ThunderGuts
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Nov 2018
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:53 - 11 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

All interesting stuff. As a new biker, I have been "born" into a biking world where there is a strong emphasis on safety kit; the problem is understanding what works and what doesn't!

It certainly is a minefield though; my textile trousers posses the "motorcycle" logo and CE approval, but I can't work out what level; the "matching" jacket doesn't appear to but doesn't have the usual PPE disclaimer either. I'm sure they both have CE approved armour in though, albeit the cheap stuff and who knows at what grade either.

Back to my original post, I think I'll go for the level 2 stuff, even though it's going into a non-CE approved jacket and isn't going to be used for hooning around . . .
____________________
TG.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

There is a gap of 295 days between these two posts...
Blueberry This post is not being displayed because it has a low rating (Spam). Unhide this post / all posts.
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 5 years, 332 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.15 Sec - Server Load: 0.27 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 89.23 Kb