Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Daytona 675

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

FF68
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 06 May 2025
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:53 - 12 May 2025    Post subject: Daytona 675 Reply with quote

Has anyone here owned one?

Last edited by FF68 on 16:10 - 12 May 2025; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:10 - 12 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

I believe Paddy might have done. I had two TT600s which are the predecessor, and essentially the same bike but with a different fairing.

The Daytona is a great bike. A little weak on power compared to Japanese 600s of the era, but they handle well, stop well and are reasonably comfortable. They are certainly not a bad bike. The TT's had fuelling issues but were sorted over their life, and I think the switch in shape and name to Daytona was to do a sort of reset from the reputation of the very early TTs.

There is very little downside to owning one other than a little bit of rarity I think.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

FF68
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 06 May 2025
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:25 - 12 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

MarJay wrote:
I believe Paddy might have done. I had two TT600s which are the predecessor, and essentially the same bike but with a different fairing.

The Daytona is a great bike. A little weak on power compared to Japanese 600s of the era, but they handle well, stop well and are reasonably comfortable. They are certainly not a bad bike. The TT's had fuelling issues but were sorted over their life, and I think the switch in shape and name to Daytona was to do a sort of reset from the reputation of the very early TTs.

There is very little downside to owning one other than a little bit of rarity I think.


I went to look at one yesterday and the sound (whistle) was amazing. I've never had a bike that sounds like that...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kawasaki Jimbo
World Chat Champion



Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:20 - 12 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hang on, I think the Daytona 600/650 in-line 4 is what MarJay is referring to. The Daytona 675 was a triple and should have been given a different name. I was very tempted when they first came out but somehow never even rode one. Beautiful to look at, quite a slim bike, and it had great reviews. I saw a mustard yellow one at the Stafford Show just the other week and it’s still an eye-catcher. Enjoy!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:36 - 12 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah the OP edited the damn title after I posted.... Rolling Eyes

The 675 is a VERY different bike. It's a triple rather than a four, and is dynamically better than the Daytona 600. I have a Street Triple R which is essentially the naked version of the Daytona 675, and it is a reasonably common bike that a lot of people bought.

It's less comfortable than the Daytona 600, but does handle nicely and has great brakes. I mean, there's so much stuff out there on the internet about Daytona 675s I'm sure you'll find something.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.


Last edited by MarJay on 09:47 - 13 May 2025; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

FF68
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 06 May 2025
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:51 - 12 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

MarJay wrote:
Yeah the OP edited the damn title after I posted.... Rolling Eyes

The 675 is a VERY different bike. It's a triple rather than a four, and is dynamically better than the Daytona 600. I have a Street Triple R which is essentially the naked version of the Daytona 675, and it is a reasonably common bike that a lot of people bought.

It's less comfortable than the Daytona, but does handle nicely and has great brakes. I mean, there's so much stuff out there on the internet about Daytona 675s I'm sure you'll find something.


Sorry for the edit mate. i didn't know there were 2 different Daytonas when I posted this topic Cool
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

FF68
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 06 May 2025
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:02 - 12 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="FF68"]
MarJay wrote:
I have a Street Triple R


Does it "whistle" like a 675 Daytona???
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

rpsmith79
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Jan 2017
Karma :

PostPosted: 06:55 - 13 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

FF68 wrote:


Does it "whistle" like a 675 Daytona???


Yes, all Street Triples/Daytonas whistle

They do have a very distinctive sound, i believe it is partially down to the induction noise, and also the straight cut gears on the counter-balance shaft that give it such a distinctive sound

I have a Street Triple R with the optional Arrow exhaust, sounds absolutely perfect, not too loud, but has a nice little pop on the over-run
____________________
Current Bike: Honda CG125 ES4 // Honda CB600FS Hornet // Triumph Street Triple R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:31 - 13 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

A little bit on my Street Triple R here:

https://www.bikechatforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=337020

Also look out for a forthcoming issue of Classic Motorcycle Mechanics where I do a little write up on my time with the Street Triple.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

FF68
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 06 May 2025
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:31 - 20 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

Proper gutted today. Just found out the Daytona675 is no longer in production so there's no way to buy a new one!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

t121anf
World Chat Champion



Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:43 - 20 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

Get a 660 instead?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

FF68
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 06 May 2025
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:03 - 20 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

t121anf wrote:
Get a 660 instead?


Didn't even know there was a 660. Same bike is it???
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

rpsmith79
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Jan 2017
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:07 - 20 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, the Daytona 675 hasn't been in production for over 10 years, have you been living under a rock??

Any reason you need to buy a new one, anything wrong with a 2nd hand one?

And no the new Daytona 660 isnt very closely related to the older 675 model, it uses a variation of the original 675 engine, albeit detuned, but uses a totally different frame/suspension etc, built to a budget

That isn't to say the new 660 is a bad bike, but from what i have seen/read, it is not a patch on the original

The closest relation to the original 675 Daytona now is probably the Street Triple 765 R/RS, albeit without the fairing, though there has been a few recent limited edition Daytona Moto2's available, but these were pretty exclusive, and no doubt pretty expensive these days
____________________
Current Bike: Honda CG125 ES4 // Honda CB600FS Hornet // Triumph Street Triple R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

FF68
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 06 May 2025
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:40 - 20 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

rpsmith79 wrote:
Yeah, the Daytona 675 hasn't been in production for over 10 years, have you been living under a rock??


Yes mate. I have. if you've read my other posts you would know I've been on 4 wheels for 10 years with no interest in biking again until lately.[/quote]
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

t121anf
World Chat Champion



Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:42 - 20 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

FF68 wrote:
t121anf wrote:
Get a 660 instead?


Didn't even know there was a 660. Same bike is it???


Dunno, it's only thing listed under Daytona
https://www.triumphmotorcycles.co.uk/motorcycles/sport/daytona-660/daytona-660-2024

Loved the 675 when it came out, but I'd become a Suzuki man by the time I would allow myself a more powerful bike.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

rpsmith79
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Jan 2017
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:44 - 21 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

t121anf wrote:

Dunno, it's only thing listed under Daytona
https://www.triumphmotorcycles.co.uk/motorcycles/sport/daytona-660/daytona-660-2024

Loved the 675 when it came out, but I'd become a Suzuki man by the time I would allow myself a more powerful bike.


I think that just goes to show how far removed it is from the original, baring in mind the Street Triple was essentially a naked Daytona in its first itteration

Currently the Daytona starts at £8,595, whereas the Street Triple R starts at £10,095 and the RS at £11,795

So yeah, the new "Daytona" is not the bike it used to be

It has been deigned/built to adhere to the new "Sportbike" racing class, since the demise of the road-going 600 Supersport class

Similar to the R7, RS660, GSX-8R, Ninja 650 etc, all built to a similar spec for street/racing purposes
____________________
Current Bike: Honda CG125 ES4 // Honda CB600FS Hornet // Triumph Street Triple R


Last edited by rpsmith79 on 10:27 - 21 May 2025; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

A100man
World Chat Champion



Joined: 19 Aug 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:01 - 21 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

Epic fail on naming convention from Triumph.. Can they really not invent another name..?
Not including the current 660 mentioned here's what wikipedia reckons is a list of past models:

Triumph Daytona 500, 1966–1970
Triumph Daytona 600, 2002–2004
Triumph Daytona 650, 2005
Triumph Daytona 675, 2006-2017
Triumph Daytona 750, 1991–1994
Triumph Daytona Moto2 765, 2019-2022
Triumph Daytona 900, 1993–1996
Triumph Daytona 955i, 1997–2006
Triumph Daytona 1000, 1992–1993
Triumph Daytona 1200, 1993–1997
Triumph Tiger Daytona, 1967–1974
____________________
Now: A100, GT250A, XJ598, FZ750

Then: Fizz, RS200, KL250, XJ550, Laverda Alpina, XJ600, FZS600
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

t121anf
World Chat Champion



Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:44 - 21 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

Triumph Evetona?
Triumph Nightona?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

P.
Red Rocket



Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:57 - 24 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

FF68 wrote:
t121anf wrote:
Get a 660 instead?


Didn't even know there was a 660. Same bike is it???


Worse engine.

Just buy a used 675..
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

FF68
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 06 May 2025
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:40 - 28 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

@P.

I'm not a big fan of used bikes/cars/vans outside of the warranty period unless they're cheap and low mileage. Had too many issues in the past and big repair/service bills.[/quote]
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:58 - 29 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

FF68 wrote:
@P.

I'm not a big fan of used bikes/cars/vans outside of the warranty period unless they're cheap and low mileage. Had too many issues in the past and big repair/service bills.


I've owned 29 bikes in 26 years. I've had only a few that's needed major work in that time. One was a Buell that ran OK but needed piston rings replacing and the others were all ancient Japanese two strokes which are notoriously fragile. None of these have been financially ruinous (except maaaaaybe my RGV250 but that was my fault)

I've owned 10 cars in that time, and they've all had the odd thing that broke here and there - a shock absorber, a seized caliper, a weird engine management light here etc. But none have been financially ruinous.


So it begs the question: How are you choosing bikes and cars and vans that give you these problems?

Do you know what IS financially ruinous? Depreciation on a brand new bike.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Ste
Not Work Safe



Joined: 01 Sep 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:30 - 29 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

FF68 wrote:
I'm not a big fan of used bikes/cars/vans outside of the warranty period unless they're cheap and low mileage. Had too many issues in the past and big repair/service bills.

They were cheap despite being low mileage because of the issues the vehicles had which needed big repairs.

But if you're willing to take the hit on depreciation from buying new then that's no bad thing for everyone else. Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

P.
Red Rocket



Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:06 - 29 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've had nearly 100 bikes and cars now, never new. All used. Only been fucked 3 times.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

recman
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Mar 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:50 - 29 May 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

All this talk of Daytonas and Streets has given me a chubby.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.10 Sec - Server Load: 0.75 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 123.42 Kb