Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Jawa 350 638 Cylinder porting & results

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> The Workshop
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Flying_fish
L Plate Warrior



Joined: 04 Jun 2024
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:25 - 04 Sep 2025    Post subject: Jawa 350 638 Cylinder porting & results Reply with quote

Hello.

Around a year ago I made a post asking what could be done to improve the motor in a JAWA 350, the answers proved to give some inspiration, but I decided to ultimately read a 2 stroke tuning handbook and look into it with a bit more fines.

A thing that caught my eye was porting via use of specific port-area-times.

It is essentially a means of quantifying how big does a port need to be for optimal performance at a certain RPM value. And after some calculations, I had come up with some changes that could in theory bump up the maximum RPM of the engine from 5800 to 6500. However the book also mentions that ring flutter is a thing, and that the 2mm thick rings will flutter at around 6400RPM for the specific engine.

Never minding that "small" problem, I changed the ports. Exhaust port was made wider by ~1.5mm on each side, and the intake was made bigger both height and width wise by 1mm, as well as the piston skirts being shaved down by 3mm increasing the intake port duration.

Ignorantly I assembled everything back and fired it up. Ran OK, but not up to snuff. Also after 1 run a bad ticking noise developed, and upon inspection the lower 2 piston rings had decided to separate into bits. Issue? - The ring pins were in positions where the rings now popped out of the exhaust port a bit, making them break off.

After acquiring new pistons and changing the pin locations it runs with no ticking.

Performance gains? - Currently not much. A healthier idle sound, not as much struggle, and up top it does go to 6k in 4th gear if you give it time, but this isn't much more than the stock 5.5k it managed to squeeze. Perhaps a modified exhaust and intake is the next step.

Perhaps I had done it wrong, that's why I'm making the post. The port job has been done like this - I took a pneumatic grinder and a self made guide, colored in the meat I would grind away and went to work. But I only made the port openings larger in the bore itself and a bit into the port, but not the whole port. Thinking about it logically this maybe wrong, since in the end the gases flowing would end up in the same size hole than before, just now they have a bigger door.

Any porting tips would be greatly appreciated. At the time of making this post I don't have any pictures of the actual port jobs, In the upcoming days I shall upload them.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:09 - 04 Sep 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

I referr you to my previous answer. Porting is something you do after everything else is bang-on. Do the existing port holes in the liner and barrel even line up? None of the ones I owned did by a significant margin and I don't see the point in trying to fiddle with port timing when the gas is flowing through something akin to an elevator stopped between two floors.

As I said, getting everything how it should be is a good starting point. So ensuring the bores are round, concentric and paralell (which they are not as standard). Ensuring the squish bands are at least equal (which they are not as standard). Ensuring there are no air leaks at both the inlet manifold and crank seals (including the centre mechanical seal). Ensuring the bearings are round.

A properly designed expansion chamber exhaust would probably do a lot for them. The maths is outrageously complex for this but finding one for an engine with roughly equivalent bore and stroke would be a good starting point. Or looking at pictures of exhausts off some of the Jawa/CZ race bikes and working out roughly where the cones start and end and how long the stinger is could help.

If I was doing it on the cheap, you can get MZ125 race exhausts very cheaply (as such things go) online. You'd obviously need two of them. When they arrive, they have a "silencer" fitted which is just a can which has a spring up the middle with exhaust packing wrapped round it. This needs replacing with a stinger pipe of an appropriate length. I recently fitted one to my Minsk 125 (same bore, stroke and port timing as the MZ), I used a solid pipe going the full length of the end-can with holes drilled in the last 2/3 of it. This gave a significantly improved performance, it revs up quickly with a real crack to it and only fires occasionally on the overrun which shows it's scavenging well.

The pressure wave timing wont be correct for a Jawa, but it'll probably be at least as good as the standard exhausts, you might get lucky and it works. It'll probably SOUND faster.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pw/AP1GczNIiRA-iGWPHn-DOD9Q9Yj_uepNvycnH3gfQbb7gaKYPtFs-weqT2vQrLIg7ODvmFbBCZvTIjfiVNvBPqxOHekpD8QK4l8aw2CfwmFzR_qEWYodQy0vTCWXZv96p1C2C2QRIRiuSy1eSfu8U9NhpZHz=w1669-h939-s-no

Your Jawa will blow up. As I said before, tuning is what you do once everything else is running optimally. Round, paralell, concentric bores, equal squish bands, round bearings, perfectly set ignition timing, clean gas-flow, a properly sealed engine, dialled in carburettion. THEN tuning. I did all these things to my Minsk before fitting the expansion chamber, then had another go at the carburettion and ignition timing to suit. It's still dog slow but runs really well.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

that_impulse_guy
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 07 Mar 2023
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:15 - 04 Sep 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

if you watch this video, which is trying to explain expansion chambers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDCeOjHQZsM
you'll also inadvertently realise the main thing about 2 stroke is actually the port opening and closing timings as the pressure pulses are where gains are at.

I can 100% guarantee you that a 1mm or 2mm bigger port will not need the entire port widened as you propose. The timing of when the port opens is much more critical.

Yes, gains are to be found in every little detail, but if its "no real better than stock" then spending half a day ensuring the port is exactly equal diameter all the way to the pipe fitting isnt going to fix that.
____________________
Gone: Yamaha DT50lc, Suzuki DR500, Suzuki A100, Kawasaki z250ltd, RD350YPVS, Suzuki DR Big, Kawasaki AR125, Kawasaki KMX200, Suzuki GS1000S, Katana 1100, GS550M, Suzuki RGV250
Now: Suzuki GSX400X, Suzuki RF900R, NS400R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:18 - 04 Sep 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

I also seem to remember some of the "special edition" model 640 Jawas they came out with just as the brand was dying off had factory expansion chamber exhausts. I think one was the 640 "sport" and another was the 640 "tramp".

I'd imagine the silencer is very restrictive and could do with being modified with a stinger in it but they are a proper expansion chamber and are designed to fit that engine.
https://www.bikechatforums.com/files/200904022331441.jpg
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

A100man
World Chat Champion



Joined: 19 Aug 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 06:57 - 05 Sep 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

stinkwheel wrote:
I also seem to remember some of the "special edition" model 640 Jawas they came out with just as the brand was dying off had factory expansion chamber exhausts. I think one was the 640 "sport" and another was the 640 "tramp".

I'd imagine the silencer is very restrictive and could do with being modified with a stinger in it but they are a proper expansion chamber and are designed to fit that engine.
https://www.bikechatforums.com/files/200904022331441.jpg


https://www.motorcyclespecs.co.za/model/Jawa/jawa_640%20sport%2095.htm

23.5 hp @ 5250 rpm Neutral
____________________
Now: A100, GT250A, XJ598, FZ750

Then: Fizz, RS200, KL250, XJ550, Laverda Alpina, XJ600, FZS600
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

A100man
World Chat Champion



Joined: 19 Aug 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 06:59 - 05 Sep 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

and yet..

https://www.motorcyclespecs.co.za/model/Jawa/jawa_350%20TS%2087.htm

27hp @ 5500 rpm Confused
____________________
Now: A100, GT250A, XJ598, FZ750

Then: Fizz, RS200, KL250, XJ550, Laverda Alpina, XJ600, FZS600
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Flying_fish
L Plate Warrior



Joined: 04 Jun 2024
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:15 - 05 Sep 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

stinkwheel wrote:
getting everything how it should be is a good starting point. So ensuring the bores are round, concentric and paralell (which they are not as standard). Ensuring the squish bands are at least equal (which they are not as standard). Ensuring there are no air leaks at both the inlet manifold and crank seals (including the centre mechanical seal). Ensuring the bearings are round.


That has been done already. Everything lines up port wise, new bottom end was installed last summer, transmission bearings are new. Everything else is up to snuff. Thumbs Up
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Flying_fish
L Plate Warrior



Joined: 04 Jun 2024
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:32 - 05 Sep 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

that_impulse_guy wrote:
if you watch this video, which is trying to explain expansion chambers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDCeOjHQZsM
you'll also inadvertently realise the main thing about 2 stroke is actually the port opening and closing timings as the pressure pulses are where gains are at.

I can 100% guarantee you that a 1mm or 2mm bigger port will not need the entire port widened as you propose. The timing of when the port opens is much more critical.

Yes, gains are to be found in every little detail, but if its "no real better than stock" then spending half a day ensuring the port is exactly equal diameter all the way to the pipe fitting isnt going to fix that.


OK thank you this answers what I asked.

I have seen this video, it does provide some insight into the matter. However the book I read -Two stroke tuners handbook by Jennings - Mentioned that the port area & timing both are important and need to be considered. It provided values for so called "Specific Port Time Area" values for intake, transfer and exhaust ports.

Quote:
The numbers given here express time and area, and the ratio between port-
window area and cylinder volume. They represent narrowly defined guidelines for
intake, transfer and exhaust port time areas as follows:
For piston-controlled intake ports, 0.00014 to 0.00016 sec-cm2 /cm3
For transfer ports……………….., 0.00008 to 0.00010 sec-cm2 /cm3
For exhaust ports……………….., 0.00014 to 0.00015 sec-cm2 /cm3
For rotary-disc intake valves,,,,,,,,, 0.00018 to 0.00019 sec-cm2 /cm3

To calculate them for an existing port you take the mean area of the port, which is done by measuring how big the port area is when the crank is half-way through the port open period, then you multiply this mean-area with the time the port is open for a specific RPM, and then divide by the cylinder volume.

This very method provided nice results in a smaller scooter engine porting job, it could wheely afterwards.

Here it seems to have done a less impressive job. Id have to think that the stock exhausts & intake is to blame since the exhausts are limiting in their design, another post about JAWA said that they muffle the engine so much that when revving standing still it cant get past 5.5k RPM. I have removed these restrictions, but perhaps a more aggressive approach is necessary, since the Stock exhausts do have some sort of expansion chamber built into them, but its probably tuned for much lower RPM hence the torque hit for the bikes is usually at 4k.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Flying_fish
L Plate Warrior



Joined: 04 Jun 2024
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:41 - 05 Sep 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

A100man wrote:


The values on the Web are far and few between what is actually real. The Owners book of my bike says 26HP at 5750RPM, and a shop manual from the dealership says 23HP at 5250RPM.

Some even proposed that there were JAWA's that were exported to italy with 36HP at 6500RPM and had different transfer ports and so on, but noone else can verify that so I'm doubting that thats a thing that existed.

What I do know is that the stock values of the aforementioned specific port time areas are consistent with the Books values at the specified 5500RPM-ish, so we can gather that at least the peak power RPM values are somewhere in the ballpark of right.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

A100man
World Chat Champion



Joined: 19 Aug 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:00 - 05 Sep 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

Now you've 'opened it up' perhaps it's worth tryimg a decent pair of carbs - something off a JAP 250 or 350. Got to be better than the standard single set-up, no?
____________________
Now: A100, GT250A, XJ598, FZ750

Then: Fizz, RS200, KL250, XJ550, Laverda Alpina, XJ600, FZS600
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:33 - 05 Sep 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

A100man wrote:
Now you've 'opened it up' perhaps it's worth tryimg a decent pair of carbs - something off a JAP 250 or 350. Got to be better than the standard single set-up, no?


You'd need to fabricate a custom 2 into 2 manifold to do it, the bolt pattern wouldn't allow fitting of two seperate carbs. Not saying it's impossible but it would take a bit of machining. If you were going to go to that degree of effort, I'd be putting reed valves in there too. Pic of standard Jawa inlet manifold for reference.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

A100man
World Chat Champion



Joined: 19 Aug 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:42 - 06 Sep 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

stinkwheel wrote:
A100man wrote:
Now you've 'opened it up' perhaps it's worth tryimg a decent pair of carbs - something off a JAP 250 or 350. Got to be better than the standard single set-up, no?


You'd need to fabricate a custom 2 into 2 manifold to do it, the bolt pattern wouldn't allow fitting of two seperate carbs. Not saying it's impossible but it would take a bit of machining. If you were going to go to that degree of effort, I'd be putting reed valves in there too. Pic of standard Jawa inlet manifold for reference.


Hmm, indeed. Perhaps try a larger bore/venturi single first then. Looks like plenty of 'meat' on that inlet manifold to play with.
____________________
Now: A100, GT250A, XJ598, FZ750

Then: Fizz, RS200, KL250, XJ550, Laverda Alpina, XJ600, FZS600
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Flying_fish
L Plate Warrior



Joined: 04 Jun 2024
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:09 - 07 Sep 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a work-in-progress 2nd engine that will use Yamaha pistons and will have custom reed valve adapters machined for each cylinder in the somewhat near future (hopefully).

The cylinders for that engine too has been ported so it should be quite OK at the very least.

I will make a post once it the build has progressed.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

that_impulse_guy
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 07 Mar 2023
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:53 - 08 Sep 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

when I was a youngster and had access to a welder and a 50cc two stroke I took upon myself to make some pipes up. I had no books, or maths to fall back on...just "well, this looks ok".

I made 3 pipes. They were all fitted to the same japanese 50cc rated at 7.2ps with standard exhaust.

I had no dyno.

This isnt going to surprise anyone with the results as two of the pipes did nothing much. The third one moved the powerband down from a peak at 10k down to around 7.5k. It wasnt only that it wouldnt rev higher..it was actually torquier lower down. Not by much. But it did move things down the rev range. I went from a 12front sprocket to a 15 tooth.

Ok, why the chat.
Well, with same port timings, the exhaust itself can make a massive difference.

And this conversations seems to have moved slightly towards "why isnt the jawa making 200hp/litre like an RG500" which I'm actually quite interested in.
____________________
Gone: Yamaha DT50lc, Suzuki DR500, Suzuki A100, Kawasaki z250ltd, RD350YPVS, Suzuki DR Big, Kawasaki AR125, Kawasaki KMX200, Suzuki GS1000S, Katana 1100, GS550M, Suzuki RGV250
Now: Suzuki GSX400X, Suzuki RF900R, NS400R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

blurredman
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:04 - 08 Sep 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think an expansion will help you.
____________________
CBT: 12/06/10, Theory: 22/09/10, Module 1: 09/11/10, Module 2: 19/01/11
Past: 1991 Honda CG125BR-J, 1992 (1980) Honda XL125S, 1996 Kawasaki GPZ500S, 1979 MZ TS150.
Current: 1973 MZ ES250/2 - 18k, 1979 Suzuki TS185ER - 10k, 1981 Honda CX500B - 91k, 1987 MZ ETZ250 (295cc) - 40k, 1989 MZ ETZ251 - 51k.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

that_impulse_guy
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 07 Mar 2023
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:27 - 08 Sep 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

also regarding this:
"Perhaps I had done it wrong, that's why I'm making the post. The port job has been done like this - I took a pneumatic grinder and a self made guide, colored in the meat I would grind away and went to work. But I only made the port openings larger in the bore itself and a bit into the port, but not the whole port. Thinking about it logically this maybe wrong, since in the end the gases flowing would end up in the same size hole than before, just now they have a bigger door. "

using your terminology, the door ideally should not be larger than 75% of the port size. So to reiterate, its really doubtful that enlarging the inside diameter of the port area to match your new port shape is going to do anything.

here's another nice video, but youll probably need to add subtitles.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9DteiVQNl8
(its worth watching as much as you can of this youtuber...as he is going through possibly the same things as you)
____________________
Gone: Yamaha DT50lc, Suzuki DR500, Suzuki A100, Kawasaki z250ltd, RD350YPVS, Suzuki DR Big, Kawasaki AR125, Kawasaki KMX200, Suzuki GS1000S, Katana 1100, GS550M, Suzuki RGV250
Now: Suzuki GSX400X, Suzuki RF900R, NS400R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:30 - 08 Sep 2025    Post subject: Reply with quote

that_impulse_guy wrote:

And this conversations seems to have moved slightly towards "why isnt the jawa making 200hp/litre like an RG500" which I'm actually quite interested in.


Actually. The RG500 is like a Jawa. Jawa made the model 673, a 500cc, liquid-cooled V4 race bike before either Yamaha or Suzuki. It was also a total animal. And, you guessed it, it blew up a lot (but gammas don't?).

https://amcn.com.au/editorial/jawa-v4-grand-prix-racer/

So it shows anything is possible if you throw enough time and money at it.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> The Workshop All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.09 Sec - Server Load: 0.54 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 106.12 Kb