|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stinkwheel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stinkwheel Bovine Proctologist

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rookie |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rookie World Chat Champion

Joined: 09 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 01:01 - 26 Sep 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
That is a great idea, bring that on!!
I attempted to browse through it Kickstart, but there's a mountain of info in there! |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| McGee |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 McGee O RLY?

Joined: 24 Jun 2005 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 09:34 - 26 Sep 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
Cat in the pigeons.
The tax is on 'Luxury Goods'. Sorry.
It's like Scottish folks being asked to pay for water
W ____________________ W-ireless A-rtificial L-ifeform L-imited to O-bservation P-eacekeeping and E-fficient R-epair |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stinkwheel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stinkwheel Bovine Proctologist

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarJay But it's British!

Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 14:18 - 26 Sep 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
Hello,
VAT should still be charged on leathers, boots and gloves.
This is because if they were 'safety' equipment then they would need to be CE marked. This would be ludicrously expensive and probably double the cost of most leathers (and boots and gloves).
Now personally, I think they cost a lot as it is and do provide reasonable protection. I am happy to pay VAT on the basis that otherwise I'd have to pay 'safety tax' of the CE marking.
Helmets are a different matter. They are already tested for safety and so should not be subject to VAT IMO.
Never really thought about lids before with regard to this TBH...  ____________________ British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| 8316 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 8316 Could Be A Chat Bot

Joined: 08 Jul 2004 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 17:27 - 26 Sep 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Kickstart wrote: | By the way, motorcycle helmets are VAT zero rated, although visors sold seperatly to a helmet are not.
All the best
Keith |
strange thing is,that it is illegal to wear a full face helmet without a visor attached...
i hate labour
of course i voted for MCN when i could.....hehe  ____________________ Now own a Fireblade!! Speed Limits? Bah! |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| delboy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 delboy Scooby Slapper

Joined: 31 Aug 2005 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 21 years, 3 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|