|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Tarmacsurfer |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Tarmacsurfer World Chat Champion

Joined: 29 Jun 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarJay But it's British!

Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Suitor_Stu |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Suitor_Stu Could Be A Chat Bot

Joined: 19 Jun 2006 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarJay But it's British!

Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Tonka |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Tonka World Chat Champion

Joined: 11 Jun 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Tarmacsurfer |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Tarmacsurfer World Chat Champion

Joined: 29 Jun 2004 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 20:28 - 27 Apr 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
Y'see I'd disagree with you there Tonka, that's a personal extrapolation. The quote simply points out that the other party's happiness is a pre-requisite for you to be genuinely happy.
Given that you disagree, what's your personal definition? Discussion requires counterpoint  ____________________ I'm immortal. Well, so far. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Suitor_Stu |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Suitor_Stu Could Be A Chat Bot

Joined: 19 Jun 2006 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| mistergixer |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 mistergixer World Chat Champion

Joined: 15 Jun 2005 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| ..... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ..... Quote Me Happy
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Visitor Q |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Visitor Q $25 whore

Joined: 30 Apr 2004 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 22:52 - 27 Apr 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
Much as the romantic side of me really likes the neat quote at the beginning, I'm with Steven Pinker on the Evolutionary importance of the deliberately irrational attachment to an often substandard mate.
It's all good, but if you only want the love bit then skip to part 3. Each segment is 10 minutes long mind
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3 - Pertinent part ____________________ China traffic/travel bike vid - When I make a sweeping statement, please add the word 'statistically' in to the sentence before you bitch...
From September 2014 to January/February 2015 I will not be using any English, nor reading any. As such, I won't be on here. PM at will, but I won't be checking/posting unless in emergencies. Certainly not for the first couple of months. Please berate me savagely if I break that rule... |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Amanda |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Amanda Renault 5 Driver
Joined: 03 Apr 2009 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 10:03 - 28 Apr 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
I slightly agree with the happyness concept except there are 2 different forms of Love.
There's 'to Love someone' and 'Being In love with someone'
Ie: I love my family and yes i don’t like them being unhappy, but it doesn’t necessarily make my life an unhappy one.
Yet I’m in love with my boyfriend and when/if he’s unhappy then it makes me unhappy and vice versa, and we do everything we can to make the other happy.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| jack_zxr400 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 jack_zxr400 World Chat Champion

Joined: 15 Jul 2008 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Visitor Q |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Visitor Q $25 whore

Joined: 30 Apr 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Visitor Q |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Visitor Q $25 whore

Joined: 30 Apr 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Visitor Q |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Visitor Q $25 whore

Joined: 30 Apr 2004 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 09:46 - 29 Apr 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
I'll admit it is all makes such good sense as to be obvious once told, but I still think the logic on Love is flawless. Explains how evolution could favour it in altricial species, and thus is great argument fodder.
You're right though, the brain as a computer is a very tired metaphor. ____________________ China traffic/travel bike vid - When I make a sweeping statement, please add the word 'statistically' in to the sentence before you bitch...
From September 2014 to January/February 2015 I will not be using any English, nor reading any. As such, I won't be on here. PM at will, but I won't be checking/posting unless in emergencies. Certainly not for the first couple of months. Please berate me savagely if I break that rule... |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| killa |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 killa Won't Shut Up

Joined: 18 Oct 2004 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 10:45 - 29 Apr 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
In brief my thoughts begin and end with the idea that, you can't have one without the other.
Right from the word go, or the big bang, what ever you call it, created the light and the dark, the ying and the yang and all that jazz. Ever expanding but never apart, this rock we're on and all life that co-exists with it is bound by it.
I think it makes it difficult to define in such a way because all of our senses have deteriorated over generations, sight, smell, hearing etc...as well as maybe the 'gut' feeling and emotions that we survive on.
Love has possibly become something it wasn't, we haven't had much choice over the years, love is described as a feeling you get when your very fond of it. 'It' because the word love is used just as much as 'like' for pretty much anything, even inanimate objects.
If you want a piccy!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chemical_basis_of_love.png ____________________ Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
Bike:- Yamaha TRX850 | Killas Biking History | Killas Gaming History | Killas autmotive history |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| snomag |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 snomag Trackday Trickster

Joined: 12 Nov 2008 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| snomag |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 snomag Trackday Trickster

Joined: 12 Nov 2008 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Fawbish |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Fawbish World Chat Champion

Joined: 27 Jan 2006 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 14:17 - 29 Apr 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Hetzer wrote: | | bonny_ricardo wrote: | I'll admit it is all makes such good sense as to be obvious once told, but I still think the logic on Love is flawless. Explains how evolution could favour it in altricial species, and thus is great argument fodder.
You're right though, the brain as a computer is a very tired metaphor. |
It did get me thinking about love again, and I had a sudden moment as I was going to sleep, one that tied in very nicely with my 'Single Consciousness' theory. It also encompasses the Buhddist belief of Nirvana/wheel of life (where a person's soul becomes as one with the 'creator' upon working out all issues in the corporeal realm after a multitude of reincarnations).
Love, in this world, is all about being as close as possible to another person, both physically, mentally, and, more importantly, spiritually.
The greatest ideal, from that, is that all humans become similarly close to each other, strangers included. The utopian ideal. Love is everything.
So how about if the one consciousness, having hived itself off into countless trillions of individual consciousnesses across the universe, has done so in order to have them eventually work out that utopian ideal in corporeal form, at which point they carry it on beyond the grave, eventually forming back into the one consciousness? There's a cycle there, one that appears to mirror the cyclic Big Bang of the physical universe (as proposed by some physicists).
It actually finishes my theory off very nicely, creating one start-to-finish process. The one consciousness, entertaining itself eternally, almost as if breathing (where each exhalation is the creation of a new universe [big bang], the hiving of itself into countless individual consciousnesses, and the inhalation the discovery of love amongst the individual souls and their gradual recombination back into the one consciousness).
I think I've cracked it.  |
Elementary, dear Watson....
By jove Penfold, I think he's cracked it! Hetz, I feel a new religion rearing its ugly head...  ____________________ "Oh....it looks like Average Joe's is forfeiting the match!" - "Yeah, its a risky strategy but lets see if it pays off for 'em Cotton." |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| colin1 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 colin1 Captain Safety
Joined: 17 Feb 2005 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 16 years, 346 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|