Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Fears that motorbike swerve test 'could kill'

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

multijoy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Oct 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:06 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Fears that motorbike swerve test 'could kill' Reply with quote

https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8067672.stm

I've no idea of what the video says as it's blocked from work, but thought it might be of interest.

Enjoy!
____________________
'11 CBF1000A, '99 C90, '98 CB500
silky666: He rode amazingly well considering his bike is the weight of a small van and had slicks on.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

chadwick
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 10 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:21 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cannot believe the silly **** from the DSA at the end of the interview saying 'if the changes prevent just one death or injury on the road it will be worth it'... the whole story is banging on about how learners are being injured trying to complete the maneuver, so as long as people aren't injured on the highway that's ok then????!!!!

F***ing hypocritical government policy.
____________________
Chadwick
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Grayzo
Borekit Bruiser



Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:25 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

i cannot watch the video either as im in college (blocked)
however as a person who has passed his test a month ago! :>:>:>
yipee before the new test came into play............
i do think that they should keep the test as it was, plain and simple.
and it cost a bomb!!!! i paid £300 to do my 1 and a half days training and then my test afterwards.
i didnt think anything of it to be honest. wouldent like to do the new test though Razz
____________________
BULLDOG BASH 2009 - 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th OF AUGUST
had - NS125R current - FZR400RR EXUP (89)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Poseidon
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Aug 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:28 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

I for one am glad that Justine Moore fell off and broke her shoulder whilst doing the "swerve test"... Too many poor defenceless traffic cones are being wiped out by people who cannot safely swerve around them! It's about time the DSA did more to protect what I believe is an unsung hero on our highways!!! And by keeping people like her off the roads, our humble traffic cones can sleep safe in the knowledge that they are that little bit safer!

https://www.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/911567/2/istockphoto_911567-traffic-cone.jpg
____________________
1977 Honda CG125
2002 Ducati Monster S4 (currently restoring)


Last edited by Poseidon on 10:02 - 26 May 2009; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ariel Badger
Super Spammer



Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:40 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

chadwick wrote:
Cannot believe the silly **** from the DSA at the end of the interview saying 'if the changes prevent just one death or injury on the road it will be worth it'... the whole story is banging on about how learners are being injured trying to complete the maneuver, so as long as people aren't injured on the highway that's ok then????!!!!

F***ing hypocritical government policy.


She said it is to simulate the type of incidents that we encounter in real life, are they now going to have a brick wall in the test to simulate a lorry that cuts across your path necessitating laying your bike on its side as the only means of avoidance?
____________________
Bikers make great organ donors, get 115 on your licence today.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Poseidon
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Aug 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:54 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

1930 Ariel wrote:
She said it is to simulate the type of incidents that we encounter in real life, are they now going to have a brick wall in the test to simulate a lorry that cuts across your path necessitating laying your bike on its side as the only means of avoidance?


Why stop there! Why not add 2 extra wheels to a bike to make them less likely to fall over and injure the rider... They could even put some sort of cage around this new type of "bike with 4 wheels" so that the rider is even more protected... Maybe even a metal skin as well to keep the elements out!

Wow, I think I've just thought of a brilliant new invention! I shall call it the "Ultra-protector-safety-quad wheeled-motorised-movement facilitator"!!! I reckon it could really catch on!

'kin double standards agency... I reckon the frigid munter from the DSA is the type of person who moves into your path to stop you filtering past her!
____________________
1977 Honda CG125
2002 Ducati Monster S4 (currently restoring)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

chadwick
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 10 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:02 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

completely agree with the posts above.

New riders who may possibly have only been riding for a few days should not be expected to perform this kind of maneuver after just a few days riding, especially in the wet.

Surely it would have been more sense to insist that the training a rider undergoes includes more advanced, defensive riding techniques, to enable new riders to read the road and predict dangers further in advance, allowing them to react in a safe controlled manner. The ability to throw a bike around and avoid things at the last minute at speed comes with time and experience riding, experience that can be made up for to a large extent in new riders through teaching decent controlled defensive riding.

I suppose its just too difficult to test if the rider is bothering to read the road ahead without banging an obstacle in their path though...
____________________
Chadwick
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Poseidon
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Aug 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:09 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Surely the fact that newbies ride slower would negate the need for "high speed" manouveres. I've only had my licence 6months and for the first month, I went so bloody slow that the controlled stop I learned for the old test would've been enough to get me out of most dagerous situations. Now that I ride almost everyday, and I have learned how to counter steer, I am more comfortable at higher speeds, better able to throw the bike around and would be more than confident on the "swerve test".
____________________
1977 Honda CG125
2002 Ducati Monster S4 (currently restoring)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Newbiker0507
Crazy Courier



Joined: 29 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:09 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8067212.stm

Looks like curtains for the new test
Law suits may ensue, looking at it from a purely blank slate
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

psbresner
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:20 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lets hope they do something about it, 300 trials isn't alot of testing in my book. Rolling Eyes
____________________
CBT Expired / Theory Expired / Mod1 : TBD / Mod 2 :TBD
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

arry
Super Spammer



Joined: 03 Jan 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:51 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mister Drewie wrote:
Surely the fact that newbies ride slower would negate the need for "high speed" manouveres.


Past statistics would somewhat prove otherwise. You're in the sensible camp, unfortunately not many are.

A need for it there may be - I've not done it, nor do I want to so I'm not going to pre-judge, but no speed differential allowance for poor weather conditions? FFS, no-one thought of that?!

Love the way the DSA are blaming the tutors though - couldn't possibly be their fault could it....
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:49 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Questions:

Should someone who is unable to satisfactorily avoid hitting at traffic cone that they know is there be given a full motorcycle licence?

Should someone who is not capable of knowing when they are exceeding the handling envelope of their machine to the extent they crash be given a full motorcycle licence?

Should the motorcycle test REALLY be tailored so it can be passed by novices or should it be set so only people who can demonstrate a good degree of control of their riding skills and machine can pass?

Are you more or less likely to have to dodge round a previously unseen obstacle in the wet? Taking the answer to this into account, is the suggestion that the speed of the manouver be reduced in wet conditions a valid one?

OPPINION:
I think the test ought to be difficult.

It should not be possible to pass the bike test after only three days of tuition, especially for direct access riders. There is no way you can get sufficient road experience and machine control in that time. New riders ought to have completed a minimum amount of road experience before they are eligable for a test.

The DSA have attempted to make the test cover more for safety but have only managed to increase expense and complexity.

Consider yourselves lucky you don't have to do your test in Japan where to get a 400cc+ licence you have to do slow riding exercises over both a narrow metal bridge 5m long and over a series of randomly tilted concrete slabs.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Crazy Manx Man
The Fly Swatter



Joined: 26 Oct 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:26 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Only value added to the test by the swerve test is the entertainment value! Laughing Well done DSA!
____________________
Too Fast For Even The Plod To Keep Up With
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

iooi
Super Spammer



Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:31 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

chadwick wrote:


New riders who may possibly have only been riding for a few days should not be expected to perform this kind of maneuver after just a few days riding, especially in the wet.

...


So you let them out onto the road, not being able to safely swerve and brake at the same time.....

Remember this is the test.....

They should already be able to ride a bike and do the above..

Its all well and good teaching defensive riding, But when that muppet, pulls out of the side road shouting SMIDSY, what are they to do.....

Yay, yet another biker statistic..... Sick

You cannot be trained to spot every idiot on the road, but can be trained how to avoid them when they do.

The worry is that, soon there will be no biking on L plates. It will become like learning in a car.
But on a bike that will mean only learning via a approved school and leassons with them at god knows what cost.....

Quote:
Surely the fact that newbies ride slower would negate the need for "high speed" manouveres.


I hardly think that 31 mph is high speed.......
This speed is slower than your average speed in a 30 MPH limit....
____________________
Just because my bike was A DIVVY, does not mean i am......
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:41 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Tend to agree with Stinkwheel that the test should be more difficult. However that difficulty should be in being observed in normal conditions for longer, not just more hoops to jump through.

At present the idea just seems to be more and more flaming hoops to jump through. What next, force car drivers to recover from a sideway skid towards a brick wall, while failing those who control the vehicle and avoid skidding?

stinkwheel wrote:
Should someone who is not capable of knowing when they are exceeding the handling envelope of their machine to the extent they crash be given a full motorcycle licence?


Is it a valid test to force someone to ride beyond what they regard as the safe handling envelope?

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

supZ
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Feb 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:47 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:

stinkwheel wrote:
Should someone who is not capable of knowing when they are exceeding the handling envelope of their machine to the extent they crash be given a full motorcycle licence?


Is it a valid test to force someone to ride beyond what they regard as the safe handling envelope?


beat me to it.
____________________
CBR954RR - Daily toy
CBR600RR - Trackbike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

UnknownStuntm...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:49 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

chadwick wrote:
Cannot believe the silly **** from the DSA at the end of the interview saying 'if the changes prevent just one death or injury on the road it will be worth it'... the whole story is banging on about how learners are being injured trying to complete the maneuver, so as long as people aren't injured on the highway that's ok then????!!!!

F***ing hypocritical government policy.


You're right, she got the UnknownStuntman Swear Box quite heavy this morning. I don't know how it could be any clearer for the daft old bat. That presenter should have just leaned in, past the camera, and rabbit punched her in the eyes.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Pickledswede
Traffic Copper



Joined: 15 Jul 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:56 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Watching that video certainly makes it look very easy, I can't see how at 30mph, even in the wet, you can generate enough lean to fall off from that. Personally, I think you'd struggle to do it wrong, but then what do I know, we'll see when I take my test in a couple of months...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:01 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:


Is it a valid test to force someone to ride beyond what they regard as the safe handling envelope?


In a way, yes.

If they do not feel comfortable pushing the handling that far, they are perfectly at liberty to either slow down or pass outside the cones. The test area is pretty damned big, there is more than enough room to bail-out at any point. They'd fail, but it wouldn't be much of a test if everyone passed.

If they push it beyond their limit or are not aware of that limit then they double fail. Once for not completing the exercise, once for not knowing their limits.

To give a fairly unrelated but possibly relevant analogy. My Dads company used to, among other things, proof-test lifting equipment. One day they were testing a large telescopic crane. It lifted the proof load of around 150 tonnes of steel weights and as it pivoted, one of the outriggers collapsed. The load bounced, the jib broke, the hydraulic ram buckled and the crane collapsed in a heap of twisted metal and hydraulic fluid. Whole thing was utter scrap.

My Dad wrote out a fail certificate and issued an invoice for the test fee. The owner of the crane was less than happy BUT should they have not performed the test because there was a risk of this happening? If they were never proof loaded, would it be reasonable to lift things over peoples heads with it?

In the same way. If they aren't tested to check they are in control and aware of their limits, is it reasonable to allow someone to ride a 150bhp motorcycle on public roads.

I don't think risk of failure is a good reason to not do a test.

Whether that particular test is a good one or not remains to be seen but it certainly seems to be weeding out a large number of people who simply don't know their limits.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:12 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

stinkwheel wrote:
If they do not feel comfortable pushing the handling that far, they are perfectly at liberty to either slow down or pass outside the cones. The test area is pretty damned big, there is more than enough room to bail-out at any point. They'd fail, but it wouldn't be much of a test if everyone passed.


Not much of a test if you have a choice of crashing or failing if it happens to be wet. Hardly like these freshly built tarmac car parks (now covered in spilt oil, fuel and coolant) are going to have a half decent surface.

It is akin to turning up for your bike test and failing for undue hesitency because the examiner instructed you to to sit behind a slow moving queue.

stinkwheel wrote:
In the same way. If they aren't tested to check they are in control and aware of their limits, is it reasonable to allow someone to ride a 150bhp motorcycle on public roads.


Different point, but not sure any petty little test is suitable to check if someone can ride a 150hp bike.

stinkwheel wrote:
Whether that particular test is a good one or not remains to be seen but it certainly seems to be weeding out a large number of people who simply don't know their limits.


Quite possibly they do know the limits, but having had to take a day off work, pay out a load of money and travel a long way they are pushed into exceeding those limits to pass a test.

As the highway code says to increase the gap in the wet it would seem logical to increase the space allowed in the wet. Otherwise it is hardly a test, just a check to see if the rider is lucky enough to have a test in the dry.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:27 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:

Not much of a test if you have a choice of crashing or failing if it happens to be wet. Hardly like these freshly built tarmac car parks (now covered in spilt oil, fuel and coolant) are going to have a half decent surface.


My point being. I strongly suspect the exercise is perfectly possible to do, and do safely at the required speed even in the wet.

I may be proven wrong about this but you are among the first to point out that wet roads do not affect handling as much as people think.

I've often thought there ought to be a randomised number of driving tests (car and bike) taken in the dark too.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

arry
Super Spammer



Joined: 03 Jan 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:33 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

stinkwheel wrote:

My point being. I strongly suspect the exercise is perfectly possible to do, and do safely at the required speed even in the wet.

I may be proven wrong about this but you are among the first to point out that wet roads do not affect handling as much as people think.

I've often thought there ought to be a randomised number of driving tests (car and bike) taken in the dark too.


From what I'd read on the situation, it seems that the new surface that's been laid in these test centres take at least 18 months worth of abuse UNDER NORMAL ROAD CONDITIONS in order to become an effective grippy surface - bearing in mind how little use it'll have in a test centre by comparison, this will take years. The issue being that the test was devised and tested away from these centres, on surfaces that had already bedded in.

If that's the case, then their testing means norra lot, really
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:41 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

arry wrote:

From what I'd read on the situation, it seems that the new surface that's been laid in these test centres take at least 18 months worth of abuse UNDER NORMAL ROAD CONDITIONS in order to become an effective grippy surface - bearing in mind how little use it'll have in a test centre by comparison, this will take years. The issue being that the test was devised and tested away from these centres, on surfaces that had already bedded in.

If that's the case, then their testing means norra lot, really


If you mean stone mastic asphalt. It's all over the place on the roads in the UK, no gritting, no skid warning signs. As you say, takes 18 months to bed in.

So, it's a road surface the testee is highly likely to encounter in their day to day riding.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

UnknownStuntm...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:52 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

I recall them saying that the test will take place off road, and it will be a special high specification surface. So, not an actual surface you're gonna encounter day-to-day then. Thumbs Down
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:09 - 26 May 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

stinkwheel wrote:
My point being. I strongly suspect the exercise is perfectly possible to do, and do safely at the required speed even in the wet.


It is perfectly possible to lock the rear wheel, recover and still stop rapidly but that is a fail.

stinkwheel wrote:
I may be proven wrong about this but you are among the first to point out that wet roads do not affect handling as much as people think.


Not really.

stinkwheel wrote:
I've often thought there ought to be a randomised number of driving tests (car and bike) taken in the dark too.


Possibly, but to have any meaning it would need to be all those doing the test. Otherwise you may as well issue licences by lottery.

stinkwheel wrote:
If you mean stone mastic asphalt. It's all over the place on the roads in the UK, no gritting, no skid warning signs. As you say, takes 18 months to bed in.

So, it's a road surface the testee is highly likely to encounter in their day to day riding.


Very true, and on the road they would be expected to cope with it by adjusting their speed, not going at it the same speed and preying they can live with the consequences.

Layout of the new test is here:-

https://www.dsa.gov.uk/Documents/MPTC/2009/dsa_motorcycle_manoeuvre_diagram_mptc.pdf
https://www.dsa.gov.uk/Documents/MPTC/2009/dsa_mc_diagram_manoeuvring_layout.pdf

(note the 2 maps are mirror images).

They have 41m to swerve, swerve back and stop from 31mph or more. As there is 10m to swerve, say 10m to swerve back that leaves 21m. Should be easy enough (HC braking distance is 14m from 30mph). Add the wet on a dodgy surface and it becomes rather more dubious.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 16 years, 224 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.11 Sec - Server Load: 0.21 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 144.14 Kb