|
|
| Author |
Message |
| MattHirst |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MattHirst World Chat Champion

Joined: 25 Jun 2006 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 21:21 - 23 Oct 2009 Post subject: Engineering maths boffins |
 |
|
Right, got an assignment due in about 3 weeks, part of it is on Simply Distributed Loads and Uniformly Distributed Loads.
I know we have a few engineers on here, and a few maths boffins so i'm hoping someone will be able to do what i can't
Apologies if it's in the wrong section.
Firstly, SDL's. I know these are fairly easy to do and i don't have a problem with doing these generally but just to re-cap. I've added an attatchment of an example of how they are set out in our assignments. The idea of them is to illustrate a supported beam (imagine a bridge with a support at either end).
So to work out Ra -
We know Ra - 8.5m
So from there 8.5Ra = (2x5) + (5x4) + (6.5x5)
Therefore 8.5Ra = 62.5 - 62.5/8.5 = 7.353KN exerted on Ra in an upwards motion.
Can't be bothered typing out the shizzle for Rb but we know there is a 15KN downward force.
So 15 - 7.353 = 7.647KN, so Rb has an upward force of 7.647KN.
Right, onto UDL's. These are the ones i can't grasp. I've drawn another shoddy using the same figures as the other one just to make things easier.
I know my UDL is 2.7 x L x (L x 0.5)
I know Ra is calculated the same as the SDL, but you place the result of the UDL in the centre of Ra and Rb (or is it the centre of the beam?) and use this as a downward force when working out Ra. But the problem i have is calculating Rb while taking into account the overhang.
Hope someone can help me as i'm totally baffled haha.
You will be karma'd accordingly.
Thanks
Matt ____________________ It's all fun and games until someone gets hurt, then it's bloody hilarious!!!
Last edited by MattHirst on 22:12 - 23 Oct 2009; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Suitor_Stu |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Suitor_Stu Could Be A Chat Bot

Joined: 19 Jun 2006 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 21:34 - 23 Oct 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
Answer is 42.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MattHirst |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MattHirst World Chat Champion

Joined: 25 Jun 2006 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 21:41 - 23 Oct 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
You can GTFO with your 42 aswell  ____________________ It's all fun and games until someone gets hurt, then it's bloody hilarious!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| instigator |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 instigator Super Spammer

Joined: 19 Oct 2004 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MattHirst |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MattHirst World Chat Champion

Joined: 25 Jun 2006 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 22:06 - 23 Oct 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
Yeah the UDL should be shown as 'semi-circles' accross the whole length of the beam, to show that it is evenly distributed. I just couldn't be arsed to draw them
I, for some reason, was led to believe that the UDL was 2.7 * L * (L*0.5) where L = Length.
Not sure why, sure my lecturer taught us that way..meh i dunno  ____________________ It's all fun and games until someone gets hurt, then it's bloody hilarious!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| instigator |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 instigator Super Spammer

Joined: 19 Oct 2004 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 22:15 - 23 Oct 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
I don't have my books on this any more which is a shame as Structural mechanics was one of my favourite classes and this is one of the first calculations you learn. I did this back at Higher (a-level)
This may help - https://www.mechguru.com/?p=299 I'm fookin nackered otherwise I'd quite like to re-learn it.
Or this - www.mathfiles.com/view.php/2420.doc
What are you studying anyway? Mechanical or structural? |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 16 years, 323 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|