|
|
| RXS or H100 |
| RXS100 |
|
62% |
[ 17 ] |
| H100 |
|
37% |
[ 10 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 27 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| warped one |
This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.
|
 warped one Banned

Joined: 25 Dec 2007 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| hmmmnz |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 hmmmnz Super Spammer

Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| warped one |
This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.
|
 warped one Banned

Joined: 25 Dec 2007 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| pinkyfloyd |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 pinkyfloyd Super Spammer

Joined: 20 Jul 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| warped one |
This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.
|
 warped one Banned

Joined: 25 Dec 2007 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 G The Voice of Reason
Joined: 02 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 00:28 - 04 Oct 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
I voted H100.
But only because I know it'll annoy cows . |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stevo as b4 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stevo as b4 World Chat Champion
Joined: 17 Jul 2003 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 05:46 - 04 Oct 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
I've ridden both and tbh yes they are light weight awesome little nippy commuters. They don't look much different to a CG125, but they are so much more fun to ride.
I think with any old bike search these days its best to buy a good one on condition, instead of seeking a particular model. That said they both go really well for 100cc commuter bikes and do wheelie quite nicely too!
The RXS is a bit faster and can top a real 70mph in favourable conditions. It's the full 12.2bhp so it always feels much more lively than a badly restricted 12bhp 125. The H100 is about 11bhp, and about 5mph slower, but it's still very nippy and the engine is designed a bit like a trials engine to give loads of low down power and torque. A mate at school had a H100 and he said it did 65mph, but on very hot days it would fade a bit and struggle over 60mph being air cooled. It did wheelie very well, and he could get it up off the power in 1st and 2nd and wheelie for the length of Morrisson's car park!
If i saw one though id definately have a KH100EX over either, just for the disc brake, rotary valve engine, and the sporty cast wheels. They also did some nice paint jobs on the KH for some years. The biggest downside to an RXS or H100 is that you have to have metallic blue or red and thats your lot!
All great little bike's and everyone with a big bike now, should go out and get a small cheap 2stroke to play with or keep as a winter bike, as while there are still a few around there is lots of fun to be had! |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| 27cows |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 27cows World Chat Champion

Joined: 01 Nov 2009 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 06:57 - 04 Oct 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
The H100A was dreadful. The H100S provides possibly the only example of any bike reverting to points ignition from CDI, despite the fact that the ignition system was one of the very few parts of the H100 not prone to failure at low mileage. The SII wasn't too bad at all. Decent handling, not too hideous to look at...but there is no excuse for that engine. I've seen many dead before 20K, and I could never work out WTF there was a balance shaft in such in tiny motor. Honda and strokers - it doesn't mix. Every road 2 stroke they ever made was shite.
RXS is good if you want A to B reliability and aren't bothered about things like looks, lights and the ability to stop. The electrics are inexcusably awful even by commuter standards. The original suspension is pretty crap too. The motor is the jewel in the crown. It's been in continuous production in some parts of the world since 1983 and there's a good reason for that.
The KH100 is ridiculously tiny, even for a 100. And slow. They stop well, simply because they only do about 57 flat out The 12v lighting is similar to that on the AR125, though - that is very useful.
If you could take an RD125LC chassis and stick an RXS motor in it in, with the KH100's brakes and electrics, you'd have something close to the ideal lightweight runabout bike. ____________________ The RXS100: vehicle of choice for Chuck Norris |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 08:39 - 04 Oct 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
Hi
Big problem with the H100 is that they are geared so low. Think the claimed top speed was 58mph, but peak power was at 6500rpm which is 50mph in top gear. So you are constantly thrashing the nuts off it when cruising, and you can't get sprockets to gear it up (front is as big as will fit, back is tiny already). That said they are very good on fuel despite being thrashed full time and will wheelie easily. Weak point of the engine is the main bearings (not really surprising as the engine is basically an MB5 / MT5 moped engine). H100 headlights are proof that Honda have a sick sense of humour (pathetic at night, then you come to a corner and brake, and the brake light coming on dims the headlight, while what little light remains now points at the floor just in front of the bike)
RXS has far more sensible gearing, doesn't seem to be quite so good on fuel nor as well finished.
All the best
Keith ____________________ Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Carvel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Carvel World Chat Champion

Joined: 01 Jun 2010 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 15 years, 80 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|