Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Had an accident, advice please.

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

calyx
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Dec 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:21 - 11 Dec 2010    Post subject: Had an accident, advice please. Reply with quote

Hi,

A twat turned into a driveway while I was overtaking him. He indicated, indicator blinked once and he turned the steering wheel. All this took 1 second. maybe less. I managed to slow down to 5mph before crashing into his bumper.
I was doing 15mph, he was doing 5.
Witness says it is 50/50. Car driver blames me.

I have 2 questions.

1) Can my pillion be a witness?
2) What was the name of that bike insurance claims company? Mr. Green

I almost forgot the most important part:

https://img257.imageshack.us/img257/1743/crasha.jpg
____________________
Boris - London
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Cheeseybeaner
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Jul 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:37 - 11 Dec 2010    Post subject: Re: Had an accident, advice please. Reply with quote

calyx wrote:
Hi,

A twat turned into a driveway while I was overtaking him. He indicated, indicator blinked once and he turned the steering wheel. All this took 1 second. maybe less. I managed to slow down to 5mph before crashing into his bumper.
I was doing 15mph, he was doing 5.
Witness says it is 50/50. Car driver blames me.

I have 2 questions.

1) Can my pillion be a witness?
2) What was the name of that bike insurance claims company? Mr. Green

I almost forgot the most important part:

https://img257.imageshack.us/img257/1743/crasha.jpg



Speak to Rider Support Services in Putney, they did me well.
Your pillion may be a witness but is not impartial as he was on your vehicle rather than a by stander though his/her acount may be useful it would not be considered fully credible as an opposite account to the driver's.
You could argue he failed to keep proper look out before turning and failed to indicate properly before turning. If you were positioned alongside his vehicle before he indicated and turned its his fault but proving that without a bystander would be difficult so it may be that liability is split.
If you are seeking a claim though I'd speak to RSS pronto.
It looks from your image though more as if you rear ended him in while he turned in which case liability would probably be considered fully yours as you didn't keep adequate stopping distance.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

yuri2085
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:03 - 11 Dec 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think stopping distance is relevant. If it was a safe overtake then it's not his fault. ie. overtake at reasonable speed, lane positioning etc.

In fact please think for a second, if it was about stopping distance then there is no such thing as a safe overtake, even on a motorway.
If someone cuts in front of you then you are no longer a safe distance away!!!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

chris-red
Have you considered a TDM?



Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:07 - 11 Dec 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's gonna go 50/50 at best, your pillion doesn't count as a witness neither does anyone in the other guys car.


Depending on the damage I would try to avoid going through the insurance, speak to the other guy see if he will consider not going through the insurance to avoid both of you losing your no claims.
____________________
Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

weasley
World Chat Champion



Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:58 - 11 Dec 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

I vote 50:50 too.

He should have taken reasonable care to make observations before making the manoeuvre. However you should have anticipated the possibility of the move. One assumes that he was driving at a speed that allowed the manoeuvre (ie, not 30 mph). You're in a residential road and overtaking - there is some onus on you to be alert to these possibilities.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:03 - 11 Dec 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think calling the guy a twat is a bit rich. I'd say 50 50 is exactly where the blame lies.

I'd hazard a guess that you could have avoided him with better obs.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

colin1
Captain Safety



Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:01 - 11 Dec 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was in a similar collision that I would have thought would be 50 50. I was more in the wrong than you but it went all in my favour, so I think you should be ok unless the driver lies about how long they had their indicator on.

In my case, they didnt turn into a driveway, but into a sideroad, so me filtering past I should have expected the possibility that someone might want to turn in there. In your case, the driveway is less obvious than a sideroad.

However what may have gone in my favour was, the driver had only just joined the main road, and was treating a staggered crossroads as if it were a crossroads. They had probably done the same several times a week for years without having someone come alongside them.

Bottom line is, even if they did indicate, they should have checked their wing mirror before turning. Hardly any car drivers do it, but it's their responsibility.
____________________
colin1 is officially faster than god
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MattJ
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 Nov 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:27 - 11 Dec 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

As someone who has their car test on Monday, I can tell you that people are now taught to ALWAYS check their right wing mirror before turning right, specifically in case somebody is overtaking you (mainly bikes). He obviously didn't do that, so he did not check it was safe to do the manoeuvre. Hope that helps you, I do not think you were in the wrong. If you were overtaking unsafely then that means you should always have to join traffic again every time you approach a junction.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

calyx
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Dec 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:01 - 12 Dec 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

MarJay wrote:
I think calling the guy a twat is a bit rich. I'd say 50 50 is exactly where the blame lies.

I'd hazard a guess that you could have avoided him with better obs.


My hand was on the brake lever when this happened. I reacted in less than half a second. Seen him moving right, brake hard, didn't lock tyres, he indicates and turns at the same time, still not locked, he turns more, bang.
I don't think I could do any better than this. Especially with a screaming pillion at the back Laughing
____________________
Boris - London
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ingah
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Apr 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:14 - 12 Dec 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

calyx wrote:
MarJay wrote:
I think calling the guy a twat is a bit rich. I'd say 50 50 is exactly where the blame lies.

I'd hazard a guess that you could have avoided him with better obs.


My hand was on the brake lever when this happened. I reacted in less than half a second. Seen him moving right, brake hard, didn't lock tyres, he indicates and turns at the same time, still not locked, he turns more, bang.
I don't think I could do any better than this. Especially with a screaming pillion at the back Laughing


I agree actually. Overtaking a car passing a side road is a bit Confused but in suburbia every house has a driveway and a sudden maneuver without warning is going to be their fault. It sounds like you took every reasonable precaution. However, proving this chain of events is going to be significantly harder, although if your independent witness states the length of time that the indicator was on etc (without muddying up, missing some of, or withholding the details) then the insurance companies will hopefully arrive at the right answer eventually Wink (after all, it's only the witness statement of events that's important, their opinion of blame is meaningless unless they're qualified to make such judgements).

Unlucky imo.

Personally, it annoys me how drivers feel that they can get away with not checking their mirrors - it's sad that people even feel this is suitable as a defense. How the hell can it really be someone else's fault when they've pulled a sudden maneuver AND failed to make adequete checks/observations! (it seems the equivalent of running across a busy road blindfolded)

Edit - One exception to the above i've just thought of: If he'd slowed down and then you overtook him just after he'd slowed, then i'd forsee you getting partially blamed. When a vehicle slows down suddenly from ~30 to ~10, you should really be asking yourself why, rather than diving for the quick overtake Laughing
____________________
-- Ingah


Last edited by Ingah on 03:55 - 12 Dec 2010; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

-LG-
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:31 - 12 Dec 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would say its his fault, I was told when I was learning to drive to signal around 10 car lengths before I plan on turning (unless there is a road before it, then its as soon as possible with as much notice as possible).
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
londonbill This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

iooi
Super Spammer



Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:52 - 12 Dec 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

MattJ wrote:
As someone who has their car test on Monday, I can tell you that people are now taught to ALWAYS check their right wing mirror before turning right,.


BLIND SPOT......

I hope you are also taught to look over your shoulder before moving. I know my daughter is......

OP.

Was the guy turning the lead car or in a line of traffic, did the guy behind you stop as they would be needed to confirm what the guy did.
____________________
Just because my bike was A DIVVY, does not mean i am......
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

L4Isoside
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Mar 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:27 - 12 Dec 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

When I was driving I was taught to check for blind spots when manoeuvring etc, but I don't think I was for turning? (Only mirrors)

To me it does sound like 50:50, even in my CBT I was taught never to overtake when there is a junction/side road etc to the right... this almost caught me out once Shocked

hope it doesn't go too badly but your probably better off settling it out side the insurance.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

SinceNow
Nitrous Nuisance



Joined: 18 Jul 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:10 - 12 Dec 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Try BLD they are helping me with my claim right now.

https://www.bldgroup.co.uk/
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:18 - 12 Dec 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

L4Isoside wrote:
, even in my CBT I was taught never to overtake when there is a junction/side road etc to the right... this almost caught me out once Shocked

Not only is a lot of what they teach in a CBT questionable, but this was a driveway, not a side road. Wouldn't be overtaking at all in most British urban areas if you avoided that.

I'd call up a claims company and see what they say - generally they'll only take it if they're pretty sure they'll win anyway.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

calyx
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Dec 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:57 - 12 Dec 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Red is me. Blue is the car.
Traffic was very heavy and they were doing 10ish. This guy was doing 10 as well. There was no oncoming traffic. (that's why he turned)
I overtook 3 cars before crashing into this car. I mean, I was there for a good 10 seconds.
It was dark. No rain, clean conditions.

https://img146.imageshack.us/img146/2430/crash2s.jpg
____________________
Boris - London
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

calyx
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Dec 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:04 - 12 Dec 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

weeOne wrote:
Try BLD they are helping me with my claim right now.

https://www.bldgroup.co.uk/


Thanks for that. I am in contact with these guys. Hopefully they'll help.
____________________
Boris - London
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

instigator
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:09 - 12 Dec 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your fault.

You are responsible for looking after yourself, not anyone else.

Chalk it down to experience and move on.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:10 - 12 Dec 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mirror, signal, maneouvre.

Not

No mirror, signalmaneouvre.

He's 100% at fault.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

willis1337
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 06 May 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:44 - 12 Dec 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hetzer wrote:
Mirror, signal, maneouvre.

Not

No mirror, signalmaneouvre.

He's 100% at fault.


Provided that you weren't going at an excessive speed then I would say 100% his fault too, due to failing to observe before turning. However without an independent witness it's going to be a 50/50, as doubtful he would admit not looking, or signalling too late. Definately no independent witness?

I suspect he will say you were hooning it up the outside going too fast etc etc. while he was doing a sedate 25mph and mirror - signal - manoeuvre, then whack, speeding biker hits him in the side whilst killing 000,000's of kittens.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

The Shaggy D.A.
Super Spammer



Joined: 12 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:02 - 12 Dec 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can you provide a picture that's zoomed out a bit more? It's hard to tell what the road layout leading up to and after that spot is. That looks more substantial than just a driveway, it looks like you've left one section with a traffic island and heading to another, and if you had already overtaken 3 cars, it looks like you were thinking more about passing even more cars than what the next one the list was doing.

Sure, people should signal clearly, and check their mirrors, but you're responsible for your own fate when on a bike, so 50:50.
____________________
Chances are quite high you are not in my Monkeysphere, and I don't care about you. Don't take it personally.
Currently : Royal Enfield 350 Meteor
Previously : CB100N > CB250RS > XJ900F > GT550 > GPZ750R/1000RX > AJS M16 > R100RT > Bullet 500 > CB500 > LS650P > Bullet Electra X & YBR125 > Bullet 350 "Superstar" & YBR125 Custom > Royal Enfield Classic 500 Despatch Limited Edition (28 of 200) & CB Two-Fifty Nighthawk > ER5
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

L4Isoside
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Mar 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:12 - 12 Dec 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:
L4Isoside wrote:
, even in my CBT I was taught never to overtake when there is a junction/side road etc to the right... this almost caught me out once Shocked

Not only is a lot of what they teach in a CBT questionable, but this was a driveway, not a side road. Wouldn't be overtaking at all in most British urban areas if you avoided that.

I'd call up a claims company and see what they say - generally they'll only take it if they're pretty sure they'll win anyway.


I don't unless I have to, I save the high speed riding/ overtaking for the more open roads. Confused
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

calyx
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Dec 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:58 - 12 Dec 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is an independent witness. She says it is half half. But her statement means more than what she thinks.
If she tells the truth I'll be fine. What concerns me is if she says "he indicated, biker overtook, bang". This kind of statement would cause me losing my ncb.

instigator wrote:
Your fault.
You are responsible for looking after yourself, not anyone else.
Chalk it down to experience and move on.


I know. I should never overtook. Actually I should buy a car.

Hetzer wrote:
Mirror, signal, maneouvre.
Not
No mirror, signalmaneouvre.
He's 100% at fault.


When I contacted my insurer first thing they asked was "did he indicate?". I think this means something.
Maybe you are allowed to kill people when you indicate Confused

The Shaggy D.A. wrote:
Can you provide a picture that's zoomed out a bit more?


Yes Sir!

https://maps.google.co.uk/?ie=UTF8&ll=51.607232,-0.124489&spn=0.000976,0.002411&t=k&z=19

And A to B(ang)

https://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=d&source=s_d&saddr=Bounds+Green+Rd%2FA109&daddr=Bounds+Green+Rd%2FA109&hl=en&geocode=FeF2EwMdMxf-_w%3BFX13EwMdGRb-_w&mra=dme&mrcr=0&mrsp=0&sz=20&sll=51.607298,-0.125145&sspn=0.000488,0.001206&ie=UTF8&t=k&z=20
____________________
Boris - London
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:58 - 12 Dec 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm presuming you don't commute through a busy town/city, then.
If I can't filter, I'll just take the car as that's the main advantage the bike has - that I get there three to four times quicker!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 14 years, 252 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.17 Sec - Server Load: 1.88 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 134.09 Kb