|
|
| Author |
Message |
| JonnyFoxtrot |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 JonnyFoxtrot Trackday Trickster

Joined: 01 Jan 2009 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 09:22 - 26 Mar 2012 Post subject: Rescuing old laptop with Linux |
 |
|
Morning all,
I trying to put life back into a really old Dell laptop for a down on luck mate but need some advice on setup, upgrades etc.
Specs:
1.2ghz celeron 3 cpu
512mb RAM (apparently this is the max that it can be upgraded)
10GB hard drive (this can be upgraded to a max 120gb 2.5" IDE)
No boot from USB
CD reader only, no write
Basically a right pig of a machine.
The not booting from USB and CD reader only problems aren't much of an issue, I've got a home desktop I'm going to use to burn a copy of Linux Mint onto.
Regarding the Linux distro, from what I've read I think I'm going to go for Linux Mint 9 Xfce due to not needing a lot of resources and the best of all worlds for compatibility, stability, performance. My mate isnt a dunce, and should be fine going to Linux (he has dabbled before), he's just skint and recently moved out from his missus
Any tips for setup? I've already read about getting a good partition setup so if I cant upgrade the hard drive I'm thinking the following:
1GB Swap (2x 512mb RAM)
5GB /
2-3GB /home
That seem ok? He isn't going to need it for much at the moment, mostly just browsing the net (looking for a flat, ebay, banking etc), perhaps the odd bit of office work and loading stuff to and from his android, so I'm thinking the limited space shouldnt be too bad, though its pushing the limits of tight should he need to download anything.
And on the subject of the shit old hard drive, anybody willing to donate a bigger one? Anything up to 120gb 2.5" IDE would be amazing. Nathan (my mate) is willing to put some money towards it if needs be. There doesn't seem to be much we can buy new or used for extortionate money (I guess thats antique hardware for you).
And to sum it all up, is the LM 9 Xfce even going to help? Or are we flogging a dead horse with the whole thing and we should just keep scouring egay for a better spec bargain laptop? It did have XP on it, but ran like a bit of a dog and was forever suffering security issues.
TIA  ____________________ '89 Honda NS125F (SOLD) -> '92 Suzuki GS500E (SOLD) -> '03 Kawasaki ZX6R B1H (SOLD) -> '96 VFR 750 RC36 (SOLD) -> '02 Honda CBR1100XX Blackbird |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Seb |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Seb World Chat Champion

Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| doggone |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 doggone World Chat Champion

Joined: 20 May 2004 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Pernig |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Pernig World Chat Champion

Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 11:46 - 26 Mar 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
Personally I wouldn't bother with separate partitions for / and /home on such a small hard drive, there is too much risk of one of the partitions running out of space, especially as your mate might not be used to where things will be situated to start with. Like you said, one big download and you will start to have problems (although it may be possible for him to mount his phone and download straight to the SD card).
My Dad's netbook ran bog standard Ubuntu ok but a bit choppy with 512MB RAM. I've not tried Mint but i'd say it will be ok. Xfce ran nicer than gnome 2 and unity and I think it's prettier, too.
As for other light distros, I find Puppy runs really well but the choice of available software is pretty small. I find that when I start to use puppy for a while, I soon find limitations. That some of the versions are Ubuntu based doesn't make any difference, I find; installing Ubuntu packages rather than pet/pup ones doesn't often work.
I will look in the shed for spare hard drives today. ____________________ H100 Breaking for spares |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stinkwheel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stinkwheel Bovine Proctologist

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 13:24 - 26 Mar 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
My eeepc netbook runs the full version of ubuntu no problem at all with 512mb of RAM and an 8GB SSD. Faster processor mind.
It'll even run 3D graphic acceleration.
I would just go with the recommended partitions on the installer (ie, use the whole disc, unless you want to hang onto windows for some reason). You'll need at least as much swap as you have RAM to allow hibernation.
Use USB sticks for data storage. ____________________ “Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.”
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Andy_Pagin |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Andy_Pagin World Chat Champion

Joined: 08 Nov 2010 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| P.addy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 P.addy Red Rocket
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 14:55 - 26 Mar 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
Its crap but I had gOS running on 256 ram and an 800mhz processor to get me out of the shit.
Ubuntu, probably 2 or 3 releases back will run fine on it, Mint is also pretty good  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| JonnyFoxtrot |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 JonnyFoxtrot Trackday Trickster

Joined: 01 Jan 2009 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Pernig |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Pernig World Chat Champion

Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 16:54 - 26 Mar 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
Don't be too disconcerted if you find a lot of the distros run badly from a live CD. They will be a lot faster once you've installed to the hard drive. ____________________ H100 Breaking for spares |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 14 years, 217 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|