|
|
| Author |
Message |
| ScaredyCat |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ScaredyCat World Chat Champion

Joined: 19 May 2012 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Alpha-9 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Alpha-9 Super Spammer

Joined: 19 Jan 2012 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 13:33 - 03 Jul 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
Really are a ScaredyCat aren't you
It seems legit, just shows that the bikes had a crash at some point, you might want to ask about anything else that was damaged. I had to change my clocks and that's because when I crashed it bent the frame, the forks, and smashed the clocks up
depends if it's cheap enough to justify buying a crashed bike  ____________________ Fzr-600 1999 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Beez |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Beez Nitrous Nuisance

Joined: 17 Jan 2012 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| blurredman |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 blurredman World Chat Champion

Joined: 18 Sep 2010 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 16:08 - 03 Jul 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
I remember back when I broke my CG speedo, I purchased a new one, and used that one for a while, including going through an MOT. So, from my previous MOT I had acheived some 25k on a 125...LOL!
However, I did note down the numbers before and after any changes and managed to calculate what I would have if I put it back, so my bike is all legit, even if looking through the old MOT there is a discrepency. Namely in the fact that one mot shows 22k, the next shows 48k then the 3rd shows 27k xD ____________________ CBT: 12/06/10, Theory: 22/09/10, Module 1: 09/11/10, Module 2: 19/01/11
Past: 1991 Honda CG125BR-J, 1992 (1980) Honda XL125S, 1996 Kawasaki GPZ500S, 1979 MZ TS150.
Current: 1973 MZ ES250/2 - 18k, 1979 Suzuki TS185ER - 10k, 1981 Honda CX500B - 91k, 1987 MZ ETZ250 (295cc) - 40k, 1989 MZ ETZ251 - 51k. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 16:15 - 03 Jul 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
On a bike, wouldn't bother me. Assume it's the highest of any candidate figure though, unless there's compelling evidence to the contrary. If dealer told me that a bike came with two wheels, I'd count them carefully. ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| The Shaggy D.A. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 The Shaggy D.A. Super Spammer

Joined: 12 Sep 2008 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 18:02 - 03 Jul 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
I wouldn't shy away from it, but I'd want to see MOTs backing up mileage claims. I sold my CB500 with a speedo that read 32,000 miles more than the bike had done, but I had a picture of me doing the swap, plus MOTs for the previous 6 years. If you can see an owner's done 4k, 4k, 4k, 36k, 4k, 4k, then unless they went around the world for their holiday on it it's quite likely it's genuine  ____________________ Chances are quite high you are not in my Monkeysphere, and I don't care about you. Don't take it personally.
Currently : Royal Enfield 350 Meteor
Previously : CB100N > CB250RS > XJ900F > GT550 > GPZ750R/1000RX > AJS M16 > R100RT > Bullet 500 > CB500 > LS650P > Bullet Electra X & YBR125 > Bullet 350 "Superstar" & YBR125 Custom > Royal Enfield Classic 500 Despatch Limited Edition (28 of 200) & CB Two-Fifty Nighthawk > ER5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| J.M. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 J.M. World Chat Champion

Joined: 27 Mar 2011 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 18:19 - 03 Jul 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
I don't get why people never set the mileage on new clocks to match that of their old clocks?
Surely all it takes is using a drill to act as the speedometer cable and add miles on to the clocks. Then they reset to 0, then you increase the mileage until it matches your original clocks mileage?
I've done more miles than my bike says! The speedometer cable managed to fall out about 20 miles from home ____________________ 2004 R1 & 2018 XSR900 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| blurredman |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 blurredman World Chat Champion

Joined: 18 Sep 2010 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 20:40 - 03 Jul 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
| J.M. wrote: | I don't get why people never set the mileage on new clocks to match that of their old clocks?
Surely all it takes is using a drill to act as the speedometer cable and add miles on to the clocks. Then they reset to 0, then you increase the mileage until it matches your original clocks mileage?
I've done more miles than my bike says! The speedometer cable managed to fall out about 20 miles from home |
I actually took the whole unit appart and removed the dial, allowing me to manually choosing whatever figure I wanted.. ____________________ CBT: 12/06/10, Theory: 22/09/10, Module 1: 09/11/10, Module 2: 19/01/11
Past: 1991 Honda CG125BR-J, 1992 (1980) Honda XL125S, 1996 Kawasaki GPZ500S, 1979 MZ TS150.
Current: 1973 MZ ES250/2 - 18k, 1979 Suzuki TS185ER - 10k, 1981 Honda CX500B - 91k, 1987 MZ ETZ250 (295cc) - 40k, 1989 MZ ETZ251 - 51k. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| ScaredyCat |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ScaredyCat World Chat Champion

Joined: 19 May 2012 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Alpha-9 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Alpha-9 Super Spammer

Joined: 19 Jan 2012 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 08:47 - 04 Jul 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| J.M. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 J.M. World Chat Champion

Joined: 27 Mar 2011 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 13 years, 242 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|