|
|
| Author |
Message |
| treeno |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 treeno Crazy Courier
Joined: 26 Dec 2012 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| P. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 P. Red Rocket
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| treeno |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 treeno Crazy Courier
Joined: 26 Dec 2012 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 12:37 - 04 Jan 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Walloper wrote: | | treeno wrote: | Hey all! I need a new chain for my CG 125 as it is showing some wear in terms of tight in some places loose in others. So I thought I might as well replace the sprockets as well, they are probably worn too right?
Anyway, my mate is insisting I should go for a different number of teeth on the sprockets (can't remember which, maybe you can tell me). Reason being that it won't really do more than 60mph, maybe 65mph in no wind, on the flat. It gets there almost at the top of 4th, in the very low end of 5th. He is saying 5th is not being utilised so why not fit a sprocket that will give me the same top speed but using all the gears, that way it should give me more acceleration on the way to top speed.
Is this logic right? Is there any point? Will it harm the engine? Also, what configuration of sprockets would I need to achieve this?
I know you will probably say "Why bother, just wait to get a new bike." but if I am changing them anyway then it could be fun. Thanks! |
His theory is interesting but really you won't be much better off.
The gearing is set to match the engine horsepower. I think it's about 7.5. The designer sets the ratios which best suit the power range of the engine.
You may get faster acceleration with a smaller front cog on a standard rear. But you will lose all your top speed for minimal performance.
The CG125 is perfect the way it is. Your issue is you want it to perform like a 600.
The secret of the CG125 is to learn the dark art of energy conservation. It's not the gearing that is your enemy it's the dammed brakes. DO NOT USE THEM.  |
| ##Paddy## wrote: | You want standard sprockets on there. a CG has an engine that works great with standard gearing, altering these will not make it faster. 60/65 is what you will get out of a sub 10HP 125. |
All I needed to know, thanks guys! |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 14:47 - 04 Jan 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
As a counterpoint, I lengthened the gearing on my CG-copy engined bike-in-a-box by a full 14% (15 - > 17 teeth on the front). While it added the sum total of sod all to the speed, it made the bike feel much more relaxed and unstressed - it's a popular mod on those particular machines.
This is not a recommendation, since the CG gearing (when you factor in the rear wheel size) will be different, but at £5 per front sprocket, you could have some cheap fun trying out different ratios and seeing what suits you best.
Another £10 buys you 1-up and 1-down, and then you can speak from experience, if somewhat adenoidally. ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Scootaloo |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Scootaloo Could Be A Chat Bot
Joined: 09 Dec 2011 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| P. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 P. Red Rocket
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Scootaloo |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Scootaloo Could Be A Chat Bot
Joined: 09 Dec 2011 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| P. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 P. Red Rocket
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Scootaloo |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Scootaloo Could Be A Chat Bot
Joined: 09 Dec 2011 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| P. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 P. Red Rocket
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Alpha-9 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Alpha-9 Super Spammer

Joined: 19 Jan 2012 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 15:50 - 04 Jan 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
My mate put on wrong sprockets on his CG and now it's retarded, it can do 60+ in 4th but going into 5th just loses speed
His brakes are shit too and he's lost his engine braking on top of that
Haynes doesn't say number of teeth on rear and front by default, is dumb. Anyone know? ____________________ Fzr-600 1999
Last edited by Alpha-9 on 15:52 - 04 Jan 2013; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 15:51 - 04 Jan 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
The CG I ride doesn't suffer from lack of power in top. It does feel the wind and it knows when you stick your head up into the breeze. But it holds 60 no problem.
The issue is not the gearing or engine power per say. It's just that the engine has reach the limit of puff at around 60mph. And 70 is only a dream.
A better bet is a bigger engine.
I think this thread is due the Power Band discussion now. ____________________ W-ireless A-rtificial L-ifeform L-imited to O-bservation P-eacekeeping and E-fficient R-epair |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Scootaloo |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Scootaloo Could Be A Chat Bot
Joined: 09 Dec 2011 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 13 years, 33 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|