Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


1982 CB125T Project

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> The Workshop
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

mattday
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 01 Mar 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:44 - 09 Mar 2014    Post subject: 1982 CB125T Project Reply with quote

A couple of weeks ago, I bought my first bike: a 1982 CB125TD-C. I have read a lot of Teflon-Mikes hugely informative articles (on his site) and his posts on here. I am still optimistic this bike needs relatively little to get it on the road. Laughing However, I could really do with a little help from anyone who owns one.

1) The back end is in pieces at the moment. As far as I can see, the grab handle should bolt on to the indicator brackets via some kind of spacer, although I don't have any of these parts. I'm referring to part 19 in this diagram. I'd rather not spend £30 on four bolts at the moment, so I was thinking it should be possible to knock something up (M6 threaded rod into tapped tube perhaps). If someone would be kind enough to measure this part, I would be very grateful.

2) The carbs on my bike had the bottom nipples linked by a single tube. I have not been able to find a picture that clearly shows them, but am I correct in thinking they should instead have separate drain tubes running down the back of the engine?

3) Thoughts on my rear shock?...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Teflon-Mike
tl;dr



Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:31 - 09 Mar 2014    Post subject: Re: 1982 CB125T Project Reply with quote

mattday wrote:
A couple of weeks ago, I bought my first bike: a 1982 CB125TD-C. I have read a lot of Teflon-Mikes hugely informative articles (on his site) and his posts on here. I am still optimistic this bike needs relatively little to get it on the road. Laughing However, I could really do with a little help from anyone who owns one.

The NHS mental Heath service is free..... that should help.... you do have to pay for prescriptions, but the drugs are better and you dont get the same hassle from the heat Wink

Welcome fellow loonie! OK, kets get seriouse.

mattday wrote:
1) I'm referring to part 19 in this diagram.
If someone would be kind enough to measure this part, I would be very grateful.


https://cdn.bikechatforums.com/files/dsc_3512.jpg

Overall length = 35mm
Male thread = M8 and is 10mm deep (so 'free' length of spacer from indy-bracket to grab-rail is 25mm)
Female thread in the end, is M6, and the blind hole depth is 15mm - I could not be arsed to try measuring the threaded lenth.... go in whatever your tap will allow; I suspect you need about 8-10mm of thread in the hole.

mattday wrote:
2) The carbs on my bike had the bottom nipples linked by a single tube. I have not been able to find a picture that clearly shows them, but am I correct in thinking they should instead have separate drain tubes running down the back of the engine?


Yes. They follow the crank-case breather pipe over the top of the gear-box, and through the gap between the rear engine mounts and frame, exiting just beneath the center stand.

mattday wrote:
3) Thoughts on my rear shock?...

Err... it looks like a shock?
It has a spring and, well, everything!
Little rusty, but then thats what happens to metal!
OK, getting a little more seriouse; there's some obviouse rust damage on the damper rod....
Other than that, I really cant tell you bog all.
Does it 'Damp'? Thats the thing. And, when assembled, and you are sat the bike, where in the travel does that rust on the damper rod sit? Next up; how contientiouse do you want to be?

If the rust is above the nominal travel of the suspension, then not a huge worry, provided the sock still damps... it probably doesn't, or at least not wonderfully well; but off the bike they are so fucking hard, you cant really tell bog all.

If It was a scrubber upper I just wanted to get through an MOT, and assembled, sat at decent ride height and did 'damp'... Probably live with it. Rust on rod will eventually chew seals out the damper and it will start pumping its oil out... at which point you have to get a new shock... but, since there's bugger all you can do with that one, as they are not rebuildable... if it 'works' get the life out of it.

Eagle eyed mot man would tend to be inclined to fail it for rust on damper rod... but he would have to have X-Ray vision to spot it, as long as the side panels and air-boxes are on, and they aren't allowed to remove anything for inspection.

However; IF you want to be contientiouse; ditch it. Pattern replacements are about £90, you dont need to stump up the £200 odd they charge for a Hagon or anything. New shock will damp, and will sit the bike at correct rear ride height.... IF all the bushes in the linkage working it are good... and little point fitting decent shock unless that IS done, and they are the weak link in teh super-dreams back end.

That sophisticated rising rate linkage, is the 'novelty' of the super-Dream, and was what gave it remarkeably 'sure' and nimble handling; BUT, theres Shit... I'm counting these in my fucking HEAD.... I REALLY need to restore something DIFFERENT some-time SOON!.... two in each swing arm leg, to wish-bone; two in the wish-bone to shock-arm. Two in the shock arm at the frame end...eight? 'split' bushes all in phenolic, all likely to have been completely neglected, siezed and or worn out.

Now, operation of that mono-shock, and the reason its so stiff, is that the linkage de-coupled suspension travel from damper travel; wheel axle has about four inches of movement, but linkage ratio means that the damper has barely an inch of travel. 'Rising rate' also means that the relationship between travel at the wheel isn't directly proportional to the damper travel; and for it to get stiffer the further the axle moves up, means that the initial suspension travel moved damper very little, for the first half of the suspension travel shiftes damper less than half way into the shock, and as suspension movement increases, so more damper rod is shoved into the shock body. Make sense?

Basically! means that the linkage magnifies any 'slop' in the bushes, and by more than the over all 4x ratio the linkage has over overall travel at the shock, and more so at the 'normal' ride height end. Compound slop in each link, and the back end can sag by half an inch or more at rest, more when you sit on it, and that tilt 'choperises' the steering geometry, making it very lazy, and at the same time rather wobbly, while the slop in the links can mean that wheel can 'flop about' undamped for quite a few mm of travel, particularly between going up and coming back down, and there is huge 'lag' in the back wheel being moved by bump and the damper getting shifted by it, as the slack is taken up.

An 'OK' Super-Dream rear suspension, you can feel is 'better' than the under-damped pog0-sticks on a CG or YBR or something... but a clapped out linkage and they are just horrible.

If you want to experience what a Super-Dream can and should handle like.... bite the bullet and rebush the linkage and swing arm, and fit new shock. It makes it a completely different motorcycle.

BUT, depends how much its worth to you. New shock is £90 and you can probably add as much again to that tab, for all the bushes and pins you'll need to fully overhaul the linkage.

If penies tight? Them bushes better target for your attension than the shock... but without bouncing it, on the bike I REALLY cannot say from a photo whether its good, bad, OK, or fucking horrible!
____________________
My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

mattday
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 01 Mar 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:05 - 09 Mar 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fantastic! Very Happy Laughing

Thanks Mike, that is incredibly helpful (much more so than the NHS Sick ).

What you say about the shock is along the lines I had been thinking. I asked only because I was concerned it might be a bad idea to leave something that could fail a MOT if it were visible. But assuming it damps OK, I'll focus on getting the bike on the road first. It will probably take me a while to get enough confidence to benefit from new suspension anyway.

I did see a new shock on eBay which seemed quite cheap for a genuine Honda part. Perhaps some kind of licensed copy?

I'll no-doubt be adding to this thread in the coming weeks Mr. Green
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

mattday
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 01 Mar 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:20 - 17 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've been slowly getting there with this bike... hopefully not far off getting it on the road now. Had it running on both cylinders for the first time today (video clip attached).

I didn't touch the throttle, and whilst the tach was working, it was showing the idle to be about 5500rpm! Not sure how the tach cable is driven, but it seems to keep coming dislocated at the engine end.

Anyhow, it looks to me like maybe the carb slides are too high with the throttle closed (see pic). I haven't had to detach them from the throttle cable, but I understand there are several positions at which they will attach. Am I on the right track here, or does this look OK? Any other ideas on the racing idle?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Teflon-Mike
tl;dr



Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:31 - 17 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

1/ The pipe poking out the middle, that has a cut-out in the choke flap; that's the pilot air port.
May be my eyes, may be the photo... but LOOKS like it's full of crap.
Air sucked through that hole, aerates the fuel in the emulsion tube as it comes out the jet. If it's blocked, it'll be screwing the mixture right up.

2/ Again, could be photo, but choke butterfly on that one carb doesn't look totally horezontal. The flex link between the two choke butterfys is also a bit flakey, and before you try and get these carbs set up, you have to make sure that, first, both flaps do FULLY open, and close, and also that they are perfectly syncronised, opening and closing together.

3/ No, the carb slides dont attach at different heights on the throttle cable. The idle speed is set, on the screw on teh side of teh carb body that sets how low the slide falls in the venturi.

Tip: when setting idle speed, lift slides by twisting throttle twist grip to lift them off the stop. Make adjustment on the idle screw, then lower slide by closing throttle at twist grip, to let idle 'settle' and avoid merely screwing adjustment screw into soft aluminium of slide!

Note: the thing in the throttle slide that has variouse 'positions' is the throttle needle that changes the area of the main jet when you raise the slide; it has, from memory, five notches in it, and the height is set with a circlip that sits in the top of the throttle body and is sandwhiched by a plate that also retains the throttle cable, pressed down by the slide spring. On most engines, the middle notch, third from top is usually the 'default' needle setting; on the 125 Super-Dream, however, I think its the second notch from top, or one up from middle.

Often found needles sitting high making engines ritch, and not carburate cleanly, where people have presumed usual default on the middle groove.

TIP: book carb settings for needle and for mixture screw just 'work'. I think its 5x 1/4 turns on the mixture screw from fully in OTMH but CHECK THE BOOK.

After making sure idle air port is clear; set the mixture screw; check needle height; make sure chokes syncronised; THEN start worrying about the idle speed, and if you want to get a bit keen about it, 'balence' the carbs so that the idle settings are identicle on both carbs with vacuum guages.

Dont think I How2'd it on here, but is on my webby Balance or Synchronise Carburettors

BUT ought to be last thing on list of service adjustments, after you have made sure that engine's good vis tappet clerances cam-chain adjustment, spark-plugs, air filters etc.

Here and now you need to get it down from half revs, but looking at the slide height in pic; dont think that's cause; pilot air, needle hight and mixture screw could be.
____________________
My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

mattday
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 01 Mar 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:21 - 18 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Those pilot air ports looked clean but both have fuel in them, so I guess that is bad? Not had any previous experience with carbs, so learning as I go along. Thanks for the explanation.

Also correct about the choke butterfly. It is not horizontal because the stop allows it go further. However, I spent quite a while messing about with these previously, added a spacer to the stop and tweaked the linkage etc, trying to get them better synchronised. I gave up in the end as IIRC one moves through a bigger angle than the other and there was always slop in the linkage. Obviously they need to both open fully, but is the synchronisation really that crucial? The design doesn't really seem to permit very accurate synchronisation.

Plugs were new yesterday, air filters are not new, but are clean. Oil looked like it was changed not long before I got the bike. Adjusted the cam chain tension this morning, but had to postpone valve clearances until I have more suitable tools. They are currently all too tight though as I couldn't get a 0.04mm gauge under any of them.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Teflon-Mike
tl;dr



Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:51 - 18 May 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

mattday wrote:
Those pilot air ports looked clean but both have fuel in them, so I guess that is bad?

Implies that teh float-bowls are flooding; the needle valve not shutting fuel off.
Petrol is filling the bowl to the top, then rising up the jets and leaking into the pilot air port through the emusion tube.
This will not be doing your mixture any good, and absolutely no point trying to get the carb set up until that fault fixed.
Common fault for the float needle valves to be a bit 'sticky', and to flood the float-bowl if the bikes not been used for a while, and you might get them to start working giving the gloat bowl a few light taps with the back end of a screwdriver.
BUT, if the bikes been left derelict and or the valve's worn or corroded, then you'll need new float valves and to thoroughly clean the float valve seat.

mattday wrote:
Obviously they need to both open fully, but is the synchronisation really that crucial?

Yes.
Short answer. More messing needed.

Left hand carb, worked directly by the cable, OUGHT to travel from the fully closed 'stop' (choke 'on'; flap filling carb-mouth) to fully open 'stop' (choke 'off' flap horezontal, letting full air-flow to the slide)

If you dont get that range of travel on that carb; look to the cable to adjust until you get it.

Right hand carb, once you have full travel on the left HAS to be properly in sync with the Left. Or the LH choke will either be choking the air to that cylinder when the choke is 'off' or not giving you full choke when 'on' and screwing mixture controll all the time.

That 'slop' in the linkage has to be dialed out by tightening up the flex link, or packing it some-how so that they do sync, or worst case LH butterfly will be flapping around in the breeze in that slop REALLY screwing the mixture and you will NEVER get the bike running right.

mattday wrote:
but had to postpone valve clearances until I have more suitable tools. They are currently all too tight though as I couldn't get a 0.04mm gauge under any of them.


Pointless trying to set carbs up if the valves aren't fully opening or sealing... worse, dangerouse to even RUN the engine with tight tappets, as if the valves dont seat, they cant dump thier heat; likely to burn them out, and that even MORE likely if you haven't got the mixture set up.

PATIENCE
PERSEVERANCE
PUNCTUALITY... (Well, closest word I could find beginning with 'P' for doing stuff in at the right time in the right order!)

Remember, 'Random' and 'Rushing' be fast way to hurt on a motorbike... applies to fixing them as much as riding them; and if there's nothing you can do... there's nothing you can do... so don't anything, least of all something that might make matters worse 'just' to feel you are doing 'something' enjoy the brake.
____________________
My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

mattday
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 01 Mar 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:52 - 01 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Teflon-Mike wrote:

Implies that teh float-bowls are flooding; the needle valve not shutting fuel off.


You were right that at least one the of the float needle valves was not cutting the fuel off properly, even though I had thoroughly cleaned the seats. I fitted new float valves and polished the seats this week and there is no overflow anymore. (I am still running the engine with a funnel rigged up to feed the carbs though as it is just easier).

Teflon-Mike wrote:

mattday wrote:
Obviously they need to both open fully, but is the synchronisation really that crucial?

Yes.

I knew you were going to say that. Razz Laughing

Well... I'm not going to say they are all sorted now, but with most of the play eliminated, definitely a lot better.

Teflon-Mike wrote:

PATIENCE
PERSEVERANCE
PUNCTUALITY... (Well, closest word I could find beginning with 'P' for doing stuff in at the right time in the right order!)

'Procedure' would have worked very nicely Smile

Anyhow, update time...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

mattday
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 01 Mar 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:55 - 01 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

In addition to the float needle valves, I removed everything from the carb that would unscrew and made sure it was all clean. Blew everything out with carb cleaner and compressed air. Tried to figure out how the thing is supposed to work and drew a little diagram that is attached. Let me know if I have got anything fundamentally wrong in it. I set the idle mixture screws to the book spec - 1.25 turns out.

The very high idle was due to the slides resting too high. This was mainly because the throttle outer cable had got caught on the adjuster at the twist end. Whilst the carbs were apart, I replaced the throttle stop screws losing whatever setting they were on, but after adjusting them it now idles between 1k and 1.5k.

This would all be very good - it starts easily and the engine sounds OK to my ear. However, the main issue now is that it seems to be idling very rich. The plugs are getting black, the exhaust stinks of petrol and it seems to be drinking the stuff. I have tried backing the mixture screws out a bit. The engine will happily tolerate a bit, but started to sound unhappy if I went another full turn out. There still seemed to be a lot of unburned fuel in the exhaust.

A second potential problem is the main air jets have fuel in them again. I don't see that this would have any effect on the idling. They should only come into play when the throttle is opened up. It is also possible that this is due to me bouncing the bike to manoeuvre it out from storage to where I can run it. The first time after I put the carbs back on, I am fairly sure there was no fuel in these ports.

So I am a bit stumped now. What could be the cause it running rich? Or is this kind-of normal for old carbs?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 11 years, 205 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> The Workshop All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.12 Sec - Server Load: 0.56 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 82.92 Kb