|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Northern Monkey |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Northern Monkey World Chat Champion

Joined: 17 Nov 2013 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| DrSnoosnoo |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 DrSnoosnoo World Chat Champion

Joined: 28 Mar 2012 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| lihp |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 lihp World Chat Champion
Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Scotsman37 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Scotsman37 World Chat Champion
Joined: 17 Aug 2004 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 10:19 - 01 May 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
I convinced myself that I got slightly better cold starting with an iridium plug in my 125. Probably delusional though. ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| LaurenceR46 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 LaurenceR46 Renault 5 Driver

Joined: 28 Dec 2013 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Snorty |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Snorty World Chat Champion

Joined: 13 Oct 2010 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Baffler186 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Baffler186 World Chat Champion

Joined: 31 May 2013 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| ws4936 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ws4936 World Chat Champion

Joined: 10 Sep 2009 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| LaurenceR46 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 LaurenceR46 Renault 5 Driver

Joined: 28 Dec 2013 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Bubblin77 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Bubblin77 Nitrous Nuisance
Joined: 29 Apr 2013 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 11:46 - 01 May 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
Copper is a fantastic conductor, much more than the iridium coated crap, a new, properly gapped copper electrode will fire more accurately than the same in an iridium tip.
Iridium however doesn't wear as quickly as copper so the spark will remain more consistent for a given tip style.
Here's the crux, the finer and more sharp you can make the tip of an electrode the better the spark you will get, but that tip will wear quickly, hence if we had a fine copper tipped electrode it's would be good, but would breakdown within a few hundred miles. And the reason why the poor conducting iridium can be used, so its quite a trade off.
As long as your compression isn't too high, then a copper pointed electrode, gapped and tip reshaped every few hundred miles will win out, although iridium is far easier to maintain a good strong spark. ____________________ Kawasaki Z800 (SOLD) |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| map |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 map Mr Calendar

Joined: 14 Jun 2004 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 11:58 - 01 May 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
If I had a hard to work on bike with difficult to get to plugs (e.g VFR750) then I'd fit iridium plugs.
When riding it does give you a superior sense of using the latest technology, copper is so 20th century  ____________________ ...and the whirlwind is in the thorn trees, it's hard for thee to kick against the pricks...
Gibbs, what did Duckie look like when he was younger?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| kramdra |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 kramdra World Chat Champion

Joined: 28 Oct 2010 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Bubblin77 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Bubblin77 Nitrous Nuisance
Joined: 29 Apr 2013 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| temeluchus |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 temeluchus World Chat Champion

Joined: 01 Oct 2008 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 05:24 - 03 May 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Bubblin77 wrote: | Copper is a fantastic conductor, much more than the iridium coated crap, a new, properly gapped copper electrode will fire more accurately than the same in an iridium tip. |
To quote the wikipedia article:
| Quote: | In addition, electrons are emitted where the electrical field strength is greatest; this is from wherever the radius of curvature of the surface is smallest, from a sharp point or edge rather than a flat surface (see corona discharge). It would be easiest to pull electrons from a pointed electrode but a pointed electrode would erode after only a few seconds. Instead, the electrons emit from the sharp edges of the end of the electrode; as these edges erode, the spark becomes weaker and less reliable. |
| Quote: | The development of noble metal high temperature electrodes (using metals such as yttrium, iridium, tungsten, or palladium, as well as the relatively high value platinum, silver or gold) allows the use of a smaller center wire, which has sharper edges but will not melt or corrode away. These materials are used because of their high melting points and durability, not because of their electrical conductivity (which is irrelevant in series with the plug resistor or wires). The smaller electrode also absorbs less heat from the spark and initial flame energy. |
So an iridium coated fine tipped spark plug will perform better in every way than a standard copper plug..... mmmmn.....
I wonder if the difference in conductivity is even worth mentioning with the above in mind. Indeed copper is a better conductor than iridium, but iridium is a also a perfectly good conductor and certainly better than the 5KOhm resistor contained within the sparkplug? ____________________ Some shite cruiser. Now with guns and FREEDOM! |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Bubblin77 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Bubblin77 Nitrous Nuisance
Joined: 29 Apr 2013 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| temeluchus |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 temeluchus World Chat Champion

Joined: 01 Oct 2008 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| temeluchus |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 temeluchus World Chat Champion

Joined: 01 Oct 2008 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MattEMulsion |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MattEMulsion World Chat Champion

Joined: 29 Aug 2004 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 06:13 - 03 May 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
They also add approximately £500 to the selling price of a bike because "its got iridium plugs init bro"...  ____________________ Yamaha YZF-R6 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Fizzer Thou |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Fizzer Thou World Chat Champion

Joined: 06 Aug 2011 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 07:39 - 03 May 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
I have iridium plugs fitted to the R1 and the KTM enduro and they made a differance to throttle response.
But on the Exup1000 I fitted gold-paladium plugs and it made a similar differance.
And at £2.50 per plug (Maccess) then they were worthwhile  ____________________ Just talk bikes.What else is there?
Always have a 'Plan B' |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Teflon-Mike |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Teflon-Mike tl;dr

Joined: 01 Jun 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 08:20 - 03 May 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
A 'better' spark? In what way 'better'?
The spark sets the fire in the hole.
The Ignition Timing device tells it when.
I spent a term at uni with a Recardo Test Engine, polishing a perspex piston, playing with mixture strengths and ignition timing, measuring fuel consumption and brake force; and watching high-speed camera footage of the flame patterns in the pot.....
This is 'Tuning'.
Playing with all the different variables to find the 'optimums' where they work best 'Together'... and THAT is the key here. Make a change in isolation, and it's likely to screw the optimums, and make stuff WORSE unless you adjust all the other variables to find a new optimum for the variable you just changed... and even then, likely not to make anything 'better' overall, just shift the compromise around some-where.
The one saving grace of 'Performance' spark plugs, is that in all likelihood, they don't change fuck-all, and save the optimisation manufacturers have invested thousands of lab hours, or, these days, a few million computer-simulations, and a few hundred lab-hours arriving at!
A 'better' spark plug, shouldn't help 'find' any more power, any more economy, any more throttle response, or any 'easier' starting.
Any gain in spark energy from having greater conductivity... well, for a start, such a gain is going to be pretty small, tending to insignificant, but, even if it were as huge an increase as presumed, difference it would make to the engine performance is negligible.
The 'flame-front' is where burning charge sets fire to unburned charge next to it. Imagine a candle; you set fire to the wick, the flame moves down the candle as its burned away, I dont know, maybe an inch an hour depending how fat the candle is. Same thing happens in an engine.... just a lot faster! BUT, how fast the flame-front travels is pretty much a constant, fixed by the 'rate of chemical reaction' for turning fuel into CO2.
So your spark creates a 'fire ball', but it is absolutely tiny. Maybe, the size of a pin-head. Area of a sphere is 4/3Pi r2, volume, 4/3Pi r3.
And as the flame front progresses, R will increase at an 'almost' fixed rate, but, the area of flame front, will increase at 4x the square of that speed, the volume of charge burning, increasing at 4x the cube of the flame speed.
Its a bit like, the rice on the chess-board fable; if you place one grain of rice on the first square of the board, two on the next, four on the next, eight on the next and so on, doubling the number of grains of rice each time... how many squares will you have covered before a 50Kg sack of rice is empty? From memory, its something like the first two rows; by the 64th square you need something like all the rice in China, enough to cover the UK by to a depth of about six inches or something daft... but no matter... WE have finite amount of rice, one sack. And doubling the rice on each square, we run out after 16 squares.
So, start with two grains of ride on the first square instead of one... double the amount of fuel set on fire by your spark.... you run out of rice after 15 squares...not 16... doubling the initiator, lifts the start point one increment, it doesn't double the rate of exponential growth.
A better, bigger spark, then WONT burn your charge any faster... that's fixed by the rate of reaction. Wont burn you any MORE charge; that's fixed by the displacement of the cylinder.
At the VERY best... a bigger beefier spark, will merely increase the initial size of the flame front at point of initiation... and as that increases on an exponential, it will be incredibly insignificant to the overall combustion efficiency. We are talking one grain of rice in a 50Kilo sack difference!
That's the 'best' difference a better spark plug might achieve.... fuck all in real terms.
SO, unless you have built a hi-po motor and changed all the other variables and need to find a new optimum around them.... the only 'advantage' a better plug might offer is stability.
Plugs don't 'wear out' they are pretty much an inert device... yup, they errode... but take one out the pot, you can still get a spark from it, clean the electrodes, re-gap it, shove it back in.... might be a bit degraded from less sharp corners... BUT... the ability a plug has to effect anything, as explained is pretty bludy negligible.
So at best, all a 'performance' spark plug CAN do, is maintain the electrode gap within tolerance better, over a longer period of service.
Any benefit allegorically reported by buyers, is as likely to simply be from replacing a fucked old plug in a tired old engine with a nice new one, at the same time that tired engine gets a service, NOT from the miracle properties of snake-oil spark-plugs!
And on re-tuned engines? Well, again; its a spark plug. Its ability to 'enhance' engine performance is incredibly limited. If the ECU has been re-mapped to re-optimise fuel mixture and ignition timing? Its POSSIBLE that a different plug might be required, possibly with a different gap, to complete the new optimisation... but again... any 'improvement' found from such re-optimisation is likely to come from shifting the compromises in the engine map, NOT from the plug, and just as likely that a conventional plug of a suitable heat grade and gap would show the exact same improvements.
Buy them if you wish.... but its a bit like sticking a gold plated phono-plug on a pair of Pound-Land ear-phones, hoping for Sennheiser sound quality.... the Plug simply isn't the weakest link, and has little influence over the system as a whole to be able to make such a huge difference. ____________________ My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?' |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| lihp |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 lihp World Chat Champion
Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Bubblin77 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Bubblin77 Nitrous Nuisance
Joined: 29 Apr 2013 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| parkmoy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 parkmoy Scooby Slapper
Joined: 09 Jun 2011 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 09:08 - 03 May 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
Anecdotal evidence I know but when I had a 125 marauder I fitted an irrdium plug and I swear I got better performance from it. Might just have been a following wind though  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Teflon-Mike |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Teflon-Mike tl;dr

Joined: 01 Jun 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 09:25 - 03 May 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Bubblin77 wrote: | TEF, if the quality and size of the flame doesn't matter how come Ferrari fit spark plugs with the open side of the plug facing the chamber of the cyclinder, and why toyota sell different plugs for different cylinders so the spark plug sparks in a different place to get maximum effect. |
How does the positioning of the earth electrode in the combustion chamber effect the spark 'quality'?
It doesn't.
The electrode position may 'shroud' flame propagation as it burns out from the plug, and THAT can effect the combustion pattern hence efficiency.
Why do Ferarri do it?
Tradition, mainly.
Why do other people shim plugs to locate the electrode similar to Ferarri? 'cos Ferarri do it, so has to be a good idea, dunnit?
Why does it make a difference on 'old' Ferarri Engines?
Because to get the performance they did from thier older engine's, they used pretty crudimentary tuning principles; Big Valves to get as much charge in the pot as they could, and high compression ratio's to make as big a bang as possible... combustion chamber shapes were often not particularly efficient, and the spark plug not initiating the burn in the most effective location.
Those were the compromises they chose to make to 'optimise' their engines for the power they wanted from them.
And if a copper plug needs electrode aligning in a Ferarri, so will an irridium.
While if you have to align a single electrode copper plug in a Ferarri engine to make it work properly... electrode 'shrouding' being THAT significant on that engine...
WOULD sort of suggest that a multi-electrode plug is probably not a great plug to fit, as which electrode would you alight to? With pairs 180 degrees about, you are probably going to put an electrode exactly where Ferrari found its NOT helpful!
As for Toyota; I dont know what 'different' plugs they may be selling for different pots on different engines. But again; the point is, that the engine is a system, in which ALL components have to work in harmony. And the manufacturers look for and set those 'optimums' in thier specs. Having two different grade or gap plugs in a motor, is little different to having carbs where two out of four have different jets; to get the 'optimum' overall for the system, due to perhaps hotter running on those two cylinders, or for lean running on them caused by exhaust plumbing.
Look at the design of a spark-plug. The business end, the gap, where spark happens, JUST makes a spark to get the fire lit. There is little or no magic in it, or in the materials its made from.
You have gap, you have electrons one side, you have depletion of electrons the other, energy 'jumps' the gap, starts a fire.
What matters is where the fire goes from there.... and the plug has bog all influence over that.
Rest of the plug, and most of the difference between different grades of plug is the design of the beak, to avoid deposits or heat building up, that could create 'hot-spots' that might set the charge on fire before ignition system triggers the spark. ____________________ My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?' |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 11 years, 232 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|