Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


England: - Total Smoking Ban on 1st July 2007.

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

akaDAVE
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:00 - 04 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I generally avoid pubs where everyone's got BO, but you're right, the air would be anything but fresh.
I expect pubs will need to get thier carpets and upholstry cleaned to rid them of the stale smell otherwise the smell of fresh smoke would actually be preferable.
____________________
GSXR600
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

JonB
Afraid of Mileage



Joined: 03 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:12 - 04 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had heard that the age of buying tobacco was being raised to 18, to coincide with alcohol, but I cannot remember if it is still going ahead. I believe it was going to happen when the ban comes in.
____________________
Be careful whose advice you buy, but, be patient with those who supply it. Advice is a form of nostalgia, dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than it?s worth.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Mudskipper
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:22 - 04 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'll be glad of it, will help me quit properly.

Works fine in Ireland from what I've experienced, once it's in place here everyone will stop bleating about it. Wink

Scare stories of pavements/doorways spilling over with crowds of smokers, reminds me of the 'debauchery, violence and continuous state of drunkeness for all' warnings when 24 hour licenses for pubs came in!! Laughing
____________________
CBR125|||GSXR400|||CBR400|||CBR400|||CB250RS|||GSXR750|||CB250RS Mr. Green
"You're clumsy, you eat too much and you behave like a 12 year old boy. But you know what? Every once in a while, you find a thumb."
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

gixxersixx
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 17 Sep 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:02 - 05 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

It would just be nice if there were a choice of smoking and non smoking bars and clubs. That way if the smokers wanted to go to a bar where they can smoke they can, and like wise if the non smokers want to drink in a smoke free environment then they should be able to, I wouldnt want anyone who doesnt smoke to work in a bar where smoking is permitted if they dont want to which is the majority at the moment. But just give everyone the choice on this were all adults apparently and can make those choices.
____________________
We're all just born to die. So lets have some fun
gsxr6k1,pc,k&n,skimmed block,flowed head,yoshi gasket,cams,blue print,arrow system titanium can,quick shifter,gilles rear sets,ktech forks,ohlins shock,galfer waveys, -3front+4rear + other goodies
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

byke95
World Chat Champion



Joined: 25 Mar 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:51 - 05 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I see this issue being quite black and white:

This ban is not (solely) intended to stop people smoking, just protect the majority who do not smoke from a harmful substance (and here's the important bit) in public places.

I can't see this slipping into banning all 'dangerous' behaviour (motorbikes, cars, being male aged 18-25 etc.) either as there is no real link between them. If it got to the point where motorcyclists were causing the deaths of 700-800 'non-bikers' when riding each year, I'd expect any government to take steps to reduce this, and as a biker I'd support it.

You'll still be able to smoke at home, at private clubs and at pubs that do not serve food (arguments of beer nuts etc. seem arbitrary, awkward and ill-informed). Therefore, smokers will still have a choice, just not the choice to smoke around those who do not wish to smoke. This sounds fair to me.

For what it's worth, I'm a smoker and look forward to the change.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:49 - 05 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

byke95 wrote:

You'll still be able to smoke at home, at private clubs and at pubs that do not serve food (arguments of beer nuts etc. seem arbitrary, awkward and ill-informed). Therefore, smokers will still have a choice, just not the choice to smoke around those who do not wish to smoke. This sounds fair to me.

No, you will not be able to smoke at pubs that do not serve food. I believe that is the old rules that are now in place?

The new rules say no smoking anywhere.

Now, I definitely don't smoke in pubs/clubs and would probably prefer to go to ones where smoking isn't allowed. But, the fact is that at the moment I choose to go to pubs/clubs where I know there will be smoking. Nobody has forced me to do this - it is purely my own choice. I will no longer have that choice.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

byke95
World Chat Champion



Joined: 25 Mar 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:59 - 05 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:
But, the fact is that at the moment I choose to go to pubs/clubs where I know there will be smoking. Nobody has forced me to do this - it is purely my own choice. I will no longer have that choice.


But is the smoking/not smoking a conscious/active choice in your evening's plans?

Where a pub is, how much it costs, what type of people go there, if my friends can get there (and if they want to go there), what time it closes restrict my 'free will' and 'choice' far more than smoking/not smoking ever has or will do.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:10 - 05 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

No, it's not really.
If I was an out and out non-smoker (usually reformed smokers, ime) I may well choose to go to a non-smoking pub, but it's not a big thing to me.

And that's the point; if it was a big thing to me and other people, then they would choose to go to non-smoking establishments.


I do to some degree see that millions is spent in advertising to encourage people to start smoking; so perhaps there should be more 'anti' effort.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:32 - 05 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

byke95 wrote:
I can't see this slipping into banning all 'dangerous' behaviour (motorbikes, cars, being male aged 18-25 etc.) either as there is no real link between them.


Way more people are killed in bike / pedestrian accidents than in car / pedestrian accidents.People choose to go to smokey places (or choose not to). There are choices. Hardly like you are going to drink alcohol for your health.

It comes down to choice, and stamping down on a minority for the benefit of a larger minority is getting common. Could easily be bikes getting heavily stamped on due to noisy exhausts.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

byke95
World Chat Champion



Joined: 25 Mar 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:57 - 06 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
Way more people are killed in bike / pedestrian accidents than in car / pedestrian accidents.People choose to go to smokey places (or choose not to). There are choices. Hardly like you are going to drink alcohol for your health.


Sure, but that links bike/pedestrian deaths with car/pedestrian deaths, but neither with smoking.

kickstart wrote:
It comes down to choice, and stamping down on a minority for the benefit of a larger minority is getting common. Could easily be bikes getting heavily stamped on due to noisy exhausts.


Again, the link between smokers and bikes; can you really compare something that has been proven (I use the word with some reservation, perhaps "linked' would be better) to cause ill-health to non-smokers be compared to noisy motorcycle exhausts?

As for choice, as I mentioned above I can't see how a ban on smoking limits 'choice' further than the realms common sense and politeness?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

True Blue
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:33 - 06 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:
But, the fact is that at the moment I choose to go to pubs/clubs where I know there will be smoking. Nobody has forced me to do this - it is purely my own choice. I will no longer have that choice.


Maybe London is different, but in Scotland before the ban I didn't go to a pub where I knew there would be smoking, by choice. I had no choice as there were no non smoking pubs! I suppose now that the smokers have all the choice. They know where they can't smoke and can choose not to go if the don't like it.

Quote:
Why cant people be given the choice and have areas for smoking and non smoking. I'm not saying different areas of the same room but totally separate rooms if the facilities are available. Then if you wish to smoke you can go to the smoking room.


Well I think I'm right in saying that they have had this choice for a very long time. However they didn't bother their arse with decent air filtering, smoking rooms etc as profit comes before customers wellbeing.

Lots of people moaned about the ban before it came into place in Scotland. The reality now is that it works very well and the general consensus is that it was a good idea. You'll be surprised how little policing it needs.
____________________
Past >>>> Honda NSR 125 >>>> Suzuki GSXR 600 K1 >>>> Suzuki GSXR 600 K4 >>>>Kawasaki Z1000 DAF >>>>Suzuki RMZ 250 >>>> Current >>>> KTM Superduke R 1290 >>>>
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:48 - 06 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

byke95 wrote:
Sure, but that links bike/pedestrian deaths with car/pedestrian deaths, but neither with smoking.


No, just illustrates the links between different things that will be used to justify knee jerk legislation. Next time it might well be used to screw over something that affects you.

byke95 wrote:
Again, the link between smokers and bikes; can you really compare something that has been proven (I use the word with some reservation, perhaps "linked' would be better) to cause ill-health to non-smokers be compared to noisy motorcycle exhausts?


No, just stronly suspect that there are a hell of a lot more letters to MPs complaining about noisy motorcycles and that something must be done than there are about people smoking in pubs.

byke95 wrote:
As for choice, as I mentioned above I can't see how a ban on smoking limits 'choice' further than the realms common sense and politeness?


Err, how about the example of now no choice to have a smoking area of a pub?

There are lots of things that minorities do that other larger minorities would like to stop. Encourage it and look forward to having others give up any tolerance of your activities.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

byke95
World Chat Champion



Joined: 25 Mar 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:13 - 06 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
There are lots of things that minorities do that other larger minorities would like to stop. Encourage it and look forward to having others give up any tolerance of your activities.

All the best

Keith


Some good points there, but you may have missed that I am the minority in this case, I'm a smoker. The majority of smokers I socialise with also 'don't mind' the ban.

Nine times out of ten I subscribe to the above belief, but even as a smoker I understand how a ban on smoking in public places makes sense.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:38 - 07 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

So why not rules allowing a seperate smoking area for those who want it.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

byke95
World Chat Champion



Joined: 25 Mar 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:37 - 07 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
So why not rules allowing a seperate smoking area for those who want it.


I'd guess that it's a 'finite' ban as defining what constitutes an 'area' or even a 'room' would make any ruling impossible to enforce:

Many pubs already have smoking areas/no smoking at the bar but, as the evidence would suggest, this does not stop the dangers of passive smoking.

A well ventilated smoking room does sounds fine, but I personally don't know of any pubs with a 'room' to spare. Again, what constitutes a room would also leave a grey area. When traveling Canada I understood smoking to be banned, but such rooms existed: most of the time they were little 'perspex boxes' within the main pub area, and they were crammed with smokers. Of all the places I travelled I smoked the least in Canada, the perspex boxes just looked like gas chambers (and it was far too cold to go outside! Smile ).

I don't see a ban as perfect, but the only way to cover all bases. I don't feel my right to 'choose' is infringed beyond what is fair to myself (I can still smoke, just not in 'public places'), and those around me who do not smoke.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:36 - 07 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

byke95 wrote:
I'd guess that it's a 'finite' ban as defining what constitutes an 'area' or even a 'room' would make any ruling impossible to enforce:


Seems like a fairly dubious way of doing things. Coming up with harsh laws just because it is a touch too hard to write a sensible law is pretty extreme.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Krakatoa
Borekit Bruiser



Joined: 05 Jun 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:54 - 07 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

bazza wrote:
Villers wrote:
II also like the idea of refusing to treat patients who smoke, and or fat.


I think that's a great idea.

Of course we'd all have to be refunded every penny we've paid in tobacco tax and NI contributions just to make sure you smug cnuts aren't profiting from us.

I'm sure you'd enjoy the resulting third world shithole of a country you'd be left with as a result.


Common sense. For every £1 I cost the NHS, I pay back nearly £4. Personally, i think i have more right to treatment than a non smoker, considering i also pay the same taxes as you.

As for fat people, why not tax cakes,chocolates etc like ciggies? I should imagine that would slow a few people down.

The Governments an arse. You moan about cigarette's? What about the millions of cars out there? Industry? It`s just another piss poorly thought out and implimented idea.

If cigarette`s are that bad, why even sell them?
____________________
Tatty(but loved) NC 24.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

True Blue
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:25 - 07 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think some people are missing the point a bit. On the whole most people couldn't give a fuck if it's more healthy to be in a non smoking pub. I've never been in a pub and heard someone moan about passive smoking killing them off. It's more about the fact that the smoke nips your eyes, tastes disgusting and stinks the place out. Being healthy is just a bonus.
____________________
Past >>>> Honda NSR 125 >>>> Suzuki GSXR 600 K1 >>>> Suzuki GSXR 600 K4 >>>>Kawasaki Z1000 DAF >>>>Suzuki RMZ 250 >>>> Current >>>> KTM Superduke R 1290 >>>>
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Louise
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:38 - 08 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Im for and against this happening. Its our social life and were now being told what to do.
Hell, I hope it helps me give up - But, I still think its wrong to do an outright ban.
We have a non smoking part in our pub, we couldnt extend this as its an old building that cant be touched.
Now were having to fork out loads for a 'smokers room outside'
It will be really intresting to see what happens.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

GodzGift
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:54 - 08 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

ok guys pretty much most of the concerns have been mentioned, and since its been decided there is sweet f,a, that anything can be done about it.

I smoke only when i drink, and after meals etc etc, i was recently in ireland for 3 months and over there they have already implemented this non-smoking policy.over there they allocated small places either inside the club outside specially for smokers so its not that bad. That way it gave smokers to have a smoke and not affect other people.

Now in the uk, where its getting more and more cramped, it will be hard to provide spaces for smokers outside let alone inside, imagine the places in london, no space.

What does this mean for the smokers i.e. myself: Nothing, its a law which all pubs/clubs etc etc will follow so everyone will learn to live with it.

What will this mean for the Landlords of club owners: well theyll be able to increase turn over by creating smoking zones in the places.

As mentioned I have seen this first hand, the clubs are going to stink more and more and more. people B.O. people puking, ( ill stop getting graphic), all these smells are neutralized (lol) by the cigarette smell. so expect some stinking nights out.

now, i could write all day on this topic so as a casual smoker and since i have respect for other peoples health ill say why not its not a bad idea. The smokers will have to get used to it, smoke outside, smoke in the toilets which everyone will, but affectively not kill each other.

i just think if they made airconditioning mandatory then would have been the same thing. the amount of pollution on the street (i.e. london since i live here) that will probably have more of a impact on my health.

Reasons i gave doesnt justify us not implementing this Ban, but then again the Ban isnt the best choice.

Thumbs Up
____________________
Bike Level: Amateur | CBT Passed
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Richard Green
Crazy Courier



Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:17 - 23 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I GUESS WHEN EVERYONE QUITS SMOKING MR brown will then be looking at heavier taxes somewhere else to off set the losses , did anyone think of that one Sad
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:08 - 24 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

More to the point, higher taxes will be needed to support the greater number of people surviving in retirement and their associated medical bills.

Smokers generally have the good grace to die before they cost the country large amounts in pensions and medical bills.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

True Blue
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:59 - 24 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'll be happy to pay my share of the offset if it means a smoke free enviroment.
____________________
Past >>>> Honda NSR 125 >>>> Suzuki GSXR 600 K1 >>>> Suzuki GSXR 600 K4 >>>>Kawasaki Z1000 DAF >>>>Suzuki RMZ 250 >>>> Current >>>> KTM Superduke R 1290 >>>>
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

robboadd
Nitrous Nuisance



Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:13 - 24 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its a great idea. I just got back from Canada, it works really well, people who are saying itll smell of BO and stale beer are talking rubbish.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Louise
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:40 - 24 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I hate smokers near me when I am having a meal so for one I will be happy. However, when im drinking its not so bad.
But recently I have had to move because the smell of smoke is just making me ill and more ill each day. I smell it everyday at work so, that will be good once it has gone.
I still think tho, its un-called for, my social time being told what I can and what I cant do Thumbs Down
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 19 years, 249 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.18 Sec - Server Load: 0.47 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 142.89 Kb