Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Official bike parking charges in London revealed

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

kawakid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:43 - 03 Jan 2007    Post subject: Official bike parking charges in London revealed Reply with quote

https://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/6227709.stm

The one thing I like about biking is free parking, up here my local council provides great parking for bikes, next to the police station, under cover, anchor bars ohh and its free. Another North South win.
____________________
I've a twin and a 4.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

LustyLew
World Chat Champion



Joined: 19 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:56 - 03 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

If I had to pay £12.50 a month to ensure I get a space and a nice solid bar to chain my bike to, then I'm all for it.

It's still a fraction of the cost of the train, or driving!

Where I park at the moment is pure carnage.
____________________
Like a Yorkie - I'm not for the girls Wink
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Stiffler
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:06 - 03 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

So let me just do a quick bit of conservative maths:

~4000 spaces all charged at £1.50 a day = £6000 a day

£30,000 a week or £1,560,000 a year....

Think they can afford to build space for 500 more bikes with that?? Call me a cynic, but does anyone else think this is just a cover story for yet another way for councils to make money out of the road users of this country??

Tim
____________________
Current Bikes - Kawasaki ZX-6R (636) | BMW G650GS
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

sickpup
Old Timer



Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:09 - 03 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Although I disagree with it I can understand it.

As LH-ER5 knows all the parking spaces in the square mile are filled by 8am on a weekday, theres over 2000 of them. Think about that, over 2000 spaces in a square mile!

Theres a huge amount of spaces in central London and every space equals lost revenue.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

techierob
Traffic Copper



Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:17 - 03 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The fees are needed to expand parking for the increase in motorcycles following the introduction of the congestion charge


Quote:
"Whilst I understand why bikers will be annoyed that they are going to have to start to pay, I realise that the funding has to come from somewhere," Mr Beeley said


it's fact that both the public departments and private companies involved in implementing the congestion charge make ludicrous amounts of money out of it. Why not use that money to fix the problem, or is that too obvious?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

JonB
Afraid of Mileage



Joined: 03 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:19 - 03 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

London does not equate to the South of England dummy!

Everywhere else has free bike parking. In the South.
____________________
Be careful whose advice you buy, but, be patient with those who supply it. Advice is a form of nostalgia, dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than it?s worth.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

headlamp
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Nov 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:36 - 03 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Both the Westminster & Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea's schemes to charge bikes is a cynical attempt to recover revenues lost through the congestion charge as more cars don't drive into Central London.

Kensington are proposing only allowing residents to park in motorcycling 'bays' & pay for the privilege anyone else on two wheels will not be allowed.....or park on a standard meter. Westminster, by offering an extra 500 places in bays as well as secure parking is trying to justify a 'tax' on bikes. The non-cynical solution is to allow bikes to park anywhere, as long as they don't cause an obstruction, on single yellow lines with the exception being residents bays. At the same time, all the bus lanes in London should be open to PTW's.
____________________
Using a mobile phone while driving a car should be made a capital offence!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

TheDonUK
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:37 - 03 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Living, working and now commuting to and from the affected areas this is a joke,

using stiffler's figures and saying there are 4000 spaces, can a mere 500 spaces justify a tax?, Why not double the length of every bike bay(where "safe"), so maybe you get another 3000+ spaces, at the expense of car spaces (or remove unnecessary yellow lines), after all is that not at least the premise of what they claim to intend to do with the congestion charge and numerous other propasals currently in effect or at the green paper stage

Have they considered the problem of desplaying licences or tickets on a bike... Issues such as Theft, Weather, Location to be displayed... or will we all have to register with a system, which i would imagine make the ticket issuing processes instantaneous, removing the ability to ride off before the ticket is placed on the bike.

Most places i go regularly i know backstreet/offroad places to park and (touch wood) havent been ticketed when parked in them.

If they bring this in, may have to buy a Velcro numberplate Smile
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Project9928
Traffic Copper



Joined: 19 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:51 - 03 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wouldn't fantsy leaving my bike in Central London anyway, even if it has a more chains then you can carry....... its still going to get nicked!

Paying for the privilage to have your bike stolen..... great Rolling Eyes

Then again that only applies if you can find a space in the first place.

Like most councils they will use the money to make a 2nd rate shelter, which will be covered in graffity within 2 minutes of it being put up. No doubt they will then be used as a toilet during the night. Not to mention they would probably use a bit of copper pipe for you to lock your bike to.

The rest of the money will be used to screw over the bikers and then the cost of parking a bike in London will increase every year.

I'm sure they mean well Wink Wink
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

flat eric
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 23 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:18 - 03 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

it's a blinking disgrace that they are being allowed to force this upon the biking community. although i'm from north wales, i am not in the slightest for it. it's only a matter of time when other councils get their budgets cut, that they start to look around for ways to claw some money from other means.
think back to when they brought in the congestion charge to reduce traffic in London city centre. now that they have reduced the traffic (as they set out to do), their proffits are down. now hang on, i thought the only reason was to reduce traffic, not make money form the poor already overtaxed public.
no.... they have got greedy, and because they were making so much money, now that it's started to go down (the revenue that is), they want to access other areas of revenue.
So the reason it was brought in, was to make money Ahhhh, now i see (wink,wink,nudge,nudge).
and now that the revenue has gone down, they are now charging bikers to park their bikes in what must be described as minute areas.
and i'd like to know how we are supposed to stop people from nicking the tickets ?

i will be contacting my council to see what their stance is.
i'm with you brothers from the south. Thumbs Up
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

yambabe
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:47 - 03 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can all you Londoners clear something up for a poor ignorant Northern lass here? The impression I am getting from the replies is that the congestion charge is made by the various London Boroughs, specifically their councils.

Is it not the case that the revenue from the congestion charge actually goes to TFL and not the Boroughs at all, so the introduction of it shouldn't have made any difference to Borough revenue? Unless possibly there are now a few empty car parking spaces knocking about the place that would have previously been paid for by car drivers maybe?

Having read the Westminster proposals in some detail (and AFAIK they are still only proposals, you can download them from here) the one thing that I picked up on was that they would not be doing anything until they had a system for ticketing or identifying the bikes that were there legally. I have not heard anything yet to suggest that they have found one.

Maybe anyone who is likely to be affected could liase with their local MAG group (or even better, join if they haven't already) which would be this one?
____________________
Sod falling in love, I wanna fall in chocolate. Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

map
Mr Calendar



Joined: 14 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:59 - 03 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

flat eric wrote:
...how we are supposed to stop people from nicking the tickets ?...

Slightly off topic but in the car parks in York you can pay via mobile phone. Need to register a card first but it's a cashless solution. BTW there are some free parking for bikes in York still (see here) Thumbs Up Very Happy. At the others (well St. Georges) I put it on the islands for the lighting, not taking a parking bay as such and (touch wood) haven't got a ticket so far.

One of the best if unlikely places I've found for bike parking is in Hull. In the city centre there are marked bays with nice metal bars to chain to, plus it's free. Not too many mind but then I've always found a place.

As said, keeping a watch on this as, like the congestion charging, it's likely to spread from London to the rest of us Mad

Thumbs Up
____________________
...and the whirlwind is in the thorn trees, it's hard for thee to kick against the pricks...
Gibbs, what did Duckie look like when he was younger? Very Happy


Last edited by map on 16:59 - 03 Jan 2007; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Adam_P
World Chat Champion



Joined: 23 Jan 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:59 - 03 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm more concerned about the maths of either the person that wrote the BBC article or the government/council person that gave them out...

I mean, 16,000 bikes ride into central londn every day, there's currently 4000 spaces and they're only going to increase this by 500...

Thinking Eh? Brick Wall
____________________
Colin McRae MBE 1968 - 2007 RIP Sad
Orwell Rolls in his Grave
God is imaginary
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

TheDonUK
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:12 - 03 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

babyyam wrote:
Can all you Londoners clear something up for a poor ignorant Northern lass here? The impression I am getting from the replies is that the congestion charge is made by the various London Boroughs, specifically their councils.

Is it not the case that the revenue from the congestion charge actually goes to TFL and not the Boroughs at all, so the introduction of it shouldn't have made any difference to Borough revenue? Unless possibly there are now a few empty car parking spaces knocking about the place that would have previously been paid for by car drivers maybe?

Having read the Westminster proposals in some detail (and AFAIK they are still only proposals, you can download them from here) the one thing that I picked up on was that they would not be doing anything until they had a system for ticketing or identifying the bikes that were there legally. I have not heard anything yet to suggest that they have found one.

Maybe anyone who is likely to be affected could liase with their local MAG group (or even better, join if they haven't already) which would be this one?


You are right Congestion charge money goes to Ken Livingstone and TFL, but in theory if the money is used as it should be, public transport and transport infrastructure should be improved to the benefit of all local boroughs and inturn the people that live there...

Bikes do not cause congestion, infact they reduce it if people switch to bikes.

Also i wonder if we dont have a system in place already, The congestion charge cameras take your picture and if you dont pay (online or wherever) within a certain time you get a bigger fine, So swap cameras for traffic wardens with cameras. And you have parking hell...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

headlamp
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Nov 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:13 - 03 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

babyyam wrote:
Is it not the case that the revenue from the congestion charge actually goes to TFL and not the Boroughs at all, so the introduction of it shouldn't have made any difference to Borough revenue? Unless possibly there are now a few empty car parking spaces knocking about the place that would have previously been paid for by car drivers maybe?

The revenues generated go to TfL, who ostensibly use the money for increased bus services. Councils, such as Westminster (in particular) have seen a decrease in revenue from meters - which charge approx. £4 an hour so are looking to recoup the money through bikes. Twisted Evil
____________________
Using a mobile phone while driving a car should be made a capital offence!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Paivi
World Chat Champion



Joined: 30 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:19 - 03 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm more interested in this proposal:

BBC wrote:
The council is also proposing a new by-law which will allow traffic wardens to penalise car drivers for parking in the motorbike-only spaces.

So, at the moment it's legal for a car to park in a bike bay (presumably without paying, as that's not needed in a bike bay) but if a bike parks in a car bay without paying, it's ticketed?

LH-ER5 wrote:
If I had to pay £12.50 a month to ensure I get a space and a nice solid bar to chain my bike to, then I'm all for it.

So am I. If they made the bays, not only bigger, but with separate spaces, I'd be tempted to take the Ducati out more often.

sickpup wrote:
As LH-ER5 knows all the parking spaces in the square mile are filled by 8am on a weekday, theres over 2000 of them. Think about that, over 2000 spaces in a square mile!

There are loads of spaces in the Corporation carparks, which are free for bikes. A well kept secret, it would seem, as the London Wall one has loads of empty spaces every day.

headlamp wrote:
Kensington are proposing only allowing residents to park in motorcycling 'bays' & pay for the privilege anyone else on two wheels will not be allowed.....or park on a standard meter.

When I heard about this, I got quite excited, as I can never park my bike in the bays near my flat. Then I got the details and saw that none of the bays near me are affected, which means that they'll be even fuller, as non-residents are forced to relocate from the new residents only bays.

What the council was first going to do was to extend existing bays by 1-3 places and put ground anchors on these and reserve them to residents. I pointed out to them that this won't work, as this would require PAs to get down on all fours to check for residents parking permits so they would be used by non-residents, too.


Adam_P wrote:
I'm more concerned about the maths of either the person that wrote the BBC article or the government/council person that gave them out...

I mean, 16,000 bikes ride into central londn every day, there's currently 4000 spaces and they're only going to increase this by 500...

16,000 in Central London, 4,000 spaces in Westminster only. Add to that the Corporation, Kensington & Chelsea, Camden and any other council the article writers mean by Central London.

But even so, no matter how you look at it, there's a huge shortfall of spaces.

Even worse are residents parking permits: Kensington & Chelsea keep issuing more and more permits while cutting the amount of bays; there are now almost exactly twice as many permits as there are residents' bays. Go figure...
____________________
My other bike's a Monster... Wink
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Keir
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:32 - 03 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

reading that article has made me think..... 4500 spaces at £1 a day over 5 days a week (the bays are empty at weekends) would equal the £80,000 price tag of the proposed works in just 3 and a half weeks. Ok so supposing 'they' have to cover the cost of parking enforcement during this time then it will go on for what... 4-5 weeks max? would the charge then be cancelled as it has paid for itself? no, it wont because they are sneaky little fucking runts too spineless to admit that this is the beginning of a bike congestion charge.
I couldnt give a toss about the parking charge as i have private parking under my work building but i would be more than happy to pay £1 a day for these 5 weeks for these spaces as they can be handy when popping out. give a little take alot springs to mind.

rant over.
____________________
Current : '08 Yamaha FZ1s
Previous: '99 Honda CBR 600FX, 03 ZX636 B1H, 99 Fazer 600 (red), 02 GSX-R 600 K2, 00 SV650s (red), 2008 ZX10R, 97 Bandit 1200N, 04 ZX6RR K1H, 04 GSX-R 1000, 98 Fazer 600 (gold), 05 Madness 110 Pit bike, 04 CR125R, 00 SV650s (black), 06 KTM 625 SMC, 99 SRAD 600 track bike, 03 SV650, 98 Bandit 1200N, Bandit 600SY, 03 GSX-R 600 K3, 01 GSX-R 600, 01 Fazer 600 (black), VFR 400 NC30 x3, 78 Honda Dream, 00 Speedfight 50
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

White Noise
Mr Dudwee



Joined: 17 Dec 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:54 - 03 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

whats next push bike bays? running shoe bays?
WN
____________________
Buy my wife: 96' Yam XJ600s (Diversion)
Wing Commander White Noise - SE Clique
Riding Tip #86: See God, then back off a bit: Problem is i haven't seen god yet, just a close up of tarmac on revett straight
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

natv4
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 31 Dec 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:59 - 03 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would certainly worry that this is the thin edge of the wedge. It may only be a pound fifty now, but that will only increase.

All those of you who think that this won't affect you...do you really believe that bike parking everywhere else will escape? As soon as one borough successfully starts charging for parking, so will everyone else.

London needs to start thinking. Everyone who lives (or has lived) in an area where they find it difficult to park their vehicle each night. Where resident bays are not only required but over used. Bikes an answer to this. The more people whom opt to use a PTW instead of keeping a car (use a cab when needs be), the less of this problem we will have.

If you think, hey why should we let others use our residents bays, then remember when you want to go somewhere (visit a friend) then you will not be allowed to park at your destination either.

Other than for the previously mentioned financial considerations of the boroughs, there seems no good reason not to promote biking as a saviour. In central London, 1 old Victorian house could easily be 3 flats each containing 2 people. Thats 6 people and their vehicles to fit into around 1.5 car spaces outside the door. In that 1.5 car spaces you could easily accomodate 6 bikes. Not everyone is willing or able to give up the car for a bike, but we should encourage those whom are willing to.

Now where do I sign up for MAG/BMF?
____________________
Travelling around the world...a bit at a time. Where am I now? / Visit my BLOG
Bike: Blue Honda VFR800fi (*NEW*) Mileage: 22k Countries visited: GB/F/D/CZ/PL/E/I/B/A/HR/H/Rus/E/MA
West Europe...2004, East Europe...2005, Russia/France...2006, Morocco...2007
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

tintin
Traffic Copper



Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:14 - 04 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

This was something that was proposed a couple of years ago. I park in Camden (just) so I will probably be affected by riders parking for free in the already crowded bays. Opposite our office are 2 car bays which were for doctors, the parking restriction plate has 'fallen off' and so you can park there without getting a ticket. Two car spaces can easily fit the 14 bikes that normally park there.

Is there an online petition or something similar?
____________________
The older I get the better I was
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

natv4
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 31 Dec 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:41 - 04 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

https://www.free4bikers.org.uk/

This was the nearest thing I could find. I haven't read through properly yet, so I'm not sure if they are going to send it off. I would have hoped someone would have created a petition from the gov.uk site as that would seem more official.
____________________
Travelling around the world...a bit at a time. Where am I now? / Visit my BLOG
Bike: Blue Honda VFR800fi (*NEW*) Mileage: 22k Countries visited: GB/F/D/CZ/PL/E/I/B/A/HR/H/Rus/E/MA
West Europe...2004, East Europe...2005, Russia/France...2006, Morocco...2007
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

techierob
Traffic Copper



Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:48 - 04 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

headlamp wrote:
The revenues generated go to TfL, who ostensibly use the money for increased bus services. Councils, such as Westminster (in particular) have seen a decrease in revenue from meters - which charge approx. £4 an hour so are looking to recoup the money through bikes. Twisted Evil


so, if tfl (and it's privately run partners) are profiting from a scheme that cuts into the revenue of the councils, can't the councils demand that tfl pay to fix the problems that it caused? It's unfair to demand that the public foot the bill again, especially considering the amounts of money that tfl and (indirectly) capita are making out of the scheme. It seems ludicrous that tfl can give 31 million pounds 'compensation' to capita for outstanding penalty notices but it won't even consider footing the bill to solve the parking crisis that it's responsible for.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

natv4
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 31 Dec 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:16 - 04 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whatever happens, the public are the ones whom foot the bill for any of this.

The boroughs are not allowed to profit from parking, sadly this does not mean they don't. It also does not mean they won't try and recover their supposedly lost revenue.

Its just that they won't admit to why they are doing things.

Shame on everyone whom completed the questionaire and said they would not mind being charged.
____________________
Travelling around the world...a bit at a time. Where am I now? / Visit my BLOG
Bike: Blue Honda VFR800fi (*NEW*) Mileage: 22k Countries visited: GB/F/D/CZ/PL/E/I/B/A/HR/H/Rus/E/MA
West Europe...2004, East Europe...2005, Russia/France...2006, Morocco...2007
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

krebsy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:50 - 04 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

techierob wrote:
Quote:
The fees are needed to expand parking for the increase in motorcycles following the introduction of the congestion charge


So, let me get this straight....

1.No congestion charging=no money.
2.Congestion charging=money
3.Time+Congestion charging+some additional bikes-some fewer cars =slightly less money.

4.slightly less money than before but much more than none originally=not enough?

5. Doesn't add up. They are still getting money. If the reason for the charge is to reduce the congestion then the ultimate goal is 0 revenue from charge due to 0 congestion, not let's top up the money we are now getting to the maximum we have raised from the charge to get us all our profits again....

Unless my maths are rubbish.. Smile

K.
____________________
What's my New Year's resolution?

1280 x 1024.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

techierob
Traffic Copper



Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:21 - 04 Jan 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

krebsy wrote:
Doesn't add up. They are still getting money. If the reason for the charge is to reduce the congestion then the ultimate goal is 0 revenue from charge due to 0 congestion, not let's top up the money we are now getting to the maximum we have raised from the charge to get us all our profits again....


As far as I can tell, tfl (which is a private enterprise in every way that counts) is making a profit from the congestion charge but the councils themselves (which are funded by taxes from the local residents) are losing money as a result of the scheme. tfl seem to be quite happily contriving ways to indirectly skim off profits for themselves through the companies they contract while the councils are looking elsewhere to make up the shortfall.

I'm taking the whole issue rather personally so I'm certain I'm oversimplifying things quite a bit, but the net result appears to be public money making its way to private profit with no discernable benefit to the people who are ultimately footing the bill.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 18 years, 364 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.13 Sec - Server Load: 0.87 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 146.79 Kb