|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Skudd |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Skudd Super Spammer

Joined: 01 Oct 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 14:15 - 28 Jan 2007 Post subject: Amazement |
 |
|
I'm not trying to be pedantic in any way but it does wind me up when authors and corrispondents use " TXT " speach such as; cuz, ppl, u,2,midz,foned,wanna,pls,m8 and the like when posting ordinary language for ease and quickness but can type out in full ; fuck, fucking, pricks, cunts, bastards, wankers, tits and other such profanity. Now I'm not saying that I don't use language like this but once upon a time the profanity was shortened and the correct language was left alone. ____________________ Famous last words of Humpty Dumpty. " Stop pushing me "
Petty Anarchists look at "1984".............. The Visionary looks at "Animal Farm". |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Mr.Everready |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Mr.Everready World Chat Champion

Joined: 28 Mar 2003 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| iruleurass |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 iruleurass Derestricted Danger
Joined: 02 Sep 2006 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| NickD |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 NickD World Chat Champion

Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Finglonga |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Finglonga World Chat Champion

Joined: 27 Jul 2004 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| TheShaggyDA |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TheShaggyDA Repost Police

Joined: 14 Jun 2004 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Shaun |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Shaun Likes 'em bent

Joined: 17 May 2003 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| CortezTheKill... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 CortezTheKill... Could Be A Chat Bot

Joined: 19 Sep 2006 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 17:04 - 28 Jan 2007 Post subject: Re: Amazement |
 |
|
| Skudd wrote: | I'm not trying to be pedantic in any way but it does wind me up when authors and corrispondents use " TXT " speach such as; cuz, ppl, u,2,midz,foned,wanna,pls,m8 and the like when posting ordinary language for ease and quickness but can type out in full ; fuck, fucking, pricks, cunts, bastards, wankers, tits and other such profanity. Now I'm not saying that I don't use language like this but once upon a time the profanity was shortened and the correct language was left alone. |
Mate I'm not trying to be pedantic either, but do you think that:
a) You could learn to spell, and
b) You could learn to use punctuation?
People might take your arguments more seriously. ____________________ SV650 - TRASHED
ZX636R C6F - SOLD
Current number of wheels: 0 (not including a bicycle). |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Handsome |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Handsome World Chat Champion

Joined: 30 Dec 2005 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Silver |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Silver World Chat Champion

Joined: 03 Oct 2004 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarJay But it's British!

Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 17:35 - 28 Jan 2007 Post subject: |
 |
|
| iruleurass wrote: | It's just natural progression of the english language. It has always been changing for many centuries, yet for some reason in this era old people stuck in their own ways wont accept the change! There has never been a problem in the past, if it is easier to write and quicker to say i dont see where the problem lies! Stop living in the past! |
Don't talk daft.
Didn't you do Shakespeare at school? the language hasn't changed that much since then, and often it is written in a 'posh' english that most folk wouldn't have been able to understand.
I can tell what shakespeare is saying, and barring the occasional thee, thy etc, I can understand every word. The changes that have happened have taken hundreds and hundreds of years, whereas text language sprung up around 1999-2000 when SMS first became popular.
Soon, you won't be restricted to 160 characters by the technology and you will be able to type the whole thing out on a qwerty keyboard, and so it will fizzle out.
Additionally, the difference between now and Shakesperian times was reflected in spoken language as well as written language, and yet we don't tlk lyk ths vry dy. Unless you're a moron.
To be honest its a terrible fad that is just reducing the literacy of the country by destroying spelling and grammar.
Hopefully it will die soon. ____________________ British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Handsome |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Handsome World Chat Champion

Joined: 30 Dec 2005 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| CortezTheKill... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 CortezTheKill... Could Be A Chat Bot

Joined: 19 Sep 2006 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 G The Voice of Reason
Joined: 02 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 17:51 - 28 Jan 2007 Post subject: |
 |
|
Shorthand of one form or another has been around for a while.
However something like the current text-talk fad has a lot of limitations - it's fine if you're wanting to get basic information over in a condensed form, but if you want to convey anything more complex it has serious limitations.
In a mobile phone message it doesn't matter if the recipient has to spend some time working out which words have been shortened. Also, as there's relatively little information, punctuation and capital letters or the lack of, are less of an issue.
However, when trying to get across slightly more complex situations (which, admittedly, some of the posters may have an issue with in the first place ) it makes it a lot worse. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarJay But it's British!

Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Dan 4RR |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Dan 4RR World Chat Champion

Joined: 02 Dec 2004 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 22:10 - 28 Jan 2007 Post subject: |
 |
|
Is this aimed at LUXY DJ or whatever his name is?  ____________________ Humans....the largest form of cancer the world has ever seen!
Speed Cameras - Putting goverment revenue before public safety! |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| fast_tzr |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 fast_tzr World Chat Champion

Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Skudd |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Skudd Super Spammer

Joined: 01 Oct 2006 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| CortezTheKill... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 CortezTheKill... Could Be A Chat Bot

Joined: 19 Sep 2006 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 01:37 - 29 Jan 2007 Post subject: |
 |
|
| fast_tzr wrote: | I'm sure some of the English today is shortened from the traditional Shakespearean English though? |
Well, Shakespeare's English was just that - Shakespeare's English. It bore little resemblence to the vernacular of the Elizabethan/Jacobean period. Shakespeare's contemporary audiences would have found the language as strange and fascinating as modern audiences do (15 and 16 year-olds excepted).
However, the English language has undergone a series of simplifications since 1600 (and before, obviously) hence, for example, we no longer use 'you' and 'thou' but only use 'you' instead - why have two words when you can make do with one. Incidentally, the French use 'Tu' and 'Vous' in exactly the same way as we once used 'thou' and 'you', as a mark of informality and formality respectively, although in the younger generation this is declining and 'tu' is much more common than 'vous).
So we could be witnessing another stage of this process in 'texting' language, or we could just be witnessing a fad (kind of like a modern Esperanto).
Either way, I prefer to set my phone to guess the words I'm typing so all my text messages are written in 'proper' English.
But I am a self-confessed pedant. ____________________ SV650 - TRASHED
ZX636R C6F - SOLD
Current number of wheels: 0 (not including a bicycle). |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Phil_G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Phil_G Traffic Copper
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 01:45 - 29 Jan 2007 Post subject: |
 |
|
ITs about laziness. You ask half the text typing retards and they say its "easier". Perhaps to type, but not to decypher the resultant mess of letters I can see the benefit on a rsize restricted media such as the SMS system, but i still refuse to use it, as if I cant read it then I can hardly expect the other person to either!
On a side note, I caused an absolute outroar by asking a text typer on another forum if a cat had stood on his keyboard after he ahd written something like "yh i d y" as a sentence  ____________________ 1997 Kawasaki ER 500 A1:- Once again, Its merely crap  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stinkwheel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stinkwheel Bovine Proctologist

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| CortezTheKill... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 CortezTheKill... Could Be A Chat Bot

Joined: 19 Sep 2006 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 19 years, 249 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|