Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Fractured foot help.

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Dear Auntie BCF...
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Irezumi aka Reuben
Carrot Top



Joined: 28 Sep 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:11 - 12 May 2008    Post subject: Fractured foot help. Reply with quote

I've fractured a bone in my foot and nothing can really be done bar taking some pain killers and rest.

I've tried searching the internet for alternative ways to speed up recovery as I do Thai boxing but havent found anything yet. Does anyone know of anything which may help?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Cigaro
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Mar 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:14 - 12 May 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vitamin D and calcium are both important. Therefore, lots of sunlight and milk.

edit:

Quote:
Substances such as proteins and minerals are the building blocks of bones, any fracture or break in the bones requires abundant supplies of these very essential nutrients within the body to bring about healing and recovery. The most vital and essential minerals in this regard are silica, calcium and magnesium, which must be available in abundant amounts within the body and in the diet. The essential mineral silica is found in abundance in the form of a water-soluble vegetal silica capsules or in a gel form-known as silicea, it can be used as a supplemental measure in both forms. The absorption of the essential mineral calcium is promoted by the levels of the vitamins C and D within the body. The health of bones in the human body is also determined by the vitamin C. All diets must therefore include this vitamin in abundant quantities. All diets must also include green food supplements, because they provide an important trace mineral supply and a rich abundant chlorophyll component.


From: https://www.herbs2000.com/disorders/bone_fractures.htm
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:38 - 16 May 2008    Post subject: Re: Fractured foot help. Reply with quote

Make sure you don't take anti-interrogatories like ibuprofen or diclofenic etc.

Try and eat well generally, maybe supplement with vitamin pills.
I'm not sure how, but I suspect you're going to be wanting to move it about where possible - this will get blood to it, which is what will deliver cells that will heal it. However obviously you don't want to be aggravating the bits that need healing.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

LeeR
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:04 - 16 May 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whilst I ordinarily would take G's advice on board I have to say that from personal experience I found ibuprofen an effective pain killer when I broke my foot because it's very good for soft tissue pain and inflammation.

The best advice I can give you is follow the medical advice to the letter.

Keep you foot elevated, preferably above the level of your heart especially when you sleep.

Use a cold compress of bags of peas or beans (I used soya) wrapped in a tea-towel every hour for about 10-15mins initially then as and when necessary.

Don't neglect your diet eat healthily and drink plenty of fluids, your body will be working hard to repair itself. On this note if you do smoke then stop, restricting blood flow to the small capillaries will slow recovery, and funnily enough smoking does this.

A fractured bone is above all things a soft tissue injury and if you broke it in an impact then the soft tissue will be a longer repair than the bones.

If you have been advised to not bear a load on your foot then heed it, until the advice is to start using it again.

The bone should heal in 6-8 weeks, and then you need to do some exercises to build up strength and loosen up your tendons once again.

I found Deep Freeze Cold Spray also an effective painkiller, in the later stages of recovery when my cast was off and I'd weaned myself off the drugs.

All the best for a steady recovery. Thumbs Up
____________________
My claim to fame: Austin Vince nicked my pen...


Last edited by LeeR on 13:00 - 17 May 2008; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Irezumi aka Reuben
Carrot Top



Joined: 28 Sep 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:37 - 16 May 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the help.

I eat very well, I like to think anyway.

I've just had to reduce my training for the forseeable future, not bothering with taking any pain killers, too much hassle.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:22 - 16 May 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

LeeR wrote:
Whilst I ordinarily would take G's advice on board I have to say that from personal experience I found ibuprofen an effective pain killer when I broke my foot because it's very good for soft tissue pain and inflammation.

Sorry, I should have clarified that.
The diclofenic (a stronger anti-inflammatory) I was taking when I broke my shoulder did seem to help the pain, but that not the issue.

The reason not to take them is because it can prevent bone growth.

In some cases where bone growth is specifically not wanted they are prescribed apparently.

Both my initial surgeon and Brian Simpson (a well respected racing physio who's worked on many international racers, as well as footballers erc) both said this. Unfortunately the hospital which the doctor worked in still gave me some, when he made it clear to me I shouldn't be taking any.

When I was doing some research on what I was taking I got mixed up and kept taking them for a while.


Last edited by G on 13:11 - 17 May 2008; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

sickpup
Old Timer



Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 04:24 - 17 May 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:


Both my initial surgeon and Brian Simpson (a well respected racing surgeon who's worked on many international racers, as well as footballers erc) both said this. Unfortunately the hospital which the doctor worked in still gave me some, when he made it clear to me I shouldn't be taking any.



Hmm strange.

Never mentioned by any of my Surgeons and one of them is one of the best in Europe if not the world. George Dowd of the Wellington.

I also can't find any reference to Diclofenec inhibiting bone growth, can you list some please? I ask as it's the drug of choice in virtually all UK Hospitals for orthopaedic work and one of the most commonly prescribed drugs.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:59 - 17 May 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

I didn't have specific web-resource-links, but just did a basic search on google; the second result was this:
https://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/316/7141/1390

Quote:
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are a large class of compounds that inhibit cyclo-oxygenase and thus the formation of prostaglandins, which are involved in bone metabolism. However, the effect of these drugs on bone metabolism is often overlooked. They inhibit osteoblasts at the endosteal bone surface and also reduce both the immune response and the inflammatory response.2 Despite animal studies which have highlighted the harmful effects of these drugs on the healing of fractures 3 4 and spinal fusion,2 they continue to be used commonly for the relief of postoperative pain in the absence of well designed human trials. Furthermore, with the advent of joint prostheses coated with hydroxyapatite, which work by promoting primary bone formation to fill the gap between the prosthesis and the host bone, the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may be counterproductive.

A random survey of the type of analgesia received by patients undergoing hip arthroplasties on our elective orthopaedic ward showed that 95% (18/19) were being treated with these drugs; this treatment had been started immediately after surgery and then had simply continued. Diclofenac sodium or ibuprofen were the most commonly prescribed drugs. Ibuprofen has been shown to have an irreversible effect on the healing of fractures.3 Also the inhibitory effect of these drugs on fracture healing is greater the longer the duration of use.


The third result, about mice:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2134295

Quote:
Morphometric and microdensitometric studies on normal bone growth and bone wound healing in growing ICR strain male mice were carried out as preliminary investigations. Then the effects of oral administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on bone growth and bone wound healing were studied. Femur length and width, and bone mineral contents in the femur as judged by microdensitometry of the soft x-ray films of the cortical portion of the femur showed time-dependent linear increase between 3 and 6 weeks of age. Wound holes were made in the parietal bones of mice with a dental bar at 4 weeks of age, and uncalcified area in the holes was determined by image analysis of soft x-ray films. The area decreased their size with the advance in age, especially a marked decrease was observed 2 weeks after the operation. From the above results, 4 week-old male mice were employed and 8 kinds of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (indomethacin, 1 mg/kg; mefenamic acid, 10 mg/kg; flufenamic acid, 10 mg/kg; diclofenac sodium, 1 mg/kg; ibuprofen, 10 mg/kg; naproxen, 10 mg/kg; phenylbutazone, 10 mg/kg and aspirin, 50 mg/kg) and dexamethasone (1 mg/kg), a steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were administered orally every day for 9 or 11 days except Sunday, and 15 days after the initial administration, the length and width of the femur were measured. The bone mineral contents were determined by microdensitometry of the soft x-ray film of the femur. Hydroxyproline contents of the femur were also determined. Wound holes were made in the parietal bones at 4 week-old and administered the drugs from one day before the operation for 9 days and the uncalcified area in the wound hole was determined 2 weeks after the operation with an image analyzer. The results obtained were as follows: 1. A significant inhibition of the growth in length of the femur was observed by dexamethasone, diclofenac sodium and naproxen administration for 9 and 11 days. A significant inhibition of the growth in width was also observed by dexamethasone and diclofenac sodium administration for 9 days and by dexamethasone administration for 11 days.


As they suggest and Brian Simpson mentioned to me; plenty of medical people still haven't considered these studies, but it's definitely not something I'd be willingly taking again.

By the way, I simply searched on google for: >>anti inflammatory bone growth<< which gave lots more results. I'm sure the search could be further fine-tuned.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

nrml76
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:09 - 17 May 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

The claim that Non steroidal anti- inflammatory drugs (NSAID's) impair bone healing is not widely accepted by the medical community. If you surveyed the practice of all orthopaedic units across the country, you will find that it is a very very tiny minority of surgeons who think that they are a bad idea. They do have lots of side effects, but are a useful pain killer when taken over short periods.

Like many other pieces of research, it is one of those things that doesn't translate directly from lab studies to clinical experience. NSAID's have been used for decades now for pain relief following both elective and emergency orthopaedic procedures in millions of people without any significant delays in healing.

I can quote you lots papers about drugs that have been shown to have adverse effects in lab studies but no effects in clinical practice. Similarly there are lots of papers which show that drugs very beneficial in lab studies, are not very effective, and sometimes even harmful in clinical practice.

The problem with medical research is that because of the pressure to publish, a lot of studies are set up with a view to getting a result. If the study is not published, it is viewed by both the academics and sponsors as wasted time and money.

Before accepting the results of a study, the methodology and the methods of analysis have to be looked at in detail. Some people just accept results without questioning their validity, while others wait for the weight of their peers opinions to swing one way or the other and a few actually analyse the study in detail for themselves. Unfortunately, not many people in the medical profession do this. Things have changed a bit recently, with doctors getting better at it (mostly younger ones).
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

lozzypop1
Certified MILF!



Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:13 - 17 May 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:

By the way, I simply searched on google for: >>anti inflammatory bone growth<< which gave lots more results. I'm sure the search could be further fine-tuned.


Laughing

Well.. I searched on Google >>George Dowd<< and it told me Boy George is Sickpup's Surgeon Shocked
____________________
Funny, I used to hate being spanked as a child!
Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll understand.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:35 - 17 May 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had a further look through the google results after I posted and found some studies based on real-world cases, rather than lab-mice.

I appreciate 'scientific' studies often tend to be rather foolishly flawed in their methods and their intentions - I have read enough reports in New Scientist etc where it's obvious the 'researchers' have had a very single-track mind.

From the information I've got, I'd definitely be avoiding them myself.

Brian Simpsone gave me an example of a famous surgeon he was talking to. The famous surgeon was saying he didn't see a problem with them, until it was pointed out to him that for another operation he actually prescribed these drugs with the implicit intention of preventing bone growth (around an implant of some sort I think).
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

sickpup
Old Timer



Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:48 - 17 May 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lets assume for a moment the studies you have shown are correct. Whats the loss in bone regeneration caused by lack of blood flow from swelling when people don't take these drugs?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

sickpup
Old Timer



Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:52 - 17 May 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:


Both my initial surgeon and Brian Simpson (a well respected racing surgeon who's worked on many international racers, as well as footballers erc) both said this.



Do you actually mean Brian Simpson the Physio who isn't a surgeon at all?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:10 - 17 May 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oops, that was a typo, my mistake. It should read 'physio', as you noticed.

As to your original post; I don't know about how issues with swelling would specifically effect it, not having done this research myself.
However, I'd suggest you have a look on google again; you should find some results taken from 'real world' cases which would suggest that it is a detrimental thing. Of course we can't know the exact situation in every case they have tested, but can presume there were similar issues in many of these.
So to answer your question; presuming these studies are correct, any detrimental effect is definitely out-weighed by the positive effect of not taking the drugs.

I've certainly heard a lot more against taking it than for it from medical professionals - with those that have been for it appearing not to have looked into the issues generally and those against it having done their research.

On this basis, I would suggest avoiding these drugs. If you talk to a physio they should be able to provide exercises to help alleviate swelling without causing further injury which is of course going to be beneficial regardless of whether or not it will air recovery.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Visitor Q
$25 whore



Joined: 30 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:41 - 17 May 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Learn to kick using your shin bones rather then foot?
____________________
China traffic/travel bike vid - When I make a sweeping statement, please add the word 'statistically' in to the sentence before you bitch...
From September 2014 to January/February 2015 I will not be using any English, nor reading any. As such, I won't be on here. PM at will, but I won't be checking/posting unless in emergencies. Certainly not for the first couple of months. Please berate me savagely if I break that rule...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

sickpup
Old Timer



Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:17 - 17 May 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:


However, I'd suggest you have a look on google again; you should find some results taken from 'real world' cases which would suggest that it is a detrimental thing.



I am a real world case having broken several toes, bones in my foot, right thumb and wrist as well as a fair few ribs. Fibula along with ligament and bone transplants. In fact around this time last year I broke out a section of my ribcage with an estimated 6 breaks within 4 inchs of each other (3 sections of rib broken completely off).

All the times I have been given Diclofenec Sodium I have healed within the expected times, generally quicker.

As previously stated there is a big difference between studies and real life.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Irezumi aka Reuben
Carrot Top



Joined: 28 Sep 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:20 - 17 May 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Learn to kick using your shin bones rather then foot?

Laughing I've been doing my boxing long enough to know that.

I managed to do my foot whilst going jogging, I slipped and fell over! Embarassed Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:31 - 17 May 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

sickpup wrote:

I am a real world case having broken several toes,

This one listed the averages from various 'real world' situations with over a hundred cases on each side I think.

My arm 'healed' at least as quickly as the NHS told me they 'expected' it to and I had taken quite a lot of Diclofenic I had for another reason around that time; mostly for the other reason I had it.

Doesn't mean it wouldn't have healed quicker if I hadn't been - just as I was still smoking a small to moderate amount at that time and that is definitely known to harm bone growth.

<shrugs> - the information is out there if you want to look for it; I've made people aware of it. It doesn't affect me if people want to listen and look into it for themselves or not.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Visitor Q
$25 whore



Joined: 30 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:48 - 17 May 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:

I appreciate 'scientific' studies often tend to be rather foolishly flawed in their methods and their intentions - I have read enough reports in New Scientist etc where it's obvious the 'researchers' have had a very single-track mind.



New scientist is usually painfully wrong. Its recent article on evolution had some glaring errors Rolling Eyes

As for one track mind of researchers, no shit. They'd of heard about the bone inhibition THEN applied for funding to find out if this was true. Its very hard to prove something is wrong, so you rarely get papers going 'results were inconclusive' as it is a waste of space in journals.

So yes, most 'flawed' research set out to prove something.

If you wanted to write an article on the pros and cons of radial verses cross-ply, with the belief that one was inferior, you would obviously set up your tests to see that. If you found fuck all, then it is a boring article. Magazines would probably still publish it as it kills space and they've already paid for alot of the article (tyres, etc). Journals do not work like that.
____________________
China traffic/travel bike vid - When I make a sweeping statement, please add the word 'statistically' in to the sentence before you bitch...
From September 2014 to January/February 2015 I will not be using any English, nor reading any. As such, I won't be on here. PM at will, but I won't be checking/posting unless in emergencies. Certainly not for the first couple of months. Please berate me savagely if I break that rule...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

YUN
Traffic Copper



Joined: 08 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:20 - 18 May 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lorenzo has 2 fractured ankles and still came 2nd. He is seen sucking on Chupa Chups - maybe that'll help Wink
Get well soon Karma
____________________
Meet the team that will win, Blade, Razor, Blazer and my personal assistant, Michelle and from Romanovia - Fran Stalinovskovichdavidovitchsky
~ * CBT - 13/01/08 --> Theory 24/05/08 --> Squished by lorries, brand new CBR125(2000miles) write-off 04/06/06 --> DAS booked 02-04/08/08 * --> DAS passed 05/08/08 * --> VFR400 (aka 'Mike') ~
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Suitor_Stu
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 19 Jun 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:39 - 19 May 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:
<shrugs> - the information is out there if you want to look for it; I've made people aware of it. It doesn't affect me if people want to listen and look into it for themselves or not.


Fair enough for showing people the other side, but people should be aware that 100 is still a relatively small number to be considered significant in clinical trials. Without going into great detail the best source for un-biased research for all things medical is the Cochrane Library. The Cochrane Reviews are best - basically what they do is take several randomised control trials (the most un-biased type of trial) and peer-review them - this is to say a group of experts review all the evidence from all the trials and then publish their results in a new report. The sample size for these reviews ranges from 700- 200,000 odd and they are generally quoted religously by people in the know. Their reviews are usually way more objective than single studies alone, but they also review clinical trials too and say what is wrong with them e.g if they need further trials/larger sample size etc.

As such, in my quick search of the library I have not found anything about bone healing and diclofenac in particular, or any other NSAID - or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug - to which diclofenac and ibuprofen are members. It does mention what you were talking about with regard to using it to prevent bone growth (in patients after hip operations) but this seems to be a higher dose given in a shorter time compared with for pain relief. There are a few reports which advocate it's use for post operative pain (I know it is routinely advised for post operative dental pain following extraction of teeth where bone healing takes place) but none directly relating to bone healing. Also the prescribing guide for all those in the medical field (the British National Formulary) mentions nothing in it's - extensive - side effect/contra-indications list for NSAIDS about impairment of bone healing. I know this doesn't prove that there is NO link, I'm just giving the other side of the story based on the evidence I have to hand.

FWIW NSAIDs are renound for being exceptionally effective at relieving bone pain, but if you are unsure please ask the advice of the professional you are dealing with. Back to your original question though with regard to helping healing, I would agree with the smoking thing - It has been proven that smoking impairs the blood flow which will in turn mean that the bone will not get as many nutrients meaning it will not heal as quickly. So if you do smoke, you could lay off them if you want a quicker healing time and also eating healthily too - basic things tbh which you're prob sick of hearing but will make a difference!

Hope this helps a little and GWS Thumbs Up

Cheers, Stu
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

nrml76
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:07 - 20 May 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whilst Cochrane is an excellent source of evidence, they also make errors, some of them very high profile ones. A prime example is the human albumin vs crystalloid report they came out with; which has been conclusively proven to be absolute rubbish. Every paper needs to be judged on an individual basis, not on the authors / groups behind it or the journal it was published in.
____________________
Everyone who lives dies, yet not everyone who dies has lived. We take these risks not to escape life, but to prevent life from escaping us.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 18 years, 84 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Dear Auntie BCF... All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.15 Sec - Server Load: 0.94 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 130.2 Kb