|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Magnum |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Magnum Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 19 Sep 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Silver |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Silver World Chat Champion

Joined: 03 Oct 2004 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Robby |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Robby Dirty Old Man

Joined: 16 May 2002 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 18:40 - 22 Nov 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
The engines are designed to make power, not to be efficient.
Simple thing up front. To make 100hp, you need 100hp's worth of fuel and air. So based on that, you could roughly assume a 600cc sportsbike to deliver similar fuel burn to a 1.6l petrol hatchback.
Then there are engine, particularly cylinder head, efficiencies. Bike cylinder heads operate at high rpm, and therefore are optimised for this. This means getting as fuel and air in as possible. In cars the push is to burning the fuel completely, no maximum throughput.
Also, until just a few years ago, a lot of bikes were air cooled and carbed. Now fuel injection is standard across big stuff, and water cooling is used more than it was. This increases efficiency, but in bikes efficiency is just used to make more power.
Aerodynamics are a factor, bikes don't really have them.
The way in which they are driven/ridden. If you ride your bike like someone would drive a car, expect better fuel burn.
Real versus quote figures. That 57mpg quote car does 40, maybe 45mpg in real life.
Of course, cars are also dragging a lot more weight around, but the basic idea is that cars are tuned towards efficiency, and bikes towards outright power.
I still want my 150kg, 100mph, 150mpg bike. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Charlie |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Charlie World Chat Champion

Joined: 27 May 2007 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| The Shaggy D.A. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 The Shaggy D.A. Super Spammer

Joined: 12 Sep 2008 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| JonB |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 JonB Afraid of Mileage

Joined: 03 Jun 2004 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| neil. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 neil. World Chat Champion

Joined: 24 Feb 2008 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 21:16 - 22 Nov 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
4 stroke 125cc bikes like the CG and YBR can do 90-100mpg...  ____________________ CBT February 2008 | A2 June 2008 | Yamaha YBR125 (written off) | Honda CBF125 (current) |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Irezumi aka Reuben |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Irezumi aka Reuben Carrot Top
Joined: 28 Sep 2004 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Dalemac |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Dalemac World Chat Champion

Joined: 15 Oct 2006 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| paulcdb |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 paulcdb Scooby Slapper

Joined: 29 Jul 2003 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 13:59 - 24 Nov 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
my mr2 = 30mpg max
my cbr600 = 50-60mpg depending on riding, twice as fast, better for overtaking...
won't complain at my bike doing 50+  ____________________ Excersise is rubbish!
If your healthy you don't need it... if your sick you shouldn't do it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| iooi |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 iooi Super Spammer

Joined: 14 Jan 2007 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 18:56 - 24 Nov 2008 Post subject: Re: Why are bikes not fuel efficient? |
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| rotax81 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 rotax81 Nearly there...

Joined: 10 Sep 2008 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 19:12 - 24 Nov 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
stick a big person on your roof and dangle a couple of single mattresses out the side windows then see if it does 57 mpg
my audi tdi does a regular 46mpg - max 125mph
my 636 worst consumption is 32mpg - MIN 125mph  ____________________ ZX636C6F road. ZX636C1H track. ZX7R redundant. ZX0.5R minimoto as ornament.
Audi A4 Avant 1.9TDi and VW Transporter 2.5TDi 888 Special (no mot and tax lol) |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 17 years, 86 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|