Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Why are bikes not fuel efficient?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Random Banter
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Magnum
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 19 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:32 - 22 Nov 2008    Post subject: Why are bikes not fuel efficient? Reply with quote

OK, this may be a silly question, i don't know and i do not yet own a bike.

Why is it that my family diesel people carrier can do a quoted "57mpg" whereas the bike i want to get only does 49mpg.
Most bikes are around this sort of level.

I would have thought that a motorbike having a very small engine in comparison to a car, and a fraction of the weight, it should do many more miles to the gallon?

Am i getting confused here or are motorbikes not that fuel efficient?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Silver
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:34 - 22 Nov 2008    Post subject: Re: Why are bikes not fuel efficient? Reply with quote

Magnum wrote:
I would have thought that a motorbike having a very small engine in comparison to a car, and a fraction of the weight, it should do many more miles to the gallon?


A bike engine is more highly tuned than the average car engine. A fast sportsbike is much more fuel economic than a fast sportscar.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Robby
Dirty Old Man



Joined: 16 May 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:40 - 22 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

The engines are designed to make power, not to be efficient.

Simple thing up front. To make 100hp, you need 100hp's worth of fuel and air. So based on that, you could roughly assume a 600cc sportsbike to deliver similar fuel burn to a 1.6l petrol hatchback.

Then there are engine, particularly cylinder head, efficiencies. Bike cylinder heads operate at high rpm, and therefore are optimised for this. This means getting as fuel and air in as possible. In cars the push is to burning the fuel completely, no maximum throughput.

Also, until just a few years ago, a lot of bikes were air cooled and carbed. Now fuel injection is standard across big stuff, and water cooling is used more than it was. This increases efficiency, but in bikes efficiency is just used to make more power.

Aerodynamics are a factor, bikes don't really have them.

The way in which they are driven/ridden. If you ride your bike like someone would drive a car, expect better fuel burn.

Real versus quote figures. That 57mpg quote car does 40, maybe 45mpg in real life.

Of course, cars are also dragging a lot more weight around, but the basic idea is that cars are tuned towards efficiency, and bikes towards outright power.

I still want my 150kg, 100mph, 150mpg bike.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Charlie
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 May 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:43 - 22 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

They haven't (in the recent past) been designed to be that efficient, that wasn't the selling point of motorbikes. It is only recently that people have become obsessed with efficiency.

If you want an efficient bike take a look at diesel bikes.
____________________
Past: Honda x8rs, Honda City fly, Honda Hornet 250, Honda VFR750, Yamaha xt600e.
Current: Honda CBR929RR & Yamaha XT660Z Tenere
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:46 - 22 Nov 2008    Post subject: Re: Why are bikes not fuel efficient? Reply with quote

Magnum wrote:
Why is it that my family diesel people carrier can do a quoted "57mpg" whereas the bike i want to get only does 49mpg.


While you stand a good chance of getting 49mpg from the bike, I would doubt in real life you would get anywhere near 57mpg from the car. Add to that diesel has a higher energy content compared to petrol (so 49mpg from a petrol car is about equivalent to about 56mpg in a diesel anyway).

Cars makers have to quote the fuel consumption (and worse, it affects the amount the tax man rips you off for owning one), in specific test cycles. Quite easy to fiddle to appear decent in the tests while being no use in real driving. Bike have no such tests, and road test figures for bikes will likely include performance testing.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

The Shaggy D.A.
Super Spammer



Joined: 12 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:00 - 22 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

robby wrote:
I still want my 150kg, 100mph, 150mpg bike.


Amen.
____________________
Chances are quite high you are not in my Monkeysphere, and I don't care about you. Don't take it personally.
Currently : Royal Enfield 350 Meteor
Previously : CB100N > CB250RS > XJ900F > GT550 > GPZ750R/1000RX > AJS M16 > R100RT > Bullet 500 > CB500 > LS650P > Bullet Electra X & YBR125 > Bullet 350 "Superstar" & YBR125 Custom > Royal Enfield Classic 500 Despatch Limited Edition (28 of 200) & CB Two-Fifty Nighthawk > ER5
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

JonB
Afraid of Mileage



Joined: 03 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:30 - 22 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

I know people say you can never meet the manufacturers figures for MPG. But I constantly beat my manufacturer.

On Paper the Citroen C1 should return a combined average of 61.4MPG. I am consistently returning 64MPG. That's a mixture of motorways, city driving and general pissing about.

Petrol has just dropped to 89.9p a litre at morrisons here, 20 odd quid is getting me 420 miles to a tank at the moment, it's a little bit odd.
____________________
Be careful whose advice you buy, but, be patient with those who supply it. Advice is a form of nostalgia, dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than it?s worth.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

neil.
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:16 - 22 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

4 stroke 125cc bikes like the CG and YBR can do 90-100mpg... Thumbs Up
____________________
CBT February 2008 | A2 June 2008 | Yamaha YBR125 (written off) | Honda CBF125 (current)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Irezumi aka Reuben
Carrot Top



Joined: 28 Sep 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:20 - 22 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quite possible to get 50mpg+ out of a 600 sports if ridden sensibly. Even if driven sensibly something like a Subaru Impreza wouldnt get anywhere near that. Using the Impreza as a vehicle with relatively close acceleration and top speed.

Something like a Deauville can do 65mpg easily.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Dalemac
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:19 - 23 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

neil.martin wrote:
4 stroke 125cc bikes like the CG and YBR can do 90-100mpg... Thumbs Up


yeah. mine used to do something silly like 141mpg, and that was thrashing the crap out of it.

gpz gets about 50mpg, thrashing it.
____________________
YBR125 -> GPZ500S -> SL1000
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

paulcdb
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 29 Jul 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:59 - 24 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

my mr2 = 30mpg max

my cbr600 = 50-60mpg depending on riding, twice as fast, better for overtaking...

won't complain at my bike doing 50+ Twisted Evil
____________________
Excersise is rubbish!
If your healthy you don't need it... if your sick you shouldn't do it.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

iooi
Super Spammer



Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:56 - 24 Nov 2008    Post subject: Re: Why are bikes not fuel efficient? Reply with quote

Magnum wrote:
OK, this may be a silly question

Why is it that my family diesel people carrier can do a quoted "57mpg" whereas the bike i want to get only does 49mpg.

Am i getting confused here or are motorbikes not that fuel efficient?

Most bikes are around this sort of level.


Yep....

Does your faimly people carrier, have the same performance figures as the bike you want ???

Bikes are fuel efficient, for their power to weight to performance ratio, compared to a car.

XJ 600 S never less than 64 MPG Thumbs Up
Clio 1200 never more than 45 MPG Sick
Which gets me & passenger from A2B quickest and in the most comfort.....

Clue it ain't got 4 wheels Laughing
____________________
Just because my bike was A DIVVY, does not mean i am......
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

rotax81
Nearly there...



Joined: 10 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:12 - 24 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

stick a big person on your roof and dangle a couple of single mattresses out the side windows then see if it does 57 mpg Thumbs Up

my audi tdi does a regular 46mpg - max 125mph
my 636 worst consumption is 32mpg - MIN 125mph Laughing
____________________
ZX636C6F road. ZX636C1H track. ZX7R redundant. ZX0.5R minimoto as ornament.
Audi A4 Avant 1.9TDi and VW Transporter 2.5TDi 888 Special (no mot and tax lol)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 17 years, 87 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Random Banter All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.06 Sec - Server Load: 0.74 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 80.28 Kb